Education in a Global Context February 28, 2008 William H. Schmidt University Distinguished Professor Michigan State University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CCSS Mathematics Instructional Shifts 2 nd Grade Overview.
Advertisements

PA School Performance Profile 1 WHITEHALL-COPLAY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
SCIENCE. Science For current grade 9 students Grade 10 Science (Apply or Academic) is a mandatory course Taking multiple science courses in a year is.
January 22, /25/ STAAR: A New Assessment Model STAAR is a clearly articulated assessment program. Assessments are vertically aligned within.
Current legislation requires the phase-out of high school TAKS and replaces it with 12 EOC assessments in  English I, English II, English III  Algebra.
State Accountability Overview 2014 Strozeski – best guess.
Legislative Update #1 Changes in Assessment and Graduation 83 rd Texas Legislature.
© 2003 Michigan State University The Level Playing Field: An American Myth William H. Schmidt Michigan State University October 8, 2003 Archived Information.
Advanced Academics Program Options for Middle School and Beyond.
Rutland High School Technical Review Visit Looking At Results Planning Next Steps Learning About Resources.
Context for El Paso’s K-16 Partnership K-12 Enrollment in twelve El Paso area school districts:167,269 Ethnic breakdown of student enrollment: Hispanic:88.1%
State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness.
San Marino Unified School District World Class Schools Academic Accountability Measures.
Promoting Rigorous Outcomes in Mathematics and Science Education PROM/SE Ohio Spring Mathematics Associate Institute April 27, 2005.
OVERVIEW OF STATE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM June 2010 Texas Education Agency Student Assessment Division 1.
Let’s Get to the Core Presenter Info: Ron Jetty, Director, PK 16 Initiatives University of Wisconsin System.
Philomath School District Board of Directors Work Session May 10, 2012.
Barb Calton and Jeremy Conn Goshen High School. Why Prepare Kids for the ACT?
APS Common Core State Standards: Turning Dreams into Reality for All Kids! Linda Sink, APS Chief Academic Officer January 19, 2012 MC 2 Leadership Conference.
Update on the State Testing Program November 14, 2011.
Results of the 2009 NAEP High School Transcript Study America’s High School Graduates Jack Buckley Commissioner National Center for Education Statistics.
Florida Department of Education Bureau of School Improvement Office of Curriculum Support.
Looking Beneath the Surface What we can learn from the Minnesota TIMSS Science Results William H. Schmidt Michigan State University.
P-20: New Day, New Way Deborah Lowe Vandell Chancellor’s CEO Roundtable Thursday, February 7, 2008 Deborah Lowe Vandell Chancellor’s CEO Roundtable Thursday,
© 2006 Michigan State University, Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education Content Standards in an International Context William H. Schmidt.
Common Core State Standards: The Shifts and their Implications Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
RESULTS FOR ELEMENTARY AND MIDDLE SCHOOLS 2013 Statewide Test Data.
Office of Mathematics and Science Office of Professional Development Step Up to High School Easing the Transition into High School UMLN June 2005 Meeting.
State law and the federal Elementary and Secondary Education Act require Report Cards for every local school, every school district and for the state.
1 Community Accountability Summit April History of Accountability Changes.
Analyses of West Virginia Mathematics and Science Curricular Objectives in effect July 2008 William H. Schmidt University Distinguished Professor Michigan.
Pennsylvania’s Keystone Exams: A Change to Graduation Requirements.
November 2006 Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education 1 Where are We? Where do we want to be?
Achievethecore.org 1 Setting the Context for the Common Core State Standards Sandra Alberti Student Achievement Partners.
Integrating Success The Transition of All Students From High School to College November 2007 Iowa Educational Research & Evaluation Association Annual.
Southern Regional Education Board HSTW Measuring High School Students’ College and Career Readiness Race to the Top Assessment Public Meeting United States.
Systems of Support for Urban High Schools. Key Role of Large Urban Districts There are approximately 17,000 school districts in the US Approximately 66.
THE 2005 NAEP HIGH SCHOOL TRANSCRIPT STUDY. THE 2005 HIGH SCHOOL TRANSCRIPT STUDY Today ’ s Presentations.
Issues in High School Mathematics Oregon Summer Institute August, 2006 William H. Schmidt Michigan State University.
School Report Card A Focus on Academic Performance West Hempstead UFSD Board of Education Presentation June 18, 2013.
Why Implementation Requires Change William Schmidt University Distinguished Professor Michigan State University.
Content and School Effectiveness: Role and Impact December 12, 2006 William H. Schmidt Michigan State University.
Science Education in the United States: An International Perspective Oregon Summer Institute August 2006 William H. Schmidt Michigan State University.
Brad McMillen and Sonya Stephens Data and Accountability September 19, 2013.
Senate Bill 4, RTTT, and Common Core State Standards AMM 2010 St. Petersburg, FL September 2010.
The Road to College: Rigor, Readiness, and Relationships.
2012 Parent Engagement Summit. Common Core State Standards in Mathematics.
Context for El Paso’s K-16 Partnership K-12 Enrollment in twelve El Paso area school districts:170,692 Ethnic breakdown of student enrollment: Hispanic:88.2%
Raising the Bar: Common Core State Standards Idaho State Department of Education
DSHS IMPROVING COLLEGE READINESS. COLLEGE READINESS ACROSS THE NATION Source: ACT, 2010, The Condition of College and Career Readiness : National.
SAT, End of Course, SAT, End of Course, & Advanced Placement RESULTS2014 October 14, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson, Superintendent Dr. Kevin O’Gorman, Associate.
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability System What to Expect for the First Release of Data.
ACADEMIC RIGOR LEAD 615 – Group Presentation Marcelle Fung, Erin Gehant, Bruce Guttman, Kathryn Stanley, Keisha Warner
Bridgewater-Raritan Regional School District Program Evaluations A summary of recommendations from the completed program evaluations March 6, 2009.
Readable Science Textbooks: An International Perspective Oregon Summer Institute August 2006 William H. Schmidt Michigan State University.
© 2005 MSU PROM/SE Promoting Rigorous Outcomes in Mathematics and Science Education, Supported by NSF Cooperative Agreement EHR International Comparative.
State Testing Program Update Sharon Nobis CHHS Assistant Principal Grapevine-Colleyville ISD November 7, 2011.
Understanding the Common Core Standards Adopted by Nevada in 2010 Our State. Our Students. Our Success.
Requirements for graduation Prequalified Admissions Kansas State Scholars.
Casimir Middle School TUSD Transition to the Common Core.
Learning and Accountability College- and Career- Ready Standards A Balanced Assessment System A New School Accountability Model.
Geometry & Algebra 2. Currently Geometry:  Regular Geometry and Geometry Support Classes are offered. Algebra 2:  Core Algebra 2 and Regular Algebra.
Index 4/5 ESC Region Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness emphasizes the role of elementary and middle schools in preparing.
Milestones Results August 2016 Bibb County School District P-1.
Common Core State Standards: Myths vs. Facts
OVERVIEW OF STATE ASSESSMENT PROGRAM June 2010
Science Education in the United States: An International Perspective Oregon Summer Institute August 2006 William H. Schmidt Michigan State University.
Muncy School District November 9, 2015
An Introduction to AVID:
Education in a Global Context April 24, 2008 William H
Presentation transcript:

Education in a Global Context February 28, 2008 William H. Schmidt University Distinguished Professor Michigan State University

© 2008 Michigan State University, Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education Elementary Students’ Performance on a Fractions Problem

© 2008 Michigan State University, Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education Elementary & Middle School Students’ Performance on a Fractions Problem

© 2008 Michigan State University, Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education Middle School Students’ Performance on an Algebra Problem

© 2008 Michigan State University, Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education Instructional Content Constructs  Curricular Coherence Curricular Structure  Curricular Focus Exposure Time (OTL)  Curricular Rigor Level of Cognitive Complexity

© 2008 Michigan State University, Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education Top Achieving Countries’ Mathematics Curriculum

© 2008 Michigan State University, Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education 21 U.S. States’ Mathematics Curriculum

© 2008 Michigan State University, Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education High School Students’ Performance on a Functions Problem

© 2008 Michigan State University, Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education High School Students’ Performance on a Mathematics Literacy Problem

© 2008 Michigan State University, Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education Level of First Mathematics Course in High School

© 2008 Michigan State University, Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education Percent of Students Taking Algebra I for the First Time

© 2008 Michigan State University, Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education Amount of Mathematics Across Grades 7-12

© 2008 Michigan State University, Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education Number of Mathematics Courses Offered in 19 Districts

© 2008 Michigan State University, Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education Number of Course Patterns for Meeting High School Mathematics Requirement in 19 Districts

© 2008 Michigan State University, Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education Diagram of Mathematics Course-Taking Sequences in District F

© 2008 Michigan State University, Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education One course in each: Mathematics, Biology, Chemistry, Physics Algebra II/Biology/Chemistry/Physics Less than 30 % of ALL Students Less than 5 % of Voc/Tech Students About 15 % of General Academic Students About 40 % of College Preparatory Students Minimal Standards?

© 2008 Michigan State University, Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education Minimal Standards? One course in each: Mathematics, Biology, Chemistry, Physics Algebra II/Biology/Chemistry/Physics Less than 20 % of ALL Black Students Less than 5 % of Black Voc/Tech Students About 11 % of Black General Academic Students About 32 % of Black College Preparatory Students

© 2008 Michigan State University, Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education Teachers Coverage of Mathematics Topics in Two Types of Schools

© 2008 Michigan State University, Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education Mean Level Performance on the Mathematics Knowledge Scale Scores Across the Six Countries

© 2008 Michigan State University, Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education Mean Percent of the Topics Covered in the Preparation Program in Each Country

© 2008 Michigan State University, Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education Percent of First Year College Students in 2-year and 4-year Institutions Requiring Remediation

© 2008 Michigan State University, Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education Those who require remediation in college often fail to earn a degree

© 2008 Michigan State University, Center for Research in Mathematics and Science Education Many High School Graduates Report Gaps in Their Preparation