GSFC 5 Space Technology “Tomorrow’s Technology Today” ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 Launch Vehicle Services Section 18.0 Clyde Woodall Launch Vehicle Manager.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Larry Phillips MAY 13th-17th, 2002 Micro Arcsecond Xray Imaging Mission: Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Launch Vehicle Information Final Version.
Advertisements

Ninth Lecture Hour 8:30 – 9:20 pm, Thursday, September 13
Secondary Payloads Overview
Launch Vehicles. LAUNCH SYSTEM CONCEPTS SHROUD PROTECTS THE SPACECRAFT SHROUD PROTECTS THE SPACECRAFT MAIN VEHICLE PRIMARY LIQUID OR SOLID ROCKET PROPELLANT.
Aug.19, 1999 George T. Roach Integration Mission Design Center NASA- GSFC Code 543 Greenbelt, MD FAX
Payload Design Criteria for the Space Test Program Standard Interface Vehicle (STP-SIV) Mr. Mike Marlow STP-SIV Program Manager Payload Design Criteria.
GLAST LAT ProjectLAT Engineering Meeting, April 1, 2003 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Performance & Safety Assurance Darren S. Marsh Stanford Linear Accelerator.
GLAST LAT ProjectDOE/NASA Review of the GLAST/LAT Project, Aug. 14, 2001 Scott Williams 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Instrument Operations Center Scott.
Page 1HMI Team Meeting – January 26, 2005 HMI Mission Operations Rock Bush HMI Stanford Program Manager Stanford University
Flying, Hopping and Perching Microbots for Extreme Environment Exploration Deployed Using CubeSats Jekan Thanga 1, Jim Bell 1 Space and Terrestrial Robotic.
Spacecraft Launch Vehicles
LSU 01/18/2005Project Life Cycle1 The Project Life Cycle Project Management Unit, Lecture 2.
Speed of Sound Team BalloonWorks. Table of Contents Mission Goal and Objectives Science and Technical Backgrounds Mission Requirements Payload Design.
LSU 07/07/2004Communication1 Communication & Documentation Project Management Unit – Lecture 8.
TEMPO Mission Project July 23, 2013 Project Manager: Alan Little.
Section 20.0 Mission Assurance Roger Counts Systems Assurance Manager ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC 5 Space Technology “Tomorrow’s Technology Today”
Maximizing ISS Utilization for Small Satellite Deployments and External Hardware/Sensor Testing Photo credit: NASA.
Technological Design STS-118 Lunar Plant Growth Chamber Challenge © 2013 International Technology and Engineering Educators Association STEM  Center for.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO Integration and Test Joanne Baker GSFC Code 568 August 16-17, 2005.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Office of Commercial Space Transportation Orbital Debris 10 June, 2015 Symposium for the Small.
Satellites and Launch Vehicles. “Gee Whiz” Facts Number of satellites currently in orbit is over 900 Satellites orbit at altitudes from 100 miles (Low.
Common PDR Problems ACES Presentation T. Gregory Guzik March 6, 2003.
Verification by test and quality assurance
Cubesats A spacecraft concept to provide advances in international cooperation From: Doug Rowland, NASA GSFC Alexi Glover, ESA.
MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY NASA GODDARD SPACE FLIGHT CENTER ORBITAL SCIENCES CORPORATION NASA AMES RESEARCH CENTER SPACE TELESCOPE SCIENCE INSTITUTE.
Near-Real-Time HIRDLS Processing for START08 Vince Dean HIRDLS Science Team Meeting January 30, 2008 Boulder, CO.
STEREO - Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory Mission STEREO STEREO Science Team Meeting May 2, 2005 Presented by Edward Reynolds APL STEREO Project.
Mechanical SuperNova/Acceleration Probe SNAP Study Dave Peters George Roach June 28, a man who's willing to make a decision in the first place can.
Space Engineering 2 © Dr. X Wu, Space Engineering 2 Lecture 1.
NMP EO-1 TECHNOLOGY WORKSHOP Section 2 Meeting Objectives.
Space Exploration Technologies Corporation Spacex.com Space Exploration Technologies Corporation Spacex.com.
NASA CII GEO Guidelines and Database Bernie Bienstock May 21, 2013.
Exploration Flight and Project Development Office Launch and Crewed Systems Office (MXS) Space Launch Systems WBS Payload Fairing Monthly.
TREADS Semester Review Dec. 14, Objectives Assess and Communicate Current Design Identify interfaces Approve the System Requirement Specification.
THE PROJECT LIFE CYCLE PROJECT MANAGEMENT LIFE CYCLE LSU 01/18/2005 PROJECT LIFE CYCLE 1.
Polar Gateways 2008THEMIS Constellation Operations − Jan 2008 THEMIS Constellation Operations Dr. Manfred Bester University of California at Berkeley.
Final Version Dick Bolt Code 302 May 13-17, 2002 Micro-Arcsecond Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Mission Success.
Proprietary BalloonWinds Update Author: Ivan Dors – UNH Presented By: Michael Dehring -- MAC 28 June 2006.
Mission Operations –Launch February 15, 2000 at 22:02:15 UTC = 14:02:15 PST –41 Days IOC and antenna deployment period –2 year science mission operations.
24b - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center LRO Safety Dave Bogart Code 302 August 16-17, 2005.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes 12/25/20151 Flight Software Template for Instrument Critical Design Review Gary M. Heiligman.
CRICOS No J a university for the world real R ENB443: Launcher Systems Image Credit: ESA Caption: The generic Ariane-5 (Ariane Flight 162) lifting.
Guan Le NASA Goddard Space Flight Center Challenges in Measuring External Current Systems Driven by Solar Wind-Magnetosphere Interaction.
© 2014 Orbital Sciences Corporation. All Rights Reserved. SPRSA Excess Capacity Panel Carol P. Welsch Orbital Sciences Corporation June 10, Welsch.
SWT Overview 1 UCB, Nov15/16, 2006 THEMIS SCIENCE WORKING TEAM MEETING Mission Overview Peter R. Harvey Project Manager University of California - Berkeley.
LEO Propellant Depot: A Commercial Opportunity? LEAG Private Sector Involvement October 1 - 5, 2007 Houston, Texas LEAG Private Sector Involvement October.
Approved For Public Release © The Aerospace Corporation 2009 June 17, 2009 Initial Summary of Human Rated Delta IV Heavy Study Briefing to the Review of.
1 SUZAKU HUG 12-13April, 2006 Suzaku archive Lorella Angelini/HEASARC.
KSC Ground Operations Timeline. KSC CGSE TIM A Technical Interchange Meeting regarding the Cryo Ground Support Equipment was held at KSC November 1 st.
GLAST LAT ProjectCDR/CD-3 Review May 12-16, 2003 Document: LAT-PR Section 5 IOC Subsystem 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: IOC Subsystems WBS: 4.1.B.
DSN CCSDS SLE SM Prototype Plan Erik Barkley December 2006.
THEMIS MRRSystems - 1 GSFC, Jan 5, 2007 Systems Engineering.
ACE Science Workshop March 10 th, 2009 Armin T. Ellis, Deborah Vane, Mark Rokey Jet Propulsion Laboratory.
2014 CoDR Team Name Conceptual Design Review University/Institution Team Members Date 1.
Micro Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Mechanical George Roach Dave Peters 17 May 2002 “Technological progress is like an axe in the.
AAE 450 Spring 2010 AAE 450 2/11/2010 Kathy Brumbaugh Chris Spreen
EDGE™ Preliminary Project Plan P09102 – METEOR Stage Separation System JJ Guerrette (ME)
Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) SRR/Mechanical System August 16-18, 2005
Failure of Process / Failure of Mission
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 12. Risk Management.
I&T&C Organization Chart
CINEMA System Engineering
Technical Resource Allocations
Failure of Process / Failure of Mission
TEMPO’s Commercially Hosted Payload Concept
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Lockheed Martin Canada’s SMB Mentoring Program
Launch and On-orbit Checkout
HMI Top Level Requirements
Presentation transcript:

GSFC 5 Space Technology “Tomorrow’s Technology Today” ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 Launch Vehicle Services Section 18.0 Clyde Woodall Launch Vehicle Manager

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC 18-2 Launch Services Agenda Launch Requirements Launch Vehicle (LV) Status LV Study Results Risk Mitigation

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC 18-3 Launch Requirements (1 of 2) S/C and DS compatible with SPL accommodations on EELVs (MRD ) –S/C and DS design is based on information obtained from Boeing &LM for secondary payload accommodations on the EELVs Access to each S/C on Launch Pad for battery top-off and aliveness test (MRD ) –ST5 evaluating a couple of approaches based on information obtained from Boeing & LM for secondary payload accommodations on the EELVs

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC 18-4 Launch Requirements (2 of 2) Orbit to expose S/C to radiation environment for instrument validation (MRD ) –ST5 will select a PPL mission that provides a GTO orbit (approx. 200 km X 35,786, 15 to 28º inclination) Orbit to expose S/C to low level magnetic background for science validation (MRD ) –ST5 will select a PPL mission that will provide a GTO orbit

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC 18-5 LV Status (1 of 2) LV Assignment not obtained Task Order Studies Completed with Boeing & LM –Identified accommodation for generic secondary payloads but used ST5 requirements as the general guideline –Provided SPL interfaces, loads, environments, etc. for EELV flights –Provided estimated costs to fly on EELVs as a secondary payload –Identified potential PPLs (looked at DoD & Commercial launches) –Initial study concluded in April 2001, task order mechanism remains in place to continue discussions with Boeing & LM as required

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC 18-6 LV Status (2 of 2) Continued to Evaluate Other Ride Opportunities –Contact with the UHF program office and LM Atlas III team Document Status –Generated an LV IRD (draft) for each launch vehicle

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC 18-7 LV Study Results (1 of 6) SPL Volume Identified ST5 configurations will fit in the available SPL volumes for both the Atlas V and Delta IV configurations Atlas V:Delta IV: Proprietary Information

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC 18-8 LV Study Results (2 of 6) Mechanical Interfaces –Atlas V configuration will use a C22 adapter with an Auxiliary Adapter Structure (AAS) to interface with the DS/ST5 S/Cs AAS being developed by Space Operations International (SOI) –Delta IV configuration will use the PAF with a Secondary Payload Structure (SPS) to interface with the DS/ST5 S/Cs Boeing looking at the SOI study design for the SPS Proprietary Information

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC 18-9 LV Study Results (3 of 6) Launch Environment –Boeing & LM provided the environmental loads expected for the EELVs Addressed in the Mechanical/Thermal Presentation Electrical Interfaces –EELVs will provide ordnance signals to deploy ST5 S/C –Atlas V: Provides limited but adequate T-0 wired services for ST5 Requires a separation indicator from ST5 S/C to LV –Delta IV Will provide T-0 services for ST5 S/C as a unique service Does Not require a separation indicator from ST5 S/C to LV

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC LV Study Results (4 of 6) Mission Design –Provided standard launch ascent profiles for the EELVs –PPL to be deployed first Approximately minutes after launch typically for a GTO mission –LV CCAM and repositioning for ST5 after PPL released –ST5 released sequentially (~1 min. apart) without LV rotating to same deployment position –LV CCAM and repositioning for disposition after ST5 released

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC LV Study Results (5 of 6) Launch Site Processing –Boeing & LM presented typical launch site processing flows envisioned for EELV processing (payload arrival to launch) Denoted where they felt the SPL would fit into the flow of PPL and LV processing which included the following –Mechanical mating –Electrical checkout (Ordnance Umbilical and T-0 umbilical) –“On-Pad” Testing: Aliveness Tests and Battery Top-off –S/C access (Atlas V thru boattail; Delta IV thru 9” access doors) Emphasized that processing was to be done on non-interference basis –ST5 can proceed with launch site planning with this information A detailed timeline will be generated once a PPL rideshare assignment has been made

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC LV Study Results (6 of 6) Rideshare Candidates –Atlas III/V DoD Missions: SBIRS (GEO), UHF Commercial: None identified to date –Delta IV DoD Missions: WBGF Commercial: Customers being signed but none identified to date LV Study Summary –No Showstoppers have been identified by Boeing or LM that precludes ST5 from being able to fly on an EELV as a secondary payload –Tall Pole: Get permission/assignment to ride with manifested primary payload going to GTO

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC Risk Mitigation Risk: Getting a Launch Vehicle Assignment Mitigation: –Meet with the AirForce SPO to get acceptance/approval to fly ST5 as a secondary payload on an EELV ST5, KSC, Lockheed Martin, and Boeing Participation Present summary of the LV Study Results Convince SPO that launching ST5 does not compromise the PPL or LV –Continue to work with HQ/K. Poniatowski on getting a signed MOU/MOA in place with the AF/DoD –Continue to work with KSC/Boeing/Lockheed Martin on SPL interfaces and issues

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC Back Up Charts-Boeing RFAs Delta IV –Additional LV figures –GTO ascent profile –Deployment Scenario –Launch Site Processing Flow

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC RFAs (Summarized Version) 041: Consider Access Doors on LV –ANS: Depending upon LV, access to ST5 S/C via access doors or thru boat tail. 043: Consider contracting directly with LV contractor once PPL is selected –ANS: ST5 not sure of the latitude we will have to do this. ST5 is the pathfinder mission for a flight on an EELV as a SPL 054A: ID parameters to be checked at the Launch Pad (LP) –ANS: AT-0 interface and parameter listing is in works as the plan is to conduct aliveness test and battery top-off on each S/C prior to launch

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC RFAs (Summarized Version) 054B: Plan to mate to LV –ANS: Depending upon LV, plan is to mount to adapter which will then be mounted on the PAF or LV Adapter which will then have the PPL mounted to (TBR). The combined payloads will then be tested and encapsulated. 054C: Monitoring of ST5 when on LP –ANS: An aliveness test via a T-0 interface is planned

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC Delta IV LV Proprietary Information

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC Delta IV SPL Envelope on PAF Proprietary Information

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC SPS Interface Plate Proprietary Information

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC Delta IV Ascend Profile

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC Delta IV Deployment Scenario ST-5 S/C separation will occur between the end of primary payload CCAM and the initiation of LO 2 depletion blowdown and hydrazine depletion Typical sequence of events –Separate primary payload –Perform primary payload Contamination and Collision Avoidance Maneuver (CCAM) Align to ST5 separation attitude Separate ST5 S/C at one minute intervals Perform ST5 CCAM –LO 2 depletion blowdown –Hydrazine depletion

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC Delta IV LS Processing Flow Proprietary Information

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC Delta IV LS Processing Flow Proprietary Information

ST5 PDR June 19-20, 2001 GSFC Delta IV PAF & SPS ST-5 Satellite