Dr. Mustafa Atilla CEO and Board Member, Cyberpark, (Bilkent University) CEO and Board Member, Mobilsoft (Meteksan Group) Turkey.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stimulating Entrepreneurship in Rural Areas of Latvia.
Advertisements

Towards a profile of the NIS in Croatia Domagoj Račić Knowledge Network
Towards Science, Technology and Innovation2/10/2014 Sustainable Development Education, Research and Innovation Vision for Knowledge Economy Professor Maged.
Technology Development Zones: Tools for Enhancing University Industry Relations Prof. Dr. Canan Cilingir Vice Rector METU Turkey.
Ministry of Economy of the Slovak Republic and supporting of innovation development in enterprises 24th June 2013.
Research center for metal in the Istrian region - MET.R.IS. Istrian development agency - IDA.
Life Science Cluster in Krakow
The design of the risk capital market in Slovakia ESTER meeting,Tel Aviv January 12, 2005.
The project is funded by the European Union Institutional capacity development of the three innovation centres and research sector in Bosnia and Herzegovina.
And sustainable development, the example of KFUPM.
Business Incubators in India Anshul Saxena CINE. What are Business Incubators Incubation is a dynamic process of business development. Incubation is a.
SC – Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs)
Wiener Institut für Internationale Wirtschaftsvergleiche The Vienna Institute for International Economic Studies Conference „Innovation:
Inno|Praxis International Ltd.. Creating world innovation centres Skolkovo Summit of Innovation Economy Creators Mervi Käki.
Business Incubators in India Anshul Saxena CINE. What are Business Incubators  Incubation is a dynamic process of business development.  Incubators.
Entrepreneurship youth
Linking BRICS innovation potential through Innovation Networking Platform Sergey Korotkov Director, UNIDO CIIC Russia.
ENHANCING INNOVATION IN LATIN AMERICA. WHY? HOW? Guillermo Perry Chief Economist for Latin America World Bank Barcelona, June 2005.
1 Foreign Direct Investment and IP in Knowledge-based Development Ralph Heinrich UNECE Team of Specialists on Intellectual Property Minsk, 9-10 June 2010.
Turkish Research Area and European Technology Platforms Hüseyin Güler FP6 Deputy National Coordinator
The National Innovation System in Kosovo
2015. MITA. All rights reserved.````` Lithuanian Country Report Gintarė Narakienė The Agency for Science, Innovation and Technology.
Olesea BORDAN SMEs Policy Development and Internal Trade Division Government of the Republic of Moldova Ministry of Economy Budapest 2015 State Policy.
Results of the ESTER project in Slovakia Juraj Poledna Salamanca June 23, 2005.
Employing Technology & Innovation in SME Development R. A. Attalage University of Moratuwa 1Employing Tech & Innovation in SME Dev.
Mid-Shore CEDS Committee Meeting January 6, 2010.
Association of University Research Parks, 2012 © Best Practices in Technopark Management Association of University Research Parks, 2012©
International Conference ON South-South Cooperation for Technology Transfer & Development of Small and Medium enterprises (SMEs) Colombo, Sri - Lanka 18-
Some aspects of National STI system in Albania & The Research at Polytechnic University of Tirana T.Korini, UPT, Tirana Tbilisi, 11 April 2012.
Enabling a Global Vision for the Baltic cleantech industry: Latvia country case Dr.sc.eng. Juris Vanags Latvian Biotechnology association Interregional.
MK Dutta September GMS- SME Business Networking- Challenges and Prospects Madhurjya Kumar Dutta Program Manager, Trade & Investment Mekong Institute.
April, 2013 Agency for Investments and Competitiveness.
Aid for Trade Needs Assessment – Georgia United Nations Development Programme.
Main directions of innovation policy development in the Republic of Belarus State Committee for Science and Technology Prague, December 2, 2014.
NEW INNOVATION SUPPORT SERVICES, case Finland Mervi Käki, CEO, Partner
KPGM-TiE Report.  Availability of finance. unavailability of easy and sufficient finances.  Policy framework from Government. Bureaucracy, Corruption,
Business Model for an Industrial development agency
Influence of foreign direct investment on macroeconomic stability Presenter: Governor CBBH: Kemal Kozarić.
III ASTANA ECONOMIC FORUM INTERNATIONAL INNOVATIVE CONGRESS Innovative potential development in SME`s in region Dr. Karl-Heinz Klinger Technostart GmbH,
THE MINISTRY OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION The Sixth (6 th ) Meeting of the SME and enterprise policy Subgroup for the EU-Russian Dialogue.
1 National innovation systems Sub-regional seminar on the commercialization and enforcement of intellectual property rights Skopje, Macedonia April.
National Innovation Strategy of the Republic of Moldova. Implementation, mechanisms and measures Ghenadie CERNEI Director, Agency for Innovation.
Policy options and recommendations José Palacín Chief, Innovative Policies Development UNECE Minsk, 19 June 2014.
InfoDev Innovation Partnership Model The ICT Innovation Partnership Symposium1 A cademic E ntrepreneurship C enter of E xcellence (AECE) Educational.
Support of small and medium-sized enterprises. 2 Importance of SMEs Business environment Business environment Structural changes Structural changes Stabilizing.
D S T I S T P Technology and Innovation Policy Committee (8 December 1999) Research-based Spin-offs Issues in benchmarking OECD member country performance.
S&T and Innovation Policy in the Republic of Armenia Innovation Programs Division, SCS RA “Development of Coherent Innovation Policy in South Caucasian.
Key Barriers for the ICT Research Sector in Serbia, and Recommendations for Future EU- Serbia Collaboration Miodrag Ivkovic, ISS Milorad Bjeletic, BOS.
NETWORK STRUCTURE AND COOPERATION BETWEEN UNIVERSITIES AND INDUSTRY Prof. Ing. Tatiana Čorejová, PhD. Prof. Ing. Ján Čorej, PhD.
JULY, 09-10, 2007 ISTANBUL KOSGEB SMALL AND MEDIUM INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION NEDRET UGUR YAVUZ KOSGEB SMALL AND MEDIUM INDUSTRY DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION.
Submission on the TIA Bill to the Parliament Portfolio Committee 16 January 2008 by The Innovation Hub Mr Tsietsi Maleho and Dr Jill Sawers.
Technology Infrastructure SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PARKS IN TURKEY MUSTAFA ATİLLA CEO, Ankara Cyberpark, Turkey Knowledge Economy Forum IV March 22-24, 2004.
This project is financed by Ministry of European Union and the Republic of Turkey. Improving the Quality of Vocational Education and Training in Turkey.
TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT IN TURKEY Threats and Opportunities A. Mete Çakmakcı 4th Annual International Conference on Managing Intellectual Property in Universities.
Financing Innovation March 25, 2004 Knowledge Economy Forum III Budapest, Hungary NATIONAL INNOVATION FUND KAZAKHSTAN.
Aid for Trade Needs Assessment Armenia: Trade and Human Development Vrej Jijyan, UNDP Armenia United Nations Development Programme.
Utilization of knowledge for economic growth in the Czech Republic Karel Klusacek Technology Centre AS CR Knowledge Economy Forum V.
1 Commercialization Segment Introduction Ralph Heinrich UNECE Team of Specialists on Intellectual Property Skopje, 1 April 2009.
R&D Supports by Ministry of Science, Industry and Technology.
1 ICT in Turkey April 2nd, 2011 CICA Business Forum Aydın Ersöz.
1 Republic of TURKEY MINISTRY OF INDUSTRY AND TRADE KOSGEB Small and Medium Industries Development Organization.
Local and National Support Schemes To Start Businesses (Start-ups) Mustafa Furkan ALBAYRAK Ministry of Customs and Trade/Turkey May 2016 Bratislava /Slovakia.
NATIONAL POLICIES FOR STEPPING-UP RESEARCH, TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT AND INNOVATION.
Science and Technology Parks to Promote University – Industry Collaboration in Iran Mostafa K. Eghbal President of West Asia & North Africa Division International.
IPR in Financial Markets
Technology Transfer Office
Venture Capital Guiding Fund for Technology-based SMEs
Impact of EU structural funds in research and innovation: the experience of the Lithuanian 'Valleys’ April, 2016.
MINISTRy of economy trade and energy general directory of policies
Does Innovation and Technology Policy Pay-off? Evidence from Turkey
Presentation transcript:

Dr. Mustafa Atilla CEO and Board Member, Cyberpark, (Bilkent University) CEO and Board Member, Mobilsoft (Meteksan Group) Turkey

Meeting Industry Demand for R&D and Technology SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PARKS IN TURKEY MUSTAFA ATİLLA CEO, Ankara Cyberpark, Turkey Innovation and Competitiveness Practitioners Workshop April 19 –21, 2004 The Marmara Hotel Istanbul, Turkey “

Number of people in R&D by Sector TURKEY R&D CAPACITY Number of people in R&D by Sector   (SSI, 2004) (SSI, 2004)

TURKEY R&D CAPACITY Source: OECD MSTI database, Nov. 2003

TURKEY R&D CAPACITY Some Facts: The amount of investment in R&D in comparison with developed countries is dramatically low An important portion of R&D investment is made by governmental institutions or universities Weak innovation culture and poor R&D infrastructure Legislation (particularly inefficient and insufficient incentive mechanisms) was the biggest barrier in front of R&D activities for many years. IT related products and software form an important import category. There is a big negative imbalance in IT exports/imports. The imbalance between the number of scientific publications and patents is an important indicator showing Turkey’s inability to convert the scientific research studies into applicable knowledge and technological products.

SCIENCE PARK? “A Science Park is an organization managed by specialized professionals, whose main aim is to increase the wealth of its community by promoting the culture of innovation and the competitiveness of its associated businesses and knowledge-based institutions. To enable these goals to be met, a Science Park stimulates and manages the flow of knowledge and technology among universities, R&D institutions, companies and markets; it facilitates the creation and growth of innovation-based companies through incubation and spin-off processes; and provides other value-added services together with high quality space and facilities.” (IASP web page, 2003).

MAIN OBJECTIVES OF SCIENCE PARKS Stimulate the formation of start-up new-technology-based firms (NTBFs) Encourage the growth of existing NTBFs Foster the technologies of the future Create synergy between firms Create new jobs for the region Improve the performance of the local economy Improve the image of the location, particularly for areas of industrial decline Shift local / regional industrial base from declining to new industries Counter the regional imbalance of R&D capability, investment, innovation Improve national competitiveness level Stimulate science-based technological innovation Encourage spin-off firms started by academics Encourage and facilitate links between higher education institutions (HEI) and industry Facilitate technology transfer from academic institutions to park firms Commercialize academic research Increase the “ relevance” to industry of HEI research Create employment and consultancy opportunities for academic staff and students Engender an entrepreneurial culture Attract inward investment, mobile R&D   Provide an adequate and safe return on capital Generate income for the academic institutions   Create convenient environments for the high-tech firms to conduct their R&D studies

TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ZONES LAW (LAW NO:4691), TURKEY Technopark concept taken in the agenda of Turkey only in the mid 90’s. To promote establishment of science and technology parks under the guidance and lead of universities some legislations were made by Ministry of Industry and Trade: Technology Development Zones (TDZ) Law (Law No:4691), which came into force on 06.07.2001, and Application Regulation of this Law, which came into force on 19.06.2002. With this law, companies are encouraged to invest more in R&D and software development, through tax incentives. Any kind of software development activity is considered as an R&D activity according to the law. In establishing a STP, involvement of an higher education or a research institution as a founder is a mandatory requirement in the law

TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ZONES LAW (LAW NO:4691), TURKEY The aim of the law is: to increase synergy between universities, research institutes and industry, to increase international competitiveness and export potential of industry by adapting/developing high/advanced technologies, to facilitate more innovations, to increase the quality of technological products, to increase productivity, to decrease the costs of production, to commercialize technological knowledge, to support technology based entrepreneurship, to enable SMEs to adapt to new and advanced technologies, to create investment opportunities in technology intensive areas, to create employment opportunities for researchers and qualified persons, to help technology transfer, to provide technological infrastructure attracting foreign capital and international firms providing high/advanced technologies.

TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT ZONES LAW (LAW NO:4691), TURKEY Tax Exemptions and Incentives provided with the law (till the end of 2013) : Income and corporate tax exemptions for the operating company Income and corporate tax exemptions for the incomes generated from software development and R&D activities of the companies operating in these zones Income tax exemptions for the salaries of the researchers, software development staff and R&D personnel working in these zones VAT exemptions for the sofware development activities Sponsored aid and donations for the individuals and institutions having R&D activities in the zone Right of recruitment of individuals from government research organizations or universities in the zone with the approval of their organizations. (The income obtained in the zone by academicians or research personnel are exempted from the university revolving fund deductions) Legal permission for academicians to establish firms or become a partner of existing firms in the zones to commercialize their academic works (with the approval of their university)

SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PARKS IN TURKEY After the Law, 12 new science and technology parks (STPs) were approved by the Ministry of Industry and Trade : Ankara Cyberpark (Bilkent University, Ankara) METU Technopolis (METU, Ankara) Hacettepe University Technopark (Hacettepe University, Ankara) GOSB Technopark (Sabancı University + Kocaeli University, Kocaeli) TÜBİTAK MRC Technopark (TÜBİTAK Marmara Research Center, Kocaeli) İstanbul Technical University ARI Technopark (İTU, İstanbul) İzmir Technopark (İzmir Institute of High Technology+9 Eylül Univ.+ Ege Univ., İzmir) Yıldız Technical University Technopark (Yıldız Tech. University, İstanbul) Kocaeli University Technopark (Kocaeli University, Kocaeli) Eskişehir Technopark (Anadolu Univ.+Yunus Emre Univ., Eskişehir) İstanbul University Technopark (İstanbul University, İstanbul) Selçuk University Technopark (Selçuk University, Konya)

SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PARKS IN TURKEY Active STPs: 1.Cyberpark 2.METU 3.Hacettepe 4.GOSB 5.MRC 6.İTU ARI Initial Dev. Phase: 7. İzmir 8. Yıldız 9. Kocaeli 10.Eskişehir 11.İstanbul 12.Selçuk 8 6 9 11 5 4 1 2 3 10 7 12 TDZ applications of Batı Akdeniz University (Antalya), Blacksea Technical University (Trabzon), Erciyes University (Kayseri) have also been recently approved!

SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PARKS IN TURKEY TURKEY (active STPs) STPs in the World When were Science Parks created? (IASP, 2002) Name of STP Year of Estab. Ankara Cyberpark 2002 METU Technopolis 2000 (2001*) Hacettepe 2003 TÜBİTAK M RC 1998 (2001*) GOSB İTU ARI (* Announced as TDZ)

SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PARKS IN TURKEY TURKEY (active STPs) STPs in the World Science / Technology Parks area (IASP, 2002)

SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PARKS IN TURKEY TURKEY (active STPs) STPs in the World STPs: Number of tenants (IASP, 2002)

SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PARKS IN TURKEY TURKEY (active STPs) STPs in the World Employees in Science Parks (IASP, 2002)

SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PARKS IN TURKEY TURKEY (active STPs) STPs in the World Technology Sectors in Science Parks (IASP, 2001)

SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY PARKS IN TURKEY STPs in the World TURKEY (active STPs) STP and University: Location (IASP, 2002) The TDZ Law enforces involvement of universities for establishment of STPs All of the STPs in Turkey are situated within or near the lands (within < 5 km radius) of universities, in order to create close relationship with university community. STP and University: Distance (IASP, 2002)

SUPPORT MECHANISMS FOR TECHNOPARKS AND INCUBATORS Governmental aids through Ministry of Industry and Trade, for land acquisition, infrastructure and management building construction costs World Bank credit to STPs by Industrial Technology Project through TTGV (Cyberpark, ARI technopark) Other international credits and funds like World Bank InfoDev Incubator Initiative (Cyberpark Technology Incubator) KOSGEBs support for TEKMERs

INCUBATORS IN TURKEY Parallel to the poor entrepreneurial culture, incubation culture is too poor as well. Currently available incubators (12) in Turkey, called TEKMERs (Technology Development Centers), are managed by KOSGEB (SME Development Organization), a governmental agency. Except one incubator (Ericsson’s Creaworld) there is no private or PPP incubator Cyberpark technology incubator will be unique with its governance model by being first incubator with public private partnership and having a private management. Cyberpark incubator has been shortlisted for app. 300.000 USD WB grant through InfoDev Incubator Initiative Program. Only two TEKMERs are located in STPs and have tax incentive advantages. Grants available for incubatees for many purposes, however access is relatively bureaucratic and limited. Services provided by KOSGEB in TEKMERS are rapidly improving

MAIN CHALLENGES AND RECOMMENDATIONS Poor Institutionalization: Still many universities are planning to establish new STPs. However, the focus should be on quality rather than quantity. Most of the STPs suffer from insufficient know-how and best practices. Most of the STPs are established as land development projects, so the required institutional development has not been achieved (technology and business support mechanisms, incubators, consultancy on IPR, access to financial resources, etc. are absent) An NGO is required to provide a platform for cooperation and sharing best practices. (Turkish Science and Technology Parks Association) Too much focus on ICT. Attracting other technologies is crucial to have crosssectoral R&D. The main attraction argument in most STPs is tax advantages (other attraction elements providing the permanent success of the zones are mostly absent!) Special purpose STPs are required. Regional capacities and priorities should be considered. (Agroparks, mediparks, etc.) Lacking Synergies: Most of the universities impose barriers for their academics to work in other universities’ science parks

MAIN CHALLENGES AND RECOMMENDATIONS Assurance of financial support for initial setup: Existing governmental support is not sufficient to meet the required investment even for a single STP. Total governmental budget is around 2 million USD, which should be more than 50 million USD. World Bank credit through the Industrial Technology Project was very limited and only covered a part of construction costs of two STPs (Cyberpark, İTÜ technopark), so new WB financed projects may have larger components. There is no support for commercialization of R&D. TTGV may devise new support mechanisms and tools for commercialization of R&D results. Similarly, there is no support mechanism for private incubators. Knowledge Economy Project may reserve some funds for supporting private incubators. Tax incentives in STPs may be given not only for software companies and companies having R&D activities but for support organizations such as venture capital funds as well. International recognition and attraction of FDI.

Dr. Mustafa Atilla CEO and Board Member, Cyberpark, (Bilkent University) CEO and Board Member, Mobilsoft (Meteksan Group) Turkey

THANK YOU !