Continuous Improvement (CI) CI IS The Mission of the District Sitebase Committee.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Ed-D 420 Inclusion of Exceptional Learners. CAT time Learner-Centered - Learner-centered techniques focus on strategies and approaches to improve learning.
Advertisements

Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process
Vs. Attending a Different Training as a Site Team.
INSERVICE GOALS: Understand TEKS Understand the difference in difficulty between TAAS & the TAKS Recognize the TAKS critical thinking skills required in.
Data-Driven Program Evaluation In Data-ease Terms.
Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
Assessment Adapted from text Effective Teaching Methods Research-Based Practices by Gary D. Borich and How to Differentiate Instruction in Mixed Ability.
A Guide to Implementation
Using Assessment to Inform Instruction: Small Group Time
How Do We Know We Are Making Progress? Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Teacher Evaluation New Teacher Orientation August 15, 2013.
Response to Intervention (RtI)
Vernal Elliott, Principal Eastern Hills Elementary FWISD Fort Worth, TX Tyrone Olverson, Principal Waggoner Road Junior High School Reynoldsburg City.
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
Framework In the ELAR Classroom Curriculum Department.
WelcomeOPLC’s Reading Program and How it Works. OPLC Overview Balanced Reading Program – Reading Block – Whole Group Reading Assessments – Grouping Supports/Enrichment.
Domain 1: Planning and Preparation
Student Growth Developing Quality Growth Goals II
Cathy Mrla Jen Mahan-Deitte
1 Introduction to the Professional Teaching and Learning Cycle (PTLC)
Professional Development and Appraisal System
Dallas Baptist University College of Education Graduate Programs
What should be the basis of
performance INDICATORs performance APPRAISAL RUBRIC
Introduction to digiCOACH Empowering Instructional Leaders Common Core Edition.
Pearson Copyright Tier Reading Model 3/26/08.
English Language Arts Program Update Cambrian School District.
Literacy Achievement Plans Adams 12 Five Star Schools A Guide to Initiating, Implementing, and Managing LAPS Revised October 2010.
Linked Learning: Utilizing Data High School Teachers Council September 22, :00 A.M. to 11:00 A.M.
Chapter 6 Leading the Data Teams Process: Standards, Assessment, and Instruction.
CLASS Keys Orientation Douglas County School System August /17/20151.
Curriculum and Learning Omaha Public Schools
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
 In Cluster, all teachers will write a clear goal for their IGP (Reflective Journal) that is aligned to the cluster and school goal.
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
Invention Convention Seth Krivohlavek Angie Deck.
Parent Academy Topic: Support for All Learners 1.
Induction Professional Development September 27, 2012 Facilitated by Lisa Wolf, Julie Shaw, and Amber Martello POLISH YOUR STARS UTILIZING EFFECTIVE, EFFICIENT.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
EDU 385 CLASSROOM ASSESSMENT Week 1 Introduction and Syllabus.
Leap Into Literacy Centers By Leigh Ann Roderick And Buffalo Jones Staff.
Mt. Diablo Unified School District Elementary Mathematics Adoption Buy Back Day Thursday, August 27, 2009.
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
SETRC network guide for assessment of programs.  Assessing quality of district program and practice in areas of literacy  Determining priority need.
Literacy Centers In-Service January 3, 2007 Facilitator: Amy Lack, Reading Coach.
READING FIRST IN ACTION Knowing and Acting: A Practical 8-Week System to Improve Achievement By Betsy Eaves and Jessica Evans.
Northwest ISD Target Improvement Plan Seven Hills Elementary
Maine Department of Education Maine Reading First Course Session #1 Introduction to Reading First.
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
Developing Common Course Syllabi November 20, 2010 Heather Sass, Education Consultant Preview.
Course Enhancement Module on Evidence-Based Reading Instruction K-5 Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability, and Reform H325A
Interventions Identifying and Implementing. What is the purpose of providing interventions? To verify that the students difficulties are not due to a.
Using Data and Grouping to Teach All Students All the Time—Differently!
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
The 90 Minute Reading Block. What does research evidence tell us? Effective reading instruction requires: At least 90 uninterrupted minutes per day At.
New Lesson Plan Template 2012 Major Divisions of the Lesson Plan Objectives Assessment Methods Lesson Overview.
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Portfolio By: Fatima Henriquez. Balanced Literacy  Identify and explain the components of a balanced literacy program. Balanced Literacy is a framework.
By: Miss Michelle M. Brand Pine Grove Area Elementary School PSCA President-Elect.
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model Oakland Schools 3 Tier Literacy Leadership Team Training November
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
From the Diocese of Allentown Mission Statement
Rochester Community Schools Understanding Michigan’s 3rd Grade Reading Law Parent Presentation PA 306 of 2016 (HB 4822)
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Tier 1 Building a Strong Core.
Diagnosis and Remediation of Reading Difficulties
Rochester Community Schools Understanding Michigan’s 3rd Grade Reading Law Parent Presentation PA 306 of 2016 (HB 4822)
Presentation transcript:

Continuous Improvement (CI) CI IS The Mission of the District Sitebase Committee

Make Informed Decisions

Define Where You Are Define Where You Want to Be Describe How You Will Get There Implement Monitor, Ask Questions Evaluate, Ask Questions Adjust -cycling back through CI process Make Informed Decisions

Define Where You Are –Ask Questions, Collect Data Analyze all data sources and define current state of the program Data Sources: Every classroom assessment taken (benchmark, quiz, teacher observation, every campus assessment (TPRI, STAR, AR reports, ITBS, SOI, PASeries) every referral (discipline, 504, Dyslexia, IDEA), every item reported in PEIMS (at- risk, econ dis, AEP, JJAEP), longitudinal Studies (COMPASS), cohort Studies, surveys, parental communications.

Define Where You Want to Be Commissioners Percentages for each subject area, each student population Enhanced Goals: What level each student will be reading, ESL student performance, SAT & ACT scores, college enrollment, Commended Performance, UIL Performance, GT Performance, Achieve Texas enrollment Campus Goals Teacher Goals Student / Parent Goals

Describe How You Will Reach Your Goals Program Descriptions using critical attributes or criteria Who will do what? How often? Which Students? Timeline Materials Resources Strategies, Procedures, Guidelines, Flowcharts Formative Assessments that will drive Program Adjustments

Implement Program Make sure all participants understand how program will be activated How? Logistics? How often? Schedule? By whom? Who is responsible? With whom? What student group? How selected? What resources? Materials, Curriculum, Strategies, Guidelines? Until When? Exit Procedures? Documentation? Records? Data collected?

Monitor – What Will You Be Looking For? Can you Document that Critical Components of the Program ARE Being Implemented? What will you use as criteria? Example: 10 students with STAR IRL scores more than 2 grade levels below grade placement will: Use EYEQ software three times a week for 7 minutes a day to increase speed & comprehension. Be required to read 1 biographical, 1 novel, and 1 AR book of their choice during the six weeks. Be given explicit direct reading instruction every other day. After 6 weeks re-take the STAR test.

Critical Components Exposure to EYEQ software program (add who, when, where) Accountability for increasing their reading repertoire (add teacher defined reading lists) Explicit & Direct Reading Instruction at appropriate Grade Level (See Nat Inst for Lit. stions/questions_about.html ) stions/questions_about.html Assessment using a benchmark test (STAR and perhaps additional TAKS-like assessments)

CRITICAL COMPONENTS of a Researched-based Reading Program Direct Instruction in phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary, and comprehension. For systematic instruction, lessons build on previously taught information, from simple to complex, with clear, concise student objectives that are driven by ongoing assessment. Students are provided appropriate practice opportunities which directly reflect instruction.

CRITICAL COMPONENTS of a Researched-based Reading Program Direct instruction is an instructional approach that utilizes explicit and structured teaching routines. A teacher using direct instruction models, explains, and guides the students through extended practice of a skill or concept until mastery is achieved. The lessons are fast paced, students are academically engaged, and teachers are enthusiastically delivering instruction. Direct instruction is appropriate instruction for all learners, all five components of reading, and in all settings (whole group, small group, and one-on-one).

Evaluate Program YOU CANNOT EVALUATE WHAT YOU HAVE NOT DEFINED or DESCRIBED IT. Formative Assessments – taken at short intervals to identify unsatisfactory and satisfactory conditions that might need tweaking within a short period of time. BASED ON PROGRAM DESCRIPTION Example: Flex Period Survey of student participation, valuing, improvement documented, scheduling issues Survey of teachers, participation, valuing, improvement documented, scheduling issues

Evaluate Program Summative Assessments – taken at the end of the program or as in grade level programs, at the end of the year. Program Evaluations should be taken over a period of at least 3-5 years to establish a trend and to determine if the change process has been given enough time to take effect. As a result- programs should not be implemented without a commitment of 3-5 years.

Resources for Researched-based Best Practices in Reading US Department of Education: k3-reading.html k3-reading.html Nat Inst for Lit uestions_about.html uestions_about.html Older-Struggling Readers: instruction.htm instruction.htm aq1.htm#11 aq1.htm#11 TEA

Adjust Program Adjustments may take place at any time, but a Formal Adjustment should be scheduled at least once a year. Program Descriptions need to be edited and disseminated throughout the organization, especially among new teachers.

Make Informed Decisions

Define Where You Are Define Where You Want to Be Describe How You Will Get There Implement Monitor, Ask Questions Evaluate, Ask Questions Adjust-cycling back through CI process Make Informed Decisions