Report Exemplar. Step 1: Purpose State the purpose of your investigation. Pose an appropriate comparison investigative question and do not forget to include.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Describing Quantitative Variables
Advertisements

Chapter 10, part D. IV. Inferences about differences between two population proportions You will have two population proportions, p1 and p2. The true.
What does integrated statistical and contextual knowledge look like for 3.10? Anne Patel & Jake Wills Otahuhu College & Westlake Boys High School CensusAtSchool.
Jared Hockly - Western Springs College
Mathematics and Statistics A look at progressions in Statistics Jumbo Day Hauraki Plains College 15 th June 201 Sandra Cathcart.
Inferential Reasoning in Statistics. PPDAC Problem, question, purpose for investigating Plan, Data, Analyse data, Draw a conclusion, justify with evidence.
Analysis. Start with describing the features you see in the data.
Secondary School Statistics The effect of NCEA and technology.
Math 161 Spring 2008 What Is a Confidence Interval?
Level 1 Multivariate Unit
PPDAC Cycle.
Some Introductory Statistics Terminology. Descriptive Statistics Procedures used to summarize, organize, and simplify data (data being a collection of.
Hotel accommodation Task 2. Write a statistical question or hypothesis, which involves comparing the two sets of data. Your question or hypothesis or.
GCSE Data Handling Coursework 1 Examining the Data examine carefully the data you are given it’s important to get a feel for the raw data before you use.
Aims: To be able to find the smallest & largest values along with the median, quartiles and IQR To be able to draw a box and whisker plot To be able to.
A student guide To completing Level 1 & 2 portfolios.
Statistics and Quantitative Analysis U4320 Segment 12: Extension of Multiple Regression Analysis Prof. Sharyn O’Halloran.
Copyright © Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. 10 Inferences Involving Two Populations.
How much do you smoke?. I Notice... That the median for the males is 13.5 cigarettes per day and the median for females is 10 cigarettes per day. This.
90288 – Select a Sample and Make Inferences from Data The Mayor’s Claim.
Formal Inference Multivariate Internal. Introduction This report compares if Auckland or Wellington citizens are more likely to borrow more money. The.
Biostatistics Class 1 1/25/2000 Introduction Descriptive Statistics.
Statistics: Mean of Absolute Deviation
Is there a difference in how males and female students perceive their weight?
Normal Distr Practice Major League baseball attendance in 2011 averaged 30,000 with a standard deviation of 6,000. i. What percentage of teams had between.
Chapter 4 Linear Regression 1. Introduction Managerial decisions are often based on the relationship between two or more variables. For example, after.
Describing and Displaying Quantitative data. Summarizing continuous data Displaying continuous data Within-subject variability Presentation.
Confidence Intervals for Proportions
Example 1: a) Describe the shape, center, and spread of the sampling distribution of. The sampling distribution of is Normal because both population distributions.
AP Statistics Chapter 24 Comparing Means.
Stage 1 Statistics students from Auckland university Using a sample to make a point estimate.
Heart Rate. Some of the ‘Heart Rate’ Data Take a look at the data so you have some ideas to start with. Get an idea about the type of question you might.
Inference Bootstrapping for comparisons. Outcomes Understand the bootstrapping process for construction of a formal confidence interval for a comparison.
Stage 1 Statistics students from Auckland university Sampling variability & the effect of sample size.
PPDAC Cycle.
Inference 3 Integrating informed contextual knowledge.
Use statistical methods to make an inference. Michelle Dalrymple.
Warm Up In May 2006, the Gallup Poll asked 510 randomly sampled adults the question “Generally speaking, do you believe the death penalty is applied fairly.
Multivariate Data credits AS recognise each part of the analysis phase.
Statistical Thinking Julia Horring & Pip Arnold TEAM Solutions University of Auckland.
Irwin/McGraw-Hill © Andrew F. Siegel, 1997 and l Chapter 7 l Hypothesis Tests 7.1 Developing Null and Alternative Hypotheses 7.2 Type I & Type.
 NHANES 1000, MARIJANA USE  COMPARE WHAT HAPPENS WHEN WE CHANGE SAMPLE SIZE CENSUS AT SCHOOL, ARM SPAN LOOKING AT WHAT HAPPENS TO THE SAMPLING.
Multi-variate data internal 4 Credits. achieved The student: Poses an appropriate comparison question, with or without guidance from the teacher,
Hypothesis Tests l Chapter 7 l 7.1 Developing Null and Alternative
L2 Sampling Exercise A possible solution.
Estimation and Confidence Intervals
Chapter 10: Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Writing the technical notes section of your report
Inference.
Stats for AP Biology SLIDE SHOWS MODIFIED FROM:
Reaction Times for Males Vs Females
Writing the executive summary section of your report
Inference About Variables Part IV Review
Two Independent Samples
Inferences to the population
Inference credits Making the call……..
Interpreting confidence intervals
Chapter 10: Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Chapter 10: Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Chapter 10: Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Chapter 10: Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Chapter 10: Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Chapter 10: Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Statistics Time Series
Chapter 10: Comparing Two Populations or Groups
Advanced Algebra Unit 1 Vocabulary
Gaining Achieved.
Describing Data Coordinate Algebra.
Exercise 1: Entering data into SPSS
Samples and Populations
Presentation transcript:

Report Exemplar

Step 1: Purpose State the purpose of your investigation. Pose an appropriate comparison investigative question and do not forget to include “by how much”. Explain why you are investigating this situation; Give a brief background linked to research Make a hypothesis – what you expect the outcome to be Identify the variables you wish to investigate.

Your question must include Variable that is being examined Groups that are being compared Population that inferences are being made about Statistic (DIFFERENCE in sample median /mean)

Achieved The purpose of this investigation is to determine if the mean distance driven in a week (in kilometres) for males in the highest risk age group (15-24 years) is higher than the mean distance driven in a week (in kilometres) for females in the high risk age group and by how much from the sample of 206 crash statistics crashes where alcohol or drugs were recorded as a factor commissioned by the New Zealand Ministry of Transport in The difference in sample means between male and female drivers from this sample will be used to make a formal inference about the 1409 serious or minor crashes where alcohol or drugs were recorded by the New Zealand Ministry of Transport as a factor in 2011.

Merit I am interested in this investigation as the reason for more males being involved in crashes than females is often given as “males drive much more than females”. It is my belief that, on average, males will have driven further than females.

Excellence This belief is supported by research carried out by the New Zealand Ministry of Transport who claim that “on average, men drive just over 12,000 km per driver per year, while women average just over 8,000 km per driver per year.” However, “Work-related travel accounts for nearly one third of all household driving time and distance.” (Ministry of Transport, 2011)

Second investigation Question In a study released by Quality Planning, an analytics company, based in San Francisco, that validates policyholder information for auto insurers found that “men break more traffic laws and drive more dangerously than women. Because they violate laws designed to make the roads safer, men cause more accidents and expensive damage.” This suggests that it might also be interesting to investigate by how much the mean insurance claim (in $) for males is higher than the mean insurance claim (in $) for females for those involved in crashes in the same 2011 study commissioned by the New Zealand Ministry of Transport.

Research integrated into the question Dr. Raj Bhat, president of Quality Planning, claims that men have about 5% more violations that result in accidents than women and because “men are also more likely to violate laws for speeding, passing, and yielding, the resulting accidents caused by men lead to more expensive claims than those caused by women." These statistics are based on an American study and may not apply in New Zealand but my feeling is that it will also be true in New Zealand.

List references as you go- clean them up at the end ments/Driver travel-March 2012.pdf ments/Driver travel-March 2012.pdf New Zealand Household Travel Survey 2008– 2011, Downloaded 13/5/13 Men Break More Traffic Laws, Drive More Dangerously Than Women, Concludes QPC Study 11/13/2008,

Data Source The study has been motivated by recent popular media campaigns by the New Zealand Transport Association. ink-driving/legend.html ink-driving/legend.html

Information about the data In 2011, there were 1409 serious or minor crashes where alcohol or drugs were recorded as a factor. A random sample was taken from these drivers and they were interviewed in person by researchers. The data obtained is what I will be analysing in my assignment.

Analysis

Achieved: Dot plots and box and whisker plots are produced and summary statistics, including the difference between the sample means/medians, have been calculated.

Achieved:

Summary Statistics

Box and whisker plots

Summary Statistics

Sample distributions- Achieved The sample distributions are discussed and compared in context. This could involve Comparing the shift/centre Spread Shape Unusual features Summary statistics

Sample distributions: Merit As for Achieved with links to the population or investigative question.

Sample distributions: Excellence As for Merit with explanations for the features of the data and the impact of these on the context or question. Relevant reference to the research.

To avoid cumbersome wording.. Male distance refers to the distance driven in a week (in kilometres) for males in the highest risk age group (15-24 years) in crashes where alcohol or drugs were recorded as a factor commissioned by the New Zealand Ministry of Transport in Similarly I will refer to female distance in the same study. Population refers to the 1409 serious or minor crashes where alcohol or drugs were recorded in 2011 by the Ministry of Transport.

Initial Visual Interpretation My initial visual impression is that the median of male distance is similar to the median female distance. This is not what I predicted.

Comparing the shift/centre In the samples, I found that the female distance was km and that male distance was km.

Comparing the shift/centre- add comment The result is quite surprising as I thought the male distance would be higher.

Comparing the shift/centre- add comment The difference between these values is quite small (6.2km).

Comparing the shift/centre- relate to the population Considering that the information was obtained in an interview and those interviewed would have to estimate these values, we cannot be sure that this result would be the same as the population.

Comparing the shift/centre- relate to the population The distribution of the data suggests that people may have been inclined to round their estimates to the nearest 10 km.

Comparing the shift/centre- add research This result is also contrary to my research (Ministry of Transport, 2011) which indicated male distance was greater than female distance. This research however included all driving rather than just driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol.

Comparing the shape The distribution of the male distance driven in a week appears to be skewed to the right. The bulk of sample data for males is between 20 and 180 kilometres. The maximum value is 263 km.

Comparing the shape The distribution of the female distance driven in a week is skewed to the right. The bulk of sample data for females is between 10 and 160 kilometres. The rest is spread out to a maximum of 263 km.

Comparing the spread The middle 50% of male distance is between 82.5 km and km- an interquartile range of 58 km. The middle 50% of female distance is between 78.5 km and km- an interquartile range of 66 km.

Comparing the spread As the boxes overlap, I am not happy to make a call that the female distance is higher than the male distance. Also, as this is only one sample from the population, I would expect to get a different but similar result if I were to take another sample.

Personal comment explaining the spread As this age group would generally be single, it is likely that females and males would have similar driving habits i.e. driving distances to school or work would be similar.

Refer to the population As the sample size in each category is reasonable (87 for female distance and 119 for male distance), I would be confident that the comparisons would be similar in the population.

Add in a reference to the research

Shift/overlap As the box for female distance overlaps the box for male distance, I would be confident to say that there is no significant difference between the medians or means of the groups. To test this I will calculate a bootstrapping confidence interval to obtain a measure of the difference between the means of the two groups. A bootstrap confidence interval is a range of believable values for the difference in means of the male distance and female distance.

The formal inference used was a bootstrap confidence interval (-0.50 mmHg, 3.30mmHg) of the sample differences between the male and female SBP. The call cannot be made that back in the population of British male and females consuming a high fat diet there is a difference between British male and female SBP.