PARENT COORDINATOR INFORMATION SESSION PARENT ACCOUNTABILITY Wednesday, July 20, 2011 Madelene Chan, Supt. D24 Danielle DiMango, Supt. D25.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WASC Visiting Committee Report 3/28/2007. Areas of Strength Organization The Co Principals and the School Leadership Team provide direction and support.
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
 A strategic plan is a guiding document for an organization. It clarifies organizational priorities, goals and desired outcomes.  For the SRCS school.
How Can Using Data Lead to School Improvement?
PORTFOLIO.
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
Parents as Partners in Education
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Curriculum, Instruction, & Assessment
Materials developed in collaboration with the Office of English Language Learners, New York City Department of Education RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux,
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
1. KCS Strategic Goals: Focus on the student to ensure they excel academically and are prepared for life beyond the classroom. Recruit, select, induct,
DOES LEADERSHIP MAKE A DIFFERENCE? 1 The importance of school leadership on the quality of schools and the achievements of pupils:
Report to the Board of Education October 15, 2007.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
Horizon Middle School June 2013 Balanced Scorecard In a safe, collaborative environment we provide educational opportunities that empower all students.
The Quality Review A Reflection.
Expeditionary Learning Elementary School Meeting June 10,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
TODAY Observations Hypotheses Connection to Student Performance CSIP ASPIRING Goal(s) Objectives & Actions.
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
40 Performance Indicators. I: Teaching for Learning ST 1: Curriculum BE A: Aligned, Reviewed and Monitored.
CFN 609 Principal’s Meeting New Evaluation System
School Improvement Planning Today’s Session Review the purpose of SI planning Review the components of SI plans Discuss changes to SI planning.
CFI: Quality Review Institute Division of Accountability and Achievement Resources Division of School Support August-September 2009 Network Leaders’ Guide.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Making Evaluation Work at Your School Leadership Institute 2012.
FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Classroom Assessment for Student Learning: Doing It Right – Using It Well.
Evidence and Standard Two. The Big Picture The Big Picture Standard Two is about: Curriculum Curriculum Planned, overseen curriculum – with clear outcomes.
MS 219 Historical Data. M.S. 219 Quality Review Recommendations ( ) 1. Further develop all teachers’ skills, knowledge, and understanding of.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Las Cruces Public Schools Principal Evaluation Overview Stan Rounds Superintendent Stan Rounds Superintendent.
WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation ___________________ Dublin High School ___________________ March 9-11, 2009.
Assistant Principal Meeting September 18, :00am to 1:00pm Presenters: Anna Arrigo & Marygrace DiForte.
Strengthening Student Outcomes in Small Schools There’s been enough research done to know what to do – now we have to start doing it! Douglas Reeves.
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
David Abbott Director of Student Services Mary Barton CFN 204 SATIF November 21, 2011.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
Data Analysis Processes: Cause and Effect Linking Data Analysis Processes to Teacher Evaluation Name of School.
ESEA, TAP, and Charter handouts-- 3 per page with notes and cover of one page.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
Learning-Centered Leadership Joseph Murphy Peabody College, Vanderbilt University.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
The Leadership Challenge in Graduating Students with Disabilities Guiding Questions Joy Eichelberger, Ed.D. Pennsylvania Training and Technical Assistance.
Multi-year Academic Acceleration Plan (MAAP) and Community Plan for Accountability in Schools (ComPAS) Oakland Unified School District January 31, 2007.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
Office of Service Quality
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
1 Far West Teacher Center Network - NYS Teaching Standards: Your Path to Highly Effective Teaching 2013 Far West Teacher Center Network Teaching is the.
Summer Series, 2007 Building Capacity to Make Research-Based Practice Common Practice In Georgia Utilizing the Keys to Quality.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
SCEP Evaluation Albany Elementary School.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Montgomery Township Board of Education
Evaluating the Quality of Student Achievement Objectives
Gary Carlin, CFN 603 September, 2012
February 21-22, 2018.
Presentation transcript:

PARENT COORDINATOR INFORMATION SESSION PARENT ACCOUNTABILITY Wednesday, July 20, 2011 Madelene Chan, Supt. D24 Danielle DiMango, Supt. D25

How can Parent Coordinators create a stronger connection for parents to better understand the Quality Review process? How can Parent Coordinators create a stronger connection for parents to better understand the Quality Review process?

What is a Quality Review? What does the process look like?  What is a Quality Review? The Quality Review is a two- or three-day school visit by experienced educators to each New York City school. The Quality Review is a two- or three-day school visit by experienced educators to each New York City school.  What does the process look like? During the review the external evaluator visits classrooms, talks with school leaders, and uses a rubric to evaluate how well the school is organized to educate its students. During the review the external evaluator visits classrooms, talks with school leaders, and uses a rubric to evaluate how well the school is organized to educate its students.

Understanding the Process Goal of the Quality Review:Goal of the Quality Review: Raise Student Achievement Raise Student Achievement Process: Look at performance statisticsProcess: Look at performance statistics Question: How is the school engaged in effective methods of accelerating student learning? Question: How is the school engaged in effective methods of accelerating student learning? Results of the Quality Review:Results of the Quality Review: How well does a school’s systems meet the needs of its students and adults? How well does a school’s systems meet the needs of its students and adults? How well does a school’s systems monitor and improve its instructional assessment practices? How well does a school’s systems monitor and improve its instructional assessment practices?

Timeline of Review Before a reviewer visits a school: 1.Complete a self-evaluation form 2.Conversation with the principal Goal: How do schools use information about outcomes to guide teaching, set goals for improvement, and make instructional adjustments. After the visit: Schools receive a score A report is published on the DOE website Community Involvement: The final quality review document provides the school community with evidence based information about the school’s progress. Sources of feedback to further improve student performance are through communication, engagement, and support.

Parents or guardians can always ask their parent coordinator for a copy of their school’s Quality Review and with questions about the Quality Review.

Quality Statement 1. Instructional and organizational coherence Indicator 1.1 Rigorous and engaging curriculum Indicator 1.2 Differentiated instruction aligned to beliefs Indicator 1.3 Aligned resource-use Indicator 1.4 Positive learning Environment Quality Statement 2. Gather and analyze data Indicator 2.1 School level assessment data analysis Indicator 2.2 School level alignment of assessments to curriculum Indicator 2.3 Data tools for decision making Indicator 2.4 Data reflection and Communication Quality Statement 3. Plan and set goals Indicator 3.1 School level theory of action and goals Indicator 3.2 Teacher team and classroom level goals Indicator 3.3 Assessments used to make adjustments and provide feedback Indicator 3.4 Clear expectations and family Engagement Quality Statement 4. Align capacity building Indicator 4.1 Instructional focus and differentiated support for teacher Indicator 4.2 Teacher teams engaged in collaborative inquiry Indicator 4.3 Teacher leadership development and instructional capacity Indicator 4.4 Support for meeting child/youth development needs Quality Statement 5. Monitor and revise Indicator 5.1 Evaluate instructional and resource decisions Indicator 5.2 Evaluate assessment and data systems Indicator 5.3 Evaluate planning and goal setting systems Indicator 5.4 Evaluate adult capacity building systems

Quality Statement 1. Coherence of curriculum, instruction and organizational decisions Indicator 1.1 a) Curricula aligned to key standards b) Rigorous habits and higher order skills c) Challenging and engaging curricula for all Indicator 1.2 a) Shared beliefs aligned to pedagogy b) Differentiating for all learners c) High levels of student engagement Indicator 1.3 a) Resources aligned to instructional goals b) Use of time aligned to instructional goals c) Student programs aligned to teacher talent and instructional goals Indicator 1.4 a) Safe and inclusive school culture b) Each student known well c) Students participate in learning and school decisions Quality Statement 2. Gather, analyze and share assessment information Quality Statement 2. Gather, analyze and share assessment information to understand school and student progress Indicator 2.1 a) School analysis of summative assessment data b) School analysis of Periodic and classroom assessment data c) Actionable feedback for school decision-making Indicator 2.1 a) School analysis of summative assessment data b) School analysis of Periodic and classroom assessment data c) Actionable feedback for school decision-making Indicator 2.3 a) Data tools for aggregating school-level decisions b) Data tools in teams for aggregating curricular and instructional decisions c) Data tools for aggregating classroom-level decisions Indicator 2.4 a) Communicating progress to families b) Student self-reflection c) Family use of progress t racking tools Quality Statement 3. Use data to inform theory of action, set and track ambitious goals, and adjust plans Indicator 3.1 a) Goals and theory of action linked to adult and student learning needs b) Goals and action plans informed by a data driven needs assessment c) Community involved in setting goals and action plans Indicator 3.2 a) Annual and interim goals for student groups, students in need b) Data analysis of differentiated goals for supports and extensions c) Goals that leverage change in classroom practice Indicator 3.3 a) School-wide adjustment of goals and plans from Periodic Assessment data b) Teacher and team adjustments of goals and plans from common assessment data c) Consistent feedback practices Indicator 3.4 a) Communicating high and clear expectations b) Commitment of family to school goals c) Family engagement and involvement

Quality Statement 4. Professional collaboration and leadership development aligned to goals and student needs Indicator 4.1 a) Common instructional focus b) Data-informed performance management decisions c) Differentiated support for all teachers Indicator 4.2 a) Teachers in teams engaged in collaborative inquiry b) Collaborative inquiry approach influencing curriculum, teaching and learning c) Distributed leadership structures embedded Indicator 4.3 a) Professional development aligned with school goals b) Teacher practice evaluated through lens of student work c) Multiple leadership development opportunities Indicator 4.4 a) Professional development for safe and inclusive school culture b) Professional development to meet student emotional needs c) Internal capacity or external partnerships for child/youth development Quality Statement 5. Structures for monitoring progress, evaluating success, and adjusting plans and actions Indicator 5.1 a) Evaluating curricula and instruction b) Evaluating use of resources c) Evaluating system of decision-making Indicator 5.2 a) Evaluating assessment practices and tools b) Evaluating data systems c) Evaluating systems to communicate progress with students and families Indicator 5.3 a) Long-term and annual planning aligned b) Evaluating progress toward goals using interim benchmarks c) Teacher and team evaluation of interim goals for student groups Indicator 5.4 a) Evaluating teacher team effectiveness b) Evaluating effectiveness of teacher capacity-building, retention, and mentoring c) Evaluating leadership development and distributed leadership

2.4 Engage in an open exchange of information with students and families regarding students’ learning needs and outcomes PROFICIENT WELL DEVELOPED 2.4aSchool leaders and faculty engage students and families in reciprocal and ongoing discussions regarding student progress toward meeting school standards and expectations, including information on students’ strengths and weaknesses 2.4aSchool leaders and faculty engage students and families in reciprocal and ongoing discussions regarding student progress toward meeting school standards and expectations, including information on students’ academic, attendance and behavioral strengths, weaknesses and next learning steps 2.4cSchool leaders and faculty help families use tools (such as ARIS Parent Link, LES) in a timely way to understand student performance 2.4cSchool leaders and faculty help families use tools (including ARIS Parent Link, LES) to understand student performance, and engage in sufficient and timely communications with families to enable them to collaborate with the school to support student learning Gather and Analyze Data: School leaders and faculty consistently engage the school community and use data to set and track suitably high goals for accelerating student learning

3.4Communicate high expectations to students and families, engage them in decision- making, and promote active involvement in the school community PROFICIENT WELL DEVELOPED 3.4aSchool leaders, faculty, parent coordinator, and other support staff consistently communicate high expectations (including attendance, academic performance, social-emotional competency, and post-secondary opportunities) to students and families 3.4aSchool leaders, faculty, parent coordinator, and other support staff consistently communicate high expectations (including attendance, academic performance, social- emotional competency, and post-secondary opportunities) so students and families can meet these expectations 3.4bSchool leaders and faculty engage parents in school decision-making parents in school decision-making 3.4bSchool leaders and faculty consistently engage parents in school decision making, which results in a shared commitment to the school’s high expectations and goals. 3.4cSchool leaders, faculty, parent coordinator and other support staff promote involvement and leadership of families in important school activities 3.4cSchool leaders, faculty, parent coordinator and other support staff promote involvement and leadership of families in important school activities and provide supports to enable this participation (e.g. childcare, parent leadership, workshops) Plan and Set Goals: School leaders and faculty consistently engage the school community and use data to set and track suitably high goals for accelerating student learning

5.2Evaluate systems for assessing students, organizing data, and sharing information with student and families, making adjustments as needed to increase the coherence of policies and practices across the school PROFICIENT WELL DEVELOPED 5.2cSchool leaders and faculty have structures in place to regularly evaluate and adjust the process and format for sharing performance data (academic, attendance, behavioral) with students and families 5.2cSchool leaders and faculty have structures in place to regularly evaluate and adjust the process and format for sharing performance data (academic, attendance, behavioral) with students and families, with a focus on ensuring that this information is accessible and helps students understand their next learning steps. Monitor and Revise: The school has structures for monitoring and evaluating progress throughout the year and for flexibly adapting plans and practices to meet its goals for accelerating learning

Accountability Tools What tools can Parent Coordinators use as meaningful information builders for parents? Statistics page on school web sites ARIS parent link Periodic Assessments New York State Exams

Periodic Assessments. K-2 Literacy Assessments ECLAS-2 and Benchmarking Assessments ECLAS-2 and Benchmarking Assessments (K−2) Design Your Own Option (all grades) Design Your Own Option ECLAS-2 and Benchmarking Assessments Design Your Own Option Predictive Assessments Acuity Predictive AssessmentsAcuity Predictive Assessments (3−11) Design Your Own Option (all grades) Design Your Own Option Acuity Predictive Assessments Design Your Own Option Formative Assessments Acuity Instructionally Targeted Assessments Acuity Instructionally Targeted Assessments (ITAs) (3−11) Performance Series Computer-Adaptive Assessments (3−12) Literacy Assessments (TCRWP, F&P, DRA2) (3−8) Design Your Own Option (all grades) Acuity Instructionally Targeted Assessments (ITAs) (3−11) Performance Series Computer-Adaptive Assessments (3−12) Literacy Assessments (TCRWP, F&P, DRA2) (3−8) Design Your Own Option (all grades) Performance Series Computer-Adaptive Assessments Literacy Assessments Design Your Own Option Acuity Instructionally Targeted Assessments Performance Series Computer-Adaptive Assessments Literacy Assessments Design Your Own Option Supplemental Assessments English Language Learner Periodic AssessmentsEnglish Language Learner Periodic Assessments (3−12) Performance Series Computer-Adaptive Assessments (3−12) Performance Series Computer-Adaptive Assessments English Language Learner Periodic Assessments Performance Series Computer-Adaptive Assessments

What are the Performance and Accountability Tools? Progress Reports – Grades schools based on student performance, progress and school environment. NYC Learning Environment Survey - Provides feedback from parents, teachers and students on school environment. Quality review - Measures how well a school is organized to support student achievement. State and Federal Evaluation - Measures student achievement according to No Child Left Behind Act and the New York State Department of Education

PARENT COORDINATORS ROCK! Thank you for your continued hard work. The families in each of your schools are lucky to have you in their lives. Thank you for your continued hard work. The families in each of your schools are lucky to have you in their lives.