I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S. Air Force Base Conversion Directorate Presented by Lt. Col. Daniel Welch AFCEE/BC.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CM/CG Contracting Tom Ravn, Mn/DOT Director, Office of Construction and Innovative Contracting.
Advertisements

Roadmap for Sourcing Decision Review Board (DRB)
CMGC Contracting at UDOT Program, Projects & Lessons Learned
1 What is Remediation Process Optimization? How Can It Help Me Identify Opportunities for Enhanced and More Efficient Site Remediation? Mark A. Gilbertson.
1 Best Practices for Risk-Informed Remedy Selection, Closure, and Post-closure Control for DOE’s Contaminated Sites October 30, 2013.
1 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers – Environmental Community 4/27/2015 USACE PERSPECTIVES ON CONTRACTING PROGRAMS FUDS FOCUS Robert F. Lubbert, P.E. 14 April.
Air Force Civil Engineer Center I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Stephen TerMaath Chief, BRAC Program Management Division 5 June.
PMOBRAC Ms. Kimberly Kesler Director, BRAC Program Management Office March
National Governors Association Meeting LM: Ensuring a Smooth Transition – Procedures and Examples June 21-22, 2005 Dave Geiser Office of Legacy Management.
+ Placer MHSA Integrated 3 Year Planning—Further Conversations July 1, June 31,2017.
The decision box represents key management decisions and serve as the GATES which delineate phases. The decision can be to proceed, exit, or recycle. More.
Procurement and Tendering Presentation to [NAME OF CLIENT] [YOUR NAME] [DATE]
Facilities Institute July , 2012 Houston, Texas Click to edit Master title style
Alderman Road Residences Phase II Design Build. Extensive master planning preceded this phase 2003 – Dagit Saylor Master Plan Hanbury Evans Update.
Presentation By: Chris Wade, P Eng. Finally … a best practice for selecting an engineering firm.
THE PROJECT TEAM TYPICAL REQUIREMENTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE PROJECT TEAM TRADITIONAL TEAM ORGANIZATION AND VARIATIONS THE OWNER’S TEAM THE DESIGN.
Air Force Civil Engineer Center I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Dr. Stephen TerMaath Chief, BRAC Program Management Division 22.
US Army Corps of Engineers PLANNING SMART BUILDING STRONG ® Project Planning with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) Presenter Name Presenter Title.
Project Management Process Overview
This Briefing is: UNCLASSIFIED Headquarters Air Combat Command Air Combat Command’s Transformation of Environmental Remediation Margaret C. Patterson HQ.
Trade order management system implementation Asset Management division of major US financial institution Provide project management and business analysis.
1 of 19 ASSOCIATION OF THE UNITED STATES ARMY INSTITUTE OF LAND WARFARE “INSTALLATION CAPABILITIES FOR A TRANSFORMED ARMY” October 3, 2005 Joseph W. Whitaker.
1 Facilitating Reuse at RCRA Sites: Innovative Technologies for Groundwater Characterization and Cleanup Introduction Walter W. Kovalick Jr., Ph.D. Associate.
GWAC Ordering Procedures Overview
1 Los Alamos Legacy Cleanup Completion Project (LCCP) Post Fiscal Year 2016 Contract(s) Industry Day Request For Information & Capability.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master subtitle style PBC Lessons Learned A Contractor’s Perspective June 29, 2005 Tushar Talele ARCADIS.
Performance Based Service Acquisition (PBSA) Treasury Industry Day July 20, 2005 Patty Hoover IRS Office of Procurement Policy Naomi Marechal TE/GE BSP.
SERVICES ACQUISITION REFORM ACT OF 2003 A STATUS REPORT Alan Chvotkin Senior Vice President and Counsel Professional Services Council DEFENSE ACQUISITION.
© 2007 Noblis, Inc. Assessment of Performance-Based Contracting Presented to: 2007 REGION 4 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY / DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE / STATES.
GBA IT Project Management Final Project - Establishment of a Project Management Management Office 10 July, 2003.
Environmental Programs Update SAME Northern Virginia Post Monthly Meeting Rob Sadorra, MBA, M.Eng., P.E. Director, Environmental Restoration Division NAVFAC.
1 Sustainable Real Property Presentation to the National Executive Forum on Public Property by Bruce Lorimer Director General Professional and Technical.
1 WARFIGHTER SUPPORT STEWARDSHIP EXCELLENCE WORKFORCE DEVELOPMENT WARFIGHTER-FOCUSED, GLOBALLY RESPONSIVE, FISCALLY RESPONSIBLE SUPPLY CHAIN LEADERSHIP.
Offsets and Climate Policy: EPA Perspectives Dina Kruger Director, Climate Change Division U.S. Environmental Protection Agency May 30, 2008.
What is a Business Analyst? A Business Analyst is someone who works as a liaison among stakeholders in order to elicit, analyze, communicate and validate.
Acquisition and Contract Management Update Jay Rhoderick Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Tank Waste and Nuclear Material AtomEco-2012.
PERT Overview Federal Perspective Annual PERT Workshop February 7-9, 2012 Nevada Site Office Evelyn Landini, Contracting Officer Brookhaven Site Office.
Joint Program Executive Office for Chemical and Biological Defense _APBI_JPEO 1 INTRODUCTIONS Preparing Proposals and Responses to Solicitations.
1 Alternative EVM Applications Not a One-Size-Fits-All.
2 William P. McNally Assistant Administrator for Procurement NASA Procurement Tenets August 4, 2008 NCMA Conference.
Department of Commerce Information Technology Conference April 12-14, 2005 Acquisitions for the Department of Commerce Greg Crider Office of Acquisition.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 1 Air Force Center for Environmental Excellence Dale Clark, AFCEE/ICC Air Force Center for Environmental.
2.2 Acquisition Methodology. “Acquisition methodology” – the processes employed and the means used to solicit, request, or invite offers that will normally.
I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S. Air Force 1 AFCEE BAA Program – Funding Opportunities Adria Bodour, Ph.D. Technology.
EGovOS Panel Discussion CIO Council Architecture & Infrastructure Committee Subcommittee Co-Chairs March 15, 2004.
New York State System Benefits Charge (SBC) – NGA Center for Best Practices April 29, 2004 Bob Callender Vice President for Programs NYSERDA.
Federal Acquisition Service U.S. General Services Administration GSA Assisted Acquisition Services Peter Han General Services Administration March 16,
Status Report on ILC Project in Japan Seiichi SHIMASAKI Director, Office for Particle and Nuclear Research Promotion June 19, 2015.
Business Analysis. Business Analysis Concepts Enterprise Analysis ► Identify business opportunities ► Understand the business strategy ► Identify Business.
Presented by Michael W. Sydow, PE Chief, Environmental and IIS Management Branch USAED Savannah Performance Based Contracting A USACE Perspective.
Transforming Transit in California October 22, 2015 CalACT Fall Conference and Bus Show Rohnert Park, CA Tony Brasil, Chief Heavy Duty Diesel Implementation.
RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GOVERNOR ’ S TASK FORCE ON CONTRACTING AND PROCUREMENT REVIEW Report Overview PD Customer Forum September 2002.
1 1 Presenter / date if required Independent, integrated thinking.
Request for Information & Capability Statements Richland Acquisitions Post-FY 2018 November 17-19, 2015.
Small Business Programs Tatia Evelyn-Bellamy Director Small Business Division Small Business Center February 2016.
Office of Major Project Development (OMPD) Overview November 2015.
RCRA 2020 Vision… A View from a Facility Owner Lloyd E. Dunlap Atlantic Richfield Company, BP.
American Recovery & Reinvestment Act Office of Environmental Management Presentation to Regulators March 6, 2009 Cynthia V. Anderson, EM Recovery Act Program.
Prof. Shrikant M. Harle.  The Project Life Cycle refers to a logical sequence of activities to accomplish the project’s goals or objectives.  Regardless.
Environmental Management Division 1 NASA Headquarters Environmental Management System (EMS) Michael J. Green, PE NASA EMS Lead NASA Headquarters Washington,
Environmental Acquisition Strategy Performance-Based Contracting
SERVICES ACQUISITION REFORM ACT OF 2003 A STATUS REPORT
Enterprise Content Management Owners Representative Contract Approval
Transformation of The AF Programs to Performance Based Management
Performance Based Contracts
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Performance Based Contracting A USACE Perspective
USACE infrastructure team update
Principal Investigator ESTCP Selection Meeting
Presentation transcript:

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e Headquarters U.S. Air Force Base Conversion Directorate Presented by Lt. Col. Daniel Welch AFCEE/BC 19 Aug 2004

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 1 Overview  Base Conversion Directorate  Performance Based Cleanup (PBC) Acquisition Strategy for the Air Force Real Property Agency (AFRPA)

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 2 Base Conversion Directorate (AFCEE/BC) Geri Lira Directorate Secretary Geri Lira Directorate Secretary LtCol Daniel L. Welch Director Maj William J. Gooden Technical Assistant LtCol Daniel L. Welch Director Maj William J. Gooden Technical Assistant West Division George Gauger Division Chief Staff of 14 West Division George Gauger Division Chief Staff of 14 East Division Dennis Lundquist Division Chief Staff of 13 East Division Dennis Lundquist Division Chief Staff of 13

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 3 AFCEE Piece of the AF BRAC Pie Dollars in Millions

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 4 Services  Environmental Restoration at Closure Bases for Air Force Real Property Agency (AFRPA)  Cradle-to-Grave Environmental Restoration Services  Assistance in Project & Program Definition and Development  Environmental Project Execution Site Investigations/Studies Site Remediation Long Term Monitoring Remedial Process Optimization Quality Control/Quality Assurance

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 5 Services (continued)  Participation in Regulatory / Community Interface  Performance Based Contracting  Evaluate and Educate on Innovative Technologies

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 6 Contract Capabilities  Environmental A&E Contracts (4P-AE)  Worldwide Environmental Restoration and Construction (WERC)  Support Contractors Global Engineering Integration and Technical Assistance (GEITA) Independent Systems Engineering & Acquisition Support (ISE&AS)

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 7 Performance Based Cleanup (PBC) Acquisition Strategy for AFRPA

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 8 PBC Objectives and Goal  Objectives Protection of Human Health and the Environment Accelerates closeout and/or reduces lifecycle costs Shift risk from the Government to private sector Harnesses innovations/creativity of the private sector Includes a full suite of contract tools  Goal is to match the “problem” with the best solution

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 9 What is PBC?  Performance Based Contracting (PBC) – Focus on results, rather than methods Set measurable performance objectives Set quality standards Identify incentives, when appropriate  PBCs vary depending on project objectives and risk, e.g. Guaranteed Fixed Price Remediation (includes insurance) Firm Fixed Price (without insurance) Firm Fixed Price with incentives

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 10 Developing an AFCEE Strategy  Initial Strategy: Categorize sites using decision logic framework Embraces lessons learned from Army & private sector PBC efforts Will site achieve SC within 9 yrs? Will site achieve RC within 5-9 yrs? Active remediation, alternate technology? Active IRP Site Evaluation FFP PBC Candidate Yes No FFP & FFP w/ Incentives PBC Candidate Yes GFPR Candidate No Optimization

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 11 PBC Assumptions  Contracts will be competitively solicited among WERC contractors  Period of Performance will be up to 5 years, plus 4 option years  Activities will be funded during first 5 years only Profile for annual funding Fund options in year five  Target: one contract per base, group bases where appropriate  Exclude chemical warfare materials, radiological, munitions/explosives handling from scope

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 12 Site Closeout Category  Site closure scheduled within the next 9 years*, in general: Lock-in planned closure date Less risk, insurance not recommended Recommended Firm Fixed Price PBC  Considerations: Ensure contractors meet or beat site closure milestones Cost savings through competition and economies of scale *Based on 5-year PoP and 4 option years; subject to change

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 13 Response Complete Category  Response complete scheduled in the next 9 years*: Lock-in response complete by planned date – no slippage! Increased contractor risk  Recommended approach: Firm Fixed Price to achieve response complete milestones Incentives to achieve accelerated site closure  Considerations: Savings resulting from competition and innovation Opportunity for reduced schedules Consider incentives for accelerated response complete *Based on 5-year PoP and 4 option years; subject to change

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 14 Alternate Technology Category  Active remediation with response complete >10 years and alternative technology available Performance objectives tailored to site Higher contractor risk Example: Pump and treat  Recommended approach Guaranteed Fixed Price Remediation PBC Use pre-solicitation process to determine if alternative technology exists Consider shared savings for cost reduction  Considerations: Affords greatest opportunity for significant lifecycle savings Cost/ benefit analysis to evaluate funding profile Increased regulator interaction/negotiation High early investment requirements – budget limitations

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 15 Optimization Category  If site closure or response complete >10 years and alternative technology not available Performance objective is reduced costs Low contractor risk Examples: Landfill cap; LTM  Recommended approach Firm Fixed Price with incentives to reduce lifecycle costs Share cost savings  Considerations: No special considerations

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 16 Bases for PBC  AFRPA Div A Griffiss Grissom Homestead Loring Pease Plattsburg  AFRPA Div B Gentile Newark Rickenbacker KI Sawyer Wurtsmith  AFRPA Div D Castle George March Mather Norton Group Ohio Group Michigan Group

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 17 Implementation  Total PBC Initiative Contract Value First Year Total $20-30 Million for 16 Bases Total Contract Value Up To $200 Million  Verify Site and Funding Data  Fine Tune Strategy to Site/Base  Develop briefing/education materials for all the players  Form implementation teams (e.g., AFRPA, BEC, AFCEE, regulator, LRA)  Develop Statement of Objectives (SOO)

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 18 Implementation  Contracting schedule – 5 1/2 months to contract award from scoping effort Pre-Solicitation Package (Draft SOO) On-Site and Regulator Meetings Shorten timeframe where feasible Contractor selection: best value evaluation  Ohio Bases Expedited as Prototype  PBC Phasing Phase 1: Gentile, Newark & Rickenbacker (Ohio Group); Grissom; Homestead; Mather; and Castle Phase 2: Loring & Pease; K.I Sawyer & Wurtsmith; Plattsburgh, Norton; and George Phase 3: March  Develop/execute contract transition plans

I n t e g r i t y - S e r v i c e - E x c e l l e n c e 19 ISSUES  Contractor/regulator/Air Force interface  Contract oversight  FY05 budget limitations