Teaching and Learning Mathematics How did we get to where we are?

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THE PROS AND CONS OF NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND
Advertisements

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No High-Stake State Mathematics Assessment: CRs and BCRs…The.
IDEA and NCLB The Connection Elizabeth Burmaster, State Superintendent Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction December 2003.
No Child Left Behind Act © No Child Left Behind Act ©Kristina Krampe, 2005 EDS 513: Legal Issues in Special Education.
No Child Left Behind Act January 2002 Revision of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Education is a state and local responsibility Insure.
NCLB Basics From “What Parents of Students with Disabilities Need to Know & Do” National Center on Educational Outcomes University of Minnesota
Southern Regional Education Board ALPHABET SOUP Using HSTW to Meet the Goals of NCLB Scott Warren Director of Contracted Services High Schools That Work.
Coal City Unit District #1 Title I Parent Meeting.
EDU 221.  Group Presentation Reflections due for 7 & 8  Quiz #2 (Tuesday, Nov. 16 th ) – Problem- based ◦ What makes an outstanding response? Referring.
What You Should Know About the State’s Two Year Old Accountability System.
FALL 2011 MATHEMATICS SOL INSTITUTES Mr. Michael Bolling, Mathematics Coordinator Dr. Deborah Wickham, Elementary Mathematics Specialist.
Principles to Actions: Ensuring Mathematical Success
N O C HILD L EFT B EHIND Testing Requirements of NCLB test annually in reading and mathematics in grades 3-8 test at least once in reading and mathematics.
Chapter 4 Changes Graduation Requirements Keystone Exams Upper Merion Area School District Presentation by Jane Callaghan 6/21/10.
CI 754X FALL 2000Mara Alagic Mathematics: Everyone’s future Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (short overview)
Robert L. Linn CRESST, University of Colorado at Boulder Paper presented at a symposium sponsored by the National Association of Test Directors entitled.
Developing Understandings ESE 426 Fall What Is Learning? Please work in groups of three to define “learning” from your own words. Write your responses.
Connecting Research to Actions Jennifer L. Curtis, Ed.D. K-12 Section Chief Mathematics Principal READY 2014.
Gary W. Phillips Vice President and Chief Scientist American Institutes for Research August 3, 2015.
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
School Mathematics in a Changing World CHAPTER 1 Tina Rye Sloan To accompany Helping Children Learn Math9e, Reys et al. ©2009 John Wiley & Sons.
The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) Principles and Standards for School Mathematics Dr. Robinson, EEX 4251, Spring 2008.
Pennsylvania Department of Education Initiatives Updates May 24, 2012.
The Complexity of Early Mathematics Education Jeanine Brownell Jennifer McCray.
TECHNOLOGY WITH MATHEMATICS AND SCIENCE BY: BRITTANY OWENS & NATHAN JACKSON.
High Stakes Testing EDU 330: Educational Psychology Daniel Moos.
NCTM Overview The Principles and Standards for Teaching Mathematics.
High School Mathematics: Where Are We Headed? W. Gary Martin Auburn University.
Mathematics Indicators and Goals. Math Tier II Indicator Indicator 1.8: All junior high students will meet or exceed standards and be identified as proficient.
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
1. 2 To have the student learn: The history of the development of the Principles and Standards; the vision of the NCTM; Principles; and the Standards.
Matthew C. Robinson, Summer B 2006
Assessment in Early Childhood Legislation. Legislation for Young Children The need for measurement strategies and tests to evaluate federal programs led.
Math Standards  NCTM  Common Core State Standards for Math (CCSSM)  Needs of Diverse Learners.
Chapter 4 Changes Graduation Requirements and Keystone Exams Upper Merion Area School District Presentation by Jane Callaghan 3/15/2011.
Teaching and Learning Mathematics How did we get to where we are?
High Stakes Testing Using Citywide Tests to Measure Student Learning High Stakes Testing Using Citywide Tests to Measure Student Learning P. Lewis P.S.
Pennsylvania’s Keystone Exams: A Change to Graduation Requirements.
Bob Mattila.  No Child Left Behind (NCLB) is an act that was passed in 2002 with the goal of - "An act to close the achievement gap with accountability,
Research Proven Strategies in Mathematics An Access Center Presentation to the Information Sharing Communities A Presentation given by Tina Diamond At.
Park County School District #6 MAP and PAWS DATA REPORT FOR
Overview of the Title I Program at [school name] Presenter Date Location.
November 2006 Copyright © 2006 Mississippi Department of Education 1 Where are We? Where do we want to be?
CHAPTER 1 Teaching Mathematics in the 21st Century
Standards in Mathematics EDN 322. Standards in Mathematics What do you think about when you hear the term “standards?” What do you think about when you.
The Do’s and Don’ts of High-Stakes Student Achievement Testing Andrew Porter Vanderbilt University August 2006.
Mathematics and Science Partnerships Program Improving Math and Science Achievement in Low-Performing, High-Poverty Schools: Implications for Professional.
High-Stake State Mathematics Assessment: CRs and BCRs…The Secrets Revealed Beth Schefelker, Teaching Specialist Milwaukee Public Schools
High School Mathematics Real World of the Teacher  Introductions  Teaching as a Profession  Standards  Accountability.
On the horizon: State Accountability Systems U.S. Department of Education Office of Elementary and Secondary Education October 2002 Archived Information.
Federal and State Student Accountability Data Update Testing Coordinators Meeting Local District 8 09/29/09 1.
University of Colorado at Boulder National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing Challenges for States and Schools in the No.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
Neo-Conservative Ideas Berliner and Biddle ( ) Neo-conservative “centrist” thought won out in school reform. Main approaches to school reform: Get.
Core Common Assessment at the Elementary Math Level and Critical Thinking Skills Ximena D. Burgin, Ed.D. Brent E. Wholeben, Ph.D. Office of Research, Evaluation.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
CHAPTER 1 Teaching Mathematics in the 21 st Century.
Granby Public Schools Annual Continuous Progress Review Presented by Diane Dugas Director of Curriculum September CMT Review.
Introduction to Math Methods Math Standards. Why can math be fun? Math can be fun because… it can have so much variety in topics. many different ways.
1. 2 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) Survey of academic achievement for the nation and the states Assesses various subjects at grades.
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools
Math Standards Math 120—Algorithms for Arithmetic
NECAP PRESENTATION.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION
Math Standards Math 120—Algorithms for Arithmetic
NCLB “No Child Left Behind”.
PHILLIPS PREPARATORY SCHOOL
AYP and Report Card.
Influence of other countries’ Mathematics Curriculum on Malaysian Mathematics Curriculum Wk 6.
History of No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Presentation transcript:

Teaching and Learning Mathematics How did we get to where we are?

Sputnik Led to the Woods Hole Conference Led to the Woods Hole Conference Chaired by Jerome Bruner Chaired by Jerome Bruner Sooner is Better!! Clashed with Piaget

History after Woods Hole 1960 – Meaningful Math (New Math) 1960 – Meaningful Math (New Math) Not only do we need to know math, we need to be fluent math theorists! 1980 – Back to the Basics 1980 – Back to the Basics Test scores have fallen, it’s a direct result of a lack of understanding the basics

History continued 1989 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) Standards 1989 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM) Standards Teaching, Curriculum, Assessment Adopted Constructivism Adopted Constructivism 1. reasoning, 2. problem solving, 3. communication, 4. representation

The Time Line of Mathematics Instruction |________|________|________|_______|_____|________> Drill & practice, Meaningful New Constructivism learning assoc- math math, iations Spiral Curriculum Curriculum

Timss — Trends in International Math and Science Study 13-year-olds from the U.S. are scoring substantially lower in mathematics than students from Korea, Ireland, Spain, and the United Kingdom 13-year-olds from the U.S. are scoring substantially lower in mathematics than students from Korea, Ireland, Spain, and the United Kingdom second International Assessment of Education Progress -1991, U.S. Students were outperformed by Korean, Swiss, and Taiwanese students in every area of mathematics second International Assessment of Education Progress -1991, U.S. Students were outperformed by Korean, Swiss, and Taiwanese students in every area of mathematics

TIMMS continued U.S. students are outperformed by French and Hungarian students in four out of five areas tested. U.S. students are outperformed by French and Hungarian students in four out of five areas tested. 13-year-old American students outperformed only Luxembourg, Nigeria, and Swaziland 13-year-old American students outperformed only Luxembourg, Nigeria, and Swaziland 2006 data – no change 2006 data – no change

NAEP – National Assessment of Education Progress – Since in 5 4th and 8th Graders is proficient in mathematics 1 in 5 4th and 8th Graders is proficient in mathematics 1/3 of 4th graders are below basic (lowest level) 1/3 of 4th graders are below basic (lowest level) 1% of 8th graders were proficient in Algebra, Geometry and basic functions 1% of 8th graders were proficient in Algebra, Geometry and basic functions

No Child Left Behind –1) to institute high academic standards for all students, and –2) to insure that there are 'highly qualified' teachers in every U.S. classroom

NCLB cont. Content Standards. Content Standards. Annual Testing. Ninety-five percent of all students in grades 3 – 8 must undergo annual testing in mathematics and reading. Annual Testing. Ninety-five percent of all students in grades 3 – 8 must undergo annual testing in mathematics and reading.

NCLB cont. Every Child’s Test Score. NCLB requires that every student be tested (only very minor exceptions exist for severe mentally or physically handicapped students) and that every child reach proficiency by (if subgroup fails, the whole school fails) Every Child’s Test Score. NCLB requires that every student be tested (only very minor exceptions exist for severe mentally or physically handicapped students) and that every child reach proficiency by (if subgroup fails, the whole school fails)

NCLB cont. Sanctions. By 2014 every American student who is tested (100%) must demonstrate Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) in reading and mathematics After five years of inadequate test score gains, a school falls into the “reconstitution” category. Such a fate results in dismissing the school’s teachers and administration and closing the school. Sanctions. By 2014 every American student who is tested (100%) must demonstrate Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) in reading and mathematics After five years of inadequate test score gains, a school falls into the “reconstitution” category. Such a fate results in dismissing the school’s teachers and administration and closing the school.

NCLB cont. Highly Qualified Teachers Highly Qualified Teachers Licensed in the area they teach Understand the content Gifted teachers

What do we need to do in order to compete in math internationally? Look at mathematics differently Look at mathematics differently Teach it Differently Teach it Differently Require students to solve problems to learn algorithms Require students to solve problems to learn algorithms Focus on Problem solving not mechanics Focus on Problem solving not mechanics

NCTM 2000 Six Features of the New Standards Equity – high expectations for all students to study and learn mathematics 2. Curriculum – coherent, well-organized learning that integrates mathematics ideas 3. Teaching – understanding what students know and need to learn and using effective pedagogical strategies

4. Learning – actively building conceptual understanding and proficiency 5. Assessment – ongoing and routine enhancement of student learning and teacher instruction 6. Technology – normal and expected support for effective mathematics teaching and learning