1 Anti-trust issues in standardisation bodies Nicholas Banasevic DG Competition, European Commission (Speaking in a personal capacity - the views expressed.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measuring social added value A model for public authorities
Advertisements

Standards, Open Standards and IPR Paul Davey Strategic Relationships Executive Vodafone Group Plc.
LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS © ETSI All rights reserved ETSI Seminar 2012.
The Agency for Cooperation of Energy Regulators (ACER) – UK Government views Sue Harrison Head of European Energy Markets 13 February 2008 EPP-ED Public.
Ian Rodgers Chairman, BUSINESSEUROPE State Aid Working Group Director, UK Steel Globalisation, financial crisis, innovation and climate change: challenges.
IETF ECRIT SDO Emergency Services Coordination Workshop 5 & 6 Oct 2006 – New York Alain Van Gaever DG Information Society & Media European Commission.
European Commission Directorate-General for Employment, Social Affairs & Equal Opportunities ─ Unit Social services as drivers of the European economy.
State aid control Wouter Pieké* Head of Unit COMP.C.4
GAMBIA COMPETITION COMMISSION GAMBIA COMPETITION COMMISSION Levelling the Field for Development SIXTH ANNUAL AFRICAN CONSUMER PROTECTION DIALOQUE CONFERENCE.
Sam Pieters International Relations Unit DG COMP 12/11/2012 Break out session 1: State owned enterprises and competition neutrality.
Footer text (edit in View : Header and Footer) The interface between Standards and IPRs The ETSI IPR Policy Dr. Michael Fröhlich ETSI Legal Adviser Copyright.
Budapest May, 2001 Anne Lehouck European Commission, DG ENTERPRISE 1 ELECTRONIC SIGNATURE LEGAL FRAMEWORK & STANDARDISATION.
Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe Standard setting and abuse of dominant position (Article 82 EC Treaty) Douglas Lahnborg.
Mexico´s financial reform objectives and current regulations in payment services February 11 th, 2015.
1 Promoting Competition by the New EU Payment Services Directive: Overview of the aims of the Directive and its scope – State of play of transposition.
Eurasian Corporate Governance Roundtable
School for Social Care Research Improving the evidence base for adult social care practice Council-managed Personal Budgets: Developments in the home care.
The EU Microsoft case: tying abuse Per Hellström DG Competition, European Commission (speaking in a personal capacity - the views expressed are not necessarily.
Riga – Latvia, 4 & 5 December 2006
6. Decreasing Discretionary Power 1. Definition of discretionary power Discretionary power is the power to issue a regulatory measure (of general or particular.
The EU Microsoft case: refusal to supply Nicholas Banasevic DG Competition, European Commission (speaking in a personal capacity - the views expressed.
European Commission Preparation of the Innovation Union Flagship Initiative European Commission Presentation to ERAC 11 June 2010.
Introductory course on Competition and Regulation Pál Belényesi University of Verona October 2006.
1 Employment in the European Union: Perspectives and threats Labour markets, Ageing labour force, migration International Conference “Days of Socio-Economy:
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Innovation and the Structural Funds, Antwerp, 16 January 2007 Veronica Gaffey Innovative Actions Unit.
1 Public Procurement of Innovations a driver for future health in Europe - Stockholm, 13 October 2009 Public Procurement Directives supporting innovation.
The FTC, Pharmaceuticals, Antitrust & IP: A Grab Bag October 23, 2008 This presentation was prepared from public sources. The views expressed herein do.
The ECJ's Huawei/ZTE judgment (C-170/13) Thomas Kramler DG Competition, European Commission (The views expressed are not necessarily those of the European.
1 FRAND COMMITMENTS AND EU COMPETITION LAW Thomas Kramler European Commission, DG Competition (The views expressed are not necessarily those of the European.
Dr. Christian Schmies 28. June 2013 The Common European Sales Law - Some Policy Questions -
De Nederlandsche Bank Eurosysteem Dutch National Forum on the Payment System 2nd Conference of the Macedonian Financial Sector on the Payments and Securities.
New EU-Framework for electronic communication Implications for Broadcasting Hans Peter Lehofer, KommAustria 16th EPRA-Meeting Ljubljana.
Overview of Issues and Interests in Standards and Interoperability Mary Saunders Chief, Standards Services Division NIST.
Rome © Campden & Chorleywood Mo. Kht 1 1 Networking of National Platforms of ”Food for Life” András Sebők*, Kitti Németh** Coordinators of the.
SEPA and the Payment Services Directive
Competition Issues in Standard Setting: The New Horizontal Guidelines Simonetta Vezzoso, Trento University Trento University March 16, 2011.
Setting the context: Full costing and the financial sustainability of universities Country Workshop: POLAND EUIMA – Full Costing Project University of.
Richard Harris DG Information Society European Commission EICTA - PHARE Business support programme Brussels, 5 December 2001 “EU Policy for electronic.
1 AIPPI Forum 2011 Hyderabad, India, 15 October AIPPI Forum 2011 Hyderabad, India, 15 October 2011 Standardisation and Software Protection Strategies.
ABA China Inside and Out September , Beijing The interface between competition law and intellectual property Nicholas Banasevic, DG Competition,
1 Hot Topics at the Interface of Intellectual Property and Competition Law Possible Antitrust Concerns Arising from Patent Pools ABA International Law.
The Enterprise Europe Network Business and innovation support for SMEs
1 The role of Economics in European Competition Enforcement and Policy Damien Neven, Chief Economist * DG COMP, European Commission 5 th International.
1 COMPETITION LAW FORUM Paris 21 June 2006 Competitiveness versus Competition Presentation by Humbert DRABBE Director for Cohesion and Competitiveness,
View from the U.S. The Swing of the Pendulum in the Antitrust Focus to IPR Licensing in the SDO Context Lauren S. Albert AXINN, VELTROP & HARKRIDER LLP.
ITU Workshop on Standards and Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) issues IPR in ICT standards View ’ s of the European Commission Anne Lehouck New Delhi,
Finding Spectrum for Technologies Beyond 3G Regulatory challenges as we enter a new world Michele Wakefield Ofcom.
Patent Pools – Issues of Dominance and Royalty Setting Marleen Van Kerckhove ABA Brown Bag Presentation March 20 th, 2007.
Review of the Transfer of Technology Block Exemption Regulation (TTBE) 2001 Report shortcomings of the TTBE new generation of regulations more economic.
Week 12. Lecture 2. Health Law & the EU Cross-border healthcare: patients’ rights.
Capacity Building within CARIFORUM on Competition Policy David Miller – Executive Director May 5, 2016 Promoting competitive markets FAIR TRADING COMMISSION.
BIICL Antitrust Conference London 2 May European Commission, DG Competition Philip Lowe A changing competition policy: Thinking back and ahead Philip.
Identification of Monopoly Agreement involving Intellectual Property Rights Wang Xianlin, KoGuan Law School of Shanghai Jiao Tong University Dalian, June.
TAIEX-REGIO Workshop on Applying the Partnership Principle in the European Structural and Investment Funds Bratislava, 20/05/2016 Involvement of Partners.
The Interface between Competition Policy and Sectoral Regulation: A UK perspective Nicola Mazzarotto, Economic Adviser* * The views expressed in this presentation.
MCCAA Conference Friday 14 th March 2014 New measures on the EU single market for telecoms Grace Attard, ACR, EESC Pauline Azzopardi, ACR.
Round Table on "The challenges in the design of a merger control regime for young and small competition authorities Sixteenth Session of the Intergovernmental.
EU Competition Rules for Technology Transfer Agreements
EYV 2011 Alliance Céline Barlet (Project Officer) 1.
Achieving the Internal Gas Market The view of gas suppliers
Session 3: IPRs panel discussion
Business Organizations and Competition
Competition for Evaluations & 2016 Conference
Adriaan Dierx European Commission* 15th Annual ACE Conference 2017
Standards and competition law Michael Adam DG Competition, European Commission (speaking in a personal capacity - the views expressed are not necessarily.
THE GOALS OF COMPETITION LAW AND THE ROLE OF LEGAL INSTITUTIONS
Outline Background: development of the Commission’s position
Gil Ohana Cisco Systems Legal Department
Social services as drivers of the European economy
European National Regional
Presentation transcript:

1 Anti-trust issues in standardisation bodies Nicholas Banasevic DG Competition, European Commission (Speaking in a personal capacity - the views expressed are not necessarily those of the European Commission) ABA Brown Bag 22 June 2007

2 Overview Importance of standards Importance of standards The economic and legal framework The economic and legal framework Standards and pricing - ex ante royalty setting Standards and pricing - ex ante royalty setting Patent ambush Patent ambush Conclusion Conclusion

3 IMPORTANCE OF STANDARDS

4 Growing importance of standards Globalising, knowledge-based economy Globalising, knowledge-based economy More and more products have to work together More and more products have to work together Of particular importance in IT/communications Of particular importance in IT/communications Standards-related issues have increased in prominence Standards-related issues have increased in prominence What are the anti-trust issues? What are the anti-trust issues?

5 THE ECONOMIC AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK

6 Cost-benefit analysis (Carl Shapiro) Costs Costs Potential limitations in product variety Potential limitations in product variety Potential market power of company controlling a standard Potential market power of company controlling a standard Benefits Benefits Open standards provide certainty Open standards provide certainty Network effects Network effects Protection from stranding Protection from stranding

7 Commission’s approach Context is specific Context is specific But recognises the benefits of standardisation But recognises the benefits of standardisation Commission Communication Commission Communication Horizontal Anti-Trust Guidelines Horizontal Anti-Trust Guidelines Subject to conditions Subject to conditions Transparency of process Transparency of process No restrictions that are not indispensable No restrictions that are not indispensable Available to all who wish to enter Available to all who wish to enter

8 Do standards confer market power? Possibly Possibly Depends on importance of standard in market Depends on importance of standard in market Depends on lock-in (sunk costs, network effects) Depends on lock-in (sunk costs, network effects) What are the implications for the price? What are the implications for the price? Does RAND have a constraining effect? Does RAND have a constraining effect? Important to also consider whether there would be market power without the standard Important to also consider whether there would be market power without the standard

9 Do standards confer ‘incremental’ market power? Possibly Possibly Depends on ex ante alternatives Depends on ex ante alternatives What would have happened ex ante is a good benchmark What would have happened ex ante is a good benchmark Unique, innovative technologies will be appropriately valued Unique, innovative technologies will be appropriately valued

10 STANDARDS AND PRICING - EX ANTE ROYALTY SETTING

11 Complaints of high royalties Many different complementary technologies in one standard Many different complementary technologies in one standard All with essential patents All with essential patents ‘Patent stacking’ ‘Patent stacking’ High royalty High royalty

12 Ex ante régime (I) Potentially economically more efficient Potentially economically more efficient Prices announced/set before standard is agreed Prices announced/set before standard is agreed Allows competition on both price and technology Allows competition on both price and technology

13 Ex ante régime (II) US Business Review Letters US Business Review Letters EU Technology Transfer Guidelines EU Technology Transfer Guidelines Role of anti-trust agencies should not be prescriptive as regards choice of scheme Role of anti-trust agencies should not be prescriptive as regards choice of scheme

14 PATENT AMBUSH

15 Patent ambush Prevention better than cure Prevention better than cure Encourage standards bodies to have clear rules Encourage standards bodies to have clear rules ETSI ETSI How might specific patent ambush cases be dealt with? How might specific patent ambush cases be dealt with?

16 CONCLUSION

17 Conclusion Benefits of standardisation recognised Benefits of standardisation recognised but the context is important but the context is important Ideally, competition authority does not want to intervene in individual cases Ideally, competition authority does not want to intervene in individual cases Important for standards bodies to design the most efficient rules Important for standards bodies to design the most efficient rules

18 Anti-trust issues in standardisation bodies Nicholas Banasevic DG Competition, European Commission (Speaking in a personal capacity - the views expressed are not necessarily those of the European Commission) ABA Brown Bag 22 June 2007