Urban Water Institute Annual Water Conference August 27, 2015 S ITES R ESERVOIR P ROJECT www.sitesjpa.net.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WATER FOR THE 21 st CENTURY ECONOMY AND ENVIRONMENT Santa Ana River Watershed Conference April 11, 2013.
Advertisements

California Water Balance. Water Reserved for the Environment.
Northern Sacramento Valley Conjunctive Water Management Investigation Public Workshop December 8, 2010 The Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District and The Natural.
Borrego Valley Borrego Valley Integrated Regional Water Management Planning Integrated Regional Water Management Planning.
1 San Joaquin River Exchange Contractors Water Authority WEF- Central Valley Tour April 23, 2014 Mission Statement : To effectively protect the Exchange.
1 NODOS/Sites Reservoir: A Local Perspective Glenn Colusa Irrigation District July 2009.
. Achieving California’s Water Supply and Delta Ecological Improvement Simultaneously. Achieving California’s Water Supply and Delta Ecological Improvement.
Department of Water Resources Role in Water Transfers Jerry Johns, DWR
1 Water Planning & Stewardship Committee Item #6b Summary Subject: Review of Long-Term Delta Actions & Water Supply Planning Implications Purpose:To open.
1 Overview of Water Law and Policy University of San Francisco School of Law Water Law Class 1 January 13, 2010 David Sandino Chief Counsel California.
California Recycled Water Plan California Recycled Water Plan A comprehensive approach to California’s long-term water supply By Gregory B. Ryan and Meagan.
Water Resource Division San Joaquin County Water Resource Management Planning Update C. Mel Lytle, Ph.D. Water Resource Coordinator San Joaquin County.
1 N ORTH - OF - THE -D ELTA O FFSTREAM S TORAGE S ACRAMENTO R IVER C ONSERVATION A REA F ORUM TAC N ORTH - OF - THE -D ELTA O FFSTREAM S TORAGE S ACRAMENTO.
2 1)Familiarize State agency staff with Water Plan Update 2013 information, tools and resources 2)Identify opportunities for State agencies to derive.
North-of-the-Delta Offstream Storage Investigation Planning and Timeline “Planning is bringing the future into the present so you can do something about.
Water in California: Self-induced Scarcity Waterscape International Group.
Moving Forward after the Colorado River Basin Water Supply & Demand Study Urban Water Institute’s 21 st Annual Conference San Diego, CA August 14, 2014.
Drought and the Central Valley Project August 2014.
1 Regional Report San Joaquin River Hydrologic Region.
In-Delta Storage Process OverviewProcess Overview Program BenefitsProgram Benefits Project CostsProject Costs IssuesIssues Proposed Work Plan for FY 2003Proposed.
USGS Water Resource Monitoring and Assessment Activities Salinity and other topics presented to the Garfield County Energy Advisory Board Dec. 1, 2005.
Fresno County Water Crisis and Opportunities. The Delta And Our Water Supply In August 2007 the Federal Court ruled that the Delta Smelt was in danger.
Southern California Water Committee March 26, 2010 Ontario KARLA NEMETH, Natural Resources Agency.
To San Francisco The Delta Sacramento River  Stockton San Joaquin River California Aqueduct Clifton Court Forebay California depends on fresh water from.
Urban Water Institute Conference August 22,
Integrating Water Management Statewide Integrated Water Management (IWM) Gary Bardini, Deputy Director IWM Rijkswaterstaat & California Coordination Kickoff.
Regional Grant Funding Coordination for Implementation of Watershed Management Plans Project Clean Water Summit July 15, 2004 David W. Gibson SDRWQCB
Governor’s Strategic Growth Plan Flood Protection and Clean, Safe, Reliable Water Supply Bond and Financing Acts of 2006 and 2010 Southern California Water.
Draft Recommendations of the San Joaquin Water Quality Management Group Plan for Achieving Salinity/Boron and DO Objectives Plan for Achieving Salinity/Boron.
Integrated Regional Water Management MAY 22, 2015 TRACIE BILLINGTON DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES 1.
Your Help is Requested Chatfield is critical to the future water needs of the Front Range area. Please help by writing letters of support for this project.
Solano Habitat Conservation Plan 580,000 Acres 36 Covered Species; 4 Natural Communities 17,500 acres of Urban Development; 1,280 acres of other New Facilities.
UNDERSTANDING THE DELTA - AN ENGINEERING PERSPECTIVE.
Cooperating Partners Presentation October 12, 2006 Integrated Regional Water Management Plan (IRWMP) B S Strategies and Objectives C ANTA ARBARA OUNTY.
September 23, 2010 Overview of DWR’s Flood Management Activities Related to the Delta A Briefing to the Delta Stewardship Council 1.
1 December 19, 2007 North-of-the-Delta Offstream Storage Project Overview State of California Department of Water Resources U.S. Department of the Interior.
1 Arne Simonsen Chair Delta Protection Commission October 23, 2008 Governor’s Delta Vision Process E.O. S
Upper San Joaquin River Basin Storage Investigation ACWA Regions 9 and 10 Carlsbad Water Summit U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation State.
CVPIA §3406(b)(2) Water Operations on the Sacramento River Sacramento River Conservation Area Forum Technical Advisory Committee February 7, 2012.
1 September 13, 2007 North-of-the-Delta Offstream Storage ACWA Regions 9 and 10 Carlsbad Water Summit North-of-the-Delta Offstream Storage ACWA Regions.
Rebuilding the System Reducing the Risk California Water Plan Plenary Session October 22-23, 2007.
In-Delta Storage Program. Background and historyBackground and history Evolution of the fish screensEvolution of the fish screens Proposed Re-engineered.
BAY DELTA CONSERVATION PLAN SEPTEMBER SUISUN BAY SACRAMENTO STOCKTON STATE & FEDERAL PUMPING PLANTS Getting Oriented – The Delta.
Drought Management Sheri Looper CVP Water Resource Specialist.
Draft example: Indicators for water supply reliability and storage projects Presented by Steve Roberts (Department of Water Resources, Storage Investigations)
California Water Supply Overview Robert Shibatani CEO & Consulting Hydrologist The SHIBATANI GROUP, Inc.
Watershed Monitoring *Background Watershed Stewardship Plan-2004 Gap Projects IRWMP-Dec Policies SFEI study-2007 Joint TC/WC meeting-June 2010 *Proposed.
Climate Change Threat Reduced Snowpack 1. Potential Impacts Related to Reduced Snowpack How might our community be impacted by reduced snowpack? 2.
A Water Manager’s Perspective: A View from the Field Jeffrey Kightlinger The Metropolitan Water District of Southern California June 2003 Jeffrey Kightlinger.
Top Five Reasons South Bay Needs WaterFix
Assemblymember Adrin Nazarian
Top Five Reasons Three Valleys Needs WaterFix
Water Resource Management Planning Update
CWEMF Annual Meeting March 2005
Top Five Reasons San Diego County Needs WaterFix
Top Five Reasons Orange County Needs WaterFix
Texas Water Resources Institute
Zone 7 And WaterFix March 7, 2018
Top Five Reasons South Bay Needs WaterFix
Climate Change and Potential Effects on California Water Operations
Top Five Reasons San Diego County Needs WaterFix
Top Five Reasons Three Valleys Needs WaterFix
Top Five Reasons Los Angeles County Needs WaterFix
2018 November Water Bond Act Initiative Benefits to Kern County
Water Resource Management Planning Update
San Joaquin River Exchange Contractors Water Authority
Sites Reservoir Project: Water Supply Investment Overview
Top Five Reasons Los Angeles County Needs WaterFix
California Water Commission
Agenda Item 9A: Sites Project
Presentation transcript:

Urban Water Institute Annual Water Conference August 27, 2015 S ITES R ESERVOIR P ROJECT

Partners - Sites Joint Powers Authority Members Glenn County Colusa County Glenn-Colusa Irrigation District Tehama Colusa Canal Authority Reclamation District 108 Maxwell Irrigation District Yolo County Flood Control and Water Conservation District Colusa County Water District Westside Water District Orland Artois Water District Proberta Water District DWR – non voting member

Project Location

Location and Features Storage capacity: 1.3 to 1.8 M acre-ft Aug Draft

Flyover 2015 Aug Draft

Alternatives 2015 Aug Draft

Annualized Yield (Thousand acre-ft.) Reservoir Size: 1.8 MAF1.3 MAF Year Type:AverageDry/Critical AverageDry/Critical Filling: Releases*: * Results do not include operation of the CA WaterFix (aka in- Delta conveyance), which, depending on additional spring outflow, reduces overall water supply available for Ag & M&I Aug Draft

Costs/acre-ft. (with financing) 2015 Aug Draft

Annualized Water Benefits (Thousand acre-ft.) Reservoir Size: 1.8 MAF1.3 MAF Year Type:AverageDry/Critical AverageDry/Critical Filling: Releases*:  Ag & M&I:  Carriage Loss:  Public Benefit: * Results do not include operation of the CA WaterFix (aka in-Delta conveyance), which, depending on additional spring outflow, reduces overall water supply available for Ag & M&I. NOTE: Carriage loss is the contribution to in-Delta water quality (aka ‘salt cost’), which is estimated Aug Draft

Public Benefits of Sites Public Benefits

Public Benefits ($ million/year) 2015 Aug Draft

Public Benefits, Ecosystem (DFW Priorities) 1.Native Fish: Promote recovery of threatened & endangered plus at risk species 2.Restore physical processes & flow regimes to improve habitats & natural communities 3.Enhance Recreation 4.Reduce adverse effects of non-native species 5.Reduce in-river structures’ impact on anadromous species 6.Increase aquatic & riparian habitat & wetlands (managed & unmanaged) Timing of releases & Shasta Cold water pool Releases can match time of year ‘needs’ Included ?Further evaluation is needed Existing intakes are compliant. New intake/outlet will be designed to current standards Managed seasonal wetlands, including refuges Self-Assessment 2015 Aug Draft

Public Benefits, Water Quality (SWRCB Priorities) 1.For water bodies listed as impaired by CWA §303(d), a.Improve water temperature b.Improve dissolved oxygen c.Improve nutrient conditions d.Reduce effects of mercury e.Reduce salinity 2.Protect &/or cleanup groundwater deemed high or medium per CASGEM 3.Achieve Delta tributary flows that resemble natural hydrograph patterns for aquatic species 4.Develop local water supplies to reduce water demand on the Delta watershed Shasta CW Pool ?Location dependent ?Potentially ?Flow vs. new habitat Emergency response ?In lieu of groundwater pumping in S. of Delta ?Baseline dependent Sac. valley interest in project allows stored water to be used in lieu of diversions during critical times Self-Assessment 2015 Aug Draft

Other Societal Benefits (not eligible for Prop 1 funding) 1.Pumped-storage capability to capture surplus renewable energy (daytime) & contribute to demand during off-peak (night) & shoulder loading time periods (dawn & dusk), which aligns with the governor’s goal to ‘decarbonize’ the state. 2.Contributes to the local & regional economy 3.Contributes to stabilizing local groundwater levels 4.Additional source for transfer water (some of which could be used to supply disadvantaged communities in the San Joaquin valley) Alternatives A thru C Ancillary services created by recreation, additional jobs (construction & O&M), & spending on maintenance. Local use of stored water in lieu of groundwater pumping All alternatives Self-Assessment 2015 Aug Draft

Operations (with Existing System) 2015 Aug Draft

Increases annual carryover storage * (Thousand acre-ft.) Reservoir Size: 1.8 MAF1.3 MAF Year Type:AverageDry/Critical AverageDry/Critical End Sept: 1, * Increase in the end of September storage in Trinity, Shasta, Folsom, Oroville, & Sites reservoirs 2015 Aug Draft

“Mutual Aide” to Folsom: Proximity to Delta allows Sites to release flows in response to in-Delta water quality concerns in lieu of the CVP & SWP dependence on relying solely on releases from Folsom. Integrated Operations: Operating Sites in conjunction with CVP & SWP to better optimize available water for both water supply and public benefits Aug Draft

Project Summary DWR/USBR Alternative C 1.8 MAF 500 TAF/Year yield 1.2 MAF of increased upstream storage Benefits - Water Supply-50%, Ecosystem- 50%, Power, Recreation $ B Construction Cost 10 Year Planning &Construction $550 - $700/AF