medium size full arch trays depending on the user Imprint ™ II Penta ™ Heavy Body Applications per Foil Bag (360mL)

 Polymer with vinyl terminal groups  Mineral fillers  Synthetic fillers  Platinum complex  Crosslinker  Surfactant  Pigments Imprint ™ II Penta ™ Heavy Body Chemistry

 Impressions may be poured 30 minutes after disinfection  Impressions made with 3M ™ ESPE ™ Imprint ™ II Garant ™ HB/LB  Impression material may be poured immediately after disinfection Imprint ™ II Penta ™ Heavy Body Model Pouring

Imprint ™ II Penta ™ Heavy Body Impression Material

3M ™ ESPE ™ Imprint ™ II Penta ™ HB  1:5 catalyst/base ratio  3M ™ ESPE ™ Pentamix ™ mixing unit  Mauve color  More putty-like resistance during tray seating 3M ™ ESPE ™ Imprint ™ II Garant ™ HB  1:1 catalyst/base ratio  3M ™ ESPE ™ Garant ™ dispenser  Purple color Imprint ™ II Penta ™ Heavy Body What are Some Differences?

 Crown and bridge impressions  Inlay/onlay impressions Photo courtesy of Dr. Timothy Kosinski, DDS Imprint ™ II Penta ™ Heavy Body Indications

 Rated by 85% of dentists as the same as or better than current*  Dentist satisfaction rating of 90%*  Easy to remove final impression with excellent final fit and detail reproduction  Putty-like resistance when seating the tray  3M ™ ESPE ™ Pentamix ™ mixing unit dispenses fast and easy with push button activation  Void-free and homogenous mix when used with the 3M ™ ESPE ™ Pentamix ™ mixing unit *April 2002 VPS Impression Material Field Evaluation, The Marketing Solutions Group, Inc. Imprint ™ II Penta ™ Heavy Body Features

 Does not drip or slump  Hydrophilic  Acceptable final set rigidity  Room-temperature working time of two minutes  Four-minute setting time  30-minute minimum stone model pour time Imprint ™ II Penta ™ Heavy Body Features (continued)

 Easy to remove final impression with excellent final fit and detail reproduction  Putty-like resistance when seating the tray  Hydrophilic and no-drip properties *April 2002 VPS Impression Material Field Evaluation, The Marketing Solutions Group, Inc. Imprint ™ II Penta ™ Heavy Body Top 3 Features*

Mixed consistency, mm Strain in compression (%) – Working 73° F, minutes2:002:152:152:30 Setting time, minutes4:005:003:153:30 – 5:00 Mix tip waste, ml Shore A hardness after 15 mins after 1 hour after 24 hours M ™ ESPE ™ Imprint ™ IICaulkDMGKulzer Penta ™ AquasilHonigum ® Flexitime Heavy BodyDECAHeavyMagnum 360 H Heavy Imprint ™ II Penta ™ Heavy Body Competitive Comparison

Imprint ™ II Penta ™ Heavy Body Mixed Consistency

Imprint ™ II Penta ™ Heavy Body One Step/Two Viscosity Technique Working and Setting Time Recommendations

Imprint ™ II Penta ™ Heavy Body Strain in Compression

This slide series illustrates an anterior case using 3M ™ ESPE ™ Imprint ™ II Penta ™ Heavy Body impression material with the 3M ™ ESPE ™ Pentamix ™ mixing unit and 3M ™ ESPE ™ Imprint ™ II Garant ™ light body impression material. This clinical case was made courtesy of Timothy F. Kosinski, D.D.S. Dr. Kosinski currently practices esthetic and implant dentisty and is an Adjunct Assistant Clinical Professor; Department of Stomatology Section of Oral Medicine, University of Detroit School of Dentistry. Imprint ™ II Penta ™ Heavy Body Introduction

 Delivers consistent, homogeneous, void-free mix  Dispenses fast and easy with push button activation  Hygienic and reduces the risk of cross-contamination Photo courtesy of Dr. Timothy Kosinski, DDS *April 2002 VPS Impression Material Field Evaluation, The Marketing Solutions Group, Inc. Imprint ™ II Penta ™ Heavy Body Pentamix ™ Mixing Unit - Top 3 Features*

Slide 1 - Removed fractured post. Tooth fracture at tissue crest. Photo courtesy of Dr. Timothy Kosinski, DDS Imprint ™ II Penta ™ Heavy Body

Slide 2 - Final prepared tooth. Tissue retracted using 0a Gingibraid and #2 Z twist Gingi-Plain. Ready for placement of plastic para-post and impression material. Photo courtesy of Dr. Timothy Kosinski, DDS Imprint ™ II Penta ™ Heavy Body

Slide 3 - Plastic para-post positioned in root canal. 3M ™ ESPE ™ Imprint ™ II Garant ™ Light Body Impression Material injected around preparation. Photo courtesy of Dr. Timothy Kosinski, DDS Imprint ™ II Penta ™ Heavy Body

Slide 4 - Dispensing 3M ™ ESPE ™ Imprint ™ II Penta ™ heavy body impression material into a stock anterior tray. Photo courtesy of Dr. Timothy Kosinski, DDS Imprint ™ II Penta ™ Heavy Body

Slide 5 - Final pick up impression of the para-post. Photo courtesy of Dr. Timothy Kosinski, DDS Imprint ™ II Penta ™ Heavy Body

Slide 6 - Cast post & core on model. Photo courtesy of Dr. Timothy Kosinski, DDS Imprint ™ II Penta ™ Heavy Body

Slide 7 - Cast post & core cemented. Photo courtesy of Dr. Timothy Kosinski, DDS Imprint ™ II Penta ™ Heavy Body

Slide 8 - Final porcelain fused to metal crown. Photo courtesy of Dr. Timothy Kosinski, DDS Imprint ™ II Penta ™ Heavy Body

 90% were satisfied or very satisfied with 3M ™ ESPE ™ Imprint ™ II Penta ™ heavy body impression material.  85 % rated the Imprint ™ II Penta ™ heavy body material as the same or better than their current heavy body material. April 2002 VPS Impression Material Field Evaluation, The Marketing Solutions Group, Inc. 38% Imprint II Users, 36% Dimension ™ Penta H users, and 26% competitive users Imprint ™ II Penta ™ Heavy Body Clinical Results Imprint ™ II Penta ™ heavy body impression material field evaluation 2002*

 “Creamy mix, with no slumping and a nice color. A good material.”  “No defects, good detail and easy to read.”  “Handling is easier, dispensing is easier. The self-puncture feature of each bag is a huge improvement over my current material.”  “Better incorporation of heavy and light body material with less voids.” *April 2002 VPS Impression Material Field Evaluation, The Marketing Solutions Group, Inc. Imprint ™ II Penta ™ Heavy Body Evaluator’s Comments Imprint ™ II Penta ™ heavy body impression material field evaluation 2002*

Imprint ™ II Penta ™ Heavy Body Intro Kit