Accelerating All Schools Toward Greatness The New Rhode Island Accountability System.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.
Advertisements

Presented to the State Board of Education August 22, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
AMOs 101 Understanding Annual Measurable Objectives Office of Educational Accountability Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction November 2012.
1 The Ewing Public Schools Overview of NCLB Results presented by Dr. Danita Ishibashi Assistant Superintendent.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
1 Accountability System Overview of the Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
PSP Summer Institute| July 29 – August 2, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon.
School Report Cards 2004– The Bottom Line More schools are making Adequate Yearly Progress. Fewer students show serious academic problems (Level.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER RENEWAL Overview of Proposed Renewal March 6, 2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
ESEA Waiver: Implications for the Providence School District Providence School Board Presentation June 18, 2012.
Accountability data overview August Topics  Changes to 2014 accountability reporting  Overview of accountability measures  Progress & Performance.
Rhode Island Accountability Process Revisions for School Years 2015 and 2016 A Presentation to the Accountability 3.0 Statewide Webinar March 27, 2015.
State Accountability Overview 1 Performance Index Framework: For 2013 and beyond, an accountability framework of four Performance Indexes includes a broad.
A ccountability R esearch and M easurement 1 Overview of Proposed School Grading Formula for :
Understanding Wisconsin’s New School Report Card.
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
Review Planning Faribault Public Schools DATA DAY.
School Performance Index School Performance Index (SPI): A Comprehensive Measurement System for All Schools Student Achievement (e.g. PSSA) Student Progress.
ESEA ACCOUNTABILITY JAMESVILLE-DEWITT
STATE ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Back To School| August 19-22, 2013 Dean Munn Education Specialist Region 15 ESC.
NECAP Ramp-Up Programs Math Grade 4  4 /5 Students Improved 2/5 Improved 2 levels 2/5 Improved 1 level 1/5 No Change Reading Grade 4  8/9 Students Improved.
Measuring Charter Quality Eric Paisner, NAPCS Anna Nicotera, NAPCS Lyria Boast, Public Impact.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
Florida’s Implementation of NCLB John L. Winn Deputy Commissioner Florida Department of Education.
Fall Testing Update David Abrams Assistant Commissioner for Standards, Assessment, & Reporting Middle Level Liaisons & Support Schools Network November.
Composite Index Scores (CIS) Understanding Accountability for Strategic Goal Setting August 24, 2015 Andrew Milligan | RIDE Office of Transformation.
2015 Texas Accountability System Overview and Updates August 13, 2015.
School Year. Unbridled Learning Next Generation Learners (100%) Next Generation Support (23%) Next Generation Professionals (10%) Next Generation.
ESEA Flexibility: School Progress Index Overview Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 3 of 8.
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
Ohio’s New Accountability System Ohio’s Response to No Child Left Behind (NCLB) a.k.a. Elementary & Secondary Education Act a.k.a. ESEA January 8, 2002.
Collecting data & information Talking with teachers, administrators, service providers Progress Monitoring Consolidated Planning /Use of Data Alternative.
What happens next? Introduction to Diagnosing, Planning and Monitoring for School Transformation.
Iowa School Report Card (Attendance Center Rankings) December 3, 2015.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
No Child Left Behind California’s Definition of Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) July 2003.
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability System What to Expect for the First Release of Data.
Public School Accountability System. Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall performance Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall.
South Carolina Succeeds
Hawaii’s Public Schools Update USPACOM Pacific Theater Education Conference Deputy Superintendent Ronn Nozoe Asst Supt Stephen Schatz 12/4/ :15-11:15.
Overview Plan Input Outcome and Objective Measures Summary of Changes Board Feedback Finalization Next Steps.
Our State. Our Students. Our Success. DRAFT. Nevada Department of Education Goals Goal 1 All students are proficient in reading by the end of 3 rd grade.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
NDE State of the Schools Adequate Yearly Progress Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools Nebraska Performance Accountability System Board of Education.
1. Every Student Succeeds Act ESSA December
Legislative Requirement 2013
NYS School Report Card & Spring 2014 NYS Assessment Results Orchard Park Central School District Board of Education Presentation August 26, 2014.
Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) State Plan: Update
Accountability Overview 2016
2012 Accountability Determinations
Accountability in Virginia: Revisions to the Standards of Accreditation and Virginia’s Federal Programs Application under ESSA Virginia Department of Education.
What is API? The Academic Performance Index (API) is the cornerstone of California's Public Schools Accountability Act of 1999 (PSAA). It is required.
Mark Baxter Texas Education Agency
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
Accountability Progress Report September 16, 2010
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability & Assistance System
Accountability Update
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Massachusetts’ Next-Generation Accountability System
Milton Public Schools 2013 Accountability Status
Specifications Used for School Identification Under ESSA in
Framework for a Next-Generation Accountability System
Campus Comparison Groups and Distinction Designations
Summary of Final Regulations: Accountability and State Plans
Maryland State Board of Education October 25, 2011
Spencer County Public Schools
November 09, 2012 Suzanne M. Wright Joe Prather
ELEMENTARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATION ACT
Presentation transcript:

Accelerating All Schools Toward Greatness The New Rhode Island Accountability System

A New Approach to School Measurement All schools will be assigned a composite index score between 1 and 100. MeasureDefinition Elementary / Middle Schools High Schools Absolute Percent Proficient How many students have attained proficiency or better? 30 points Progress To 2017 Target Is the school approaching its 2017 targets? 10 points Achievement Gaps Is the school serving all students, including those with disabilities and English Learners? 30 points Percent of Students at Distinction Level How many students have attained distinction? 5 points Growth Are all students making progress? 25 pointsn/a HS Graduation Rates Is the school reaching its graduation-rate goals? n/a 20 points High School Scaled Score Is the school improving annually? n/a 5 TOTAL 100 possible points

A New Approach to School Classification Primarily on the basis of their index score, all schools will be placed in one of six classifications. ClassificationDescription Commended The highest performing schools that represent the strongest patterns of performance across metrics, test at least 95% of their students, and serve all students well Leading Strong achievement in reading and mathematics, small or no gaps in student performance, and/or are improving student achievement, and increasing graduation rates Typical Performance at or near the state average, sometimes with pockets of strength and/or challenges in one or more areas Warning A combination of low achievement in reading and math, unacceptable achievement gaps, and/or little or no progress in improving achievement or graduation rates. Focus Substandard achievement in reading and math, unacceptable achievement gaps, and little or no academic progress in improving student achievement or increasing graduation rates Priority The lowest achievement in reading and mathematics, intolerable gaps in student performance and demonstrate little or no progress in improving student outcomes.

Composite Index Scores and School Classifications: A Statewide View Composite Index Score

School Report Cards: Elementary and Middle

School Report Cards: High School

Timeline for Implementation DateOrganization responsible Action July 13RIDEPublic announcement of school classifications JulyRIDERIDE distribution of diagnostic screen for Priority and Focus schools AugustRIDERIDE distribution of diagnostic screen for Warning schools July, August, & September School districtsPriority, Focus, and Warning schools complete diagnostic screen OctoberSchool districtsSuperintendents of Priority and Focus schools select an intervention model NovemberRIDECommissioner review and approval of intervention model November, December, & January School districtsPriority and Focus schools develop a school reform plan