A TTRACTION AND A TTRACTIVENESS IN M ALE -F EMALE D YADS : D O D ATING C OUPLES D IFFER FROM C ROSS -S EX F RIENDS ? Whitney Joseph, Heather Williquette,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Prevalence & Correlates of Eating Disordered Behaviors Among Students at the University of WI-Eau Claire Sarah Hammon, Catherine Filtz, Kaci Kufalk, Amanda.
Advertisements

An Analysis of Personality Type and Relationship Desirability Within Hook-up Culture: Nice-Guys vs. Bad-Boys An Analysis of Personality Type and Relationship.
College Student Identity and Emotional Intelligence Abstract This research examines the longitudinal relationship between identity and emotional intelligence.
AGE VARIATION IN MATING STRATEGIES AND MATE PREFERENCES AMONG COLLEGE STUDENTS Danielle Ryan and April Bleske-Rechek, University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire.
Both self-esteem and co-rumination have been shown to influence an individual’s psychological well-being. Rose (2002) defined co- rumination as “excessively.
Finger Length and Longevity Student Name Mentor Name, Department Abstract The ratio of index finger length to ring finger length (2D:4D) is an indicator.
Ashley Adams & Whitley Holt Hanover College
The Double-Edged Nature of Friendship: Attractiveness and Rivalry in Women’s Friendships Katherine Quigley and Carolyn Kolb, University of Wisconsin-Eau.
Kelsey Grossman Laura Jimenez
Can You Match These Friends? A Test of Genetic Similarity Theory Katrina M. Sandager, Stephanie R. A. Maves, Sarah L. Hubert, and April Bleske-Rechek University.
Classroom Crushes: An Exploration of Student-Instructor Attraction Emily L. Travis and Traci A. Giuliano Southwestern University Student-teacher romances.
Latino fathers’ childbearing intentions: The view from mother-proxy vs. father self-reports Lina Guzman, Jennifer Manlove, & Kerry Franzetta.
Supplemental to Heather Littleton, Amie Grills- Taquechel, Katherine Buck, Lindsey Rosman, and Julia Dodd 2013.
1]Knoll, N., Burkert, S., & Schwartzer, R. (2006). Reciprocal support provision: Personality as a moderator? European Journal of Personality, 20,
Attraction and Flirtation in Young Adults’ and Middle-Aged Adults’ Opposite-Sex Friendships Erin E. Hirsch, Cierra A. Micke, and April Bleske-Rechek University.
Examine the Biological, Psychological and Social Origins of Attraction
Both descriptive and correlational. First, the researcher reviewed the online courses according to the Quality Matters scoring rubric to provide a score.
View Attractive Female(s) Perception of attractiveness level of subsequent images of females Down Contrast Effect Adaptation Level (Helson) Frame of reference.
Exploring College Students’ Perceptions of Their Peers With Disabilities Katie Beck a and Kellie Risberg a, Faculty Mentor: Mary Beth Leibham b, Ph.D.
POSTER TEMPLATE BY: om Sex Differences in Associations between Fear of Negative Evaluation (FNE) and Substance Use Lesley A.
Origins of Attraction MATTHEW CORRINET. Biological: Fischer et al. (2003)  “... used an fMRI... to investigate blood flow in the brains of 20 men and.
Introduction ► College-student drinking remains a significant problem on campuses across the nation. ► It is estimated that 38-44% of college students.
EVENT LEVEL: Sex obtained through aggression will frequently be unprotected GLOBAL LEVEL: Men who have perpetrated sexual aggression will be more likely.
Figure 1. Display of the percentage of men and women in each age group who spontaneously nominated mating desires as a benefit of their friendships (left)
Results show that participants favored females in fields of surgeons and corporate setting jobs than males. They also showed preference for males in the.
Supervisor-Subordinate Friendships The Effects of Promotion on Peer Relationships Katie Nichols, Stefanie Ress, Jessica Rudd with Dr. Martha Fay Department.
Introduction Method Implications Educational training programs regarding self-injury have potential to improve professionals’ attitudes towards and comfort.
Friends as Rivals: Perceptions of Attractiveness Predict Mating Rivalry in Female Friendships Stephanie R. A. Maves, Sarah L. Hubert, and April Bleske-Rechek.
Growth Curve Models Using Multilevel Modeling with SPSS David A. Kenny January 23, 2014.
Friends (Temporarily) Forever: Frequency of Facebook Use, Relationship Satisfaction, and Perception of Friendship Zack Hayes, Jerad Hill, Heather Jacobson,
Introduction College Students’ Attitudes about Cohabitation Before Marriage Alexiss Jeffers and Dr. Lori Bica, Faculty Mentor (Psychology) Participants.
This research was supported by funding from the Office of Research and Sponsored Programs at the University of Wisconsin- Eau Claire. References Study.
Religious Affiliation Predicts Prejudice and Prosocial Behavior Cody Butcher, Alex DeLaPena, Hemapreya Selvanathan Faculty Mentor: Dr. Jeffrey Goodman,
Attractive Equals Smart? Perceived Intelligence as a Function of Attractiveness and Gender Abstract Method Procedure Discussion Participants were 38 men.
THE IMPORTANCE OF SYMMETRY. Women appear to be more attracted to men who have features that are more symmetrical than other men. One study (Thornhill.
Chapter-8 Chi-square test. Ⅰ The mathematical properties of chi-square distribution  Types of chi-square tests  Chi-square test  Chi-square distribution.
1 of 29 Department of Cognitive Science Adv. Experimental Methods & Statistics PSYC 4310 / COGS 6310 Mixed Model ANOVA Michael J. Kalsher PSYC 4310/6310.
Figure 1. Percent of Couples Still Dating at Time 2, as a Function of Their Relationship Commitment at Time 1. Trolley Problem Decisions Follow the Laws.
Introduction Disordered eating continues to be a significant health concern for college women. Recent research shows it is on the rise among men. Media.
Early Adolescent Behaviors in Disagreement with Best Friend Predictive of Later Emotional Repair Abilities Lauren Cannavo, Elenda T. Hessel, Joseph S.
Initial Validity and Reliability of the Revised Sexual Experiences Scale in a Sample of College Men RaeAnn E. Anderson, Timothy J. Geier & Shawn P. Cahill,
1 Psychology 320: Gender Psychology Lecture Announcements 1. The 12th Annual UBC Psychology Undergraduate Conference is scheduled for: April 10.
Extremes of Online Interpersonal Relationships Brian Coleman Angela Lutheran April
Personal Control over Development: Effects on the Perception and Emotional Evaluation of Personal Development in Adulthood.
By: Jennifer Busico, Renee Egizi, Laura Jimenez Buss, D. M. (2008). Attractive Women Want It All: Good Genes, Economic Investment, Parenting Proclivities,
Lydia Moua, Hua Xiong-Her, and April Bleske-Rechek University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire Cash, T. F., Cash, D. N., & Butters, J. W. (1983). Mirror, mirror,
Dyadic Patterns of Parental Perceptions of Health- Related Quality of Life Gustavo R. Medrano & W. Hobart Davies University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Pediatric.
Greek Affiliation and Success in College Ev A. Lynn Practicing Until Perfect University Introduction When students enter college, they have the choice.
RESULTS In both studies, greater anticipated mobility significantly predicted reduced relationship prioritization, even after controlling for demographics.
B ACKGROUND M ETHOD D ISCUSSION R EFERENCES R ESULTS A CKNOWLEDGMENTS S IMILARITY B ETWEEN F RIENDS AND R OMANTIC P ARTNERS IN M ORAL I NTUITIONS Mallory.
MADELEINE A. FUGÈRE, ALITA J. COUSINS, & STEPHANIE A. MACLAREN Presented at the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Please contact Dr.
Template provided by: “posters4research.com”   Ideals: mental constructs that represent an idea of traits we are attracted to in potential partners (Fletcher.
Who’s Cheating Who? Perceptions of Infidelity Across Gender and Sexual Orientation Holly M. Albers and Madeline G. Dugolenski University of Wisconsin,
1 Psychology 320: Psychology of Gender and Sex Differences Lecture 35.
Method Participants  145 undergraduates: 38 men (26.2%) and 107 women (73.8%) earning research participation credit for Psychology courses  Recruited.
Can Pretty People Have Their Cake and Eat it Too? Positive and Negative Effects of Physical Attractiveness. Megan M. Schad, David E. Szwedo, Joanna M.
W HEN M ISFORTUNE B EFALLS A NOTHER Cassandra L. Abel, Amanda L. Johnson, and April Bleske-Rechek University of Wisconsin-Eau Claire B ACKGROUND Schadenfreude.
Testosterone Levels in Women and Men Who are Single, in Long-Distance Relationships, or Same-City Relationships Sari M. van Anders and Neil V. Watson Department.
Sexiness on Social Media Hurts Men Too
Attraction and Attractiveness in a Naturally Occurring
University of Wisconsin – Eau Claire  Department of Psychology
My, But We are Impressive
Sociosexuality and Perceptions of Partner Over Time
Natural Sampling versus Mental Concepts Whitney Joseph
Presentation transcript:

A TTRACTION AND A TTRACTIVENESS IN M ALE -F EMALE D YADS : D O D ATING C OUPLES D IFFER FROM C ROSS -S EX F RIENDS ? Whitney Joseph, Heather Williquette, and Bryan Donavan Faculty mentor: April Bleske-Rechek Heterosexual dating partners tend to be similarly attractive. 1,2 They are also highly attracted to one another; and both men and women rate their partners as more attractive than they rate themselves. 3, 4 Less is known about attractiveness and perceptions of attractiveness among heterosexual cross-sex friendship dyads, although a common finding is that men report more attraction toward their female friends than women do toward their male friends. 5 In the current study, we aimed to (1) replicate the finding that men are more attracted than women are to their cross- sex friends; (2) investigate variability within each sex in attraction to cross-sex friends; and (3) determine whether friends – like romantic relationship partners – rate their partners as more attractive than they rate themselves. We also aimed to determine whether discrepancies in friends’ attraction to one another were related to discrepancies in friends’ perceptions of one another’s attractiveness. B ACKGROUND M ETHOD D ISCUSSION R EFERENCES A CKNOWLEDGEMENTS We thank the Office of Research and Sponsored Programs at UWEC for supporting this research into the upcoming year with a Summer Research Experiences for Undergraduates grant. We also thank Lyndsay Nelson, our collaborator and UWEC alumnus who is collecting outsiders’ ratings of participants’ attractiveness for subsequent analyses with this dataset. Past research on friendship has utilized a “bring a friend to the lab” design; in the current study, we approached male- female dyads in a social environment to increase ecological validity of our data. Two researchers, themselves a dyad, approached male-female dyads at the university student union and asked them if they were interested in participating in a study “for the Psychology Department.” Upon consent, each member of the dyad independently completed a survey about their perceptions of their own attractiveness relative to others of their same age and sex, their counterpart’s attractiveness relative to others of the same age and sex, and their attraction to their counterpart. All attractiveness and attraction ratings were on 7-point scales, not at all to extremely, and much less to much more. Each member of the dyad also reported the status of their relationship: just friends, in a romantic relationship, or other (e.g., “it’s complicated”). Finally, we photographed each dyad and asked for their permission to use their photographs in the research, specifically by having judges from another university rate their attractiveness (data not yet in). When data collection was complete, 8 dyads were excluded because they held discrepant views on their relationship status (4), were related (2), or included a homosexual member (2). R ESULTS 1 Luo, S., & Klohnen, E. C. (2005). Assortative mating and marital quality in newlyweds: A couple-centered approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, Bleske-Rechek, A., Remiker, M. W., & Baker, J. P. (2009). Similar from the start: Assortment in young adult dating couples and its link to relationship stability over time. Individual Differences Research, 7, Swami, V., Stieger, S., Haubner, T., Voracek, M., & Furnham, A. (2009). Evaluating the physical attractiveness of oneself and one’s romantic partner. Journal of Individual Differences, 30, Prichard, I., Polivy, J., Provencher, V., Herman, C. P., Tiggemann, M., & Cloutier, K. (in press). Brides and young couples: Partners’ weight, weight change, and perceptions of attractiveness. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 5 Bleske-Rechek, A., Somers, E., Micke, C., Erickson, L., Matteson, L., Schumacher, B., Stocco, C., & Ritchie, L. (2012). Benefit or burden? Attraction in cross-sex friendship. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 29, P ANEL 1: A TTRACTION P ANEL 2: A TTRACTIVENESS R ATINGS P ANEL 3: D ISCREPANCIES IN A TTRACTION As shown in the figure at right, men in cross- sex friendships did not report significantly more attraction toward their cross-sex friends than women did, t(39) = 1.64, p =.109, d = Both men and women in cross-sex friendships reported less attraction toward their partner than did men and women in romantic relationships, whose attraction toward their partner was at ceiling, t(36) = 1.14, p =.264, d = The four histograms below show that men’s and women’s reports of attraction toward their cross-sex friends varied quite widely, whereas among dating couples, nearly all men and women reported very high levels of attraction toward their romantic partner. Men and women in both types of dyads were likely to give their partner a higher attractiveness rating than they gave themselves. This was particularly the case among dating couples, where there were no men and only one woman who gave themselves a higher attractiveness rating than they gave their partner. We computed a discrepancy attraction score by subtracting women’s attraction to their male partner from men’s attraction to their female partner; positive scores reflected more attraction from the male toward his partner and negative scores reflected more attraction from the female toward her partner. As anticipated from the variation in attraction discrepancy scores among cross-sex friends, men’s and women’s attraction toward one another were not correlated, r(40) =.10, p =.556. That is, feeling attracted toward one’s friend provides no indication of whether that friend feels attraction in return. Women who gave themselves lower attractiveness ratings than they gave their friend were also more attracted to their friend than he was to them, r(40) =.45, p =.004. Among cross-sex friendships, in 33% of the dyads the woman reported more attraction to her friend than he did to her (33%); in 50% of the dyads, the man reported more attraction to his friend than she did to him (50%). In contrast, dating partners commonly reported the same level of attraction toward one another. In this study, we approached male- female dyads around campus, and then evaluated their attraction toward one another and their perceptions of one another’s attractiveness as a function of whether they were romantically involved or “just friends.” Although men trended toward more attraction to their female friends than the reverse (as found in several prior studies), the difference was not statistically significant. We speculate that because we approached dyads in the field, we captured an ecologically valid sample of friendships among young adults in which the two friends vary widely in their attraction toward one another. Moreover, one friend’s attraction was not at all correlated with the other’s. Thus, our data suggest that asymmetries in attraction, which have the potential to cause hurt feelings and confusion about the status of the relationship, are quite prevalent in college students’ cross-sex friendships. We also found that men and women in both types of dyads gave their partner higher attractiveness ratings than they gave themselves. We are in the process of obtaining outside judges’ ratings of partners’ photos to determine whether participants’ perceptions of each other’s attractiveness converge with “objective” evaluations. We will also use those ratings to examine whether cross-sex friends – like dating partners – are similarly attractive.