WG3 Leader: Michelle Bush International Working Forum for Regulatory Supervision of Legacy Sites (RSLS) – Technical Meeting 22-24 October 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Introductions; Objectives and Scope of the Course Tr aining course on Authorization and Inspection of Uranium Mining.
Advertisements

1 Graduates’ Attributes : EMF, EUR-ACE and Federal Educational Standards Alexander I. Chuchalin, Chair of the RAEE Accreditation Board Graduates’ Attributes.
INSAG DEVELOPMENT OF A DOCUMENT ON HIGH LEVEL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NUCLEAR POWER Milestone Issues: Group C. Nuclear Safety. A. Alonso (INSAG Member)
Regulatory Body MODIFIED Day 8 – Lecture 3.
Health and Safety Executive Health and Safety Executive Inspector’s Competency Model - HSE’s approach Mike Cross 3 June 2014.
Kiggavik Project Final Hearing Presentation
Technical Meeting on Evaluation Methodology for Nuclear Power Infrastructure Development December, 2008 Nuclear Safety in Infrastructure Building.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency How do you know how far you have got? How much you still have to do? Are we nearly there yet? What – Who – When.
Postgraduate Educational Course in radiation protection and the Safety of Radiation sources PGEC Part IV The International System of Radiation Protection.
Environmental Remediation National Policy,Strategy and
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Overview of legal framework Regional Workshop - School for Drafting Regulations 3-14 November 2014 Abdelmadjid.
A Proposed Risk Management Regulatory Framework Commissioner George Apostolakis Presented at the Organization of Agreement States 2012 Annual Meeting Milwaukee,
RER/9/096 Regional Planning Meeting “Strengthening National Infrastructures for the Control of Radiation Sources” (TSA-1), (Phase II) Country: Kazakhstan.
LEGAL FRAMEWORK & REGULATORY SYSTEM f or introduction of NPP into Vietnam Le Chi Dung (VARANS, Vietnam) Vienna, December 2008.
TEAM 1 NONAMECOUNTRY 1SU RUI (LEADER)CHINA 2TENG IYU LIN (PRESENTER)MALAYSIA 3MUHAMMAD TARIQ AZIZ (RAPPORTEUR)PAKISTAN 4NORAISHAH PUNGUTMALAYSIA 5MOHAMMAD.
19-20 March 2009 IAEA, Vienna RER/9/096 Regional Planning Meeting "Strengthening National Infrastructures for the Control of Radiation Sources" (TSA-1),
1 International Working Forum on Regulatory Supervision of Legacy Sites (RSLS) Technical Meeting Amel MELLOUK – ASN / DRC Jérémie VALLET – MEDDE/MSNR Regulatory.
Swedish IRRS mission 6-17 Feb 2012 IRRS lessons learned workshop – Brussels 22 nd and 23 rd January Elisabeth Öhlén and Ingemar Lund.
08 October 2015 M. Ammar Mehdi Introduction to Human Resource Management & SSG-16 Actions 4 th Steering Committee on Competence of Human.
Uranium Mining and Remediation Exchange Group, UMREG2012 Vienna 7 – 8 November 2012, DEVCO Nuclear Safety 1 EU - Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation.
ENSI Swiss Federal Nuclear Safety Inspectorate ENSI ENSI Management System IAEA Regulatory Cooperation Forum, 18 September 2015 Dr. Hans Wanner, Director.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency ESTABLISHING THE SAFETY INFRASTRUCTURE FOR A NUCLEAR POWER PROGRAMME IAEA WORKSHOP ON LEADERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT.
International Working Forum for Regulatory Supervision of Legacy Sites (RSLS) Review of 2013 and Introduction of Next Steps of RSLS Malgorzata.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AND COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
EUNetPaS is a project supported by a grant from the EAHC. The sole responsibility for the content of this presentation lies with the author(s). The EAHC.
International Working Forum on Regulatory Supervision of Legacy Sites (RSLS) - Technical Meeting October 2013, Vienna, Austria Results and discussion.
3/2003 Rev 1 IV.2.1 – slide 1 of 16 Part IVPrinciples of Radiation Protection and the International Framework Module 2The Role of International Organizations.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Legislation.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning Objectives Introduction IRRS review of regulations and guides Relevant safety standards.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Summary and Overview of TECDOC Russel Edge Decommissioning and Remediation Unit Division of Radiation,Transport.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.5/1 Design Geoff Vaughan University of Central Lancashire,
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Regulatory Authority.
56th Regular Session of the IAEA General Conference
“ OVERALL DECISION MAKING IN PLANNING FOR REMEDIATION OF URANIUM MINES” Presentation to the Senior Regulator’s meeting at the 56 th IAEA General Conference.
Algerian nuclear power programme Status, needs and perspectives T/M on development of nuclear infrastructure of NP programme February, ,Vienna.
Staffing and training. Objectives To understand approaches to the development of strategies and policies for staffing of a Regulatory Authority including.
IAEA 1 - Issuing regulations a, b The regulators of transport in Republic of Belarus are Department of supervision for the safe industrial activities and.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA Safety Standards for Research Reactors W. Kennedy Research Reactor Safety Section Division of Nuclear Installation.
4rd Meeting of the Steering Committee on Competence of Human Resources for Regulatory Bodies Vienna, 4-7 December 2012 Current Status of the Human Resources.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline LEARNING OBJECTIVES REVIEW TEAM AMD COUNTERPARTS Team Composition Qualification PREPARATORY PHASE.
Current Status of the National Nuclear Infrastructure and Human Resources Development in the Republic of Belarus TM/WS on Topical Issues on Infrastructure.
Swedish IRRS mission 6-17 Feb 2012 Ongoing work after the IRRS mission Elisabeth Öhlén, Ingemar Lund, Lars Skånberg.
International Atomic Energy Agency Meeting Summary Technical meeting of the International Project on Demonstration of Operational and Long-Term Safety.
Market Surveillance in the Republic of Moldova Bratislava 2007 Maria Bizgu, MoldovaStandard Market Surveillance in the Republic of Moldova Bratislava.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency TM/WS TOPICAL ISSUES ON INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT: MANAGING THE DEVELOPMENT OF NATIONAL INFRASTRUCTURE FOR NUCLEAR.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Burkina Faso Delwendé NABAYAOGO RAF9038 Final Coordination Meeting Arusha, Tanzania 2 – 5 December 2013.
Early public participation In Decision-Making Process Nana Aghlemashvili Chief Specialist of the Legal Department.
Leading State Inspector Ivan Rovkach Department of Nuclear and Radiation Safety Ministry of Emergency Situations of the Republic of Belarus(GOSATOMNADZOR)
By Annick Carnino (former Director of IAEA Division of Nuclear Installations Safety) PIME, February , 2012.
Safety Management Systems Session Four Safety Promotion APTA Webinar June 9, 2016.
(3.6) General requirements on resources for the establishment of IMS
Competence of Human Resources for Iran Nuclear Regulatory Authority
Nuclear and Treaty Law Section Office of Legal Affairs
WP 3 How to assess implementation of ALARA
Office of Legal Affairs
Serbian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency
SESSION 3 Policy Framework
Radiation & Nuclear Safety and Security Aspects in Lao PDR
Nuclear and Treaty Law Section Office of Legal Affairs
Republican Unitary Enterprise “Belarusian Nuclear Power Plant”
ETPRES MISSION Conducted: in Jakarta, June 2012
Establishing the Infrastructure for Radiation Safety Preparatory Actions and Initial Regulatory Activities.
Training Courses for RPOs
Armenia Training and Tutoring Feedback
RCF Plenary Session 21 September 2018
USNRC IRRS TRAINING Lecture18
Legal and Regulatory Framework for Nuclear Installations in IRAN
THE INSPECTION SYSTEM AND THE SCHOOL EXTERNAL EVALUATION
Radioactive materials and associated facilities
IAEA RER/9/141: Improving National Infrastructure for Safety   Regional Workshop on Regulatory Enforcement and Inspection Vilnius, Lithuania 11 September.
Presentation transcript:

WG3 Leader: Michelle Bush International Working Forum for Regulatory Supervision of Legacy Sites (RSLS) – Technical Meeting October 2013

Overview Professional development of regulators Focus on training and development for inspectors of legacy sites Distribution of questionnaire to MS Q2/2013 Original objective to use the responses to contribute to the development of a training programme to further train inspectors

Activities Three technical meetings Drafting and continued development of questionnaire Distribution of questionnaire in early 2012 Returned surveys received in last 12 months Analysis of results at 2012 TM Contribution to drafting TECDOC

Questionnaire Provided context and information on RSLS Instructions for completing the questionnaire Important to acknowledge limitations of questionnaires THANK YOU to MS who provided a response

Discussion of results Question 1 In your opinion, what are the most important skills that an inspector of legacy sites should have? Please include technical and non-technical skills in your response

Analysis of results Technical: Basic radiation protection principles Use of monitoring equipment in the field, particularly related to radiation Safety awareness and risk assessment Knowledge of regulatory framework and associated legislation (regulatory fundamentals specific to country / province)

Q1 continued Non technical: Verbal communication skills, including negotiation Written communication skills, including accuracy and attention to detail Critical thinking, decision making, problem solving Good personal character Observation skills

Question 2 In your country, is there an Agency, Ministry of Department with responsibility for legacy sites from the nuclear fuel cycle (including uranium production cycle)?

Question 3 Does your Agency have standard skills or qualifications that legacy site inspectors are required to have?

Question 4 In your Agency, what are the skills or qualifications that inspectors of operating sites (for example, uranium mining and milling sites, storage and disposal sites and facilities) are required to have? Please detail.

Question 5 What training programs does your Agency provide or offer to staff responsible for inspecting operating or legacy sites? Please list and indicate if each is optional or compulsory

Analysis of results Diversity / cultural training Site specific training (i.e. specific to a mine, former test site, NPP, etc) Health and safety training Radiation protection and nuclear safety Environmental laws, and regulations generally Risk assessment Use of equipment, such as handheld GPS’

Question 6 For the training programs listed in Q5, please provide information on how each of these training programs are delivered. For example: online learning, external contractors, internal providers, on-the-job.

Analysis of results Mode of DeliveryNumber of responses Internal courses7 External contractors10 On-the-job training9 Online learning3

Question 7 Do any of the training programs listed in Q5 include training on radiological risk assessment for sites (legacy or operating)?

Question 8 & 9 Do attendees of any of the training programs listed in Q5 receive any kind of accredited certification or acknowledgement of course completion? Do any of the training programs details include formalised assessment?

Question 10 Are site inspectors (for legacy or operating sites) required to re-train in skills or qualifications after a period of time?

Question 11 What area of skills or qualifications would you like to see improved for inspectors of legacy sites operating in your Agency / country?

Analysis of results Use of field and monitoring equipment Communication and conflict resolution Site characterization Safety awareness

Discussion Points Limited skills of inspectors can be a barrier to effective supervision of legacy sites Information from questionnaires highlights skills that are needed, important, lacking

Discussion Points Limitations of on-the-job training Often this is the only option! Loss of historical legacy site knowledge and information No recognized qualification from informal learning

Discussion Points Importance of drawing together the most relevant and appropriately skilled team of inspectors Establishing a feedback loop with regulatory body to incorporate findings from inspections of legacy sites into future management programmes and decision making

Discussion Points TECDOC to include recommendations for MS regarding training for inspectors of legacy sites Information from WG3 activities can support training program

WG3 NEEDS YOU! Thank you