International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group CABIN CREW FIRE TRAININGNEEDS ANALYSIS CABIN CREW FIRE TRAININGNEEDS ANALYSIS A study carried.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Human Factors in Flight Operations A CAA Perspective
Advertisements

PROVING FLIGHTS.
Integra Consult A/S November 2005Dhaka, Bangladesh Reporting - Inspired by ESARR 2 Workshop Dhaka, November 2005.
Module N° 3 – ICAO SARPs related to safety management
1 Reporting April Safety Policy Regulator Service Provider Service Provider Service Provider Regulator to established SRF to harmonize reporting.
1 Welcome Safety Regulatory Function Handbook April 2006.
Integra Consult A/S January 2006Karachi, Pakistan Severity Classification Scheme.
Eurocontrol HQ, Brussels September 13-14, 2011 Belgian Civil Aviation Auhtority General Directorate Aviation Belgian approach related to unmanned aircraft.
IFATCA's Perspective on TEM and NOSS
Experiences on the road to Fatigue Risk Management Regulation
ICAO Part 139 Review Aerodrome Certification Rule Design Proposal
APEC Air Cargo Security Workshop Bangkok, Thailand June 2008.
SECURITY RESEARCH SEVENTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME Mark Stroud Home Office Scientific Development Branch UK Security Programme Committee Member.
Survival Factors Cindy Keegan.
Hazard Prevention Program
Opening the European market for civil drones in an appropriate way: the role of the EU Jean-Pierre LENTZ European Commission DG Growth.
Accident Summary Cargo smoke warning during approach to PHL Smoke filled cockpit after landing Crew evacuated via slide at left forward (L1) door Major.
Federal Aviation Administration Summary of Recent Safety Recommendations from Aircraft Accident Investigation Authorities Sources: Korean Aircraft and.
Aerodrome Certification Exercise The Process
NTSB review of crew actions during in-flight fires has resulted in a series of recommendations calling for improved crew training and modification of cabin.
Flight Department 1 A Research and a Result Barcelona October 2003 Capt. Cor Blokzijl, Aero Lloyd 10 th Airbus Flight Safety Conference.
08 June 2006Portland; Oregon; USAPeter Corbeeel Reducing the risk of smoke and fire in transport airplanes: related EASA rulemaking actions Peter Corbeel.
Review of Draft AC 021 – Maintenance Contracting Draft AC 022 – Task and Shift Handovers Nie Junjian Airworthiness Inspector COSCAP-NA.
Office of Aviation Safety Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Aviation Operations Jeff Guzzetti Deputy Director for Regional Operations.
DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF DCA ON CABIN SAFETY ISSUE October 2008, 10 th Steering Committee Meeting, Macau Thipsuda Chiamcharoenvut, Department.
Local Public Health System Assessment using the NPHPSP Local Instrument Essential Service 6 Enforce Laws and Regulations that Protect Health and Ensure.
What about the Cabin Crew? What about the Cabin Crew? Fatigue Risk Management Systems Symposium Montreal, Canada Candace K. Kolander Occupational Health.
Runway Incursions and Prevention Initiatives in Canada Alyre Boudreau Aerodrome Safety (613)
Module N° 8 – SSP implementation plan. SSP – A structured approach Module 2 Basic safety management concepts Module 2 Basic safety management concepts.
5/26/20161 AUDIT SERVICES PRIVATE/CORPORATE Captain Iain Tulloch tel /
Swissair 111: Where Do We Go From Here? Royal Aeronautical Society Flight Operations Group Meeting London, England October 22, 2008 Henry Wright, Board.
Update on European Rulemaking for ETOPS-LROPS Global ETOPS/LROPS Implementation: Timetables and Approaches Yves Morier, St Petersburg, 4 June.
Federal Aviation Administration Presented to: 2008 US/Europe International Aviation Safety Conference By: Robert W. Reich, Asst Manager (Operations), Seattle.
Programme Performance Criteria. Regulatory Authority Objectives To identify criteria against which the status of each element of the regulatory programme.
08 June 2006 Portland 2006: aircraft certification session Yves Morier The EASA Advance -NPA for UAV systems Certification Presentation by: Y Morier EASA.
Thermal Acoustic Insulation Contamination & Aging Task Group Date: June Thermal Acoustic Insulation Contamination Cologne June 2009.
NTSB review of crew actions during in-flight fires has resulted in a series of recommendations calling for improved crew training and modification of cabin.
Responsible Care® Health & Safety Task Force – 06 H&S.
Cargo Strategic Action Plan Prepared by: Cargo Strategic Action Group Air Carrier Maintenance Branch, AFS-330.
Enhanced Airworthiness Program for Airplane Systems (EAPAS) Presented by: Massoud Sadeghi FAA - Aging Systems Program Manager EAPAS Workshop November 2002.
ACCEPTABLE METHODOLOGY AND STANDARDS Carey Edwards CRM Advisory Panel.
Safety Regulation Group Slide 1 CABIN CREW CRM TRAINING BEST PRACTICE Aviation House 29 January 2009.
National Public Health Performance Standards Local Assessment Instrument Essential Service:6 Enforce Laws and Regulations that Protect Health and Ensure.
Certification Considerations for the Implementation of ASAS Applications on Aircraft Kevin Hallworth: UK CAA ASAS-TN Seminar – October 2004.
Presentation to Transport Canada November 2008 – Fire & Cabin Safety Research Integrated Fire Protection Systems – Update.
International Civil Aviation Organization Global Runway Safety Symposium ICAO’s Harmonization Initiatives John Illson Air Navigation Bureau 25 May 2011.
Pilot Project on implementation of SEA for regional planning in Ukraine Prof. Dr. Michael Schmidt Dmitry Palekhov Brandenburg University of Technology.
ISM Code 2010: Part A - Implementation Malcolm Maclachlan.
A Technology Partnership for the New Millennium Anne Harlan, Director William J. Hughes Technical Center 68th NASAO Annual Convention September 20, 1999.
CAA, 1 November 2001 Methods used to Evaluate the Effectiveness of CRM Training in the Aviation Industry. Paul O’Connor & Pieter Hemsley.
WORKSHOP ON ACCREDITATION OF BODIES CERTIFYING MEDICAL DEVICES INT MARKET TOPIC 9 CH 8 ISO MEASUREMENT, ANALYSIS AND IMPROVEMENT INTERNAL AUDITS.
C.S.R.T.G Third International Fire and Cabin Safety Conference 22 October 2001 PRIORITISATION OF OCCUPANT SURVIVAL FACTORS Ray Cherry Graham Greene Stèphane.
ICAO COSCAP - SA May AERODROME CERTIFICATION COURSE How can aerodrome certification be achieved? Establish an appropriate regulatory system within.
The fourth Aircraft Fire and Cabin Safety Research Conference Lisbon, Portugal November
AFTERMATH AND ACTIONS TAKEN On 20 October 2004, the Transportation Safety Board of Canada issued Safety Advisory A (Verification of Cargo Weights)
Aircraft Maintenance Engineering
Aviation safety NEED FOR AVIATION SAFETY
A European Community Contribution to World Aviation Safety Improvement
Drones, RPAS, UAV’s, UAS Unmanned aircraft.
WG-MISD Release of Radioactive Material (RRM) Work Stream
CAA’s CA98 investigation and sector review in airport “surface access” British Parking Association – Parking Forum Pedro Lino Pinto 2 March 2017.
Recommended practice Training and Competency: Flight Crew
Runway Incursions and Prevention Initiatives in Canada
The European Aviation Safety Agency: latest developments, future tasks
Runway Incursions and Prevention Initiatives in Canada
GA Flight Examiners Seminar
Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB
Turbulence Accidents and NTSB Research Update
Seminar Passengers with reduced mobility when travelling by air
COURSE OBJECTIVES After successful completion of this course, participants will be able to; Apply the IATA DGR correctly understand the legal aspects.
Presentation transcript:

International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group CABIN CREW FIRE TRAININGNEEDS ANALYSIS CABIN CREW FIRE TRAININGNEEDS ANALYSIS A study carried out on behalf of the UK Civil Aviation Authority

International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Study Analysts  Saryani Asmayawati (Project Manager)  Nick Butcher  Ray Cherry  Sue Knight  Tom Mason  Karen Monk  Helen Tsai

International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Acknowledgement RGW Cherry & Associates Limited and the UK Civil Aviation Authority would like to express their gratitude to all parties who have supported and contributed to this project.

International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Acknowledgement In particular our thanks go to:  The training organisations that participated in the review of cabin crew training programmes  The organisations that helped in promulgating the online survey  The Royal Navy, the Royal Air Force, Eurostar

International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Acknowledgement In particular our thanks go to:  The FAA, and Transport Canada Civil Aviation.  Flight Safety International Inc.,  And last but not least to the 2,500 cabin & flight crewmembers and trainers that participated in the on- line survey

International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Objectives of the Project To evaluate current and possible future issues, and identify potential improvements in existing fire training in order to ensure that cabin crews have the most appropriate training and procedures to match current and likely future fire threats.

International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Structure of the Project  Review of current cabin crew fire training programmes  On-line Survey  Assessment of fire training currently carried out in non-civil aviation environments.  Review of in-flight fire occurrences and how the threats experienced might change in the future

International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Structure of the Project  Identification of potential improvements to cabin crew fire training and their evaluation in the light of current regulatory material and foreign comparable regulatory material

International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Phase 1 – Review of Current Fire Training Programmes  8 UK and 2 European operators and training organisations were visited

International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Phase 2 - On-line Survey  Over 2,500 questionnaires were completed of which 2,164 were analysed  Of the UK respondents approximately 9% had experienced an in-flight fire

International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Phase 2 - On-line Survey

International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Phase 2 - On-line Survey

International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Phase 3 - Fire Protection Training In Non Civil Aviation Environments Royal Navy, Royal Air Force, and Eurostar crew fire training were observed

International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Phase 4 - Identification Of Cabin Fire Threats  316 fire-related UK Mandatory Occurrence Reports were analysed  Recommendations relating to world- wide in-flight fire accidents over the period were reviewed

International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Phase 4 - Identification Of Cabin Fire Threats  Future in-flight fire threats were identified by brainstorming with Airworthiness Authority Fire & Cabin Safety Specialists – supported by literature searches

International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Identification of Potential Improvements  Based on the information obtained during phases 1 to 4 of the study, potential improvements were derived from a process based on the EASA Regulatory Impact Assessment approach

International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group  Recommendations were made regarding standardisation of  Fire Extinguishers used in training  Protective Breathing Equipment used in training  Fires used in training  Smoke used in training Picture from Identification of Potential Improvements

International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Identification of Potential Improvements  Recommendations were made regarding  Standards for fire and smoke training facilities  Standards for fire training instructors  Evaluation criteria in Practical fire & smoke training Picture from

International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Picture from Identification of Potential Improvements  Recommendations were made regarding Training in  Fire Prevention Measures - Theoretical  Communication/Co- ordination with Flight Crew – Theoretical & Practical  Communication/Co- ordination amongst Cabin Crew - Practical

International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Picture from Identification of Potential Improvements  Recommendations were made regarding Training in  Detecting and Locating Source of Smoke and Fire – Theoretical & Practical  Dealing with Hidden Fires – Theoretical & Practical  The Management of Passengers– Theoretical & Practical

International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Identification of Potential Improvements  Recommendations were made regarding Practical Training in  Removing Firefighting Equipment from Stowage  Removing Protective Breathing Equipment from Packaging

International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Identification of Potential Improvements  Recommendations were made to generate regulatory material addressing  Fire Scenarios  Firefighting using protective equipment

International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Identification of Potential Improvements  Recommendations were made to generate regulatory material addressing  Theoretical Training in Conversion & Differences Training and Recurrent Training  Regulation of Training Provided by ‘Third-Party’ Training Organisations

International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Identification of Potential Improvements  Recommendations to provide guidance for  Training methods in performing firefighting procedures  Implementing integrated fire training scenarios in a cabin environment

International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Identification of Potential Improvements  Recommendations to provide guidance for  Training methods in emphasising the required urgency of response to in-flight fires

International Aircraft Systems Fire Protection Working Group Next steps  The CAA is to:  Publish the Training Needs Analysis as a CAA Paper  Arrange a Fire Training Instructors Workshop/Forum  Consider the need for regulatory or advisory changes