Office of Inspector General (OIG) 2015 Florida Annual Assessment and FSAA Meeting.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Policy 2340 West Virginia Measures of Academic Progress (WV MAP)
Advertisements

Parents Need To Know About… HB 656 Georgia Academic Placement and Promotion Law Department for Assessment/Accountability, DeKalb County School System.
Roles and Responsibilities. Collaborative Efforts to Improve Student Achievement Guidelines for developing integrated planning and decision making processes.
(Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act) and
Educational Specialists Performance Evaluation System
WHAT TO EXPECT IN AN EXTERNAL AUDIT OR INVESTIGATION An Overview of External Audit and Investigative Processes Performed by Outside Entities at UCSD.
1 The Revised PEP Process Presented by… Rick Losemann Director, Employee Relations Division Office of Personnel Services and Benefits.
Campus Improvement Plans
Parents Need To Know About… HB 656 Georgia Academic Placement and Promotion Law Revised 7/08, Department for Elementary Instruction, DeKalb County School.
The Office of Inspector General MEETING OF THE PARTNERS’ COUNCIL Integrity and Transparency Orlando, Florida May 11, 2010 The Office of Inspector General.
The Villages Charter Middle School 450 Village Campus Circle The Villages, FL November 21, 2009 Mrs. Jane Smiley 225 NE 39 th Avenue Summerfield,
F L O R I D A D E P A R T M E N T O F B U S I N E S S A N D P R O F E S S I O N A L R E G U L A T I O N Division of Regulation Complaint Process Division.
Internal Audit Awareness
HARASSMENT, INTIMIDATION AND BULLYING POLICY AND PR0CEDURES Irvington Public Schools Staff Training School Year.
Office of Inspector General (OIG) Internal Audit
Financial and Programmatic Monitoring ESEA/Act 807 ACSIP Arkansas Department of Education Division of Academic Accountability.
Internal Auditing and Outsourcing
Quarterly Update Blue Ribbon Commission’s Recommendations of the 2009 Criterion Referenced Competency Test (CRCT) Erasure Investigation Dr. Beverly L.
IDEA 2004 Procedural Safeguards: Legal Rights and Options Mississippi Association of School Superintendent Spring, Mississippi Department of Education.
An Educational Computer Based Training Program CBTCBT.
Establishing A Compliance Program: It Makes Sense
C.O.R.E Creating Opportunities that Result in Excellence.
BTOP OVERSIGHT WASHINGTON D.C. MAY 2012 U.S. DOC Inspector General Recovery Act Oversight Task Force 1.
DEPARTMENT OF MANAGEMENT SERVICES OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL.
Communications in the Face of Crisis Lesley Bruinton Tuscaloosa City Schools.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
Quarterly Update Blue Ribbon Commission’s Recommendations of the 2009 Criterion Referenced Competency Test (CRCT) Erasure Investigation Dr. Beverly L.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Virginia Association of School Superintendents Annual Conference Patty.
Florida Test Security Measures Presented at CCSSO National Conference of Student Assessment National Harbor, Maryland June 2013.
Caveon Test Security Audit for Cesar Chavez Academy – Oral Report December 5, 2009 Commissioned by Colorado Department of Education.
1 Standard Test Administration Testing Ethics Training PowerPoint Spring 2007 Utah State Office of Education.
OIG’S Audit Process Diane Kozinski Auditor. 2 MISSION STATEMENT OF OIG To serve the American Worker and Taxpayer by conducting audits, investigations,
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
Audit Planning Process
1 Standard Test Administration Testing Ethics Training PowerPoint Spring 2011 Utah State Office of Education.
1 NCLB Title Program Monitoring NCLB Title Program Monitoring Regional Training SPRING 2006.
On Site Review Process Office of Field Services Last Revised 8/15/2011.
Presented by: Jan Stanley, State Title I Director Office of Assessment and Accountability June 10, 2008 Monitoring For Results.
An Overview: The Role of the Audit Committee in Monitoring, Oversight, and Compliance Derry Harper, Inspector General and Director of Compliance.
OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL PRESENTERS : Charles W. Hicks, Jr., Interim Inspector General S. Maurice D. Ingram, Manager, Benefits Recovery Unit PRESENTED.
How to Prepare for an Ohio TAV/TRV September 21, 2006 D.D. Davis, Mill Creek, Youngstown.
Comprehensive Equity Plan
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
School Monitoring and OEPA Greg Miller MEL – 540 School Resource Management Spring 2015.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
Office of Test Security Rina Davis office fax.
Arizona Board of Osteopathic Examiners in Medicine and Surgery Medical Consultant Orientation.
Federal Flexibility Initiative and Schoolwide Programs.
IMPLEMENTING TITLE I IN BARROW COUNTY SCHOOLS ANNUAL PARENT MEETING
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California English Language Development Test (CELDT) Program.
Internal Audit Section. Authorized in Section , Florida Statutes Section , Florida Statutes (F.S.), authorizes the Inspector General to review.
Investigations Section. Authorized in Section , Florida Statutes Section , Florida Statutes (F.S.) authorizes the Inspector General to conduct.
Title I Information Lake Preston School District 38-3
District Coordinator Training
Parent and Family Engagement Policy
Parent & Family Engagement Policy
Proctoring In Our Schools St Johns County School District
Red Flags Rule An Introduction County College of Morris
Survey Results Overview
Proctoring In Our Schools St Johns County School District
Parent and Family Engagement Policy
Parental Involvement Policy
Parental Involvement Policy
Parent & Family Engagement Policy
Roles and Responsibilities
Essential Questions What are the ramifications of continued identification under the ESEA Accountability Act? What do we need to do to get our school.
School Health Advisory Council SHAC Overview October 12, 2017
Roles and Responsibilities
Presentation transcript:

Office of Inspector General (OIG) 2015 Florida Annual Assessment and FSAA Meeting

OIG Responsibilities Section (s.) , Florida Statutes (F. S.), establishes the Office of Inspector General (OIG) within each state agency to provide a central point for coordination of, and responsibility for, activities that promote accountability, integrity, and efficiency in government. Additionally, in accordance with s , F. S., the OIG will conduct or coordinate investigations into substantiated allegations that a district school board or college board of trustees is unwilling or unable to address relating to waste, fraud, or financial mismanagement, as determined by the Commissioner of Education.

Mission Statement The mission of the Office of Inspector General (OIG) is to assist the Commissioner of Education in achieving the department’s mission of increasing student proficiency and maintaining an accountability system that measures student progress. The OIG accomplishes this by providing independent audits and reviews of programs and activities, conducting investigations of alleged violations, and offering consulting services to assist management in their efforts to maximize effectiveness and efficiency.

OIG Caveon Data Forensics Investigations The Division of Assessment, Research, and Measurement (ARM) and Caveon Data Forensics identifies schools with extreme levels of similar answer patterns and erasures; because of the severity of these anomalies, ARM refers these schools to the OIG for investigation.

Background Since the implementation of Caveon Data Forensics in Spring 2011, the OIG has facilitated investigations of 92 schools. On average, 23 schools are referred to the OIG each year, with the majority of schools flagged in the Spring assessment. The OIG has investigated schools from the smallest district to the largest district in the state. Schools have been flagged in 24 of the 67 county school districts, prompting further investigation.

My school is flagged, what happens next? The OIG notifies superintendents of the schools that were identified for investigation. Each school is assigned an “I” (incomplete) for its accountability outcomes (school grade). The department requires each district to conduct an internal investigation of all flagged schools within their respective district regarding the high incidence of similarities or erasures.

Focus of District Investigation Let data drive investigation. – Focus on student similarity and erasure indices. Interview students with the highest indices. – Identify the test groups (classrooms) where the students with high indices are concentrated. Interview staff who proctored/monitored those rooms. – Identify all personnel that physically handled the materials. Interview test administrators and coordinators.

Student Interviews Interview students with high indices – Students with high indices contributed to the school being flagged, so they should be a focus of the investigation. – Interview students in close proximity to those with high indices (did they see anything suspicious). OIG requires districts to interview 10 percent of the flagged students, or a minimum of 10 students, whichever is greater. – For example, 7 th grade reading was flagged with 150 students tested, 15 or more students must be interviewed. – Another example, 4 th grade mathematics was flagged with 40 students tested, 10 or more students must be interviewed. Interview questions can be provided by the OIG. Parent letters can be provided by the OIG. Convey to students that they are not the subject of the investigation and are not suspected of any wrongdoing

Staff Interviews Interview staff who proctored/monitored rooms with a large concentration of students with high indices. – Ask staff if they noticed anything suspicious from students, especially those with high indices or other staff in the room. Interview test administrators and test coordinators. – Confirm the whereabouts of test materials before, during and after the assessment in question. – Identify any violations of the Test Security Statute, s , F.S. Interview questions can be provided by the OIG.

Do’s Follow investigation guide. Provide ALL documentation listed in investigation guide. Interview required number of students. Contact OIG with any questions or concerns. Submit final report within allotted timeframe. Don’ts Leave any documentation out of the final report. Interview less than the required number of students. Copy and paste final reports from other school investigations. Treat every school as its own investigation. Submitting Findings to OIG

What's Next? When final reports are submitted, the OIG focus is on documentation, findings and conclusions: Was sufficient documentation provided by the district to support releasing the school grade or dismissing the allegation? Was sufficient documentation provided by the district to support opening a case and continuing the investigation? Did the final report reveal any violations of Florida Statutes or ? The OIG reviews final reports on a first come, first served basis.

OIG decisions The majority of school grades are released and allegations dismissed because Complete and sufficient documentation was provided. – Followed investigation guide No violations of Florida Statutes or were identified. The majority of school grades are held and cases are opened because Incomplete or insufficient documentation – Not following the investigation guide – Copy and pasting reports Violation of Florida Statutes or The Inspector General will notify the superintendent of his decision to recommend the school’s grade be released or that the investigation will continue.

Concluding a case Based on evidence and testimony obtained throughout the process, the OIG develops its findings, conclusions and recommendations. In accordance with s (6) (e), F. S., the subjects are notified by mail of the investigative findings and are provided with an opportunity to submit a written response to these findings.

QUESTIONS, CONCERNS or COMMENTS? Florida Department of Education Office of Inspector General 325 West Gaines Street, Suite 1201 Tallahassee, Florida Phone: Fax: Website