IFPSC vision statement A robust, accurate, and easy-to-use set of modeling tools will be widely available for the prediction.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Energy and Chemical Change
Advertisements

SELECTING THERMODYNAMIC PROPERTY METHODS
Thermodynamic Potentials
Property Methods In Aspen Plus
Lecture 15: Capillary motion
Aug 9-10, 2011 Nuclear Energy University Programs Materials: NEAMS Perspective James Peltz, Program Manager, NEAMS Crosscutting Methods and Tools.
11/8/20074th Challenge IFPSC1 Establishing Benchmarks for the Fourth Industrial Fluid Properties Simulation Challenge James D. Olson The Dow Chemical Company.
Update from the UNC General Education Council [presented to the UNC Board of Governors’ Educational Planning, Programs, and Policies Committee on February.
Development of Dynamic Models Illustrative Example: A Blending Process
ES 202 Fluid and Thermal Systems Lecture 18: Making the Connection (1/23/2003)
Thermodynamic Property Relations
Gibbs Free Energy Gibbs free energy is a measure of chemical energy All chemical systems tend naturally toward states of minimum Gibbs free energy G =
System. surroundings. universe.
Observables. Molar System The ratio of two extensive variables is independent of the system size.  Denominator N as particle  Denominator N as mole.
Solution thermodynamics theory—Part IV
Multidisciplinary Research Program of the University Research Initiative (MURI) Accurate Theoretical Predictions of the Properties of Energetic Materials.
Practicing Calorimetry. At the end of this lesson, you will be able to 30–A1.4k write balanced equations for chemical reactions that include energy changes.
Thermodynamics Unit 10. Endothermic vs. Exothermic Endo – chemical absorbs or takes in energy or heat Exo – chemical produces or gives off energy or heat.
Chapter 11-2: How does temperature affect enthalpy and entropy?
LAA Judging Criteria & Process 2015
Thermodynamics Basic Review of Byeong-Joo Lee Microstructure Evolution
Energy Saving Improvements for Industrial Ovens Gary Nola, Master Student Claudia Fajardo, Ph.D. David Meade, Ph.D. 4/13/2011.
Thermodynamics and thermophysical properties of liquid Fe-Cr alloys Thermodynamics and thermophysical properties of liquid Fe-Cr alloys Rada Novakovic.
© University of South Carolina Board of Trustees Chapt. 17 Thermodynamics Overview.
Biosystems engineering
Spontaneity of Chemical and Physical Processes: The Second and Third Laws of Thermodynamics 1.
Physical Chemistry content Physical Chemistry 1 (BSC) Thermodynamics Terms The thermodynamic system First law of thermodynamics Work, heat, internal energy,
Thermodynamics Chapter 19. First Law of Thermodynamics You will recall from Chapter 5 that energy cannot be created or destroyed. Therefore, the total.
Chapter 6 Energy Relationships in Chemical Reactions Nature and types of energy First law of thermodynamics Thermochemistry Enthalpy.
OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES Ensuring Ownership of PARSEL by Partners.
Review for Exam 2.
Physical Chemistry I (TKK-2246) 14/15 Semester 2 Instructor: Rama Oktavian Office Hr.: M – F
What is a spontaneous reaction? One, that given the necessary activation energy, proceeds without continuous outside assistance.
View Data The View Data module Use View Data to examine stored compound data (H, S, C p (T), G, etc.) in Compound type databases and list.
Chapter 1 The first law of thermodynamics § 1.1 Basic introduction.
Notre Dame Radiation Chemistry Data Center. Keith P. Madden Notre Dame Radiation Laboratory.
AP Biology Lab: Diffusion & Osmosis.
Center for Reliable Engineering Computing (REC) We handle computations with care Founded 2000.
Physical and chemical equilibrium of CO2-Water-Mineral system using Aspen Plus process simulator Technical University of Delft Ali Akbar Eftekhari Hans.
Overview AIChE Annual Meeting Salt Lake City, Utah November 8, 2007
ERT 206/4 THERMODYNAMICS SEM 1 (2012/2013) Dr. Hayder Kh. Q. Ali 1.
Chem. Eng. Thermodynamics (TKK-2137) 14/15 Semester 3 Instructor: Rama Oktavian Office Hr.: M.13-15, Tu , W ,
Department of Mechanical Engineering ME 322 – Mechanical Engineering Thermodynamics Review for Final Exam See also: Exam 1 prep Exam 2 prep Exam 3 prep.
Thermo-Calc Software MGI – the challenges and opportunities for CALPHAD NIST Diffusion Workshop May 9 and 10, 2013 P K Mason Thermo-Calc.
A "Reference Series" Method for Prediction of Properties of Long-Chain Substances Inga Paster and Mordechai Shacham Dept. Chem. Eng. Ben-Gurion University.
CHEE 311J.S. Parent1 4. Chemical Potential in Mixtures When we add dn moles of a component to n moles of itself, we will observe (?) a change in Gibbs.
Solution thermodynamics theory—Part IV
42C.1 Non-Ideal Solutions This development is patterned after that found in Molecular Themodynamics by D. A. McQuarrie and John D. Simon. Consider a molecular.
Thermodynamics and the Phase Rule
6 Modeling, Testing, and Final Outputs Permission granted to reproduce for educational use only.© Goodheart-Willcox Co., Inc. Objectives Explain the.
Classical Thermodynamics of Solutions
Chemical Engineering Thermodynamics-II Topic: Excess Gibbs Free Energy, Data Reduction, Thermodynamic Consistency Prepatred by:- Patel Nirav ( )
Solution thermodynamics theory—Part III
Thermodynamics and the Phase Rule
Exam #3 1. You should know from memory:
Process Design Course Using the NIST, DIPPR and DDBSP databases for Finding Physical, Chemical and Thermodynamic Properties Process Design Course.
Thermodynamics and the Phase Rule
Closing Remarks and Action Items
Solution of Thermodynamics: Theory and applications
Figure 6.2 Comparison among the Debye heat capacity, the Einstein heat capacity, and the actual heat capacity of aluminum.
Objectives of the Presentation
Chapter 13 Macromolecules in Solution: Thermodynamics and Equilibria
Chem. Eng. Thermodynamics (TKK-2137)
Phase diagrams by thermodynamic calculations
Atomistic simulations of contact physics Alejandro Strachan Materials Engineering PRISM, Fall 2007.
Atomistic materials simulations at The DoE NNSA/PSAAP PRISM Center
Equilibrium and Gibbs Free Energy
Thermodynamics Lecture 3
11 CHAPTER Thermodynamic Property Relations.
Point and Path functions
Presentation transcript:

IFPSC vision statement A robust, accurate, and easy-to-use set of modeling tools will be widely available for the prediction of physical properties of fluids and obtaining insight into the connections between molecular structure and properties. As a part of this tool set, molecular simulation will become a breakthrough technology that is widely accepted in the chemical industry and applied in conjunction with other predictive methods to meet the industry's evolving fluid property data needs. Through an international collaboration (IFPSC) between industry, academia, and national labs (coordinated by the National Institute of Standards and Technology), we will develop Standard Reference Simulations, validation of methods, quantification of uncertainty, force field and simulation databases, communication standards between computer programs, and recommendations regarding the use of other predictive methods, thus enabling users to select the appropriate tools to achieve results with requisite accuracy and insight. How well does the simulation challenge support this vision?

What we’re thinking… Continue annual challenge and report results at the AIChE meeting Continued focus on properties important to industry Succinct problems that illustrate a practical problem but require less overall effort (time) for entrants to compete Results published in papers in special journal issue Probably less emphasis on financial awards

Ideas for the next challenge… infinite-dilution activity coefficients melting temperatures interfacial and/or surface tensions thermodynamic properties for aqueous solutions of substances such as: - –Gibbs energies of solution-- enthalpies of solution –heat capacities of solution -- entropies of solution –partial molar volumes -- partial molar compressibilities VLE diagrams for asymmetric systems thermal diffusion gradients A biological simulation problem A mesoscale and/or coarse-grain simulation problem A hardware performance comparison problem

We’ve come a long way… In terms of the logistics of running the challenge from the 1 st to the 4 th Improvements for next time: –Be sure to make the finalized scoring spreadsheet available 1 month before the due date –Have a two week period after the due date for public discussion about the benchmark data to resolve any concerns –Have each entrant submit the completed scoring spreadsheet for her entry

Feedback?