Kantian Ethics Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Higher RMPS Lesson 4 Kantian ethics.
Advertisements

Ethical theorists: A comparison of main ideas
March 27, 2012 Kantian Deontology. Act Utilitarianism An action is morally wrong if and only if there is an alternative action that produces a greater.
Non-Consequentialism
What matters is the motive
What is deontology?.
Kant Are there absolute moral laws that we have to follow regardless of consequences? First we want to know what Kant has to say about what moral rule.
Kant’s Ethical Theory.
Categorical Imperative
KANTIAN ETHICS IN FIVE EASY (?) STEPS. Sandel’s Classification of Normative Ethical Theories 1.Core concept: maximizing happiness – Utilitarianism (morality,
Kantian Ethics (Duty and Reason)
Immanuel Kant The Good Will and Autonomy. Context for Kant Groundwork for Metaphysics of Morals after American Revolution and Before French- rights.
Deontology: the Ethics of Duty
categorical imperative
Kant. Kant desire Kant desire impulse Kant desire impulse incentive.
Kant’s Categorical Imperative and Euthanasia
Kantian Ethics Exam Questions
Ethical Theories: Deontology and Teleology
© Michael Lacewing Three theories of ethics Michael Lacewing
Kant’s Ethics of Duty 3 insights form the basis for his theory  An action has moral worth if it is done for the sake of duty. (DUTY)  An action is morally.
Deontological & Consequential Ethics
What is the right thing to do?
Deontological Ethics Is saving someone from drowning a morally praiseworthy act? Do motives play any role in whether an act is morally praiseworthy?
THEORIES OF ETHICS PART 2 OF CHAPTER 12 (ETHICS).
Kantian ethics (& suicide): Kantian ethics (& suicide): Immanuel Kant ( ). A German philosopher. Ought implies Can Maxims Categorical Imperative.
Consequentialism Is it OK to inflict pain on someone else? Is it OK to inflict pain on someone else? What if it is a small amount of pain to prevent a.
Kant What Gives An Act Moral Worth? Consequences: No. Why? 1.Control 2.Persons have intrinsic value, not instrumental value Motives: Yes.
Immanuel Kant. Two worlds Reason is part of the intelligible world Sensible (Lesser faculty) Part of the world of nature (empirical)
Immanuel Kant Duty Ethics The moral worth of an action depends on motive (do the right thing for the right reason)
DEONTOLOGY “DUTY” ETHICS IMMANUEL KANT
Kantian Ethics Introduction.
Duties, Rights, and Kant Ethics Dr. Jason M. Chang.
Kant’s Ethics Kant’s quotes are from FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES OF THE METAPHYSICS OF MORALS.
The Categorical Imperative Kantian Ethics. Learning Intentions and Outcomes You will: Investigate the three formulations of the Categorical Imperative.
Objectives: SWBAT  Identify Immanuel Kant  Analyze Kantian Rationality  Identify and discuss the Categorical Imperative.
Lecture 6 Kantian ethics Immanuel Kant ( )
Immanuel Kant Deontological Ethics.
WHAT IS HIS DUTY? Duty - something that one is expected or required to do by moral or legal obligation. Your response:
MORALITY AND ETHICS. Where does morality come from?
Utilitarianism Objection –Too permissive –Utilitarian response: (1) bite the bullet (2) try to show negative side-effects, long-term consequences –Rebuttal.
Setting the state for Kant --Are there any acts that are wrong, regardless of the consequences? (Are consequences all that matter?) --Case: Bombing Hiroshima.
AREA 1 GUIDING PRINCIPLES SECTION 3 Consequences (Utilitarian Ethics) Duty and Reason (Kantian Ethics)
A Universal Moral Theory Dennis R. Cooley Department of History North Dakota State University 19 January 2003 Supported by a USDA/CSREES/IFAFS grant, “Consortium.
Class 6 Kant. Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) From Königsberg, Germany.
Utilitarianism Act Utilitarianism: The right act is that which maximizes happiness (only version we’ve been discussing thus far) Rule Utilitarianism: The.
The Moral Philosophy of Immanuel Kant The Ethics of Duty and Reason
Building an ethical toolbox. Engineering 10 Spring 2008.
Utilitarianism Utilitarians focus on the consequences of actions.
The Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals Immanuel Kant.
Standard Form ► 1. State your position ► 2. 1 st Premise (Fact 1: State fact and source) ► 3. 2 nd Premise (Fact 2: State fact and source) ► 4. 3 rd Premise.
Lesson Objective Key Words Lesson outcomes Hypothetical Categorical Imperatives Freedom To evaluate the differences between the Hypothetical and Categorical.
Immanuel Kant and the Enlightenment Immanuel Kant: German ( ) Enlightenment: 1700's (18th Century) Applies the new rational scientific method of.
Kantian Ethics Good actions have intrinsic value; actions are good if and only if they follow from a moral law that can be universalized.
KANTIANISM AND EUTHANASIA ATTITUDES TO KEY ISSUES.
Lecture 13 Kantian ethics Immanuel Kant ( )
EECS 690 January 27, Deontology Typically, when anyone talks about Deontology, they mean to talk about Immanuel Kant. Kant is THE deontologist.
What is the right thing to do?
Morality and Ethics.
Immanuel Kant.
Kantian principles Starter – 1) Keywords from last lesson
Groundwork for the Metaphysics of Morals
The Categorical Imperative
“DUTY” ETHICS IMMANUEL KANT
Deontology Immanuel Kant ( ) Founder of Deontology.
Higher RMPS Lesson 4 Kantian ethics.
Introduction to Philosophy Lecture 14 Immanuel Kant
Ethics: Kantian “DUTY” Ethics.
The Categorical Imperative
Deontology Immanuel Kant ( ) Founder of Deontology.
Presentation transcript:

Kantian Ethics Introduction to Philosophy Jason M. Chang

Lecture Outline 1. Background 2. Kant on moral worth 3. Acting from duty 4. The categorical imperative

Background Biography Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals (1785) Immanuel Kant ( )

Kant on moral worth

Imagine that you are waiting to cross a busy street. Next to you is an old lady struggling to carry her grocery bags. You decide to help the lady cross the street. In fact, you help carry her bags to her house only several blocks away. Does this act have moral worth?

Kant on moral worth Utilitarian Of course – assuming that it generates the greatest happiness Kantian It depends! Does the act have moral worth?

Kant on moral worth Act with moral worth = act performed from the right motive What this implies

Kant on moral worth The motive is the only thing that matters when determining whether an act has moral worth What does it mean to act from the right motive?

Acting from duty

Human beings can act from inclination Desires (for happiness, recognition, success, power, companionship) Emotions (love, compassion, anger) Capacity to act from desires and emotions I help the old lady… From my desire for money From my desire for my happiness For my desire for companionship Out of compassion

Are human beings capable of acting from something other than desire or emotion?

Acting from duty Human beings can act from reason Rationality Can act “out of principle” Can act out of respect for what morality requires I help the old lady… Out of respect for what morality requires Because it is the right thing to do

Acting from duty If I help the old lady… From my desire for money From my desire for my happiness For my desire for companionship Out of compassion or emotion If I help the old lady… Because it is the right thing to do Out of respect for what morality requires Acting according to duty (No moral worth) Acting from duty (Moral worth)

Acting from duty To do what morality requires NOT because it is the right thing to do, but to fulfill a desire or achieve an outcome Acting according to duty Acting from duty To do what morality requires because it is the right thing to do (i.e., acting out of respect for what morality requires)

An act has moral worth only if it is performed from the right motive Human beings can do the right thing either from inclination (desires, emotions) or from reason Doing the right thing from inclination = acting according to duty Doing the right thing from reason = acting from duty Acting from duty = acting out of respect for the moral law

The moral law (The categorical imperative)

The categorical imperative About the categorical imperative Supreme principle of morality The law we respect when acting from duty Can be phrased in three different ways

The categorical imperative Second formulation “Act as you treat humanity, whether your own person or in the person of any other, as an end and never as a means only.” (Humanity formula) Major ideas: 1.Treating others as an end 2.Treating others never as a means only

The categorical imperative “Treating others as an end” Background o Humans as having intrinsic value What it means to “treat others as an end” o To treat or view a person in a manner that recognizes their intrinsic value (i.e., having value independent of their usefulness, race, gender, accomplishments, etc.)

The categorical imperative “Treating others as a means only” What it means to “treat others as a means only” o To view or treat a person as having value only because of their usefulness

The categorical imperative Second formulation “Act as you treat humanity, whether your own person or in the person of any other, as an end and never as a means only.” (Humanity formula) Translation Always treat yourself and others in a manner that is consistent with their intrinsic value as persons

The categorical imperative Second formulation “Act as you treat humanity, whether your own person or in the person of any other, as an end and never as a means only.” (Humanity formula) Examples acts forbidden by the second formulation Murder Casual sex Suicide Masturbation

The categorical imperative First formulation “Act always in a way that we can will the principle of our action to become a universal law.” (Universal law formula) Major ideas: Universal law A universal law is a moral principle that everyone will accept

The categorical imperative Particular individuals Disagree about moral principles Individuals who recognize their intrinsic worth Agree on ways they want to be treated and ways not to be treated

The categorical imperative Individuals who recognize their intrinsic worth Demand that they be treated in a manner that is consistent with their intrinsic worth Demand that they are not killed, lied to, raped, stolen from, disrespected, or used as a means only

The categorical imperative First formulation “Act always in a way that we can will the principle of our action to become a universal law.” (Universal law formula) Translation Always treat others in a manner that all beings that recognize their intrinsic worth demand to be treated