ExoMars PanCam Planetary Protection Alex Rousseau.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IMPLEMENTATION OF PLANETARY PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS FOR THE RPWI EXPERIMENT ONBOARD THE JUICE SPACECRAFT I. Kolmasova 1, O. Santolik 1,2, J. Soucek 1,
Advertisements

Basic Overview of Project Management and Life Cycle ACES Presentation T. Gregory Guzik January 21, 2003.
1 Utility Systems Process Systems – ‘Direct Impact Systems’ Contact the Product Contact Materials that will Ultimately Become Part of the Product Could.
SAE AS9100 Quality Systems - Aerospace Model for Quality Assurance
GLAST LAT ProjectLAT I&T Subsystem CDR, March 28, 2003 Document: LAT-PR Section 4 - Page 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: I & T Peer Review Performance.
GLAST LAT ProjectLAT Engineering Meeting, April 1, 2003 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Performance & Safety Assurance Darren S. Marsh Stanford Linear Accelerator.
STARLight PDR 3 Oct ‘01 G.1.1 Rashid STARLight STARLight Thermal Tahir Rashid STARLight Mechanical Engineer (734)
GLAST LAT ProjectCDR/CD-3 Review May 12-16, 2003 Document: LAT-PR-01967Section 15 Manufacturing & Processes 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope Manufacturing.
Sterilized, Validated, Documented and Pyrogen Tested Wipers
Technical requirements  Sampling  Analysis  Reporting of the results.
Qualification of HVAC systems
The ESS vacuum team has overall responsibility for all technical vacuum systems used on the: Accelerator, Target and Neutron Scattering Instruments and.
A Finmeccanica Company 04/2000/1 EUSO Development Philosophy EUSO General Meeting Max Planck Institute for Physics Munich, November the 20th 2003.
Iouri Ivaniouchenkov RAL Safety considerations at RAL July 9, RAL MICE Collaboration Meeting 1.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO Integration and Test Joanne Baker GSFC Code 568 August 16-17, 2005.
ASPERA-3 Sep. 25, 00 Monthly Status Report ASPERA Monthly Status ReportMonthly 9_25/ Page 1 Monthly Status Report Report due 9/25/00 Schedule statused.
Common PDR Problems ACES Presentation T. Gregory Guzik March 6, 2003.
Presented by Steven P. Feltman Food Safety and Quality Specialist.
World Health Organization
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW I-PER 21 January EFW Test Plan Michael Ludlam Space Sciences Laboratory.
Development programs and model philosophy1 Preliminary design review Prototype program Critical design review Qualification program Qualification review.
Proposed LBT Instrument Facility Enclosure OSU MODS.
ASPERA-3 Apr. 25, 00 Monthly Status Report ASPERA Monthly Status ReportMonthly 4_25/ Page 1 Monthly Status Report Report due 4/25/00 Schedule statused.
THEMIS Instrument CDR(1) UCB, April 19 & 20, 2004 Mission Assurance Critical Design Review Ron Jackson University of California - Berkeley.
GLAST LAT ProjectI&T&C Pre PDR Presentation– Oct. 2, I&T&C Organization Chart I&T&C Manager Elliott Bloom WBS I&T Engineer B. Grist WBS
Hydrogen system R&D. R&D programme – general points Hydrogen absorber system incorporates 2 novel aspects Hydrogen storage using a hydride bed Hydrogen.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP/EFW Boom PER 30 June RBSP EFW Spin Plane Booms Greg Dalton Space Sciences.
1 Washington, Sept 29th, 2014 Informal working group: Large Lithium batteries testing RECHARGE & SAFT.
GLAST LAT ProjectCDR/CD3 Review May 12-16, 2003 Document: LAT-PR Section 15 Manufacturing Process 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope Manufacturing Process.
PACS IIDR ESTEC 01/02 March 2001 System Engineering 1 PACS Instrument Intermediate Design Review (IIDR) Reinhard Katterloher System Engineering DDVP, Model.
MAVEN CDR May 23-25, 2011 Particles and Fields Package Critical Design Review May , 2011 Integration and Test Dave Curtis PFP Package Manager Mars.
THEMIS IDPU PDR I&T REQUIREMENTS- 1 UCB, October 16, 2003 I&T REQUIREMENTS Ellen Taylor University of California - Berkeley.
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun March 2015 Instrument Suite Name Presenter's Name.
SWEA Contamination & Planetary Protection SWEA Pre-Shipment Review December 01-02, 2011 IRAP, Toulouse.
SWEA Planetary Protection SWEA Peer Review March 28-29, 2010 IRAP, Toulouse.
PACS IBDR MPE 27/28 Feb 2002 System Engineering 1 PACS IBDR Model Philosophy / Development Plan Reinhard Katterloher.
FDA Preliminary Concept Paper Sterile Drug Products Produced by Aseptic Processing This presentation summarizes the content of PDA’s official position,
SRR and PDR Charter & Review Team Linda Pacini (GSFC) Review Chair.
PACS IBDR MPE 27/28 Feb 2002 AIV 1 PACS IBDR Test Cryostat and OGSE Gerd Jakob MPE.
1 MAVEN Breakup & Burnup Analysis for Planetary Protection M. Johnson LMSSC.
LAT Design Integration and Analysis1 GLAST LAT Project24 May 2005 LAT Monthly Status Review 24 May 2005 Design Integration and Analysis LAT Monthly Status.
GLAST LAT ProjectI&T&C Pre PDR Presentation– Oct 2, 2001 Darren Marsh1 I&T&C Organization Chart I&T&C Manager Elliott Bloom WBS I&T Engineer B. Grist.
FM1 Instrument Suite PSRSCM - 1UCB, September 21, 2005 THEMIS FM1 INSTRUMENT SUITE PRE-SHIP REVIEW (PSR) SEARCH COIL MAGNETOMETER (SCM) Michael Ludlam.
20-1 MAVEN iPSR Oct 30-31, 2012 Particles and Fields Package Pre-Ship Review October 30-31, PFDPU D. Gordon, W. Donakowski & PFDPU Team Mars.
MAVEN-SWEA Assembly, Integration & Test (AIT) Contents AIT: CESR Team Facilities Main subcontractors Applicable documents AIT documentation Cleanliness.
 Market Survey  Design, supply, delivery and installation of a Clean Room Facility  at the entrance of the LAr detector tank,  used for the storage.
1 PFP IPDR 2010/6/ Particles and Fields Package (PFP) Instrument Preliminary Design Review Integration & Test David Curtis, PF Package Manager.
MAVEN Planetary Protection Lead Bob Bartlett Mars Atmosphere and Volatile EvolutioN (MAVEN) Overall Approach to Planetary Protection Wednesday, October.
The electro-optical cabling system for the NEMO Phase-2 tower Antonio D’Amico INFN - LNS.
FIELDS MEP Thermal Vacuum Cycling iPER
Author: Nurul Azyyati Sabri
Gayle K. Martin November 14, 2016
1.3-GHz Cavity Vacuum Furnace at IB4
Agenda. Solar Probe Plus FIELDS Main Electronics Package iPER Agenda Feb 2, 2017.
THEMIS Mission Assurance
FIELDS SCM Thermal iPER
Clinical engineering Lecture (7).
PHI Status Report SO Cleanliness Working Group #24
0.0 Instrument Suite Name Presenter’s name
Peer Review Agenda (Suggested).
MRL 6 Artifacts (at End of TMRR) Page 1 of 6
Planetary Protection at ESA
Solar Orbiter EUI Extreme UV Imager
Integration, Test, and Verification
HMI Mission Assurance Manager
Managerial Lessons Learned Do’s and Don’ts in Planetary Protection
Integration and Test Organization Chart
REQUIREMENTS FOR MISSIONS towards europa
DOE Review of the LCLS Project October 2006
Manufacture of Sterile Medicinal Products: ‘Annex 1’ - DRAFT
Presentation transcript:

ExoMars PanCam Planetary Protection Alex Rousseau

PanCam isolation of accountable surfaces Use a combination of seals & HEPA filter on the OB to exclude the complete internal volume of the OB from bioburden accountable surfaces: – WACs (including filter wheels) – HRC – PIU electronics (including all associated harnessing). MSSL will follow “Excluding bioburden accountable surfaces for Instruments” EXM-PL- TNO-ESA-00001, procedures.

PanCam isolation of accountable surfaces (Cont.)

Identification of isolation zones on the PanCam OB 1.OB HEPA – Metallic fibre 2.HRC optical port – Metallic or non-metallic. 3.WACs optical ports (x2) – Metallic or non- metallic seals. 4.Connector feedthroughs – On OB – hermetic type connector feedthroughs.

PanCam PP Philosophy Hot ultrasonic at unit level. Frequent solvent wipe during AIT. (not for BB reduction but bulk BC removal from surfaces) Hydrogen Peroxide sterilisation at instrument level. For PanCam AIT phase, WACs, HRC and PIU handled, assembled in ISO Class 5 & 6 environments. During AIT PanCam will be processed using standard flight hardware handling methods (strict CC practices).

PanCam DHMR & H 2 O 2 Two subsystems on PanCam are DHMR incompatible: – WACs detectors. – PIU Lowest DHMR T at 110°C is a concern (PIU thermally stressed to unacceptable levels) H 2 O 2 sterilisation method will need to be qualified as an alternative to DHMR.

PanCam Hardware Assay philosophy Assay frequently during AIT phases: – After unit level ultrasonic cleaning. – After unit level vacuum bake out. (internal & external) – After HRC/OB integration. (Internal & external). – After WACs/PIU/OB integration. (internal & external). – Before and after instrument level sterilisation

PanCam Hardware Assay flow diagram

MSSL PanCam facilities MSSL ISO class 5 cleanroom facility has two zones: 1.ISO class 5 PanCam hardware processing and assembly area. 2.ISO Class 5 aseptic area. Aseptic area includes ISO Class 4 laminar flow bench.

MSSL PanCam facilities

MSSL PanCam AIT test facilities Cleanroom – MSSL (Assembly, processing) Vibration – MSSL (ISO Class 7 air shower) TV/TB – MSSL (ISO Class 6) Shock – Offsite (Portsmouth, classification TBC) EMC – Offsite (Location & classification TBC). PanCam instrument calibration – At MSSL or at NPL (If at MSSL ISO Class 6, if at NPL classification TBC)

MSSL PanCam AIT test flow diagram

MSSL Cleanroom facility bioburden reduction Start with an empty cleanroom and clean all surfaces. (walls, floor and ceiling). Process equipment needed for PanCam AIT. Cleaning includes, ultrasonic, vacuum bake out and solvent wet wiping methods. Once equipment in place in cleanroom, further process equipment/tooling required for aseptic area. During AIT phase PanCam hardware processing and assembly area will be cleaned at the start of each day before activities begin.

MSSL Cleanroom facility bioburden monitoring ISO Class 5 aseptic area will be bioburden monitored using: – Slit-agar air sampler – Swab & wipe assay ISO Class 5 cleanroom will be verified at (or just after CDR) using assay procedure 2. Frequent assays will be done during PanCam AIT phase of the ISO Class 5 aseptic area.

ISO Class 5 cleanroom upgrade ISO Class 5 cleanroom to be upgraded and finished at CDR. Cleanroom commissioning and verification after CDR. Cleanroom ready for normal operations at PanCam EQM phase

PDR RIDs response RID #: PANCAM-1  Note that although the RID references the KT document (EXM-PL-PCHRC-KT-PL-0003 PP and CC_Plan), the issues raised are applicable to the MSSL PP, CCP & PPIP.  Estimate of internal and external surface area: MSSL response: The PanCam PPIP will be updated with the internal and external surface areas after PDR.  Estimate of volume of non-metallic materials: MSSL Response: The PanCam PPIP will be updated with the non-metallic materials volume after PDR.  Identification of items that cannot be wiped or assayed with damps swabs: MSSL response: The PanCam PPIP will be updated with a list identifying areas that cannot be wiped or assayed.  Temperature tolerance for DHMR: MSSL response: The PanCam PPIP will be updated to include temperature tolerances of the PanCam instrument including detector subsystems.  Preliminary organic materials list: MSSL response: The PanCam PPIP will be updated to include an organic materials list.  UV bioburden control: MSSL response: The DML will be updated to exclude UV as a bioburden reduction method.

PDR RIDs response RID #: PANCAM-2  Note that although the RID references the KT document (EXM-PL-PCHRC-KT-PL-0003 PP and CC_Plan), the issues raised are applicable to the MSSL PP, CCP & PPIP.  Who will be responsible for the OB HEPA and for the request for approval according to PPL-PP-ALL-0070 and TN EXM-PL-TNO-ESA-00001?: MSSL response: MSSL will request approval for the OB HEPA according to PPL-PP-ALL It is envisaged that the HEPA will be subjected to qualification tests at ESA facilities. Responsibility of the OB HEPA is MSSLs.

PDR RIDs response RID #: PANCAM-3  There is no clear need/requirement identified for a final DHMR of the entire assembly integrated on the mast. MSSL response: MSSL will contact TAS-I and clarify the issues with regard to the PanCam instrument and the DHMR process. As mentioned in the PPIP, there are two PanCam subsystems that are not compatible with DHMR. Ways in which this can be dealt with and responsibilities of PP after delivery of the PanCam instrument will be discussed with TAS-I and the relevant PP & PPIP sections will be updated to reflect this after PDR.