Improving the Drop Shipment Process MTAC Workgroup #87 Washington, D.C. January 30, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
® MTAC User Group 007 Meeting February 18, Agenda Update from Southern Pacific Area MTEOR Enhancements Full Implementation.
Advertisements

® MTAC User Group 007 Meeting January 28, Agenda  Inventory Roll-up Reports  MTEOR Launch in Southern Pacific Area  Mailer Implementation Plan.
1 Wednesday, Sept. 17, 2008 It’s Time for Intelligent Mail ® : Overview and Value of Intelligent Mail ®
Global Systems Management Surface Visibility Presented by USPS at July 10 Packages Subgroup Meeting.
Mailer Rating National Deployment Mailer Rating Review.
MTAC General Session Meeting Electronic Verification System (eVS)/ Product Tracking System (PTS) User Group #2 February 16, 2011.
Intelligent Mail® Made Simple Through Outsourcing Dan Hindman PB Presort Services June 21, 2010 Dan Hindman PB Presort Services June 21, 2010.
Understanding & Using the USPS DSMS System The Benefits, Requirements Added Value of the Drop Ship Management System.
Visibility Strategy September, Visibility Today CONFIRM provides piece level mail processing data that can be used for tracking for letters and.
MTAC General Session Meeting Electronic Verification System (eVS®)/ Product Tracking System (PTS) User Group #2 Industry co-chair – John Medeiros Postal.
MTAC Update November 6, 2002 Larry Goodman USPS Co-Chair Dan Minnick Industry Co-Chair.
MTAC Workgroup 114 Periodicals Subgroup Update May 15, 2007.
FAST for Periodicals MTAC Workgroup 95 Washington, D.C. November 8, 2007.
Network Rationalization Mail Moves, Labeling Lists and Mail Direction File Industry Webinar July 1, 2013 To listen to a recording of this presentation.
Washington DC May 18 th, 2005 MTAC Workgroup #87 Status Improving the Drop Shipment Process.
MTAC WORKGROUP #111 MTAC GENERAL SESSION PRSENTATION FEBRUARY 21, 2007 PRESENTED BY Cher Rupp-Ruggeri Steve Colella.
Improving the Drop Shipment Process MTAC Workgroup #87 Update Washington, D.C. November 8, 2007.
November 01, 2005 MTAC 93 Design & Concept Testing Workgroup Status.
PostalOne! / FAST Data Exchange - Vision 02/15/05.
MTAC Workgroup 93 Streamlining Verification Debbie Cooper Bob Galaher May 18, 2005 Washington DC.
® 1 MTAC 138 April 23, 2014 MTAC 138 October 22, 2014.
® MTAC WG #135 Transportation Management Systems (TMS) Combined Data Limitations August 2010.
EInduction Overview 1 eDropship Post-Induction Process October 6, 2010 MTAC Workgroup 138.
® Mail Technical Advisory Committee Workgroup 142 Industry Sponsor - Wendy Smith Industry Co-chair – Tom Underkoffler USPS Co-chair – Robert Raines.
Acceptance and Induction: The Mailing Industry’s Digital Revolution IDEAlliance Print Distribution April 22, 2007 Debbie Cooper.
1 Presentation Topics Agenda  January Release  BMA Channel Strategy –eDropship –Expanded Start-the-Clock  MTAC Workgroups.
U.S. Postal Service Areas By Customer Service Districts Western Great Lakes Northeast New York Metro Capital Metro Eastern Southeast Southwest Pacific.
MTAC Meeting February 23, 2005 Integrated Mail Management.
® MTAC WG #135 Transportation Management Systems (TMS) Combined Data Limitations November 18, 2010.
® MTAC User Group 007 Meeting October 29, Agenda  Phase 2a Update  MTEOR Enhancements  Inventory Reports.
Flats Sequencing System Update Mailers Technical Advisory Committee MTAC May 16, 2007 Mailers Technical Advisory Committee MTAC May 16, 2007.
Flats Sequencing System Update Mailers Technical Advisory Committee MTAC February 21, 2007 Mailers Technical Advisory Committee MTAC February 21, 2007.
Standard Mail Sub Group MTAC WG #114 May 7, 2007.
Improving the Drop Shipment Process MTAC #87 Update Washington, D.C. November 2, 2006.
EInduction Overview 1 eDropship Induction Process September 8, 2010 MTAC Workgroup 138.
EInduction Overview 1 eDropship Post-Induction Process November 15, 2010 MTAC Workgroup 138.
USPS Product Information MTAC Jim Cochrane Vice President, Product Information February 17, 2011.
Mail Acceptance and Induction Seamless Mailing with Intelligent Mail Barcodes Debbie A. Cooper Quebecor World Logistics.
® Intelligent Mail® and Start-the-Clock (101) Presented by Pritha Mehra, Vice President, Business Mail Entry Friday, October 10, 2008.
MTAC Workgroup # 87 Update Improving the Drop Shipment Process Washington, D.C. May 18, 2006.
® Mail Technical Advisory Committee Workgroup 142 Industry Sponsor - Wendy Smith Industry Co-chair – Tom Underkoffler USPS Co-chair – Robert Raines.
1 MTAC eVS®/PTS User Group Thursday November 10, 2011.
Mail Entry & Payment Technology Mail.XML FAST ®  The Facility Access and Shipment Tracking (FAST ® ) system will be upgraded to support the Mail.XML Specification.
MTAC Workgroup 93 Streamlining Verification Debbie Cooper Bob Galaher Feb 22, 2006 Washington DC.
GLA FOCUS GROUP August 20, MAILING INDUSTRY ECOSYSTEM 2 Mail Owners E-Commerce Logistics Printers & Mailers Software Vendors Equipment Manufacturers.
Improving the Drop Shipment Process MTAC Workgroup 87 Update Washington, D.C. August 2, 2007.
Mailer Rating National Deployment Mailer Rating Reports.
MTAC Workgroup #87 - Update Improving the Drop Shipment Process August 3, 2006.
MTAC MAIL IRREGULARITY FEEDBACK WORKGROUP MTAC Presentation February 6, 2003.
August 3, 2006 MTAC Workgroup #95 FAST for Periodicals Update.
® FSS Update Rosa Fulton Executive Director, FSS MTAC May 20, 2010.
Advance Notification Streamlined Acceptance and Visibility for First-Class Mail MTAC Workgroup 102.
1 Service Performance Measurement System & Intelligent Mail® Barcodes MTAC – January 31, 2008.
MTAC Workgroup 102 Update Advance Notification, Streamlined Acceptance & Visibility for First-Class Mail January 2008.
MTAC #107 Update November 1, 2006 Washington DC. MTAC #107 2 © 2006 Accenture. All rights reserved. Progress Goal  To provide key visibility points for.
Workgroup # 120 Communicating Entry Requirements/ In-Home Delivery Dates Solutions/ Seasonality Impacts INDUSTRY CO-CHAIR DALE MILLER POSTAL CO-CHAIR CHRIS.
EInduction Overview 1 eDropship Post-Induction Process TBD MTAC Workgroup 138.
Streamlining Verification MTAC Workgroup Mission Statement: –Collectively determine how the USPS and the Industry can leverage existing, or guide.
Mailer Rating National Deployment Introduction. FAST 2 Agenda Mailer Rating Overview Mailer Reminders Mailer Rating Resources.
® MTAC WG #135 Transportation Management Systems (TMS) Combined Data Limitations May 20, 2010.
MTAC #95 Update FAST for Periodicals November 2, 2006 Washington DC.
1 Start-the-Clock for Non Full-Service Mailings MTAC 139 November 17, 2010 Rose FlanaganChris Simone Data-Mail IncUSPS.
ELECTRONIC PUBLICATION WATCH (ePUBWATCH) November 6, 2002 MTAC Meeting.
MTAC MAIL IRREGULARITY FEEDBACK WORKGROUP MTAC Presentation May 8, 2003.
Improving the Drop Shipment Process Update MTAC Workgroup #87 Washington DC – August 18.
February 23, 2006 MTAC Workgroup #87 Improving the Drop Shipment Process Update.
MTAC Workgroup 107 eVS/FAST/SV Integration Washington, D.C. August 2, 2007.
1 MTAC Work Group 138 eDropship November 18th, 2010.
Capital metro Area focus group
MTAC User Group 007 Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Improving the Drop Shipment Process MTAC Workgroup #87 Washington, D.C. January 30, 2008

MTAC Workgroup # 87 2 MTAC # 87 Goal The workgroup will optimize driver service time by making the appointment system for unloading trucks at postal facilities more efficient. Additionally, the group will identify opportunities to enhance the efficiency of mailer/postal drop ship management and seek to reduce USPS platform costs.

MTAC Workgroup # 87 3 MTAC # 87 Accomplishments Design and development of the Facility Access and Shipment Tracking (FAST) system to replace DSAS Integration with PostalOne! Integration between Label List, Drop Ship Product and redirection management with FAST  Integration of FAST with the Facilities Data Base (FDB) and Address Management  Development of a software vendor solution in conjunction with MTAC 106 to enable an automated information pull for updating redirections Implementation and deployment of mailer rating

MTAC Workgroup # 87 4 MTAC # 87 Accomplishments (cont.) Joint scheduling capabilities  Support for LTL and air freight scheduling Update and development of the recurring appointment request and approval process Surface Visibility data to determine start-the-clock Development of mailer placard bar code specification

MTAC Workgroup # 87 5 National Deployment Status USPS has concluded formal deployment of Mailer Rating National Deployment  92 out of 136 facilities have been activated (week of 01/14 – 01/20) Phase I: 71.4% of Phase I facilities are activated  15 out of 21 facilities activated in the Western Area Phase II: 76.6% of Phase II facilities are activated  15 out of 18 facilities activated in the Great Lakes Area  9 out of 12 facilities activated in the Southwest Area  12 out of 17 facilities activated in the Eastern Area

MTAC Workgroup # 87 6 National Deployment Status (cont.) Phase III: 60.3% of Phase III facilities are activated  9 out of 12 facilities activated in the NY Metro Area  9 out of 14 facilities activated in the Northeast Area  6 out of 14 facilities activated in the Capital Metro Area  11 out of 14 facilities activated in the Southeast Area  6 out of 14 facilities activated in the Pacific Area

MTAC Workgroup # 87 7 Mailer Rating Post-Deployment Debby Cataldi posts a weekly listing of all USPS facilities activated for Mailer Rating on the FAST What’s New Board The status of Mailer Rating activation for each USPS facility is also shown on the Facility Profile pages in FAST Mailer Rating has been activated at all FAST facilities where Surface Visibility (SV) is consistently used to track drop shipment arrivals  92 out of 136 facilities have been activated Operations continues to track and monitor SV Drop Shipment Compliance and activate or deactivate facilities as required according to data compliance

MTAC Workgroup # 87 8 Mailer Rating National Deployment – Western  Western – Phase I  Total number of possible facilities: 21  Total number of facilities activated: 15  01/23 Average SV Drop Ship Compliance Score: 87.31%  Average Mailer Rating Score: 46* Activated Facilities One Week Compliant NASSFacilityFacility Type 522CEDAR RAPIDS (Pilot Facility)Plant 800DENVER PDCPlant 500DES MOINESPlant 640KANSAS CITYPlant 660KANSAS CITYPlant 890LAS VEGASPlant 553MINNEAPOLISPlant 680OMAHAPlant 852PHOENIX SCFPlant 85HPHOENIX STCPlant 970PORTLANDPlant 612QUAD CITIESPlant 550SAINT PAULPlant 980SEATTLEPlant 570SIOUX FALLSPlant 554MATWIN CITIES METROPlant 80ZDENVERBMC 50ZDES MOINES (Pilot Facility)BMC 66ZKANSAS CITYBMC 55ZMINNEAPOLIS / SAINT PAULBMC 98ZSEATTLEBMC *From 12/22/07-01/18/08

MTAC Workgroup # 87 9 Mailer Rating National Deployment – Great Lakes  Great Lakes – Phase II  Total number of possible facilities: 18  Total number of facilities activated: 15  01/23 Average SV Drop Ship Compliance Score: 81.70%  Average Mailer Rating Score: 47* Activated Facilities One Week Compliant NASSFacilityFacility Type 617BLOOMINGTONPlant 601CAROL STREAMPlant 606CHICAGOPlant 605FOX VALLEYPlant 493GRAND RAPIDSPlant 541GREEN BAYPlant 460INDIANPOLISPlant 488LANSINGPlant 535MADISONPlant 600PALATINEPlant 615PEORIAPlant 610ROCKFORDPlant 480ROYAL OAKPlant 630SAINT LOUISPlant 604SOUTH SUBURBANPlant 60ZCHICAGOBMC 48ZDETROITBMC 63ZSAINT LOUISBMC *From 12/22/07-01/18/08

MTAC Workgroup # Mailer Rating National Deployment – Southwest  Southwest – Phase II  Total number of possible facilities: 12  Total number of facilities activated: 9  01/23 Average SV Drop Ship Compliance Score: 83.16%  Average Mailer Rating Score: 47* Activated Facilities One Week Compliant NASSFacilityFacility Type 786AUSTINPlant 707BATON ROUGEPlant 752DALLASPlant 760FORT WORTHPlant 770HOUSTONPlant 720LITTLE ROCKPlant 773NORTH HOUSTONPlant 750NORTH TEXASPlant 780SAN ANTONIOPlant 740TULSAPlant 75ZDALLASBMC 707PAPORT ALLENAnnex *From 12/22/07-01/18/08

MTAC Workgroup # Mailer Rating National Deployment – Eastern  Eastern – Phase II  Total number of possible facilities: 17  Total number of facilities activated: 12  01/23 Average SV Drop Ship Compliance Score: 81.84%  Average Mailer Rating Score: 51* Activated Facilities One Week Compliant NASSFacilityFacility Type 450CINCINNATIPlant 440CLEVELANDPlant 430COLUMBUSPlant 170HARRISBURGPlant 180LEHIGH VALLEYPlant 403LEXINGTONPlant 400LOUISVILLEPlant 190PHILADELPHIAPlant 150PITTSBURGHPlant 240ROANOKEPlant 080SOUTH JERSEYPlant 189SOUTHEASTERNPlant 434TOLEDOPlant 197WILMINGTONPlant 45ZCINCINNATIBMC 19ZPHILADELPHIABMC 15ZPITTSBURGHBMC *From 12/22/07-01/18/08

MTAC Workgroup # Mailer Rating National Deployment – New York Metro  New York Metro – Phase III  Total number of possible facilities: 12  Total number of facilities activated: 9  01/23 Average SV Drop Ship Compliance Score: 89.60%  Average Mailer Rating Score: 53* Activated Facilities One Week Compliant NASSFacilityFacility Type 112BROOKLYNPlant 07099DOMINICK V DANIELSPlant 088KILMERPlant 117MID ISLANDPlant 077MONMOUTHPlant 100NEW YORK (Pilot Facility)Plant 076NORTHERN NJ METROPlant 110QUEENS (Pilot Facility)Plant 085TRENTONPlant 105WESTCHESTERPlant 115WESTERN NASSAUPlant 07ZNEW JERSEYBMC *From 12/22/07-01/18/08

MTAC Workgroup # Mailer Rating National Deployment – Capital Metro  Capital Metro – Phase III  Total number of possible facilities: 14  Total number of facilities activated: 6  01/23 Average SV Drop Ship Compliance Score: 72.87%  Average Mailer Rating Score: 45* Activated Facilities One Week Compliant NASSFacilityFacility Type 212BALTIMOREPlant 280CHARLOTTEPlant 290COLUMBIAPlant 201DULLESPlant 217FREDERICKPlant 270GREENSBOROPlant 296GREENVILLEPlant 233NORFOLKPlant 220NORTHERN VAPlant 275RALEIGHPlant 230RICHMONDPlant 200WASHINGTONPlant 27ZGREENSBOROBMC 20ZWASHINGTONBMC *From 12/22/07-01/18/08

MTAC Workgroup # Mailer Rating National Deployment – Pacific  Pacific – Phase III  Total number of possible facilities: 14  Total number of facilities activated: 6  01/23 Average SV Drop Ship Compliance Score: 75.89%  Average Mailer Rating Score: 45* Activated Facilities One Week Compliant NASSFacilityFacility Type 917INDUSTRY (Pilot Facility)Plant 907LONG BEACHPlant 900LOS ANGELASPlant 945OAKLANDPlant 956SACRAMENTOPlant 923SAN BERNARDINOPlant 920SAN DIEGOPlant 940SAN FRANCISCOPlant 950SAN JOSEPlant 926SANTA ANAPlant 952STOCKTONPlant 913VAN NUYSPlant 90ZLOS ANGELASBMC 94ZSAN FRANCISCOBMC *From 12/22/07-01/18/08

MTAC Workgroup # Mailer Rating National Deployment – Northeast  Northeast – Phase III  Total number of possible facilities: 14  Total number of facilities activated: 9  01/23 Average SV Drop Ship Compliance Score: 82.14%  Average Mailer Rating Score: 47* Activated Facilities One Week Compliant NASSFacilityFacility Type 120ALBANYPlant 021BOSTONPlant 023BROCKTONPlant 140BUFFALOPlant 015CENTRAL MAPlant 060HARTFORDPlant 018MIDDLE ESSEXPlant 028PROVIDENCEPlant 144ROCHESTERPlant 040SOUTHERN MAINEPlant 064SOUTHERN CTPlant 010SPRINGFIELDPlant 130SYRACUSEPlant 01ZSPRINGFIELDPlant *From 12/22/07-01/18/08

MTAC Workgroup # Mailer Rating National Deployment – Southeast  Southeast – Phase III  Total number of possible facilities: 14  Total number of facilities activated: 11  01/23 Average SV Drop Ship Compliance Score: 88.39%  Average Mailer Rating Score: 46* Activated Facilities One Week Compliant NASSFacilityFacility Type 333ATLANTAPlant 350BIRMINGHAMPlant 333FORT LAUDERDALEPlant 390JACKSONPlant 380MEMPHISPlant 301NORTH METROPlant MCOORLANDOPlant 337SAINT PETERSBURGPlant TPATAMPAPlant 30ZATLANTABMC 32ZJACKSONVILLEBMC 38ZMEMPHISBMC 328PMORLANDO LDCAnnex 335DCTAMPA LDCAnnex *From 12/22/07-01/18/08

MTAC Workgroup # Mailer Rating – Summary Facilities and customers have demonstrated changed behavior from the start of the pilot to the conclusion of national deployment  No Show Numbers have decreased from 23.9% (June 2006) to 21% (January 2008) The SV Drop Ship Compliance national average has increased 65.4% from the start of pilot on 6/22/2007  SV Drop Ship Compliance currently is 82.6%  SV Drop Ship Compliance at the beginning of the Mailer Rating Pilot (6/22/07) was 17.2%

MTAC Workgroup # Preview - Upcoming Enhancements Increase the FAST appointment finalization period from 5 days to 12 days Add a Closed in SV (Surface Visibility) indicator to the Closeout Data report  Will indicate partial or complete use of SV to capture arrival, start unload, and end unload.  There is already an existing indicator showing whether any placard barcodes were scanned. Ability to cancel multiple appointments from one screen using the online application

MTAC Workgroup # Contact Information FAST issues:  Debby Cataldi at or (202) SV pallet placard scan issues:  Steve McElroy at or (202) Redirection issues:  Susan Hawes at or (202)