20 November, 2012 1 TRAINING COURSE ON RADIATION DOSIMETRY: Interaction of ionising radiation with matter Stefano AGOSTEO, POLIMI Wed. 21/11/2012, 10:00.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Gamma-Ray Spectra _ + The photomultiplier records the (UV) light emitted during electronic recombination in the scintillator. Therefore, the spectrum collected.
Advertisements

NE Introduction to Nuclear Science Spring 2012
Interaction of radiation with matter - 5
Adam Para, Fermilab, March 23, Methodology  Use Hadr01 example  In G4SteppingVerbose::StepInfo() select all the steps with inelastic processes.
Particle interactions and detectors
Light. Photons The photon is the gauge boson of the electromagnetic force. –Massless –Stable –Interacts with charged particles. Photon velocity depends.
Alpha decay parent nucleus daughter nucleus Momentum conservation decides how the energy is distributed. r E 30 MeV 5 MeV.
Charged Particle Radiation
Neutron interaction with matter 1) Introduction 2) Elastic scattering of neutrons 3) Inelastic scattering of neutrons 4) Neutron capture 5) Other nuclear.
10-1 CHEM 312 Lecture 10: Part 1 Radiation Reactions: Dosimetry and Hot Atom Chemistry Readings: §Reading: Modern Nuclear Chemistry, Chap. 17; Nuclear.
BME 560 Medical Imaging: X-ray, CT, and Nuclear Methods
Neutral Particles. Neutrons Neutrons are like neutral protons. –Mass is 1% larger –Interacts strongly Neutral charge complicates detection Neutron lifetime.
Counting Cosmic Rays through the passage of matter By Edwin Antillon.
Interactions with Matter
Particle Interactions
Nuclear and Radiation Physics, BAU, 1 st Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Nuclear Reactions Categorization of Nuclear Reactions According to: bombarding.
Radiation Dosimetry Dose Calculations D, LET & H can frequently be obtained reliably by calculations: Alpha & low – Energy Beta Emitters Distributed in.
Radiology is concerned with the application of radiation to the human body for diagnostically and therapeutically purposes. This requires an understanding.
6. Atomic and Nuclear Physics Chapter 6.6 Nuclear Physics.
Radiation therapy is based on the exposure of malign tumor cells to significant but well localized doses of radiation to destroy the tumor cells. The.
Stopping Power The linear stopping power S for charged particles in a given absorber is simply defined as the differential energy loss for that particle.
Interactions with Matter
Neutron Interactions Part I Rebecca M. Howell, Ph.D. Radiation Physics B November 2010.
Centre de Toulouse Radiation interaction with matter 1.
NEEP 541 Radiation Interactions Fall 2003 Jake Blanchard.
Lecture 1.3: Interaction of Radiation with Matter
Space Instrumentation. Definition How do we measure these particles? h p+p+ e-e- Device Signal Source.
Department of Physics University of Oslo
NE Introduction to Nuclear Science Spring 2012 Classroom Session 7: Radiation Interaction with Matter.
Physics Modern Lab1 Electromagnetic interactions Energy loss due to collisions –An important fact: electron mass = 511 keV /c2, proton mass = 940.
Extending the Bertini Cascade Model to Kaons Dennis H. Wright (SLAC) Monte Carlo April 2005.
Nuclear Reactions - II A. Nucleon-Nucleus Reactions A.1 Spallation
Radiation and radiation dosimetry Spring 2006 Introduction Audun Sanderud Department of Physics University of Oslo.
Medical Imaging Radiation I. Naked to the Bone: Medical Imaging in the Twentieth Century (Paperback)by Bettyann Kevles Bettyann Kevles E=mc2: A Biography.
Artificial Radioactivity
Alpha and Beta Interactions
1 dE/dx  Let’s next turn our attention to how charged particles lose energy in matter  To start with we’ll consider only heavy charged particles like.
Calorimeters Chapter 21 Chapter 2 Interactions of Charged Particles - With Focus on Electrons and Positrons -
Radiation damage calculation in PHITS
Interactions of radiation with Matter
© Jimoid.com 2005 Ionising Radiation There are two types of radiation; ionising and non-ionising. Radiation Ionising Non-ionising Indirectly ionising (neutral.
Monte Carlo methods in ADS experiments Study for state exam 2008 Mitja Majerle “Phasotron” and “Energy Plus Transmutation” setups (schematic drawings)
Electrons Electrons lose energy primarily through ionization and radiation Bhabha (e+e-→e+e-) and Moller (e-e-→e-e-) scattering also contribute When the.
Monday, Oct. 16, 2006PHYS 3446, Fall 2006 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #11 Monday, Oct. 16, 2006 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Energy Deposition in Media Total Electron.
Accelerator Physics, JU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Electron pick-up. ~1/E What about fission fragments????? Bragg curve stochastic energy.
Gamma ray interaction with matter A) Primary interactions 1) Coherent scattering (Rayleigh scattering) 2) Incoherent scattering (Compton scattering) 3)
Chapter 5 Interactions of Ionizing Radiation. Ionization The process by which a neutral atom acquires a positive or a negative charge Directly ionizing.
Closing a shell-> Stable atom, high ionization energy.
Interactions of EM Radiation with Matter
Appendix G1: Chapter 12: X-Ray Interaction with Matter
Particle Detectors for Colliders Robert S. Orr University of Toronto.
Interaction Ionizing Radiation with Matter BNEN Intro William D’haeseleer BNEN - Nuclear Energy Intro W. D'haeseleer
Basic photon interactions
INTERACTIONS OF RADIATION WITH MATTER. twCshttp:// twCs
Interaction of x-ray photons (and gamma ray photons) with matter.
Spallation Eric Pitcher Head of Target Division February 19, 2016.
Interactions of Ionizing Radiation
Interaction of Radiation with Matter
Chapter 2 Radiation Interactions with Matter East China Institute of Technology School of Nuclear Engineering and Technology LIU Yi-Bao Wang Ling.
Wednesday, Mar. 2, 2005PHYS 3446, Spring 2005 Jae Yu 1 PHYS 3446 – Lecture #11 Wednesday, Mar. 2, 2005 Dr. Jae Yu 1.Energy Deposition in Media Photon energy.
Absorption of Nuclear Radiation & Radiation Effects on Matter: Atomic and Nuclear Physics Dr. David Roelant.
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #13 Energy Deposition in Media
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #11 Energy Deposition in Media Particle Detection
Chapter 5 Interactions of Ionizing Radiation
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #14 Energy Deposition in Media Particle Detection
Chapter 4 Mechanisms and Models of Nuclear Reactions
PHYS 3446, Spring 2012 Andrew Brandt
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #13 Energy Deposition in Media
PHYS 3446 – Lecture #14 Energy Deposition in Media Particle Detection
Presentation transcript:

20 November, TRAINING COURSE ON RADIATION DOSIMETRY: Interaction of ionising radiation with matter Stefano AGOSTEO, POLIMI Wed. 21/11/2012, 10:00 – 11:00 am

2 CHARGED HADRONS Ionization and excitation Coulomb nuclear scattering (elastic); Inelastic reactions. 5 MeV protons P V Courtesy of P. Colautti, INFN-LNL, Legnaro, Italy P V P V Stochastic and discrete behavior

3 IONIZATION Energy loss (Bethe-Bloch formula): Mean ionization potential I=(10 eV)Z Z>16; Mean energy lost per unit path length; Continuous slowing-down approximation;

4 STOPPING POWER

5 The particle electric field: The transverse electric field of a moving particle broadens at relativistic velocities, while the longitudinal one contracts. This reflects in a collision time decrease and in an increase of the impact parameter. The latter reflects in an increase of the interaction cross section. IONIZATION – DENSITY EFFECT  =1

6 IONIZATION – DENSITY EFFECT The electric field of a relativistic particle is higher behind than ahead its direction of motion. There is an asymmetric polarization of nearby atoms. This polarization reduces the effective electric field of the projectile and shields the atoms at higher distances which might alternatively ionized or excited by the broadening of the transverse component of the electric field. The effect is significant when the inter-atomic distance is lower than the impact parameter for soft-collisions, i.e. in condensed materials and high- pressure gases.

7 IONIZATION – ENERGY STRAGGLING The Bethe-Bloch formula gives the mean energy lost per unit path length; Energy deposition by radiation is discrete and stochastic; The stochastic behavior of energy deposition in matter (energy straggling) is described by stochastic distributions such as the Landau-Vavilov distribution.

8 IONIZATION – THE BRAGG PEAK

9 SECONDARY ELECTRONS

10 COULOMB SCATTERING By neglecting the screening of atomic electrons; the differential x-sec for single Coulomb scattering is described by: where Θ is the scattering angle in the CM system and M 0 is the reduced mass. If the projectile mass is lower than that of the target nucleus Θ  θ lab and M 0  M 1 : for spin zero particles (alphas, pions,…) for spin one-half particles. p is the projectile momentum and

11 COULOMB SCATTERING  For electrons (Mott’s formula): valid for high velocities (β  1) and for light materials (Z  27);

12 COULOMB SCATTERING a) 250 MeV protons in soft tissue. b) 10 MeV protons in soft tissue. c) 2 MeV protons in soft tissue. d) 400 MeV/u C ions in soft tissue

13 COULOMB SCATTERING e) 8 MeV alphas in soft tissue. f) 10 MeV protons in Au. g) 5.57 MeV alphas in Au.

14 MULTIPLE COULOMB SCATTERING  In an absorbing medium, a charged particle undergoes a large number of small deflections and a small number of large angle scatterings followed by small deflections.  Multiple scattering is described by Goudsmit-Saunderson and Moliére.  Moliere: valid at small scattering angles (sinθ  θ) and for a collision number > 20; described in terms of the screening angle (the minimum angle limiting the scattering event because of the atomic electron screening of nuclei.

15 ENERGY LOSS – RADIATIVE COLLISIONS Energy loss for electrons:  fine structure constant;

16 ENERGY LOSS B. Grosswendt, The Physics of Particle Transport: Electrons and Photons, in: The Use of MCNP in Radiation Protection and Dosimetry (1996) ENEA

17 PHOTONS – PHOTOELECTRIC EFFECT Threshold reaction, approximately: h e-e- Atom  T e = h - B e K-shell σ= 1, L-shell σ =5, M-shell σ = 13. K-shell n = 1, L-shell n= 2, M-shell n= 3. h << m e c 2 h >> m e c 2 Characteristic X-rays and Auger electrons are emitted from atomic de-excitation.

18 PHOTONS – COMPTON EFFECT The Compton effect can be modelled by considering a free electron: h h ’   e-e-

19 COMPTON EFFECT Klein-Nishina x-sec: The Compton effect depends on Z

20 RAYLEIGH SCATTERING Predominant at low energies when h <B (electron binding energy). Photons change their direction and the recoil atom absorbs a negligible amount of energy.

21 PAIR CREATION Threshold energy 2m e c 2  1022 keV; h > 1022 keV nucleus e-e- e+e+ 1 << h / m e c 2 << 1/137 Z -1/3 h / m e c 2 >> 1/137 Z -1/3 h = (T - + m e c 2 ) + (T + + m e c 2 )

22 PHOTONS

23 NEUTRON INTERACTIONS WITH SOFT TISSUE Neutrons below about 20 MeV: Thermal neutrons (0<E<0.5 eV); Epithermal neutrons (0.5 eV<E<100 keV); Fast neutrons (100 keV<E<20 MeV).

24 NEUTRON INTERACTIONS WITH SOFT TISSUE ElementWeight percent H10.2 C12.3 N3.5 O72.9 Na0.08 Mg0.02 P0.2 S0.5 K0.3 Ca0.007 Soft tissue:

25 THERMAL NEUTRONS ElementReactionQ (MeV) Cross section H 1 H(n,  ) 2 H mb C 12 C(n,  ) 13 C mb N 14 N(n,  ) 15 N mb N 14 N(n,p) 14 C b O 16 O(n,  ) 17 O mb n h h ’ e-e- p n

26 EPITHERMAL NEUTRONS Neutron absorption cross sections depend on 1/v; Elastic scattering occurs and recoil nuclei can contribute to the absorbed dose.

27 FAST NEUTRONS Target NucleusER,max/En H1 C0.284 N0.249 O0.221 Elastic scattering occurs and recoil nuclei contribute to the absorbed dose. Inelastic reactions:

28 FAST NEUTRONS Target Nucleus ReactionQ (MeV) Threshold Energy (MeV) C 12 C(n,  ) 9 Be C 12 C(n,p) 12 B C 12 C(n,2n) 11 C N 14 N(n,  ) 11 B N 14 N(n,2n) 13 N O 16 O(n,  ) 13 C O 16 O(n,p) 16 N O 16 O(n,2n) 15 O Some inelastic reactions: 12 C(n,p) 12 B

29 SECONDARY RADIATION AT INTERMEDIATE AND HIGH ENERGIES The main mechanisms for secondary hadron production from particles other than ions at intermediate energies (from about 50 MeV up to a few GeV) will be outlined. It should be underlined that for particle momenta higher than a few GeV/c, the hadron-nucleus cross section tends to its geometric value: The interaction length scales with: References: Ferrari, A. and Sala, P.R. The Physics of High Energy Reactions. Proceedigs of the Workshop on Nuclear Reaction Data and Nuclear Reactors Physics, Design and Safety, International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Miramare-Trieste (Italy) 15 April-17 May 1996, Gandini A. and Reffo G., Eds.World Scientific, (1998). ICRU 28.

30 INTRANUCLEAR CASCADE Intermediate energy reactions can be described through the intranuclear cascade model. Its main steps are: direct hadron-nucleon interactions ( s); pre-equilibrium stage; nuclear evaporation ( s); de-excitation of the residual nucleus. Secondary particles can interact with other nuclei giving rise to an extra-nuclear cascade.

31 INTRANUCLEAR CASCADE Direct h-n interactions can be treated by assuming that hadrons are transported in the target nucleus like free particles interacting with nucleons with a probability ruled by free-space x- sections. Of course other more complex phenomena should be accounted for (quantum effects, effects of the nuclear field, Pauli blocking, local nuclear density, etc.). The free-particle model can be applied for particle momenta higher than 1 GeV/c (i.e. above about 200 MeV). Secondary nucleons from direct interactions are forward peaked and their energy distribution extends up to about the primary beam energy.

32 INTRANUCLEAR CASCADE At intermediate energies the inelastic reactions are mainly limited to pion production: threshold energy: about 290 MeV, significant production above about 700 MeV;   half life: 2.6  s (  + →  + + )  0 half-life: 8.4  s (  0 → 2  ). At high-energy accelerators (above tens GeV) muons give a significant contribution to the stray radiation field past the shield (high-energy and low LET). Neutral pions decay into two high-energy photons and may switch on an electromagnetic cascade.

33 INTRANUCLEAR CASCADE Pre-equilibrium is a transition between the first interaction and the final thermalisation of nucleons: this stage occurs when the excitation energy is shared among a few nucleons; secondaries are forward peaked; the energy distribution extends up to about the maximum beam energy.

34 INTRANUCLEAR CASCADE The last step of the INC occurs when the nuclear excitation is shared among a large number of nucleons: the compound nucleus has lost memory about the former steps; nucleons and light fragments (d, t,  ) can be emitted; for A>16 (nuclear level density approximated to a continuum): → evaporation model; → the energy distribution can be described by a Maxwellian function (peaked at T): → the angular distribution is isotropic. For light nuclei (A<16) other models such as the Fermi break-up model can be applied for describing secondary particle and fragment generation.

35 INTRANUCLEAR CASCADE Neutron spectral fluence [EΦ(E)] per primary hadron from 40 GeV/c protons/pions on a 50 mm thick silver target, at emission angles of 30°, 60°, 90° and 120°. Agosteo et al. NIM B 229 (2005)

36 INTRANUCLEAR CASCADE After evaporation, the residual nucleus can be still in an excited state: if the excitation energy is lower than the binding energy of the less bounded nucleon;  the residual energy is lost through the emission of photons. the angular distribution of the de-excitation photons is isotropic; for heavy nuclei the energy spectrum can be described by a Maxwellian function; for light nuclei the excitation levels should be accounted for.

37 INTRANUCLEAR CASCADE Of the various particles generated by a target bombarded by a high-energy beam only neutron, photons and muons can contribute significantly to the dose past a shield: protons and light fragments from evaporation are of low energy and are completely stopped in the air inside the hall (the range of a 5 MeV proton in air is 34 cm); pions decay with a very short half-life; high-energy hadrons interact with the shielding barrier and generate secondary radiation which should be accounted for; The radiation field generated inside the barrier is composed by neutrons (mainly), protons, photons, electrons, positrons and pions.

38 REFERENCES R.D. Evans, The Atomic Nucleus (1955) McGraw-Hill. E. Segrè, Nuclei and Particles, (1964) W.A. Benjamin inc. ICRU, Microdosimetry, ICRU Report 36 (1983) ICRU, Bethesda, Maryland. ICRU, Basic Aspects of High Energy Particle Interactions and Radiation Dosimetry (1978) ICRU, Bethesda, Maryland. S. Agosteo, M. Silari, L. Ulrici, Instrument Response in Complex Radiation Fields, Radiation Protection Dosimetry, 137 (2009) doi: /rpd/ncp186.

39 Additional Slides

40 Lethargy plots Conservative in terms of area for semi-logarithmic plots Therefore: Histogram: Lethargy (definition):

41 PARTICLE FLUENCE: COSINE-WEIGHTED BOUNDARY CROSSING The spectral distribution of particle radiance is defined as: v=particle velocity; n=particle density (number of particles N per unit volume). The particle fluence averaged over a region of volume V can be estimated as: nds is a “track-length density”; T ℓ sum of track lengths. The surface fluence at a boundary crossing is, for one particle of weight w: Infinitely thin region of volume S    T