Implementing the Tech Standards Presenter: Eric Curts eTech|OHIO Tech Conference 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
6-12 Focus Strategic Instruction Model developed by Kansas University Alameda Unified School District Board Meeting June 10, 2008.
Advertisements

Measuring Student and Teacher Technology Literacy for NCLB Whats an LEA to do? 2004 National School Boards Association Conference Denver Carol D. Mosley.
Career Technical Conference 2007 Alabamas Web Portal Setting the Standard for Teaching, Leading, & Learning.
Quality Liaison Meeting Thursday – April 10, 2008 Wilson Middle School.
Elementary. The District Heard Your Concerns In teachers requested that the following three documents be merged into one. Instructional Focus.
A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
ExCEL August Institute ExCEL After School High School Credit Recovery
What is the difference between undergraduate and graduate course ?
K-5 Instructional Technology Overview Darien Public Schools
Student Learning Objectives -SLOs Student Growth Measures and OTES
What Every Parent Needs to Know Oldham County Schools Fall 2011.
The Virtual Colony Project Project Overview Teacher Planning Work Samples & Reflections Teaching Resources, 1 of 2 Teaching Resources, 2 of 2 Assessment.
Login to the computer Open the Internet & go to Click on ‘current’ and choose ‘March 12 th PD Presentation’ WELCOME.
1 Literacy PERKS Standard 1: Aligned Curriculum. 2 PERKS Essential Elements Academic Performance 1. Aligned Curriculum 2. Multiple Assessments 3. Instruction.
1 Literacy Leadership Teams December 2004 Common High-Quality Differentiated Instruction for Achievement for All within The Cleveland Literacy System Module.
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
Getting Organized for the Transition to the Common Core What You Need to Know.
An Integrated Mathematics Curriculum A Core Curriculum in Mathematics.
No Child Left Behind The Basics Of Title 1 Every Child - Now! Focus on the critical nature of doing what’s right and what’s needed – today - to help every.
CSCD 555 Research Methods for Computer Science
Best Practices. Overview of Best Practices Literacy Best Practice Documents: Were developed by curriculum staff and area specialists, with coaches’ and.
EVIDENCE BASED WRITING LEARN HOW TO WRITE A DETAILED RESPONSE TO A CONSTRUCTIVE RESPONSE QUESTION!! 5 th Grade ReadingMs. Nelson EDU 643Instructional.
The Paperless Classroom with Google Docs Eric Curts - North Canton City Schools ericcurts.com - - gplus.to/ericcurts.
Early Release Survey Report to the School Board February 2008.
Gradebook Parent Portal. At Ray School, beginning with the second quarter of the school year, parents will have access to a web-based tool that.
Standards-Based Education Curriculum Alignment Project Elementary Principals’ Meeting October 21, 2010.
Who Are We? CB Sellen What We Are 4 Four elementary districts 4 One regional high school district 4 Five boards of education 4 Three district economic.
CROSS-CURRICULAR COLLABORATION Chad Carter. PRESENTATION OUTLINE Background Timeline Problem Identification Review of Literature Cross-Curricular Student.
District Learning Day August 5, 2015
Classroom Technology Plan By Saundra Tyson-Dawson E7801 Instructional Technology Planning and Management Dr. Regina Merrwether.
School City of Hobart AdvancED (NCA) District Accreditation.
Title I Annual Parent Meeting Bardmoor Elementary.
Technology Assistance for the Ohio Academic Content Standards Cindy Reighley.
Using Adequate Resources to Double Student Performance Sarah Archibald Allan Odden CPRE Invitational Conference February 21, 2007.
Student Page Title Introduction Task Process Evaluation Conclusion Credits [Teacher Page]Teacher Page A WebQuest for 5th Grade Science Designed by Aaron.
 Take this time to look at the reflection sheet provided. Complete the chart on how you currently feel about technology specifically discussion boards.
Building Collaborative Learning Communities a division of Computer Strategies, LLC Your professional development solution.
“Growing Student Learning for Life” “Growing Student Learning for Life” Information Literacy/Technology Education Integration Plan Toolkit South Carolina.
Technology in Early Childhood and Elementary Education Jessica Gilboy LeKeisha Weimerskirch Laura Windels Stephanie Zimmer.
Building a Culture of Leadership at Belmont High School Michael M. Harvey, Ed.D. Principal, Belmont High School.
1 FINAL PRESENTATION PRESENTED BY SADIE J. KIMBREW JUNE 25, 2001.
 The Business Education Department of Pasco High School needs a 3D curriculum that guide/support a diverse group of students to meet the demanding skills.
PrevNext | Slide 1 MANS 2006 Michigan Educational Technology Standards and Expectations METS - Students October 19, 2006 Ron Faulds Michigan Department.
13.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SCHOOL YEAR SESSION APR 2015 MARGINS: GREAT FOR ERRORS, NOT SO GOOD FOR.
A Resource Guide for Parents. play&list=UUF0pa3nE3aZAfBMT8pqM5PA&playnext=1
Summer Conference Wiki sion.wikispaces.com/ Fay Gore & Michelle McLaughlin
Curriculum Overview May 2011 Travis Bracht Director of Student Learning.
CCRS Quarterly Meeting CCRS Quarterly Meeting English Language Arts
What is Blended Learning? Blended learning is a hybrid of face-to-face learning between students and teacher (a more traditional approach), with digital.
1 Oregon’s Content Standards Revision Process Oregon State Board of Education October 2008.
Chapter Three – Teaching Today #3 Software Products Being a special education teacher, I loved the fact that there was a question like this. I am really.
What is Learning-Focused?
PENFIELD CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: K-5 LITERACY CURRICULUM AUDIT Presented by: Dr. Marijo Pearson Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum, Instruction,
Learning Goals, Scales, and Learning Activities Clarity and Purpose.
Academic Goals and PLC Progress Bixby Middle School.
Understanding the Common Core Standards Adopted by Nevada in 2010 Our State. Our Students. Our Success.
EDU 346A Week 2 Integrating technology with Direct Instruction.
Smart Goal Draft EDLS 642 O’Donnell. Parent Involvement Strengths Parents choose to attend the school and generally start with greater agreement with.
Teaching and Learning with Technology
Distance Learning Lesson Plan
Leading E Competent Schools – Implementing Digital Learning Materials
PDE SAS: An Overview of the 2016 Updates
California Common Core Standards
Math Parent Night September 2016
Building Academic Language
Marzano Vocabulary Instruction Follow-Up
Building Academic Language
California Common Core Standards
California Common Core Standards
California Common Core Standards
Presentation transcript:

Implementing the Tech Standards Presenter: Eric Curts eTech|OHIO Tech Conference 2006

Session Overview 1. Brief overview of the Tech Standards 2. My philosophy about the Tech Standards 3. How my district is implementing the Tech Standards a) General overview b) Detailed plan

Brief Overview of Tech Standards Created with alignment to National Standards including: ISTE ITEA AASL/AECT Adopted in December 2003

Brief Overview of Tech Standards Ohio Tech Standards address three main areas of tech literacy: Computer and Multimedia Literacy Information Literacy Technological Literacy

Brief Overview of Tech Standards Ohio Tech Standards are arranged into seven areas: Nature of Technology Technology for Society Interaction Technology for Productivity Applications Technology and Communication Applications Technology and Information Literacy Design Designed World

Brief Overview of Tech Standards The Ohio Academic Content Standards for Technology can be located online at: academic_content_standards/ acstechnology.asp academic_content_standards/ acstechnology.asp

My Guiding Philosophy These following ideas are the things I thought about when developing a plan to implement the Tech Standards. ?

My Guiding Philosophy Technology is best learned in context rather than in isolation. If you have a reason for using the technology it will make more sense, be more motivating, and have a more long-lasting impact.

My Guiding Philosophy There exist many logical connections between the tech standards and the standards in other content areas such as math, science, language, social studies, the arts, and such.

My Guiding Philosophy Most districts do not have the money to hire more teachers to specifically teach technology, like we have with art teachers, music teachers, etc.

My Guiding Philosophy The tech standards (as with any standards) can be prioritized (subjectively, but with care and educationally sound thinking). This would allow us to identify Essential Indicators.

My Guiding Philosophy Proper implementation of something as large as the tech standards will take a long time... Probably several years. The tech standards are not being tested by the state.

Our Plan for Implementation Based upon these ideas, we decided to: Roll out the essential tech standards over the next several years, primarily through our non-tech teachers, using lessons that have a natural connection between technology and the other content areas.

Our Plan for Implementation Our general steps include: 1. Make a committee We have tech representation on the team. We have curriculum representation on the team. We get input from all the teachers.

Our Plan for Implementation 2. Analyze tech standards as they relate to our district What are we currently covering? What can we cover through our non-tech teachers? What can we choose not to cover for now? What do we still need to cover, but need additional resources/programs?

Our Plan for Implementation 3. Implement standards through non- tech teachers Identify logical connections between the tech standards and other content areas. Identify resources to assist the non-tech teachers. Develop model lessons for the non-tech teachers that cover the tech standards and indicators from other content areas.

Our Plan for Implementation 3. Implement standards through non-tech teachers (continued) Provide professional development for the non- tech teachers. Provide a way for teachers to share tech- integrated lesson plans, resources, and connections as they develop them. When a group of grades are finished, officially adopt our essential tech standards as Board- approved Course of Study.

Our Plan for Implementation 4. Implement additional needed standards through new programs as time, money, resources, and opportunity allow. 5. Re-evaluate postponed standards from time to time.

Details – Analyze Standards I developed an Excel spreadsheet to make it easier to analyze the standards. That Implementation Tool and many other resources mentioned here can be found at: ~technology/standards/ ~technology/standards/

Details – Analyze Standards Through the Implementation Tool we answer four questions: What are we currently covering? What can we cover through our non-tech teachers? What can we choose not to cover for now? What do we still need to cover, but need additional resources/programs?

Details - Implementation Tool 1. Fill in column A for where standards are being met for all students by programs that currently exist. This would include traditional computer applications and keyboarding courses that all students must take. Note what the programs are in the Comments column.

Details - Implementation Tool 2. Fill in column A for where standards are being met for some students by programs that currently exist. This would most likely apply to specialized elective courses at higher grade levels. At lower grades it is important for standards to be met by all students. However, at higher grade levels, there are more specialized standards that only need to be met by students who are in a correlated academic program. Note what the programs are and which students are affected in the Comments column.

Details - Implementation Tool 3. Fill in column B for where tech standards align to current Ohio Academic Content Standards (Math, Science, Social Studies, Language Arts, etc). These tech standards will be met by the core content area teachers in their regular classes. Professional development will be needed to help them see how to meet their standards using technology. Indicate the align standard in the Connections column.

Details - Implementation Tool 4. Fill in column B for where tech standards can be met by currently existing programs. Although these tech standards dont have specific correlation to the core academic content standards, there is a reasonable connection between the tech standard and the program in that subject area or in you specific school. Note what the programs are in the Comments column.

Details - Implementation Tool 5. Fill in column D for standards that do not need to be met at this time. With limited resources the standards need to be prioritized, and it is not reasonable to think every one can be met now or in the near future. If possible, fill in the reason for excluding this standard in the Comments column.

Details - Implementation Tool 6. Everything left needs to be filled in as column C. These are the standards that you feel are important, but have not found a way to address yet. Indicate in the Resources column what is needed to meet these standards.

Details - Implementation Tool During this process we also get input from teachers concerning what they consider to be Essential Indicators in the Tech Standards. We do this by giving them a simplified version of the Implementation Tool for just their grade level.

Details – Analyze Standards When this process is done we know What is already being covered. What we can help our non-tech teachers cover. What needs to be covered if the resources will allow. What can wait.

Details – Implementing through non-tech Teachers Identify Logical Connections and Resources We collect these and make them available to all teachers through the Ohio Treasure Chest at: ~techresources/ ~techresources/

Details – Implementing through non-tech Teachers Model Lessons We survey the teachers to see what they will be covering in the next few months. We create a model lesson that covers the tech standards and the other content they were going to teach anyway. We visit their classes and present the model lesson to their students.

Details – Implementing through non-tech Teachers Model Lessons continued… This provides the teachers with: A usable lesson A model for what tech integration really means An example of how technology can work in their classroom with their kids

Details – Implementing through non-tech Teachers Model Lessons continued… Some of our model lessons can be seen on our web site at: ~technology/standards/ ~technology/standards/ We will add more as they are completed.

Details – Implementing through non-tech Teachers Professional development Continuing PD will be provided to the teachers to assist them with integrating the tech standards After school sessions Grade level meetings Department meetings Newsletters

Details – Implementing through non-tech Teachers Provide a way for teachers to share the lessons, resources, and connections they develop and discover. They will be able to use POW-PAK to put their lesson plans online They will be able to use the Ohio Treasure Chest to link lessons, resources, and connections

Details – Implementing through non-tech Teachers Adopt the essential Tech Standards We plan to complete this process in grade blocks, such as K-5, 6-8, and As that is completed we will adopt our essential Tech Standards as Board- approved Course of Study. This provides the needed accountability for everyone involved.

Conclusion We have many years still to go. Anything we develop, we will share on our Tech Standards web site at: ~technology/standards/ ~technology/standards/ And through the Ohio Treasure Chest ~techresources/ ~techresources/

Thanks! Thank you for taking the time to attend this session. Eric