Planning to achieve CCSS Implementation Goals Using a Structured Planning & Problem-Solving Process to Support CCSS Implementation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

Dan Ebbert Paul Cicciarelli
Global Congress Global Leadership Vision for Project Management.
Student Services Personnel and RtI: Bridging the Skill Gap FASSA Institute George M. Batsche Professor and Co-Director Institute for School Reform Florida.
Planning to achieve CCSS Implementation Goals Using a Structured Planning & Problem-Solving Process to Support CCSS Implementation.
A collaborative project between the Florida Department of Education and the University of South Florida School Based Leadership Team Year Two, Day Four.
Campus Improvement Plans
Goose Creek CISD Response to Intervention Training Part I.
OEPA West Virginia Board of Education Section 2: Historical Perspective of Policy 2320 Dr. Donna Davis Deputy Director, OEPA.
Summary of Results from Spring 2014 Presented: 11/5/14.
D EVELOPING & S UPPORTING L EADERSHIP T EAMS TO E NGAGE IN A CADEMIC AND B EHAVIORAL PROBLEM - SOLVING Heather Peshak George, Ph.D. Clark Dorman, Ed. S.
This product was developed by Florida’s Positive Behavior Support Project through University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health.
STUDENT SUPPORT TEAM A PARTNERSHIP FOR SUCCESS!. SST: Based on the Multi-Tiered Intervention Model and Pyramid of Intervention Framework Utilizes a collaborative.
Florida Association of School Psychologists Annual Conference
Tracy Unified School District Leadership Institute – “Leading the Transformation” Breakout Session Authentic Data Driven Decision Making July/August 2014.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Have you ever been a part of this team?
1. PBIS Team: Establishing a Foundation for Collaboration and Operation Establishing a Foundation for Collaboration and Operation – PBIS requires some.
Sharon Walpole University of Delaware Michael C. McKenna University of Virginia Literacy Coaches in Action: Strategies for Crafting Building- Level Support.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Small Group Planning and Problem Solving National Association of School Psychologists February 6, 2008 New Orleans Michael J. Curtis, Ph.D. Rachel Cohen,
Discourse. Student Discourse How would you define student discourse? “IS considered student discourse” “IS NOT considered student discourse”
Arshall Public Schools Walking the Talk: The Role of Leadership in Implementing an RtI Framework Presented By: Barb Sramek, District Administrator Barb.
School Leadership Teams Collaborating for Effectiveness Begin to answer Questions #1-2 on the Handout: School Leadership Teams for Continuous Improvement.
U SING THE IPST F ORMS TO S UPPORT THE P ROBLEM S OLVING P ROCESS Shelly Dickinson Janet Stephenson.
Full Implementation of the Common Core. Last Meeting Performance Tasks Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Upcoming Accountability Measure Strong teaching.
Mississippi’s Three Tier Model of Instruction An Overview of the Intervention Policy and Process.
Mississippi’s Three Tier Model of Instruction An Overview of the Intervention Policy and Process.
Organizational Conditions for Effective School Mental Health
National Association of School Psychologists
Using the Indistar® Web-based Planning Tool to Support School Improvement Session #2 Presenters: Yvonne A. Holloman, Ph.D. Michael Hill Office of School.
Winston/Salem Forsyth County Schools RESPONSIVENESS TO INSTRUCTION (RTI)
OIP The Ohio Improvement Process and the role of the BLT.
Suggested Components of a Schoolwide Reading Plan Part 1: Introduction Provides an overview of key components of reading plan. Part 2: Component details.
Module F Reviewing the Problem Solving Process Coaches’ Monthly Meeting Add DC Name Here.
1 Module L R ole of Coaches Coaches’ Monthly Meeting Add DC Name Here.
Victoria White, PhD Ann George, EdD Associate Professor Assistant Professor Director of KC Metro Center SSLS.
PBIS Team: Establishing a Foundation for Collaboration and Operation.
Blueprints for RtI Implementation Coaches/Principals 10/8/09.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
“We will lead the nation in improving student achievement.” CLASS Keys TM Module 4: Professional Growth Plan Spring 2010 Teacher and Leader Quality Education.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
By: Jill Mullins. RtI is… the practice of providing high-quality instruction/intervention matched to student needs and using learning rate over time and.
Establishing a Foundation for Collaboration and Operation.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
Florida Charter School Conference Orlando, Florida November, 2009 Clark Dorman Project Leader Florida Statewide Problem-Solving/RtI Project University.
Broward County Public Schools BP #3 Optimal Relationships
Positive Behavior Support for Families and Community Members School Name / Date (Red font denotes information to be completed/inserted by the district.
1 Tier 1 Effective Coaching Overview Monthly Coaching Meeting 2011 Module B DC Name and Date Here.
RtI: A Framework for Student Success Janet Graden, PhD University of Cincinnati
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE OVERVIEW. CONTEXT & RATIONALE.
July 11, 2013 DDM Technical Assistance and Networking Session.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
Introduction to the Grant August-September, 2012 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) project.
School-Based Problem-Solving for Individuals (SBIT)
Eight-Step Problem Solving for School Improvement Planning Presented by Region IV Differentiated Accountability.
Tier 1 Positive Behavior Support Response to Intervention for Behavior Faculty Overview.
STUDENT SUPPORT TEAM A PARTNERSHIP FOR SUCCESS!. Changes to SST: Based on the Responsiveness to Instruction Model Based on the Responsiveness to Instruction.
RTI/MTSS Self-Assessment. RTI Session Objectives -An increase in the understanding of the necessary components of RTI/MTSS -An awareness that each school.
Wisconsin Personnel Development System Grant Click on the speaker to listen to each slide. You may wish to follow along in your WPDM Guide.
Planning to Achieve CCSS Implementation Goals Team Planning Days 1 – 4: An Overview 1.
+ Minding the Gap: Data-Based Problem Solving Summer Leadership Conference August 2016.
School Psychologists in Multi-Tiered Systems of Support: A Discussion of Roles, Challenges, and Successes Elena Diamond, Lewis & Clark College Angela Whalen,
Mississippi’s Three Tier Model of Instruction
Florida’s MTSS Project: Self-Assessment of MTSS (SAM)
MTSS implementation: Perspectives from the National Center on Intensive Intervention Allison Gandhi, Ed.D. American Institutes for Research.
RtI Innovations: Evaluation Anna Harms & Jose Castillo
Parent-Teacher Partnerships for Student Success
Educator Effectiveness System Overview
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership
Presentation transcript:

Planning to achieve CCSS Implementation Goals Using a Structured Planning & Problem-Solving Process to Support CCSS Implementation

Agenda What are CCSS? – Critical Elements and What You Should Know Overview of Planning Process During CCSS Conference Prepare for Day 1 5:00 PM Team-based Planning Activity.

Place Holder – Slides for Fred Heid and Teresa Sweet

OVERVIEW: PLANNING PROCESS AND TOOLS FOR CCSS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN Session 1/Day 1

Need for Structured Planning & Problem-Solving Practices Consider… Why Have so Many School-Based Change Efforts/Innovations Failed?

Sample Historical Context for Education Improvement PL : Rights of All Handicapped Children Act PL : Education of All Handicapped Children Act (mid 1970’s) A Nation at Risk (1980’s) State Testing for Educators National Credentialing Systems Statewide Testing/School Grading OCR – Disproportionality – NCR No Child Left Behind IDEA

And More Recently… American Recovery and Reinvestment Act –Race to the Top Efforts to reauthorize ESEA (NCLB) –Blueprint for Reform –LEARN Act

And, for Florida Schools Revised ESE Rules Revised Florida Educator Accomplished Practices (FEAPs) Race to the Top Requirements Common Core State Standards (CCSS) New Educator Evaluation Requirements Florida MTSS framework to support above goals/expectations. *** Within context of severe budget problems

Why do innovations tend to fail? It often is the implementation of the innovation that fails and not the innovation itself (Gresham, 1989) How to ensure successful implementation of innovations? What can affect successful implementation?

What affects implementation? Lack of concern about problem (Hall and Hord, 2006) Belief that the innovation will not meet the needs of the school (Ellis, 2001) Competing initiatives or systems already in place (Office of Special Education Programs, 2004) Dual system: old system + new system

What affects implementation There may not be: –systemic support from persons in key leadership positions and/or policy makers –open and continuous communication –enough time to implement –on-going training/professional development –On-site coaching supports (Hall & Hord, 2006)

What affects implementation? Does leadership have: –A rationale for the new procedures –A commitment to new procedures –Clearly prioritized goals –Understanding of how to use resources effectively and efficiently (PD, technology instead of people, materials) –A systems perspective for implementation (Fullan, 2010)

Innovation Implementation Most people do not evaluate an innovation based on scientific evidence, rather based on information from individuals like themselves The promoter of an innovation is often different from the people who must use it in terms of role and responsibility Successful implementation of innovations requires use of a structured planning and problem-solving process

Use a Structured Data-Based Planning and Problem-Solving Process… To Achieve Improved Performance for… –Individual Students –Groups of Students –Classrooms –Schools –Districts –State

Goals of Structured Planning & Problem Solving Practices Resolution or Improvement of Problem Situation/Attainment of Goal Improved Problem-Solving/Planning Skills for Person(s) Seeking Assistance and for all Involved in the Process of Implementing Innovations

Effective Problem Solving/ Planning Groups Participation Involvement Openness to New & Different Ideas Structured Planning/PS Process Rules for Decision Making

Levels of Problem Solving Group/Systems Problem Solving One-to-One Problem Solving Peer Support/Informal Problem Solving Personal Problem Solving Impact for Investment Increasing Scope of Problem- Solving

All Problem-Solving Models Involve: Problem or Goal Identification Problem Analysis Intervention Development & Implementation Evaluation of Student Impacts & Instructional Effectiveness

Problem-Solving crosswalk: 4-step8-step 1. Problem Identification (ACT) 2. Problem Analysis (ACT) 3. Intervention Development and Implementation (PLAN & DO) 4. Response to Intervention (RtI) (CHECK) 1. Set a goal and ID how you will measure that goal 2. Identify Resources & Obstacles to attaining that goal. 3. Prioritize the obstacles. 4. Identify strategies to eliminate or reduce the obstacle 5. Develop action plan to implement strategies. 6. Develop follow-up plan. 7. Evaluate impact of the action plan. 8. Evaluate progress on original goal.

5. Develop Action Plan (Plan & Do) 6. Develop Follow- up Plan (Plan & Do) What is the Problem? Why is it Occurring? 2. ID Resources & Barriers (ACT) 3. Prioritize Obstacles (ACT) What are we going to do about it? 4. ID Strategies to Eliminate or Reduce Barriers (ACT) Is It Working? 7. Evaluate if barrier was eliminated or reduced (Check) 8. Evaluate if you reached your goal in #1 (Check) 1. ID a Goal and ID How to Measure that Goal (ACT)

Overview: Small Group Planning & Problem Solving Steps 1.Identify the problem or goal in concrete, descriptive, behavioral terms 2.Record all resources/ideas for resolving the problem or achieving the goal, and all obstacles that must be overcome or reduced. 3.Select one obstacle from the list 4.Brainstorm strategies to reduce or eliminate only the obstacle selected 5.Design a concrete plan of action, specifying who, will do what, and by when 6.Follow-up plan 7.Evaluation plan – removed barrier selected in step 3? 8.Evaluation plan – attainment of goal in Step 1?

Place Holder – Alignment with Day 4 SIP/DIAP Set Expectation of SIP/DIAP format use here (DAY 4 expectation) Communicate end-of-day team planning activities will lead up to and contribute to Day 4 plan that aligns with SIP/DIAP Instructions/Logistics for technology & team planning tools –E.g., usernames/passwords, seating with team members during planning times, etc.

PREPARING FOR TEAM PLANNING AT 5:00 PM-5:30 PM Day 1: Identifying Priorities Related to Increasing Staff Knowledge/Awareness of CCSS at Your School/District

What to expect? School-based team; District-based team Day 1 Planning Goals: 1.5 min – As a team discuss and rate your staffs’ level of awareness for CCSS on scale of 1 (lowest) to 10 (highest) min – Considering Reflection Journal responses, discuss and list as a team the top 2 most important things you have to do to ensure awareness and understanding of CCSS.

Establish Team Roles Identifying roles –Facilitator: Leads the process through the planning activity & keeps team focused. Recommendation: Team leader as facilitator –Recorder: Ensures concise and accurate capturing of team decisions using web-based program. –Time keeper: Ensures the team works efficiently to complete activity goals in time.

Preparing for Day 1 5:00 PM Team-based Planning School – “School-based Leadership Team Preparation” handout. District – See “District-based Leadership Team Preparation” handout. –Prepare to work in assigned setting –Use Survey Monkey –Overview of process Day 1 planning goals Day 2 connections