Quality Education Investment Act (QEIA) County Superintendents Oversight Responsibilities CCSESA – May 7 & 9, 2007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Proposed Funding Arrangement of Diversity Learning Grant (DLG) CDI March 2008.
Advertisements

Presented by: Susan K. Burr Executive Director California County Superintendents Educational Services Association (CCSESA) May 7 & 9, 2007 Summary of Statutory.
1 © 2008 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association Valenzuela/California High School Exit Exam (CAHSEE) Lawsuit Settlement California.
Summary of Senate Bill 1133 (Chapter 751, Statutes of 2006) The Quality Investment Act (QEIA) In Settlement of CTA v Schwarzenegger C C S E S A California.
Quality Education Investment Act of 2006 (QEIA) 1 Quality Education Investment Act (QEIA) of 2006 County Superintendents Oversight and Technical Assistance.
1 Quality Education Investment Act of 2006 (QEIA) 1 Quality Education Investment Act (QEIA) of 2006 County Superintendents Monitoring Responsibilities.
NCLB Program Improvement Status Report for Chipman Middle School Presentation to the Board of Education October 23, 2007.
Alameda Unified School District School Board Meeting Budget Information Update February 10, :30pm.
Leon County Schools Performance Feedback Process August 2006 For more information
Quality Education Investment Act of 2006 (QEIA) Principal Informational Meeting February 26, 2007 Oakland Unified School District in collaboration with.
2007 – 2008 Academic/Business Plan …a strategic initiative School District of Palm Beach County New Horizons for Student Success.
Continuous Improvement Update June 11, (Your School/Departments Mission Statement Here) (Your School/Departments SMART Goals Here)
April 15, BOEs Theory of Action Managed Performance Empowerment Theory of Action Adopted Feb. 06 Acknowledges success of Managed Instruction Retains.
February 20, 2013 Puget Sound Partnerships 2012 Action Agenda Update: Revised Approach Continues to Lack Key Accountability Tools Envisioned in Statute.
. Information from “Countdown to Accountability” Summer Leadership Institute July 2002 Arizona School Boards Association from presentations by Chris Thomas.
State Board of Education April 16, 2008 Jacqueline Jones Ellen Wolock David Joye Division of Early Childhood Education Preschool Expansion.
1 School District of Escambia County Class Size Presentation August 2010.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A new model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The correlation.
Local Control Funding Formula & Local Control Accountability Plan Stakeholders Meeting March 26, 2014.
Click here to add text Click here to add text. Local Control, Accountability, and Transforming How We Finance Our Schools Elk Grove Unified School District.
Hickory Ridge Elementary School Annual Title One Parent Meeting
Next Generation of Accountability Differentiated Recognition, Accountability, and Support Summer 2012.
The Preschool Blueprint. How will PFA work? Act becomes effective upon passage of the initiative on the June 2006 ballot and will provide a constitutional.
Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) & Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) Parent Advisory Committee Presentation April 4, 2014 With Information Provided.
Williams Lawsuit Settlement Prepared by: Susan K. Burr Deputy Executive Director California County Superintendents Educational Services Association (CCSESA)
Final Determinations. Secretary’s Determinations Secretary annually reviews the APR and, based on the information provided in the report, information.
The Local Control Funding Formula and the Local Control Accountability Plan Irma Villanueva Sr. Director of Educational Projects Hueneme Elementary School.
Twin Rivers Unified School District: Inspiring each student to extraordinary achievement every day! Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) UPDATE Presented.
School Site Budget Development Process. 2 5/23/2015 California’s Education Budget Crisis In the past two years alone, California K-12 funding.
1 of 30 1 st Derivative The formula for the 1 st derivative of a function is as follows: It’s just the difference between subsequent values and measures.
LOCAL CONTROL AND ACCOUNTABILITY PLAN Kern High School District.
Scenario – Practical Applications of School Law JESSAMY GUERRERO.
1 Wyoming Education Coalition Legislative Proposal Wyoming Education Coalition Wyoming Association for School Administrators Wyoming Association of School.
Department of Research and Evaluation Santa Ana Unified School District 2011 CST API and AYP Elementary Presentation Version: Elementary.
Module IV: Implementing and Monitoring the LEA Plan Systemic Local Educational Agency (LEA) Plan Development.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION – Reviewed on 8-May-12. The content was not modified. Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Quality.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
San Marino Unified School District Second Interim Financial Report and Long Range Financial Projections March 11, 2008.
“Reaching across Arizona to provide comprehensive quality health care for those in need” Our first care is your health care Arizona Health Care Cost Containment.
1 Prop 82: An Historic Opportunity for California’s Children.
Presented by: Mr. Kurt Madden, Superintendent Mr. Walter J. Con, Asst. Superintendent – Business Services November 12 th,
Contra Costa County Office of Education May 2015 Local Control Funding Formula: Supporting Continuous Improvement.
Williams Lawsuit Settlement Prepared by: Susan K. Burr Deputy Executive Director California County Superintendents Educational Services Association (CCSESA)
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
Regional Assessment Network (RAN) Update Chun-Wu Li, Ph.D. Assessment and Accountability Services Riverside County Office of Education November 22, 2013.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Quality Education Investment Act of 2006 (QEIA) February.
New Title I Designee Training September 17,
1 Title IA Coordinator Training Preparing for Title IA Monitoring
District Action Plan Strategic Planning for Student Success Board Meeting March 24, 2015 Dr. Rodney Thompson, Superintendent.
1 Accountability Adrift in California Schools November 2015 Greg Moser Procopio Cory Hargreaves & Savitch, LLP.
Lincoln Public Schools Budget Tool Kit. Timeline for Budget September Last Friday - Enrollment January-March Staffing Conferences January-April.
WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Shasta County Office of Education Alternative Programs March 8-10, 2010.
Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) Overview Understanding LCFF Accountability.
Oregon Department of Education Office of Curriculum, Instruction and Field Services Presenter:Bob Siewert, Associate Superintendent Presentation to the.
“A Georgia Charter System” Floyd County Schools Reduction In Force Process The Superintendent’s FY14 Plan Dr. Jeff McDaniel, Superintendent.
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
QEIA Monitoring Regular Application Schools April 29, 2010 California County Superintendents Educational Services Association QEIA Northern and.
MISSISSIPPI ADEQUATE EDUCATION PROGRAM (MAEP)
Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP
Vocational and Skill Center Program Funding Priorities
Driving Through the California Dashboard
SBDM ALLOCATIONS Jody Maggard Perry County Schools.
Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP
Local Control Accountability Plan LCAP
Strategic Plan Annual Update
Presented by: Susan K. Burr Executive Director
Driving Through the California Dashboard
Annual Williams Report
Presentation transcript:

Quality Education Investment Act (QEIA) County Superintendents Oversight Responsibilities CCSESA – May 7 & 9, 2007

QEIA – County Superintendent Oversight Responsibilities… Beginning in , county superintendents are required to annually monitor the implementation of QEIA in funded schools Beginning in , county superintendents are required to annually monitor the implementation of QEIA in funded schools QEIA provides $2 million annually to county superintendents in counties with participating schools to conduct monitoring activities QEIA provides $2 million annually to county superintendents in counties with participating schools to conduct monitoring activities Funds allocated based on Williams site visit formula Funds allocated based on Williams site visit formula C C S E S A

QEIA – County Superintendent Oversight Responsibilities (cont.) … Monitoring areas include: Monitoring areas include: Class size reduction Class size reduction Student-to-counselor ratios Student-to-counselor ratios Teacher and counselor qualifications Teacher and counselor qualifications Average teaching experience Average teaching experience Success in meeting API growth targets Success in meeting API growth targets C C S E S A

QEIA – County Superintendent Oversight Responsibilities (cont.) … Monitoring areas include: Monitoring areas include: Professional Development Requirements Professional Development Requirements Williams v. CA requirements Williams v. CA requirements Meeting requirements within statutory timelines Meeting requirements within statutory timelines School-specific measures for schools participating under the alternative option School-specific measures for schools participating under the alternative option C C S E S A

QEIA – County Superintendent Oversight Responsibilities (cont.) … If the county superintendent determines that a funded school has not met the implementation targets after the first or second year of funding, he/she must notify the SPI. If the county superintendent determines that a funded school has not met the implementation targets after the first or second year of funding, he/she must notify the SPI. C C S E S A

QEIA – County Superintendent Oversight Responsibilities (cont.) … If all of the interim and final targets are not met by the end of the subsequent year, the SPI is required to terminate funding for the program If all of the interim and final targets are not met by the end of the subsequent year, the SPI is required to terminate funding for the program The SPI is required to provide advance notice of funding termination and to provide sufficient funds needed to make staff and cost adjustments The SPI is required to provide advance notice of funding termination and to provide sufficient funds needed to make staff and cost adjustments C C S E S A

Timeline for Accountability Measures … Timelines for the program – partial funding begins in , but accountability measures dont begin until Timelines for the program – partial funding begins in , but accountability measures dont begin until See attached chart for specific monitoring timelines See attached chart for specific monitoring timelines C C S E S A