Argumentation Day 4 Math Bridging Practices Monday August 18, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction to Proofs
Advertisements

Julie Fredericks Teachers Development Group.  Definition and Purpose  What is a mathematical justification and what purposes does mathematical justification.
What is Science? We are going to be studying science all year long! Take a moment and write down on your paper in several sentences what you think science.
Section 3 Systems of Professional Learning Module 1 Grades 6–12: Focus on Practice Standards.
Argumentation Day 1 June 23, 2014 What is it???. Standards of Mathematical Practice 1. Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. 2. Reason.
Effective Math Questioning
Inductive Reasoning.  Reasoning based on patterns that you observe  Finding the next term in a sequence is a form of inductive reasoning.
So far we have learned about:
Fluency, Problem solving and Reasoning Maths for NQTs Mark Philipa Varley
Long Multiplication What is long multiplication?
RESEARCH PAPER. An abstract is a one- paragraph summary of a research project. Abstracts precede papers in research journals and appear in programs of.
Number Patterns. 1. Investigate number patterns to make and test conjectures 2. Generalise relationships in number patterns 3. Investigate and generalise.
Grade 10 Mathematics Conjectures.
Argumentation Day 1 June 23, 2014 What is it???. ARGUMENTATION PRE-WRITE (~15 MINS) When done, please make sure your name is on it and put into the Table.
2.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SUMMER INSTITUTE 2015 SESSION 2 16 JUNE 2015 CONGRUENCE IN HIGH SCHOOL.
Scientific Method Lab.
Welcome to Common Core High School Mathematics Leadership
Developing Geometric Reasoning K-2 Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Class March 14, 2011 Paige Richards and Dana Thome.
Argumentation Tuesday, October 7, 2014 “Argument is the soul of an education” “Argument, in short, is the essence of thought.” Schmoker & Graff (2011)
Bridging Math Practices Summer Workshop Wednesday, June 25, 2014 Day 3.
7th Grade Do not let me forget. You need field trip permission slips today! Today: Assign debate topics Debate guided notes Stretch You need to have at.
Improving learning in mathematics PD5: Developing questioning.
Grade 2 - Unit 1 Lesson 1 I can retell, draw, and solve story problems. I can recognize math as a part of daily life. Lesson 2 I can create story problems.
Are We Ready to Implement the Common Core Standards in Mathematics ? Katy White based on a presentation by DR. WESLEY BIRD
6.1 WELCOME TO COMMON CORE HIGH SCHOOL MATHEMATICS LEADERSHIP SUMMER INSTITUTE 2015 SESSION 6 29 JUNE 2015 SEQUENCING BASIC RIGID MOTIONS; THE KOU-KU THEOREM.
Doing Numbers and Doing Mathematics By Jim Hogan University of Waikato School Support Services.
Big Idea 1: The Practice of Science Description A: Scientific inquiry is a multifaceted activity; the processes of science include the formulation of scientifically.
Sunnyside School District
TPSP Project. Ask questions and explore theories Develop logical thinking, problem solving, and communication skills Explore mathematical patterns in.
Responding Critically to Texts
Argumentation Day 3 Math Bridging Practices June 25, 2014.
Topic 2 Deductive Reasoning Unit 1 Topic 2. Explore Deduction is a process of reasoning from statements accepted as true to a conclusion. For example,
HAWKES LEARNING Students Count. Success Matters. Copyright © 2015 by Hawkes Learning/Quant Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Section 1.1 Thinking Mathematically.
My unit plan will consist of students being given the opportunity to apply equations to their everyday life. In groups of three, they will test their.
Today’s Topics Introduction to Proofs Rules of Inference Rules of Equivalence.
Starters designed to get students ‘Talking Maths’.
Algebraic Reasoning Institute Math & Science Collaborative at the Allegheny Intermediate Unit.
Math Fellows January 22, Setting Goals and Selecting Tasks 1.Anticipating 2.Monitoring 3.Selecting 4.Sequencing 5.Connecting The Five Practices.
Module 2.2.  Learn the importance of using probing questions during the tutoring session.
EA 1.2: ArgumentATIVE SYNTHESIS ESSAY on culture EA 1.2: ArgumentATIVE SYNTHESIS ESSAY on culture To synthesize means to weave together different materials.
Argumentative vs. Analytical Writing An Introduction to Terms and Concepts.
What is formative assessment? In your table group exchange ideas on your definitions of formative assessment. "I used to think that formative assessment.
BIG IDEA: Reasoning and Proof ESSENTIAL UNDERSTANDINGS: Logical reasoning from one step to another is essential in building a proof. Logical reasoning.
Entry Task Write down your age Multiply it by 10 Add 8 to the product Double that answer and subtract 16 Divide the result by 20 Explain what you notice.
Section 3 Systems of Professional Learning Module 1 Grades K–5: Focus on Practice Standards.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Shaping Talk in the Classroom: Academically Productive Talk Features.
Preparing for NGSS: Analyzing and Interpreting Data Add your information here:
S.O.D.A. Start Of Day Activity Morning registration mathematics activity Aligned to the Renewed Framework for Mathematics Stoke-on-Trent Primary Maths.
Beginning to understand PROOF. TBAT  prove something is not true by counter-example  prove something you know.... PLTS To get stuck and be ok with it!
What is Mathematical Argumentation? Madelyn Colonnese (UConn), Sarah Brown (Manchester PS) Megan Staples (UConn) Jillian Cavanna (Michigan State University)
Agenda 9/27 DO NOW (3 parts) ◦Prove the following: 1.The length of a square is 5 cm. What is the measure of its width? How can you be sure? 2.What is the.
Lesson 1.1 AIM: Finding Patterns. 3, 6, 12, 24… Find the next three numbers in the pattern. 48, 96, 192 What is the rule? Multiply the last number by.
#1 Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them How would you describe the problem in your own words? How would you describe what you are trying.
Module 1: What is Argumentation? Bridging Math Practices-Module 1 Bridging Math Practices Math-Science Partnership Grant.
Module 1: What is Argumentation? Bridging Math Practices-Session 1 Bridging Math Practices was funded by a grant from the CT State Department of Education.
Reasoning and Proof Unit 2.
Developing questioning
Unit B2 Day 5 This unit lasts for 3 weeks.
Unit B2 Day 3 This unit lasts for 3 weeks.
Open-Ended Assessment Developing mathematical thinking
New Rhetoric Journal PDN: read the sentence below and identify what techniques the authors used to support their claim. Come up with as many techniques.
Constructing Equations
Developing Arguments for Persuasive Speeches
Honors Geometry Intro to Proof.
Logic & Reasoning.
2.1 Inductive Reasoning and Conjecturing
Writing Response Vocabulary
Reasoning with Properties from Algebra
Analyzing and Evaluating Arguments
Chapter 4: Congruent Triangles 4.2: Proving Triangles Congruent
Presentation transcript:

Argumentation Day 4 Math Bridging Practices Monday August 18, 2014

We have been wrestling with…

Monte Python – The Flying Circus

A Mathematical Argument It is… – A sequence of statements and reasons given with the aim of demonstrating that a claim is true or false – - “an argument is a collective series of statements to establish a definite proposition” (Monte Python) It is not… – (Solely) an explanation of what you did (steps) – A recounting of your problem solving process – Explaining why you personally think it’s true for reasons that are not necessarily mathematical (e.g., popular consensus; external authority, etc. It’s true because Adrianne said it, and she’s always, always right.) Take-away 1! What is an argument?

Argumentation Students offer a mathematical reason for why their method is correct Students offer a logical argument to show how they know that their result is correct What can you make an argument for? Any well formulated claim about something in math that could be determined true or false – no matter how big or small. Take-away 1! What is an argument?

THINK! What is 16 x 25? Take-away 2! There’s a difference between an explanation and an argument.

Explanation of Steps Providing an Argument I took 16 and split it into 10 and 6. I multiplied 10 by 25, and I multiplied 6 by 25. And then I added those 2 numbers together. I took 16 and split it into 10 and 6 because I need to find 16 groups of 25, and so I can find 10 groups of 25 and then add to it 6 more groups of 25. So I multiplied 10 by 25 and 6 by 25. I added them together to give me 16 25s total, which is what I need. Explanation of Steps vs Providing an Argument Student Work 16 = x 25 = x 25 = = 400 Take-away 2! There’s a difference between an explanation and an argument.

Explanation of Steps Providing an Argument I took half of 16 to get 8 and doubled the 25 to get 50. I did it again- so half of 8 was 4 and double 50 was times 100 is 400. I took half of 16 to get 8 and doubled the 25 to get x 25 and 8 x 50 are the same, because if you take ½ of one number (8), and double the other number (25), the product is the same. Explanation of Steps vs Providing an Argument Student Work 16 x 25 = 8 x 50 = 4 x 100 = I did it again- so half of 8 was 4 and double 50 was times 100 is Take-away 2! There’s a difference between an explanation and an argument.

Toulmin’s Model of Argumentation Claim Data/Evidence Warrant Take-away 3! Argumentation involves claims, warrants and evidence.

Toulmin’s Model of Argumentation Claim Data/Evidence Warrant THE ARGUMENT

Example 5 and 6 are consecutive numbers, and = 11 and 11 is an odd number. 12 and 13 are consecutive numbers, and = 25 and 25 is an odd number and 1241 are consecutive numbers, and = 2481 and 2481 is an odd number. That’s how I know that no matter what two consecutive numbers you add, the answer will always be an odd number. Claim Micah ’ s Response Data/Evidence 3 examples that fit the criterion Warrant Because if it works for 3 of them, it will work for all Take-Away 4! Not all arguments are valid (viable).

Is it a viable argument? sdf Reasoning and Proof, NCTM (2000), p 189 I think they have different areas because the triangle looks a lot bigger. I think they’re the same because they are both half of the bigger rectangles. They’re both half, so they have to be the same.

Take-away 5! (in progress) What “counts” as an acceptable (complete) argument varies by grade (age-appropriate) and by what is taken-as-shared in a class (established already as true). Regardless of this variation, it should be mathematically sound.

Example Consecutive numbers go even, odd, even, odd, and so on. So if you take any two consecutive numbers, you will always get one even and one odd number. And we know that when you add any even number with any odd number the answer is always odd. That’s how I know that no matter what two consecutive numbers you add, the answer will always be an odd number. Claim Angel’s Response Data/Evidence 2 consec #s are always one odd and one even Warrant Because we’ve shown before odd+even is odd It is an argument. It is viable. Depending on class, may or may not be complete.

STUDENT WORK – HEXAGON TASK Purposes To help us get clearer about strengths and weaknesses of different arguments To help us each develop a vision for what we value and will count as a strong argument in our classrooms

THE HEXAGON TASK Each figure in the pattern below is made of hexagons that measure 1 centimeter on each side. a)Draw Figure 5. Find the perimeter of Figure 5. b)If the pattern of adding one hexagon to each figure is continued, what will be the perimeter of the 25th figure in the pattern? Justify your answer.

Analyzing Student Work PTT -Just think. (~3 mins) Group time! (~15 mins) What is the student’s claim? In your own words, summarize the student’s argument. Take turns summarizing. (Column 2) Has this student constructed a viable argument to show the perimeter of the 25 th figure? [does it prove the claim?] (Column 3) Commentary – Explain why or why not. Perhaps address completeness -- what else would you want to see?

Is the response an argument that shows the perimeter of the 25 th figure? The result is justified! Valid, complete argument! Result is not justified [not a valid argument, or not complete –too many gaps] Place a sticky note on the poster according to the following. Put your Table # on the sticky note. We’re not sure Be prepared to share your thinking

Argumentation – solidifying What will count in your classroom for a valid argument? (What qualities or criteria are important to you?) How are these criteria communicated to students? What do you expect at the beginning of the year? Where will growth be?