Opinions of Counsel A Litigator’s Perspective Rick Matthews Friday, February 4 © 2011 Hultquist IP. All rights reserved.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fordham IP Law & Policy Conference: "ITC and Patents" April 29, 2011.
Advertisements

Auditing Your IP David Bradin Friday, February 4 © 2011 Hultquist IP. All rights reserved.
MELISSA ASFAHANI Patent Attorney El Paso, TX
Executive Perspective for Scientists & Engineers (EPSE) A Real World Look at IP Infringement Randall K. Broberg, Esq. April 8, 2013.
Cluster Meeting, 9 th February 2006 Legal issues in Open Source Software (OSS) Dr Zoe Kardasiadou (CIEEL)
Patent Mining for Freedom to Operate (FTO) Analysis Professor Stan Kowalski, Ph.D., J.D. February 24, 2009 Professor Stan Kowalski, Ph.D., J.D. February.
© Kolisch Hartwell 2013 All Rights Reserved, Page 1 America Invents Act (AIA) Implementation in 2012 Peter D. Sabido Intellectual Property Attorney Kolisch.
The German Experience: Patent litigation and nullification cases
World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Dispute Settlement and Effective Enforcement of IP.
What Do In-House Counsel Need to Know? AIA Proceedings Molly Kocialski, Senior Patent Counsel, Oracle Dion Messer, General Counsel - IP, Limelight Networks.
DEALING WITH IP ISSUES IN A FRANCHISING AGREEMENT by Tan Tee Jim, S.C. Senior Partner, Head, IP & IT, Lee & Lee Lahore, December 2007.
Speeding It Up at the USPTO July 2013 July 23, 2013.
Patent Enforcement in Germany Pros and Cons by Alexander Harguth Attorney at law Patent- und Rechtsanwälte Alexander Harguth - Attorney at law - Galileiplatz.
© 2013 Edwards Wildman Palmer LLP & Edwards Wildman Palmer UK LLP IP Issues in Transactions F.I.R.E. Series, University of Rochester May 14, 2013 Ralph.
The Role of Patent Attorneys
Confidentiality: Nondisclosure, Misuse, and Prosecution Bars David Hricik Professor, Mercer Law School Of Counsel, Taylor English Duma LLP.
IPR Litigation System & Recent Case in Korea Hee-Young JEONG Judge of Daejeon District Court, KOREA April 22, 2015.
AIPLA Annual Meeting 2014 Bifurcation before the UPC Dr. Jochen Pagenberg Attorney-at-law, Munich/Paris Past President EPLAW Prinzregentenplatz
KramerAmado Clearance Studies Akron, Ohio on May 22,
1 How To Find and Read the Law and Live to Tell (and Talk) About It Steve Baron January 25, 2006.
Written Patent Discovery  Decline of notice pleading and its impact on patent litigation  Rule 26, FRCP and written patent discovery  Local Patent Rules.
Patent Notice Letters: Manage With Care November 2004 Douglas Sharrott.
Chapter 25 Warranties McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
IP Asset Management: IP Audit and IP Due Diligence Doha, Qatar 12 April 2011 Najmia Rahimi Senior Program Officer, Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Division.
By Matthew R. Wilmot Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt, P.C. Copyright Issues for Homeowners’ and Condominium Associations.
1 AMERICA INVENTS ACT 報告人:林淑靜 學號: M A New Era ! This Act was signed into law by President Obama on September 16, 2011 and represents first.
SBZL IP LAW FIRM We bring IP Patent & Trademark Protection in CHINA.
Think IP Strategy Trusted advisors to the world’s most innovative companies Brisbane Beijing Chicago Goteborg Hyderabad Johannesburg Melbourne Mumbai Washington.
Patent Litigation in Japan April 7, 2008 Presented by: David W. Hill Partner, Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner, LLP.
Intellectual Property. Edwin Land Harvard dropout used to sneak into Columbia U. to conduct research 22 years old, obtained $375,000 from investors to.
Protecting the franchised brand Horst Becker Ariathes.
Middleware Promises Warranties that Don’t Indemnities that Won’t Stephen Rubin, Esquire
© 2011 Baker & Hostetler LLP BRAVE NEW WORLD OF PATENTS plus Case Law Updates & IP Trends ASQ Quality Peter J. Gluck, authored by.
Impact of US AIA: What Really Changed? 1 © AIPLA 2015.
Defamation: Written or verbal statements that lower a person’s good reputation in the eyes of the community.
The world leader in industrial and medical gases SPEEDY AND PROPER LITIGATION ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY The 3rd JIPA INTERNATIONAL PROPERTY SYMPOSIUM Thierry.
©2006 Sutherland Asbill & Brennan LLP Looking Both Ways Before You Cross the Street: How to Leverage Outside Patent Counsel 2006 APPA LEGAL SEMINAR October.
May 27, 2010 IP Committee Meeting ‘Quick Hit’: IP Due Diligence from the Seller’s Perspective.
Anthony C. Tridico, Ph.D. AIPLA BIOTECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE Pinning Down a Moving Target: Patenting Biotech in Uncertain Times.
PatentEng-Berkeley-Lavian Week 6: Validity and Infringement 1 Patent Engineering IEOR 190G CET: Center for Entrepreneurship &Technology Week 6 Dr. Tal.
1 SECTION 337 INVESTIGATIONS Managing Intellectual Property IP In China April 30, 2013 New York, New York.
2011 Japanese Patent Law Revision AIPLA Annual Meeting October 21, 2011 Yoshi Inaba TMI Associates.
The American Court System Chapter 3. Why Study Law And Court System? Manager Needs Understanding Managers Involved In Court Cases As Party As Witness.
Due Diligence Strategy for In-house Counsel Jen Sieczkiewicz, Ph.D., J.D. Research & Business Development Counsel.
© COPYRIGHT DICKSTEIN SHAPIRO LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Post Grant Proceedings Before the USPTO and Litigation Strategies Under the AIA Panelists:David.
Mon. Nov ) are people already adversaries? NO 2) does the cause of action concern the same t/o of an action already being litigated? NO forbidden.
The New Tool for Patent Defendants - Inter Partes Review Daniel W. McDonald George C. Lewis, P.E. Merchant & Gould, P.C. April 16, 2014 © 2014 Merchant.
© 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. Ch 6 Defenses to Liability Suits.
2015 AIPLA Annual Meeting Chemical Practice Committee October 23, 2015 Patent Opinions Edwin (Ted) V. Merkel LeClairRyan, A Professional Corporation 70.
Trends Relating to Patent Infringement Litigation in JAPAN
1 1 1 AIPLA Firm Logo American Intellectual Property Law Association THE STATUS OF INDUCEMENT Japan Intellectual Property Association Tokyo Joseph A. Calvaruso.
Enforcing Quality New methods of strengthening the IP-Systems in Europe Peter R. Slowinski, Mediator (CVM) Max-Planck-Institute for Intellectual Property,
A Career in Brand Management: Becoming a Trade Mark Attorney Patricia Collis Wednesday 17 February 2016.
Briffa and EVCOM Intellectual Property A practical guide and panel discussion on commercial issues.
12/16/07/10 – Preparatory Measures before Trade Fairs in DE HG Preparatory/Preventive Measures before Exhibiting at Trade Fairs in Germany Heinz.
1 Successful Technology Licensing: A Practical Guide.
Patent Information – The Key to Attack and Defend Heinz Mueller Swiss Federal Institute of Intellectual Property / ip-search London IP Summit October.
LAW 575 Entire Course (UOP) FOR MORE CLASSES VISIT LAW 575 Week 1 Discussion Questions LAW 575 Week 1 DQ 1 LAW 575 Week 1 DQ 2 LAW.
Reviewing Already, LLC v. Nike, Inc. and other select 2012 trademark cases of interest Garrett Parks Davis Wright Tremaine LLP Presented to the Alaska.
Protection of Trade Secret in Future Japanese Patent Litigation
@watermark Do You Have Freedom to Operate? Dr Tania Obranovich B.Sc. (Hons), Ph.D., LL.B., Dip IPP (IPTA) Special Counsel © watermark.
Hon. Victor B. Kenton (Ret.)
THE BEST DEFENSE CAN BE A GREAT OFFENSE AND SAVE THE EXPENSE OF TRIAL: Develop your game plan now for early disposition as a result of pre-trial motions.
THE BEST DEFENSE CAN BE A GREAT OFFENSE AND SAVE THE EXPENSE OF TRIAL: Develop your game plan now for early disposition as a result of pre-trial motions.
Pitfalls and privilege in a post-halo World
Trademark And Copyright Solution | Basic Principles Of Copyrights
Trademark, Copyright, And Patents | Get physical and paper proof
Trademark, Copyright, And Patents| Specialist Intellectual Property Lawyer At Aggasso
Aggasso's Trademark Registration Solution helps to protect your firm
Presentation transcript:

Opinions of Counsel A Litigator’s Perspective Rick Matthews Friday, February 4 © 2011 Hultquist IP. All rights reserved.

COMMON IP PRACTICE AREAS Patents Trademarks Copyrights Licensing IP Litigation IP Transactional Services © 2011 Hultquist IP. All rights reserved.

OPINIONS OF COUNSEL Not always first considered when researching, developing, designing, fabricating, etc. So, why are opinions necessary? And, what purpose do they serve? © 2011 Hultquist IP. All rights reserved.

OPINIONS OF COUNSEL Purpose: To better determine whether products or processes infringe a valid patent claim (Opinions are not a guarantee of success in litigation) To modify design to reduce risk with respect to third party patent – and possibly avoid litigation © 2011 Hultquist IP. All rights reserved.

OPINIONS OF COUNSEL Purpose: To determine/develop best defenses against patent owner To assess risks, possibly to decide not to proceed with a product To defend against a willfulness allegation in litigation © 2011 Hultquist IP. All rights reserved.

OPINIONS OF COUNSEL Types: Non-infringement Invalidity Clearance (Freedom-to-Operate) © 2011 Hultquist IP. All rights reserved.

OPINIONS FROM NON-ATTORNEYS Refrain from “non-attorney” (e.g., engineer) written opinions, especially negative opinions concerning patents Likely will not be privileged Might be wrong – but could be used in litigation Could undermine correct opinion from qualified U.S. Patent Attorney © 2011 Hultquist IP. All rights reserved.

THANK YOU © 2011 Hultquist IP. All rights reserved.