Doris Layton MacKenzie University of Maryland. Changing Offenders –Rigorous research –Identifying effective programs –Ineffective programs –Cognitive.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evidence Based Practices Lars Olsen, Director of Treatment and Intervention Programs Maine Department of Corrections September 4, 2008.
Advertisements

Reducing Recidivism Reducing the Rate and Use of Incarceration Reducing Recidivism Reducing the Rate and Use of Incarceration What Works and Best Practices.
Professor James Byrne.  (1) High Quality Corrections and Sentencing Research Agenda- the Centre will develop research projects focusing on evaluating.
Prevention Any organizational activity aimed at keeping unlawful behavior from occurring or keeping such behavior to a minimum and avoiding intervention.
Applying EBP In The Field Midge Christianson, Director 6W Community Corrections Montevideo, Minnesota , extension 212
Putting It All Together, Explaining Crime Trends.
Rehabilitation, Treatment, and Job Training  Rehabilitation, Treatment, and Job Training are never very popular with conservatives  Why? ◦ They think.
Douglas B. Marlowe, J.D., Ph.D. Treatment Research Institute at the University of Pennsylvania TRI science addiction Effective Strategies for Drug-Abusing.
1 Cost-Effective Strategies to Improve Public Safety and Reduce Recidivism Cost-Effective Strategies to Improve Public Safety and Reduce Recidivism Judge.
SENTENCING FOR CRIME CONTROL Mark Kleiman National Association of Sentencing Commissions Chicago August 7, 2012.
THE NSW BUREAU OF CRIME STATISTICS AND RESEARCH APPLIED RESEARCH IN CRIME AND JUSTICE CONFERENCE 2015 REDUCING THE CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES OF OFFENDERS Doris.
Court Technology and Court Performance Professor Byrne Nov.10,2010.
Second Chances: Housing and Services for Re-entering Prisoners National Alliance to End Homelessness Annual Conference Nikki Delgado Program Manager Corporation.
Sexual Offender Treatment in Estonia: the Current Situation and Future Perspective Kaire Tamm Ministry of Justice of Estonia Criminal Policy Department.
Community Corrections Research Papers Due At Beginning Of Class Probation, Parole And Intermediate Sanctions.
What Works and What Doesn’t in Reducing Recidivism with Youthful Offenders: Understanding the Principles of Effective Intervention Presented by: Edward.
Cost-Effective Interventions for Juvenile Offenders Dr. Peter W. Greenwood Academy of Experimental Criminology Association for the Advancement of Evidence-Based.
NASC 2012 ANNUAL CONFERENCE AUGUST 6, 2012 NASC 2012 ANNUAL CONFERENCE AUGUST 6, 2012 Ray Wahl Deputy State Court Administrator.
What Works and What Doesn’t in Reducing Recidivism: The Principles of Effective Intervention: Presented by: Edward J. Latessa, Ph.D. Center for Criminal.
The Pew-MacArthur Results First Initiative: INVESTING IN PROGRAMS THAT WORK May 15, 2014 Sara Dube, Manager Ashleigh Holand, Manager-State Policy.
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 2011 PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PLAN AUGUST 30, 2011.
Probation Supervision and Information Gathering Presentence Reports.
1 PROBATION IN EUROPE, FEATURES FOR AN APPROACH Lisbon, 28th. November 2011.
Juvenile Crime Prevention Evaluation Phase 2 Interim Report Findings in Brief Juvenile Crime Prevention Evaluation Phase 2 Interim Report Findings in Brief.
© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Chapter 5 Intermediate Sanctions: Between Probation and Incarceration 1.
Prevention and Early Intervention Linking Long-Term Vision with Short-Term Costs J effrey P oirier, B.A. M ary M agee Q uinn, Ph.D. American Institutes.
Review of Judicial Branch Activities in “Raise the Age” Presented by the Judicial Branch, Court Support Services Division June 28, 2012.
STICS: Strategic Training Initiative in Community Supervision Strategic Training Initiative in Community Supervision (STICS) Applying the RNR Principles.
 A: Indeterminate Sentencing: punishment where judge gives a minimum or maximum sentence. ◦ Parole: early release from prison after serving a part of.
Treatment is the Key: Addressing Drug Abuse in Criminal Justice Settings Redonna K. Chandler, Ph.D. Branch Chief Services Research Branch Division of Epidemiology,
Overview of Research, Concepts & Trends 1 10/11/2012 & 10/25/2012.
Intensive Supervision Probation (or Parole) Initial Rise to Prominence Research on First Gen ISP Programs Finding Something Useful in ISP.
AJ 50 – Introduction to Administration of Justice Chapter 10 – Probation, Parole, and Community Corrections.
2 3 Texas has one of the largest Probation Populations in the United States (Bureau of Justice Statistics, 2007) 4 Selected StatesProbation Population.
OFFENDER REENTRY: A PUBLIC SAFETY STRATEGY Court Support Services Division.
Perm June 2011 Wim van Geffen director MST-Nederland Breaking the cycle of criminal behaviour by the focus on family and not on youth.
Research, Policy and Politics in Evidence Based Practice (RPP in EBP) Peter Greenwood, Ph.D. Association of Criminal Justice Research (CA) 71 st Bi-Annual.
Public Safety and Offender Rehabilitation Services Act of 2007 (AB 900) Implementation and Impact on County Mental Health Robin Dezember Chief Deputy Secretary.
Chapter 14 Prevention and Corrections in the Community 1.
INTENSIVE SUPERVISION AND THE ROLE OF GPS Thomas H. Williams, Associate Director Community Supervision Services July 14-15, 2008 United States Sentencing.
Judge Neil Edward Axel District Court of Maryland (retired) Maryland Highway Safety Judicial Conference December 2, 2015 Best Practices & Sentencing Alternatives.
Corrections: Wassup with that?. What is Corrections? Agencies and programs that carry out the sentence of the court  Institutional Corrections = prisons/jails.
January 2012 Coalition of Community Corrections Providers of New Jersey Employment Forum.
CJS - Chapter 11 Rehab Hist: background and basic issues –Coercion issue –“Fit” issue 2 aspects (who? which prog?) –Evaluation issues (int/ext, short/long.
Community Corrections Chapter Eight. Community Corrections Comprehensive community supervision comprises a multitude of human resources, programs, automation.
Chapter 10 Looking Toward the Future Overcrowded Prisons, Drugs, Laws, and Race 7 million Americans under correctional supervision; 2 million in prison.
Earning the Right To a New Beginning By Tammy Allen.
Gender based violence and youth violence: challenges for judicial reform projects Andrew Morrison Poverty and Gender Group LCSPP
Deviance and the Criminal Justice System 1.Illegitimate Opportunity Structures and perceptions of crime in our society 2.The Criminal Justice System 3.The.
Improving Outcomes for Young Adults in the Justice System Challenges and Opportunities.
C11: Probation and Corrections  Sean Taylor:  What was his crime?  What was his sentence?  Do you think he received special treatment?
MN County Attorney Association’s Crime Prevention Tip The MCAA strives to bring current information regarding prevention topics to its members. The August.
Department of Corrections Joint Judiciary Hearing July 25, 2013.
The Criminal Justice System Crime trends, Policing, Courtrooms, Trials, Sentencing and Punishment, Corrections and the community.
Prisons Prisons vs. Jails Prisons – serving more than a year Jail Serving less than a year Awaiting trial (denied bail / couldn’t afford)
History and Concepts of Drug Courts
BCJ 3150: Probation and Parole
Promising Practices in Criminal Justice Reform
Evidence Based Practices in Napa County Probation
Juvenile Reentry Programs Palm Beach County
BCJ 3150, Probation and Parole
Unit III Flashcards Chapters 5 and 6.
What works and What Doesn’t in Reducing Recidivism: Some Lessons Learned from Evaluating Correctional Programs By: Edward Latessa School of Criminal Justice.
C H A P T E R F I V E.
Exploring the Past Improving the Future
RSAT History, Best Practices and Future
The Pew-MacArthur Results First Initiative: Improving Outcomes Through Evidence-Based Policymaking August 4, 2014.
Evidence-Based Programs What Every Sentencing Judge Needs to Know
Ashleigh Holand, Manager-State Policy
Presentation transcript:

Doris Layton MacKenzie University of Maryland

Changing Offenders –Rigorous research –Identifying effective programs –Ineffective programs –Cognitive transformations Identifying those ready to change –Readiness –Signal effect

What Works in Corrections Changing offenders’ criminal activities Identifying those ready to change

Changing Offenders Reduce future criminal activities Program impact Randomized trials Survival analyses

Reading lessonsNo reading lessons

Medical Research Example No Chemotherapy Chemotherapy How long do they live? (Survival)

Survival Rates Chemo No Chemo 60% 10%

No Drug Treatment Drug Treatment How long do they survive Without an arrest? How long do they survive Without an arrest?

Percent Surviving without new Criminal Activities Drug Treatment No Drug Treatment

What Works in Corrections Recidivism Groups of studies Meta-analyses

Effective Programs Academic education Vocation education MST for juveniles Cognitive skills programs Cognitive behavior trt for sex offenders Behavior trt for sex offenders Drug courts Drug trt in community Incarceration-based drug treatment

Effective Programs – Cognitive Transformation Focus on human service Target dynamic criminogenic factors Skill oriented Cognitive-behavior/behavior models Multimodal

What Doesn’t Work Life skills education Correctional industries Multicomponent work programs Psychosocial sex offender trt Residential trt for juveniles Community supervision for juveniles Domestic Violence programs Correctional boot camps Intensive supervision Electronic monitoring Scared straight

Ineffective Programs Poor or no theory Poorly implemented Focus on punishment, deterrence or control Emphasize ties or bonds without changing offender first

What Works in Corrections Changing offenders’ criminal activities Identifying those ready to change

Identifying Those Ready to Change Readiness for change measures “Signaling” effect

To Signal Signal -- an action, gesture, or sign used as a means of communication Signal -- to communicate something with an action or gesture

Signal Example Prisoners training dogs 50% of prisoners drop out of program

Signaling Effect Using program to select those who will succeed Compare dropouts to completers NOT impact of program Important factors –Accountability –Rigorous program –Responsibility

Signal Benefits Drop outs have higher recidivism –Boot camps –Drug Treatment

Use of Signal Effect Program may not have an effect but signals –Correctional boot camps Program and signaling effects – Drug treatment Social and institutional benefits –Dog training program

Boot Camps Reduced sentences Rigorous programs Program doesn’t change offenders Signal effect - drop outs have higher recidivism New models for reduced sentences using effective treatment

Combinations for Reentry Develop reduced sentence programs Rigorous program – signal effect Increase treatment – change offenders

Summary Reject the “nothing works” philosophy Rigorous research shows what works More randomized trials/ high quality research needed Cognitive change focus needed Some programs have signaling effect Combine effective treatment with signaling

Doris Layton MacKenzie, Professor University of Maryland 2220 LeFrak Hall College Park, MD