Summary of 2006 MAP Results for the Joplin R-VIII School District Dr. Jim Simpson, Superintendent Press Conference September 1, 2006 Joplin High School.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Adequate Yearly Progress 2005 Status Report Research, Assessment & Accountability November 2, 2005 Oakland Unified School District.
Advertisements

NCLB and MSIP Accountability for End-of-Course Assessments DRAFT – October 2008 Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Becky Odneal.
Maryland School Assessment (MSA) 2012 Science Results Carolyn M. Wood, Ph.D. Assistant Superintendent, Accountability, Assessment, and Data Systems August.
2013 Accountability Report Jurupa Unified School District Board of Education Meeting.
1 Union County School District Instructional Update 10 December 2007 Dr. David Eubanks Superintendent.
2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study.
Flexibility in Determining AYP for Students with Disabilities Background Information—Slides 2—4 School Eligibility Criteria—Slide 5 Calculation of the.
Forsyth County Schools Overview of the Proposed IE 2 Partnership Contract.
NECAP Results 2006 Chichester Central School Never Enough Children At Proficient!
Fontana Unified School District Student Achievement Data September 17, 2008 Instructional Services Assessment & Evaluation.
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
K-12 Student Performance and Efficiency Commission July 18, 2014 School Year Data.
California Standards Test and CAHSEE Correlation Use of Student Data for Targeted Preemptive Intervention November 1, 2006 Dr. Janis Fries-Martinez, Principal.
Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
Torrance Unified School District Annual Student Achievement Dr. George W. Mannon, Superintendent Dr. E Don Kim, Senior Director of Elementary Education.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
Understanding California English Language Arts & Math Standards And How Student Performance Is Reported.
School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.
Lincoln Public Schools Testing Year Scores New England Common Assessment Program Grades 3-8 and 11 Reading Math Writing.
State and Federal Testing Accountability: Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Academic Performance Index (API) SAIT Training September 27, 2007.
2015 MAP Scores Fulton 58 School District MAP Facts  Grades 3-8 and English II, Biology, Government and Algebra I and II  First year for online.
End of Course Assessments School Year English Language Arts, Math, Biology, and Government.
Report on Progress Board of Education Meeting September 13, 2011.
North Side Elementary School Dr. Mary Nardo, Principal North Side is making AYP. In addition to making Adequate Yearly Progress for the year, North.
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
October Math/Science Goals Complying with No Child Left Behind requirements, all students in Grades 3-8 and Grade 11 will meet or exceed “proficiency”
Spring 2012 Testing Results. GRANT API HISTORY
The Norwood Public Schools 2014 Accountability Overview and MCAS Results Dr. Alexander Wyeth Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum, Instruction, and.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 10, 2007.
Evaluation Results Missouri Reading Initiative.
Riverview Gardens Moline Elementary School School Progress Report September 11, 2012.
J. W. DOBBS ELEMENTARY DATA OVERVIEW FOURTH GRADE TEAM NOVEMBER 21, 2013.
Raytown C-2 School District 2010 MAP/EOC Results Core Curricular Areas September 27, 2010.
Future Ready Schools National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) in North Carolina Wednesday, February 13, 2008 Auditorium III 8:30 – 9:30 a.m.
MCAS 2007 October 24, 2007 A Report to the Sharon School Committee and Dr. Barbara J. Dunham Superintendent of Schools Dr. George S. Anthony Director of.
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
State Assessment Parent Presentation. 05/14/03 Why is this in place? Federal legislation passed in 2001  No Child Left Behind Reauthorization of the.
The Pike County School Corporation “The Role of the School Administrator In School Improvement” The Learning Conference Indianapolis, IN January 30, 2006.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
2015 PSSA/Keystone Data and Information Monday, October 12, 2015 Presented by Dr. Tammy Stern.
September 2014 Information Provided by Misty L. Slavic, Director of Curriculum & Instruction.
District 11 CSAP Results School Year D11 Board Presentation August 9,2006.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez January 2010.
MOBERLY PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT’S 2008 TERRA NOVA RESULTS FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION NANCY FLEMING DISTRICT TEST COORDINATOR MOBERLY.
Report to Board of Education April 12, 2010 Trenton Public Schools.
AYP and Report Card. Big Picture Objectives – Understand the purpose and role of AYP in Oregon Assessments. – Understand the purpose and role of the Report.
Annual Progress Report Summary September 12, 2011.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez September 1, 2008.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Performance Pay: Forging Ahead with Race to the Top Miami-Dade County Public Schools.
2007 – 2008 Assessment and Accountability Report LVUSD Report to the Board September 23, 2008 Presented by Mary Schillinger, Assistant Superintendent Education.
 According to the U.S. Department of Education the purpose of Title 1 funding, “is to ensure that all children have a fair, equal, and significant opportunity.
Connecticut Mastery Test Fourth Generation Grades 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 Connecticut Academic Performance Test Third Generation Grade 10 Presented to the.
Granby Public Schools Annual Continuous Progress Review Presented by Diane Dugas Director of Curriculum September CMT Review.
OFFICE OF FEDERAL PROGRAMS ADVISORY TEAM MEETING WELCOME Brenda B. Blackburn, Superintendent Berkeley County School District November 17, 2015, 5:30 pm.
Somers Public Schools Building and Departmental Goals
Presented to West Manor Administration and Faculty By: Felicia Belcher April 16, 2014.
Millbrae Elementary School District
PARCC Results Summary Report.
PARCC 2015 Summary Twin Peaks Academy.
NHCS READY Report October 2016.
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools
RAYMORE-PECULIAR SCHOOL DISTRICT ACCREDITED WITH DISTINCTION
FSA DATA ANALYSIS
Assessment & Achievement |
Education Services October 3, 2017.
History of No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Presentation transcript:

Summary of 2006 MAP Results for the Joplin R-VIII School District Dr. Jim Simpson, Superintendent Press Conference September 1, 2006 Joplin High School

2 Our Theme for

3 As a Result of MAP Performance Last Year Joplin Schools were Accredited with Distinction for the second year in a row. –The highest level of accreditation awarded by DESE

4 Our Goal for Is...

5 Overview of MAP Results Missouri made significant changes in the 2006 Missouri Assessment Program (MAP) to meet the standards of the National Assessment of Educational Process. Missouri gives the MAP in two content areas at specific grades. –Math--grade 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, & 10 –Communication Arts--grade 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 & 11 Student Results are reported in one of four levels –Level 1--Below Basic –Level 2--Basic –Level 3--Proficiency –Level 4--Advanced State and District goal is to move students out of Levels 1 & 2 and to move students into Levels 3 & 4.

6

7

8

9

10

11

12 Top Performing Schools Mathematics 30% of Students Scoring in Advanced Level 4 –Eastmorland--3rd 20% of Students Scoring in Advanced Level 4 –Duenweg-- 5th 0% of Students Scoring in Below Basic Level 1 –Duenweg--3rd, 5th –Duquesne--3rd, 5th –Irving--5th –Kelsey Norman--3rd, 5th –Royal Heights--4th –West Central--5th

13 Top Performing Schools Communication Arts 40% of Students Scoring in Advanced Level 4 –Duquesne--3rd 20% of Students Scoring in Advanced Level 4 –Cecil Floyd--3rd, 5th –Columbia--5th –Duquesne--5th –Eastmorland--3rd, 4th –Kelsey Norman--3rd, 5th –Royal Heights--4th, 5th –Stapleton--3rd, 4th, 5th 0% of Students Scoring in Below Basic Level 1 –Duenweg--3rd, 4th, 5th –Duquesne--3rd, 4th –Kelsey Norman--3rd, 5th

14 Schools Exceeding State Average By 10 Percentage Points Mathematics –Cecil Floyd--4th –Duquesne--4th –Jefferson--3rd –Kelsey Norman--4th, 5th –Stapleton--3rd, 4th Communication Arts –Cecil Floyd--4th –Columbia--5th –Duenweg--3rd –Kelsey Norman--3rd –Stapleton--3rd, 5th –Royal Heights--5th –South Middle School--7th

15 Schools Exceeding StateAverage By 20 Percentage Points Mathematics –Duenweg--4th –Duquesne--3rd, 5th –Eastmorland--3rd –Irving--4th, 5th –Columbia--5th –Royal Heights--5th Communication Arts –Duenweg--4th –Duquesne--3rd –Eastmorland--3rd –Irving--4th –Kelsey Norman--4th –Stapleton--4th –Royal Heights--5th

16 Schools Exceeding State Average By 30 Percentage Points or More Royal Heights--4th Grade Math percentage points above state average Duenweg--5th Grade Math percentage points above state average

17 No Child Left Behind Requirements In all elementary schools meet the AYP requirement. No school within the Joplin School District requires intervention for under the AYP guidelines. In all elementary schools meet the AYP requirement. No school within the Joplin School District requires intervention for under the AYP guidelines.

18 EAGLES SOAR HIGH ! ! !