FEBRUARY 17, 2014 PVAAS-Teacher Specific Data and Roster Verification.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Educator Effectiveness System November 5, Agenda – Town Hall Meeting Community Builder/Video (OPTIONAL) Today, we will be presenting an overview.
Advertisements

SY PIMS/Educator Effectiveness/PVAAS Teacher Specific Reporting Mini PPT for LEA Admin Use Provided by: PVAAS Statewide Team.
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa.us Measuring Educator Effectiveness Educator Effectiveness.
PAIU CC Meeting – February 2015 Kristen Lewald, Ed.D PVAAS Statewide Director for PDE
IU29 Data Quality Council Meeting February 24, 2015.
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Lynda Lupp Richard Maraschiello Amy Morton Adam Schott John Weiss.
February 11, Big Picture: How Does It All Connect? It’s critical that we prepare all students to graduate high school with the potential to continue.
Based on Survey Feedback from LEAs Examples:  Copy Rosters for a Teacher: ◦ Able to copy over a teacher’s entire roster to another subject area  Update.
PVAAS TEACHER SPECIFIC REPORTING TIMELINE AND INTENT PVAAS Pilot Roster Verification and Teacher Reporting.
PIMS Collection for PVAAS Roster Verification Spring 2105: Staff-Student-Subtest Collection Brian Truesdale, Educator Effectiveness Data Analyst Kristen.
Pennsylvania Value-Added Assessment System Overview: PVAAS
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa.us Measuring Educator Effectiveness June 26,
State of the District Performance and Curriculum November 17, 2014.
SLO Process A process to document a measure of educator effectiveness based on student achievement of content standards.
Overview for Teachers. Session Objectives I.Review Teacher Effectiveness System II.Define SLO process III.Exploring SLO Templates -Assessment Literacy-
Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) Upper Perkiomen School District August 2013.
PVAAS + Other Data Consultation 2013 PVAAS AND OTHER DATA TOOLS SCHOOL CONSULTATION FALL 2013.
PAIU CC Meeting PVAAS Update November 2014 Kristen Lewald, Ed.D. Statewide PVAAS Director for PDE Lancaster-Lebanon IU13.
Performance Diagnostic Report PVAAS Overview 2013 Blue Bar – Current Year Missing Bar – Insufficient Number of Students Whisker – Margin of Error on Growth.
Understanding the Pennsylvania School Performance Profile Introduction.
Measuring Principal Effectiveness Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education Measuring Principal.
Accountability Assessment Parents & Community Preparing College, Career, & Culturally Ready Graduates Standards Support 1.
PENNSYLVANIA’S EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS SYSTEM Dr. John White, Director of SAS EVAAS, presenting on behalf of Dr. Kristen Lewald, PVAAS Statewide Director.
[Presentation by] [Date] [INSERT DISTRICT LOGO]. Table of Contents Big Picture: How Does It All Connect? Keystone Exams: The 33% Option Keystone Exams:
PA School Performance Profile January 13, 2013 Superintendent Advisory Council 1.
School Performance Profile and PVAAS.  Federal accountability and PA law dictate that school effectiveness must be measured looking at multiple.
Measuring Principal Effectiveness Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education Correlation Data.
Measuring Principal Effectiveness Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education CIU 20 Principal.
Effectively Communicate PVAAS with your Board and Community Pennsylvania Value-Added Assessment System (PVAAS): Effectively Communicate PVAAS with your.
PVAAS Update March, 2014 IU 5 Curriculum Directors.
Provided by: PVAAS Statewide Team for PDE SY PIMS/Educator Effectiveness/PVAAS Teacher Specific Reporting Mini PPT for LEA Admin.
Non-Teaching Professionals’ Effectiveness Dr. Patricia DiRienzo October 1, 2014.
Supporting Students with IEPs: They CAN and ARE Making Progress! January 2013 Jennifer Ross, PVAAS Statewide Team for PDE Bonnie Dyer, AIU3 Curriculum.
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Ronald Tomalis, Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa.us Measuring Educator Effectiveness December 2012 revision 1.
Pennsylvania Value-Added Assessment System (PVAAS) Updates to Curriculum Directors September 2013.
PVAAS Updates to CIU # 10 Curriculum Coordinators March 2013 Bobbie W. Pfingstler, Ed.D. Central Intermediate Unit # 10.
Ready, Set, Grow! PVAAS Teacher Specific Reporting
PA School Performance Profile June /3/13. Your Role: Communicate the purpose and design of the proposed PA School Performance Profile (SPP) Create.
CHANGES IN FEDERAL ACCOUNTABILITY FOR SCHOOLS BEGINNING IN
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Ronald Tomalis, Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa.us Measuring Educator Effectiveness December 2012 revision 1.
TEAM Coordinating Committee Training (TCC).  Introductions  Mission of the TEAM Program  Design of the TEAM Program  Overview of the Module Process.
Teacher Effectiveness Who begins in ? Teaching Specialists Special Education Teachers English as a Second Language Teachers Gifted Teachers.
Testing Landscape: PSSA, Keystone Exams, Project- Based Assessment and Classroom Diagnostic Tools December 9, 2013.
Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Educationwww.education.state.pa.us Measuring Educator Effectiveness Educator Effectiveness:
Learning More About PVAAS Teacher Specific Reporting PVAAS Statewide Team for PDE January 2014 Webinars.
Act 82 Boot Camp Day 1 July 29 th, 2015 Angela Kirby-Wehr, Educator Effectiveness.
EVAAS Roster Verification Responsibilities at a Glance Clover School District 2.
Pennsylvania Value-Added Assessment System Pennsylvania Value-Added Assessment System (PVAAS) Update to PAIU CC December 11, 2013 PVAAS Statewide Team.
PVAAS Updates to PAIU Curriculum Coordinators February 2013 Kristen Lewald, Ed.D. PVAAS Statewide Director for PDE Lancaster-Lebanon IU13
Mohawk Jr-Sr High School PSSA/PVAAS Act 82 – New Teacher Evaluation Law Beginning in the school year, fifty percent (50%) of the evaluation.
November 2015 PVAAS Update PVAAS Statewide Team for PDE
Measuring Principal Effectiveness Tom Corbett, Governor ▪ Carolyn C. Dumaresq, Acting Secretary of Education Measuring Principal.
PVAAS Teacher Specific Reporting: Professional Growth, Not Gotcha! 1 PVAAS Statewide Team for PDE November/December 2014 Half-Day Sessions.
WHY? To transform teaching and learning.. Strategic Pillars Goal 1: Student Growth and High Academic Achievement – Develop and implement a comprehensive.
Boyertown Area School District Data Summary
March 31, Provide an overview of the newly implemented school rating system (School Performance Profile) Provide an overview of the newly implemented.
Educator Effectiveness Digging into Domain 4. Educator Effectiveness in PA  PDE has been working since 2010 to develop an educator effectiveness model.
Pennsylvania’s Educator Effectiveness System: PVAAS Teacher Reporting
Provided by: PVAAS Statewide Team for PDE
Professional Learning – October 12, 2015
SLO Scoring and Updates
Educator Effectiveness
Overview for School Leaders
Changes to the Educator Evaluation System
Making Sense of SLOs Overview
PVAAS Update PAIU Curriculum Coordinators Meeting
PVSD PDE School Performance Profile
Muncy School District November 9, 2015
WEBINAR TITLE SAS Review DATE and TIME December 20, 9:30-10:30 am
Presentation transcript:

FEBRUARY 17, 2014 PVAAS-Teacher Specific Data and Roster Verification

Agenda Topic Welcome /Housekeeping/Use of Mobi Device/Goals What is PVAAS, the growth concept and how does this connect to Educator Effectiveness? What does the PVAAS site look like? What kinds of reports will teachers see? What does percentage of Instructional Responsibility mean? What is the state and district timeline for implementation? Feedback survey using Mobi devices Resources/Adjourn

Which do you say, Pop or Soda? Press ‘A’ for Pop Press ‘B’ for Soda Press ‘C’ for I use a different word.

Do you prefer fries or onion rings? Press ‘A’ for Fries Press ‘B’ for Onion Rings Press ’C’ for I never eat either

Goals 1) Build awareness of the PVAAS growth concept and how it connects to Educator Effectiveness 2) View the PVAAS demo site and learn how to access the system 3) Explore the percentage of Instructional Responsibility and its meaning 4) Review the state and district timeline for implementation 5) Provide resources and collect teacher feedback

Teacher Effectiveness System in Act 82 of 2012 Teacher Observation & Practice Effective School Year Danielson Framework Domains 1.Planning and Preparation 2. Classroom Environment 3. Instruction 4. Professional Responsibilities Building Level Data/School Performance Profile Effective School Year Indicators of Academic Achievement Indicators of Closing the Achievement Gap, All Students Indicators of Closing the Achievement Gap, Subgroups Academic Growth PVAAS Other Academic Indicators Credit for Advanced Achievement Teacher Specific Data PVAAS/Growth 3 Year Rolling Average SY SY SY Elective Data/Student Learning Objective (SLO) Optional School Year Effective School Year District-Designed Measures and Examinations Nationally Recognized Standardized Tests Industry Certification Examinations Student Projects Pursuant to Local Requirements Student Portfolios Pursuant to Local Requirements Observation/ Practice 50% Building Level Data, 15% Teacher Specific Data, 15% Elective Data, 20%

Overall Important Information It is the Red Section of the Educator Effectiveness System – A teacher needs a 3 year rolling average before it counts for Educator Effectiveness PVAAS Teacher Specific Roster Verification begins this Spring It will impact teachers who plan, provide instruction for and assess: –PSSA reading and mathematics in grades 4-8; –PSSA science in grades 4 and 8; –PSSA writing in grades 5 and 8; –Keystone-related courses—Algebra I, Biology, Literature Instructional Responsibility is a new term. It is calculated by multiplying the (% Student + Teacher Enrollment) by (Full or Partial % of Instruction).

What is PVAAS teacher-specific reporting? PVAAS is a measure that indicates the academic growth of a teacher’s group of students PVAAS provides a measure of academic growth for students by taking into account both their endpoint and their entering achievement level By concentrating on growth, PVAAS puts the emphasis on what educators can influence For the first time in Pennsylvania teachers will have access to information regarding their influence on the academic progress of students

What is the purpose of PVAAS teacher- specific reporting? The purpose of PVAAS teacher-specific reporting is to: provide a teacher-specific growth measure to be used as part of Pennsylvania’s Educator Effectiveness System provide diagnostic feedback to teachers regarding their influence on the academic growth of students provide data for teachers and administrators to guide discussions about a teacher’s influence on the academic growth on groups of students

PVAAS teacher-specific reporting serves as one additional source of data to inform building-based decisions regarding: – differentiated instruction in the classroom; – tutoring students in need of extra support; – mentors for beginning teachers; – cooperating teachers assigned to work with student teachers; – members of school-wide planning committees; – curricular planning; and/or – professional development. How can PVAAS teacher-specific reporting enhance decision-making? Confidential Data As per Act 82, an employee's individual rating form shall not be subject to disclosure under the act of February 14, 2008 (P.L.6, No.3), known as the "Right-to-Know Law."

What will the teacher see when they receive their report? Demo Sites 1.Elementary: Akara.Martinez1 2.Middle: Meera.Fatehi1 3.High: Kamyl.Stoika1

PSSA Achievement vs. PVAAS Growth Measures students’ performance at a single point in time Highly correlated with students’ demographic background Measures students’ progress across time (i.e., across years and grade levels) Not related to demographic background when a student’s prior achievement is adequately accounted for; dependent on what happens as a result of schooling

Previous Year’s Group Grade 8 Most Recent Year’s Group Grade 8

Grade 3 Grade 4 Grade 5 Grade 6

Prior Achievement Teacher’s Group of Students Higher Achievement Lower Achievement Higher Achievement Lower Achievement Current Achievement Teacher’s Group of Students Concept of Measuring Growth- What do these growth colors mean?

What do we mean by “Green”? At least maintain the achievement level for a group of students – If a higher achieving group of students: to keep them high achieving – If an average achieving group of students: to keep them at least at that level – If a lower achieving group of students: to keep them at least at that level, and not lose ground as a group We may need to yield more growth if increased achievement is the goal.

Check-In 1)If another teacher asks me to explain how growth data is different than achievement data, I would : 1.Be very comfortable in responding 2.Need to consult my notes to respond 3.Need more information before responding 2)How likely are you to view the PVAAS website to view the Learning Modules and/or the Demo Site? 1.Very likely 2.Somewhat likely 3.Not very likely

What is PVAAS Roster Verification? Roster Verification is a way for teachers to VERIFY their students rosters – Are the right students linked to the right teachers for the right subject/grade/courses for the right proportion of instructional responsibility?

New Term: % Instructional Responsibility % Student + Teacher Enrollment Full or Partial % of Instruction This % is your total Instructional Responsibility for a student. This % reflects how much the student will be weighted in the PVAAS analyses. The % Instructional Responsibility is calculated by multiplying the (% Student + Teacher Enrollment) by (Full or Partial % of Instruction). % Instructional Responsibility

New Term: % Student + Teacher Enrollment 20 IS … The % of a grade/subject/course that a student and teacher are concurrently enrolled Total Days Possible: Day 1 through last school day before LEA testing window opens Default is 100% IS NOT… Attendance % Student + Teacher Enrollment

New Term: Full or Partial % of Instruction Of the time that the teacher and the student were concurrently enrolled in the grade/subject/course, – How much of the instruction (Domains 1 and 3) belongs with the teacher? – How much of the instruction (Domains 1 and 3) belongs with another teacher? Full or Partial % of Instruction

Calculating % Instructional Responsibility % Student + Teacher Enrollment Full or Partial % of Instruction What proportion of the grade/subject/course are the student and teacher concurrently enrolled? Of time student & teacher enrolled together, are you the only PA certified educator providing content-specific instruction (Domains 1 and 3) of the assessed eligible content in the grade/subject/course? % Instructional Responsibility

District Scenario #1 Teacher and Student 100% Ms. R is a 4 th grade reading, or math or science teacher. She started at the beginning of the year and continued through the end of the PSSA testing window. Jen, Debra, and Leslee are 4th grade regular education students, who started school at the beginning of the year, and continued through the PSSA testing window. Sample Student Name Sample Teacher Name Course/Inst. Area Student + Teacher Enrollment % of Student + Teacher Enrollment Full or Partial % of Instruction TotalRationale JenMs. RReading or math or science 123/123100% Responsible for Domain 1 & 3 and assessed eligible content DebraMs. RReading or math or science 123/123100% Responsible for Domain 1 & 3 and assessed eligible content LesleeMs. RReading or math or science 123/123100% Responsible for Domain 1 & 3 and assessed eligible content

District Scenario #2 Teacher/ Co-Teacher Ms. R is a 4 th grade reading, or math or science teacher. She started at the beginning of the year and continued through the end of the PSSA testing window. Ms. S is the Special Education teacher and started at the beginning of the year and continued through the end of the PSSA testing window. Jen is a 4th grade special education students who started school at the beginning of the year and continued through the PSSA testing window. Sample Student Name Sample Teacher Name Course/Inst. Area Student + Teacher Enrollment % of Student + Teacher Enrollment Full or Partial % of Instruction TotalRationale JenMs. RReading or math or science 123/123100%50% Responsible for Domain 1 & 3 and assessed eligible content JenMs. SReading or math or science 123/123100%50% Responsible for Domain 1 & 3 and assessed eligible content

Timeline—State Process Strongly Recommended School Pre-Step: Roster April 29- May 3 Teacher Verification May 6-17 Principal Verification May District Adm Verification June 3-7 SAS EVAAS Each window has a specific open and close date. Start verifying when your window opens to allow time for questions.

Goals 1) Build awareness of the PVAAS growth concept and how it connects to Educator Effectiveness 2) Review the types of PVAAS reports that teachers will see 3) Explore the percentage of Instructional Responsibility and its meaning 4) Review the state and district timeline for implementation 5) Provide resources and collect teacher feedback

PVAAS Demo Site and Resources Website: District Administrator User name: da.paurban Password: PADemo2012 PPID Password: PADemo2012 School Administrator User name: sa.beaver Password: PADemo2012 PPID Password: PADemo2012 Elementary Teacher User name: Akara.Martinez1 Password: PADemo2012 PPID 1804 Password: PADemo2012 Middle School Teacher User name: Meera.Fatehi1 Password: PADemo2012 PPID 3286 Password: PADemo2012 High School TeacherUser name: Kamyl.Stoika1 Password: PADemo2012 PPID 7652Password: PADemo2012 Erie School District Website Educator Effectiveness Project on PDE website Standard Aligned System (SAS) Portal Teacher Effectiveness Standard Aligned System (SAS) Portal Student Learning Objectives School Performance Profile