IPMVP Update M&V Summit, New Orleans May 6th, 2003 Satish Kumar.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NAESB Measurement and Verification Model Business Practice Retail Electric Demand Response 5/29/09 update.
Advertisements

North American Energy Standards Board Standards Development for Demand Side Management / Energy Efficiency September 30, 2009 Eric Winkler, Ph.D. Project.
SSC-NM0053 Determination of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Reductions Based on Whole- Building Simulation of Building Mitigation Efforts Using eQUEST/DOE-2.2.
4 basic approaches to determining energy efficiency benefits (savings) 1.Stipulated or deemed savings 2.Individual Building Metering – Measurement and.
Using computer simulations to assess energy and carbon reductions in building CDM projects Joe Huang March 14, 2011.
New Paradigms for Measuring Savings
National Town Meeting on Demand Response Session A – Estimate It, Measure It, Verify It Demand Response Coordinating Committee (DRCC) Renaissance Washington.
EESE O&E Committee Update & Next Steps May 14, 2010.
CPUC CSI Workshop CPUC CSI Stakeholder Workshop San Francisco, CA February 15, 2012.
Procuring Our Way to Compliance IEP 27 th Annual Meeting September 23, 2008 Fong Wan, PG&E.
California HVAC Program Strategy IOU Program Overview CPUC HVAC Workshop June 24, 2009.
BPA Guidelines for Measurement & Verification of Energy Efficiency Measures Presented at Brown Bag Session November 29, 2006.
Energy Performance Analysis with RETScreen
+ Impact Evaluations and Measurement and Verification First we will focus on ‘Gross Savings’ Determination - savings determined irrespective of why 1 Kentucky.
1/14 Policies/Programmes to Promote the Development of ESCO 5 March, 2012 APERC Workshop, Kuala Lumpur Bing-Chwen Yang Team Leader Asia Pacific Energy.
MEASUREMENT & VERIFICATION
Page 1 July 2014 Capacity Building of Banks/FIs For EE Project Financing Capacity Building of Banks and Financial Institutions for Energy Efficiency Project.
International Performance Measurement and Verification Protocol
There is Much More to Protocols than Good M&V Steve Kromer Chair, IPMVP Inc. Paolo Bertoldi European Commission DG JRC.
Basic guidelines for the creation of a DW Create corporate sponsors and plan thoroughly Determine a scalable architectural framework for the DW Identify.
USDOE SEP/ARRA Evaluation Webinar Guidelines for States Conducting or Contracting Evaluations of ARRA Funded SEP Activities June 16, 2010 June 17, 2010.
Return On Investment Integrated Monitoring and Evaluation Framework.
ON IT 1 Con Edison Energy Efficiency Programs Sustaining our Future Rebecca Craft Director of Energy Efficiency.
DOE OFFICE OF INDIAN ENERGY The Importance of a Good Plan 1.
Take A Load Off, Texas SM is provided by Oncor Electric Delivery LLC as part of the company’s commitment to reduce energy consumption and demand. Frontier.
Portfolio Manager—ICBA Members ENERGY STAR  Tools For Benchmarking and Tracking Energy Use.
Using Uncertainty Modeling to Optimize M&V in ESPC Projects Discussion Document 10/31/02.
Measurement, Verification, and Forecasting Protocols for Demand Response Resources: Chuck Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Slide 1 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Residential Appliance Measure Updates Danielle Gidding Bonneville Power Administration.
Heat and Energy Saving 02 March 2009 John Russell
Guidelines for the Development and Maintenance of RTF- Approved Measure Savings Estimates December 7, 2010 Regional Technical Forum Presented by: Michael.
Overview of the Regional Technical Forum Guidelines January 22, 2013.
Energy Action Plan “Report Card” and the AB32 “Umbrella” CFEE ROUNDTABLE CONFERENCE ON ENERGY Julie Fitch California Public Utilities Commission Director.
J.B. Speed School of Engineering University of Louisville KEEPS Energy Management Toolkit Step 3: Set Performance Goals Toolkit 3A: Set Energy Performance.
M&V Part 2: Risk Assessment & Responsibility Allocation.
NAESB MEASUREMENT AND VERIFICATION MODEL BUSINESS PRACTICE RETAIL ELECTRIC DEMAND RESPONSE NARUC update 9/14/09.
© 2009 AirAdvice, Inc. Increasing Profitability Through Energy Services A Comprehensive Program To Deliver Energy and Sustainability Services.
The Future of Electric Power In Utah January 12, 2010.
Forecasting and Verifying the Energy Savings for Web-Enabled Thermostats in Portable Classrooms: William E. Koran, P.E. Quantum Energy Services and Technologies.
Slide 1 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Residential Appliance Measure Updates Danielle Gidding Bonneville Power Administration.
Refrigerator Decommissioning: Measure Status Update Regional Technical Forum October 16, 2013.
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
BPA M&V Protocols Overview of BPA M&V Protocols and Relationship to RTF Guidelines for Savings and Standard Savings Estimation Protocols.
M&V Part 4: M&V Plan Review. 4-2 M&V Plan Review Ø FEMP Documents F M&V Overview Checklist (Phase 2) F Final M&V Plan Checklist (Phase 3) Ø Risk & Responsibility.
RTF Custom Protocols: Background, Issues and Critical Elements February 8, 2012 Regional Technical Forum Subcommittee on Impact Evaluation and Custom Protocol.
“Leveraging Utility Resources” April 1, | 2 Helping customers to manage energy use through:  Energy efficiency  Demand response  California Solar.
National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency Model Program Evaluation Guide Marian Brown Southern California Edison
STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY AND TECHNIQUES.
+ Websites California Measurement Advisory Council Collaborative for Energy Efficiency 1 Kentucky PSC 9/11/09 Schiller Consulting, Inc.
Energy Efficiency Action Plan Kathleen Hogan Director, Climate Protection Partnerships Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency NARUC Winter Meetings.
National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency eeactionplan The Role of Energy Efficiency in Utility Energy Planning Snuller Price Partner Energy.
California Public Utilities Commission CPUC Climate Change Activities Paul Clanon Executive Director August 28, 2007 Presentation to the Senate Energy,
Technology and market potential of energy performance contracting for buildings Conference on Pollution Prevention & Energy Efficiency (P2E2) U.S., Hong.
Comparison of CA Evaluation Protocols, CA Framework, IPMVP and CPUC Policy Manual* A preface to group discussion *In terms of how they define.
Energy Project M&V: Reports that Add Value October 27, 2015.
1 Strategic Plan | May Decisions on rates, budgets, investments, programs and services for six years ( ) The Strategic Plan.
ENERGY STAR and Eco-Rated Homes: Planning Estimates and Research Strategy Regional Technical Forum December 8 th, 2015 Josh Rushton & Mohit Singh-Chhabra.
Generation Subcommittee, Day Two Arne Olson Energy & Environmental Economics, Inc. (E3) Presented to: Subcommittee on Generation Resources Boise, Idaho.
Regional Technical Forum Recommissioning commercial retail facilities: A whole building approach to energy savings April 7th, 2009 Presented by: Jeremy.
Slide 1 B O N N E V I L L E P O W E R A D M I N I S T R A T I O N Variable Capacity Heat Pump Sub-Committee Road-Mapping Session BPA Energy Efficiency.
REBUILD AMERICA. Why look at the bills? l Bills are the bottom line –they prove the savings!
California Energy Action Plan December 7, 2004 Energy Report: 2004 and 2005 Overview December 7, 2004.
Draft Seventh Power Plan Meets RTF. Key Finding: Least Cost Resource Strategies Rely on Conservation and Demand Response to Meet Nearly All Forecast Growth.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of BGE’s DSM Programs Marshall Keneipp, PE Summit Blue Consulting, LLC Prepared for: Energy Efficiency and Conservation Stakeholders.
National Action Plan for Energy Efficiency Energy Efficiency Policy Options and Program Best Practices MD PSC Planning Conference on State’s Future Electricity.
Illustrative EE/DSM/DR Planning Process
Development of a Solar Water Heater NAMA Concept Belize
Clean Energy Options for GRC Communities
WRI/WBCSD GHG Protocol: Project Module
Dairy Subgroup #1: Fostering Markets for Non-Digester Projects
Presentation transcript:

IPMVP Update M&V Summit, New Orleans May 6th, 2003 Satish Kumar

Outline IPMVP Inc. – Organizational Issues Recent Efforts New Construction Renewable Energy Technologies Baseline Development in DR Programs Quantifying emissions reductions from EE projects

The Organization IPMVP Inc. is a non-profit organization responsible for maintaining existing and developing new protocols under the IPMVP umbrella Supported by US Department of Energy, LBNL, and Charter Members

Charter Members Bonneville Power Administration Energy Foundation Federal Energy Management Program General Services Administration NYSERDA Sacramento Municipal Utility District Southern California Gas

Mission Statement “To develop and maintain an international, consensus framework for creating measurement and verification (M&V) protocols to quantify such metrics that determine the financial value of any energy efficiency projects.”

IPMVP Sphere of Influence IPMVP Inc. Renewable Energy Tech. Energy/Water Efficiency Retrofits Performance Benchmarking of New Const. Indoor Environmental Quality Quantifying Emissions From EE Projects Baseline Determination in DR Programs

Objectives - I Maintain a stable and financially self-sustaining organization, while remaining faithful to the organization’s mission. Establish and maintain internationally accepted M&V standards for energy and water efficiency and demand reduction projects. Reach out and effectively involve the finest international talents and expertise in developing protocols and in avoiding duplicate efforts.

Objectives - II Maintain contact with practitioners and market place to ensure relevance of the protocol. Effectively disseminate the IPMVP guidelines around the world, work with our international partners to encourage the translation of the Protocol for faster and more effective adoption and application of the IPMVP concepts. Develop training and certification material to educate and train professionals in the field of measurement and verification of energy savings.

M&V of New Construction Baseline Development Basics Appropriateness of Benchmark Energy codes/standards, design standards Rigor Use appropriate M&V methods and defensible assumptions Reasonableness/Repeatability Come up with a reasonable baseline estimate with a provision to adjust based on post-construction findings

M&V of New Construction Approaches to Performance Verification Component Verification Whole Building Benchmarking Calibrated Simulation

M&V Options in New Const. M&V OptionsTypical Applications A. Partially Measured ECM Isolation Partial measurement of system energy use. Some operating parameters are stipulated. Lighting system or constant speed motors - power draw periodically measured, operating hours stipulated. B. ECM Isolation Full measurement of energy use and operating parameters of system. Variable speed control of a fan motor – Continuous measurement of energy use throughout M&V period. C. Whole Building Comparison Savings determined at whole-building level by measuring energy use at main meters or with aggregated sub-meters. Government agency wishes to determine order-of-magnitude savings level associated with a building design incentive program. D. Calibrated Simulation Savings are determined at whole-building or system level by calibrating simulated energy use to measured energy use Savings determination for the purposes of a new building performance contract, with the local energy code defining the baseline.

M&V of NC - Process Map Determine the appropriate baseline High Rigor: Building Codes Low Rigor: Existing Market Standards Select Analysis Type: Whole Building or Component Select Component Verification: Performance & Usage Performance Use Option A Baseline is relevant codes or design standards for components with usage stipulations Use Option B Baseline is relevant codes or design standards for components Use Option D Baseline is relevant codes or design standards for whole buildings Use Option C Baseline is normalized average energy performance of the control group Use Option C Baseline is published or reported normalized energy performance of buildings with similar functions, operational characteristics and climate Are Similar Buildings Available for Comparison Yes No Performance & Usage Performance Component Whole building or major system

M&V of Renewable Energy Technology (RET) Status In Final Draft Form Before the Technical Committee What’s New Consistent With the Latest IPMVP Concepts and 2001 IPMVP Volume I Format More Examples

M&V of RET Key Issues Renewables supply energy rather than reduce the amount of energy used. M&V strategy for renewables must be able to differentiate between an energy supply and a reduction in the load. The performance of renewable energy systems is a function of environmental conditions (solar radiation and wind speed), which are outside the control of the project developers and should be accounted for.

M&V of RET Baseline Applications Control Group Before and After – Before and After On and Off Calculated Reference

M&V of RET Key Issues Renewables supply energy rather than reduce the amount of energy used. M&V strategy for renewables must be able to differentiate between an energy supply and a reduction in the load. The performance of renewable energy systems is a function of environmental conditions (solar radiation and wind speed), which are outside the control of the project developers and should be accounted for.

M&V of RET Option A: Partially Measured Retrofit Isolation - It measures the ability of the system to deliver energy, capacity, and other claimed benefits and applies the measured result to an assumed set of operating conditions. Option B: Retrofit Isolation - It involves long-term measurement of energy delivery directly by metering the plant’s output or indirectly by determining savings based on analysis of end-use meters. Option C: Whole Building Analysis - It involves inferring savings by the statistical analysis of whole-facility energy consumption without end-use metering of the renewable energy system. Option D: Calibrated Simulation Models – It involves predicting the long-term performance of a system or whole building by calibrating a computer model based on data from a short-term test.

M&V protocol for Calculating Demand Reductions Sponsor California Energy Commission Jointly developed by Xenergy and IPMVP Analysis performed by Xenergy Review conducted by IPMVP Inc. Goal Calculation of the baseline against which reductions are calculated. Help increase participation in DR programs of small- and medium-sized customers by reducing the barriers related to inconsistency and confusion about baseline methods.

M&V protocol for Calculating Demand Reductions Criteria for a Good Baseline Method Simplicity Accuracy Minimize gaming Predictability Consistency (with other ISOs)

M&V protocol for Calculating Demand Reductions Recommendations A method that generally works well for a range of load types is the simple average of the last 10 days, by hour of the day, with additive adjustment to the 2 hours prior to the curtailment period. This method can be recommended for both weather-sensitive and non-weather-sensitive accounts, with both low and high variability, for summer and nonsummer curtailments.

Emissions Initiative In developmental stages Motivation Guarding EE community’s interests Key Issues Site Vs. Source Program Vs. Project Where IPMVP Can Make a Difference Build on the Strength of IPMVP Need for aggregation

Emissions Initiative – Proposed Strategy Illustrate candidate approaches to convert energy savings into emission credits based on the uncertainties inherent in the M&V option selected to quantify energy savings; Develop simple, practical, repeatable, and cost-effective monitoring, evaluation, and verification approaches Role of IPMVP in different trading program such as Cap and Trade, Offsets, and Set-asides. Emission factors for typical fuel burning appliances or reference to a range of resources; Link to national or state registry of emissions factors at least at an aggregate level; Better guidance for the EE community on the difficulties of off site emissions for electricity and district heat/cool; Current list of relevant environmental authorities/rule makers and their web sites; Related bibliography;

For More Information Satish Kumar Phone: