2004 NIH Building on the BIRN Bruce Rosen, MD PhD Randy Gollub, MD PhD Steve Pieper, PhD Morphometry BIRN.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Interfacing processing and visualization tools: FIPS to Slicer3 and the QueryAtlas.
Advertisements

2005 All Hands Meeting Multi-Site Alzheimer’s Disease Project a.k.a. “MAD” Project Leaders: C. Fennema-Notestine, R. Gollub, B. Dickerson.
All Hands Meeting 2005 MRI Calibration Update Morphometry BIRN.
Building on the BIRN Workshop BIRN Systems Architecture Overview Philip Papadopoulos – BIRN CC, Systems Architect.
Imaging, Medical Analysis and Grid Environments (IMAGE) June 3, 2015 Translating Imaging Science to the Emerging Grid Infrastructure Jeffrey S. Grethe.
SCHOOL OF INFORMATION UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN Biomedical Informatics Research Network.
Michael Marron, Ph.D., Director Division of Biomedical Technology National Center for Research Resources National Institutes of Health Department of Health.
All Hands Meeting 2005 Morphometry BIRN - Overview - Scientific Achievements.
Atlas Interoperablity I & II: progress to date, requirements gathering Session I: 8:30 – 10am Session II: 10:15 – 12pm.
Collaborations and Architectures mBIRN Progress at BWH.
Function BIRN: Quality Assurance Practices Introduction: Conclusion: Function BIRN In developing a common fMRI protocol for a multi-center study of schizophrenia,
FBIRN AHM March 13-14, 2006 David B. Keator University of California, Irvine FBIRN NeuroInformatics Working Group Update.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing XNAT eXtenible aNatomy Archiving Toolkit Steve Pieper, PhD Isomics, Inc. Slides.
2004 All Hands Meeting Morphometry BIRN Bruce Rosen, MD PhD Jorge Jovicich PhD Steve Pieper, PhD David Kennedy, PhD.
Design, Construction and Early Use of the Biomedical Informatics Research Network July 2004 Dr. Philip Papadopoulos Program Director, Grid and Cluster.
BIRN Update Carl Kesselman Professor of Industrial and Systems Engineering Information Sciences Institute Fellow Viterbi School of Engineering University.
Morphometry BIRN Bruce Rosen, M.D. Ph.D.. Scientific Goal Methods –Multi-site MRI calibration, acquisition –Integrate advanced image analysis and visualization.
Ongoing BIRN-GCRC Collaborations Medical College Wisconsin (non BIRN site) –Functional MRI acquisition calibration University of Texas (non BIRN site)
Biomedical Informatics Research Network BIRN Overview: Building the Biomedical Informatics Research Network October 9, nd Annual All Hands Meeting.
All Hands Meeting 2004 Title: Planned GCRC-BIRN Collaboration at BWH Jonathan Sacks, PhD.
Atlas Interoperablity I & II: progress to date, requirements gathering Session I: 8:30 – 10am Session II: 10:15 – 12pm.
2004 All Hands Meeting Morphometry BIRN: Milestones for 2005 Jorge Jovicich PhD Steve Pieper, PhD David Kennedy, PhD.
Morphometry BIRN Lobar analysis and atlas registration to subjects Parallel computing and statistical analysis Anatomical Segmentation Retrospective Data.
April 13 BEC Meeting BIRN Data Sharing Implementation From the BIRN DSTF Randy L. Gollub, Chair.
BIRN Advantages in Morphometry  Standards for Data Management / Curation File Formats, Database Interfaces, User Interfaces  Uniform Acquisition and.
Clinical Measures Genotype Local Storage BIRN Rack SRB MCAT HID/ XNAT/ LONI DUP Calibration & Analysis Tools GRID Portal Mediator Institution A BIRN Rack.
All Hands Meeting 2005 Morphometry BIRN - Overview - Scientific Achievements.
All Hands Meeting 2004, Boston Informatics Workshop.
2004 All Hands Meeting FBIRN 2005 – Database and Informatics Working Group David Keator.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing National Alliance for Medical Image Computing: NAMIC Ron Kikinis, M.D.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing UCSD: Engineering Core 2 Portal and Grid Infrastructure.
The Biomedical Informatics Research Network Carl Kesselman BIRN Principal Investigator Professor of Industrial and Systems Engineering Information Sciences.
Morphometry BIRN: Imaging Calibration Analysis Tools Data Sharing.
All Hands Meeting 2005 AVI Update Morphometry BIRN Analysis, Visualization, and Interpretation.
Vicky Rowley Solution Architect BIRN Coordinating Center - University of California San Diego E-x-t-e-n-d-i-n-g Rocks: The Creation and Management of Grid.
Data Integration Progress. BIRN Data Integration Framework 2. Create conceptual links to a shared ontology 1. Create multimodal databases 3. Situate the.
Spring Meeting 2006 Tensor Atlas Morphometry BIRN Analysis, Visualization, and Interpretation.
All Hands Meeting 2005 FBIRN Tools: 2005 Subtitle added here.
Neuroinformatics Working Group Update 10/26/2009 H Jeremy Bockholt.
National Alliance for Medical Image Computing Core What We Need from Cores 1 & 2 NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing.
2004 FBIRN Meeting FIRST BIRN: Challenges of Collaborative Multi- site, Multi-discipline Research Steven Potkin, MD Gary Glover, PhD Gregory McCarthy,
Morphometry BIRN Semi-Automated Shape Analysis (SASHA) JHU (CIS): M. F. Beg, C. Ceritoglu, A. Kolasny, M. I. Miller, R. Yashinski MGH (NMR): B. Fischl;
Jorge Jovicich, Ph.D. Massachusetts General Hospital - Harvard Medical School Biomedical Informatics Research Network Overview Testbeds Morphometry BIRN.
Mark Ellisman, PhD Director, National Center for Microscopy and Imaging Research Professor of Neurosciences and Bioengineering University of California.
Neuroimage Analysis Center An NCRR National Resource Center NAC Engineering Core Steve Pieper, Core PI SPL; Isomics, Inc.
Needs and Progress: Summary Flexible, powerful, modular atlas interface, and a query gateway to multiple types of data (GeneNetwork, Barlow, Smith, CCDB,
All Hands Meeting 2004 Intellectual Property Task Force Anders Dale, Jeff Grethe, Amarnath Gupta, Ron Kikinis, John Lauriello, Steve Pieper, Gary Glover.
Fire Emissions Network Sept. 4, 2002 A white paper for the development of a NSF Digital Government Program proposal Stefan Falke Washington University.
Automatic pipeline for quantitative brain tissue segmentation and parcellation: Experience with a large longitudinal schizophrenia MRI study 1,2 G Gerig,
All Hands Meeting 2005 Semi-Automated Shape Analysis (SASHA)
Imaging Capacities The ability to collect imaging data from different sites The ability to share imaging data from different sites The ability to analyze.
UCI Progress MBIRN AHM. Progress Tool Development –FIPS and HID: Modifications to store derived data, including morphometric measures from Freesurfer.
Federating Standardized Clinical Brain Images Across Hospitals.
All Hands Meeting 2005 Morphometry BIRN Tool Dissemination.
2005 AHM Mouse BIRN. Goals Review progress on mouse BIRN milestones Update priorities and milestones for SFN, next spring, and next fall 2006 Clarify.
REQUIREMENTS GATHERING Moderators: M Miller Goals: To allow participants to provide feedback to the developers (BIRN-CC and test bed applications) of what.
Atlas Interoperablity I & II: progress to date, requirements gathering Session I: 8:30 – 10am Session II: 10:15 – 12pm.
September 16, 2009 NLC INjury and TRaumatic STress Consortium Neuroimaging Leadership Core Lead Investigators: Martha Shenton, BWH Ron Kikinis, BWH Bruce.
Johns Hopkins University Center for Imaging Science 2006 Summary.
Biomedical Informatics Research Network The BIRN Architecture: An Overview Jeffrey S. Grethe, BIRN-CC 10/9/02 BIRN All Hands Meeting 2002.
Function BIRN The ability to find a subject who may have participated in multiple experiments and had multiple assessments done is a critical component.
NA-MIC National Alliance for Medical Image Computing UCSD / BIRN Coordinating Center NAMIC Group Site PI: Mark H. Ellisman Site Project.
Brigham and Women’s Hospital GCRC – BIRN Collaboration Planning August Two active GCRC protocols were selected to be part of the initial collaboration.
Department of Psychiatry, Department of Computer Science, 3 Carolina Institute for Developmental Disabilities 1 Department of Psychiatry, 2 Department.
All Hands Meeting 2004 Clinician’s Requirements for HID Query and Statistics Interface Christine Fennema-Notestine, Ph.D. David Kennedy, Ph.D.
All Hands Meeting 2005 BIRN-CC: Building, Maintaining and Maturing a National Information Infrastructure to Enable and Advance Biomedical Research.
2003 All Hands Meeting FBIRN Complete the Data Analysis  Calibration and statistics issues Assess the variability Global measures ROI measures.
BIRN: Where We Have Been, Where We are Going. Carl Kesselman BIRN Principal Investigator Professor of Industrial and Systems Engineering Information Sciences.
AVI Update Morphometry BIRN
Core 2 Progress Day 1 Salt Lake City
Presentation transcript:

2004 NIH Building on the BIRN Bruce Rosen, MD PhD Randy Gollub, MD PhD Steve Pieper, PhD Morphometry BIRN

 What is the Morphometry BIRN? (B. Rosen)  Scientific Background and Significance (R. Gollub)  BIRN Advantages in Morphometry (S. Pieper) The BIRN Advantage OUTLINE: Morphometry BIRN

 Overall Goal: Develop capability to analyze and mine data acquired at multiple sites using processing and visualization tools developed at multiple sites Morphometry BIRN

 Overall Goal: Develop capability to analyze and mine data acquired at multiple sites using processing and visualization tools developed at multiple sites  Context: Human Brain MR Based Morphometry  Initial Application:Alzheimer’s, Depression, Ageing Brain  Participants: BWH, MGH, Duke, UC Los Angeles, UC San Diego, Johns Hopkins, UC Irvine, Washington University Morphometry BIRN

Human Data Protection Multi-site data acquisition Data Upload Integration and Application of Processing Tools Human Imaging Database Morphometry BIRN: Flowchart Simplified diagram of building blocks SRB

Human Data Protection Multi-site data acquisition Data Upload Integration and Application of Processing Tools Human Imaging Database Morphometry BIRN: Flowchart Simplified diagram of building blocks SRB

Raw dataDe-faced data De-facing: automated de-facing without brain removal Pipeline: image formats, BIRN ID generation, defacing, QA, upload Accomplishment: Developed a robust automated methods for bulk MRI de-identification and upload to database (diverse inputs, sharable outputs, common package) De-identification and Upload Pipeline* UCSD (fMRI): A. Bischoff, C.Notestine, B. Ozyurt, S. Morris, G.G. Brown MGH (NMR): B. Fischl BWH (SPL): S. Pieper UCI: D. Wei Duke: B. Boyd *See demo Morphometry BIRN: Reality

Human Data Protection Multi-site data acquisition Data Upload Integration and Application of Processing Tools Human Imaging Database Morphometry BIRN: Flowchart Simplified diagram of building blocks SRB

Multi-site Structural MRI Data Acquisition & Calibration Methods: common acquisition protocol, distortion correction, evaluation by scanning human phantoms multiple times at all sites MGH (NMR): J. Jovicich, A. Dale, D. Greve, E. Haley BWH (SPL): S. Pieper UCI: D. Keator UCSD (fMRI): G. Brown Duke University (NIRL): J. MacFall Corrected Uncorrected Image intensity variability on same subject scanned at 4 sites Morphometry BIRN: Reality Accomplishment: develop acquisition & calibration protocols that improve reproducibility, within- and across-sites

Human Data Protection Multi-site data acquisition Data Upload Integration and Application of Processing Tools Human Imaging Database Morphometry BIRN: Flowchart Simplified diagram of building blocks SRB

Shared Tools for Data Analysis : FreesurferMGH SlicerBWH LONI PipelineUCLA LDDMMJohns Hopkins Morphometry BIRN

Integration and Application of Processing Tools Various projects driving developments: Multi-site Imaging Research in Analysis of Depression*† Data from one site processed with tools of multiple sites Multi-site Morphometry in Analysis of Alzheimer’s Disease *† Data from multiple sites processed with tools of one site Semi-Automated Shape Analysis Project † Data from BIRN sites processed with tools of various sites * Demo at BIRN Toolbox’s session (12:00-3:00pm) † Poster available with more details Morphometry BIRN

Integration and Application of Processing Tools Projects driving developments: Multi-site Imaging Research in Analysis of Depression*† Data from one site processed with tools of multiple sites Multi-site Morphometry in Analysis of Alzheimer’s Disease *† Data from multiple sites processed with tools of one site Semi-Automated Shape Analysis Project † Data from BIRN sites processed with tools of various sites * Demo at BIRN Toolbox’s session (12:00-3:00pm) † Poster available with more details Morphometry BIRN: Reality

MIRIAD Project: Overview Duke Archives UCLA AIR Registration and Lobar Analysis BWH Intensity Normalization and EM Segmentation Duke Clinical Analysis BWH Probabilistic Atlas (one time transfer) UCSD Supercomputing Goal: analyze legacy data using automated lobar segmentation (UCLA) and cortical/subcortical segmentations (BWH)

MIRIAD Project: Accomplishments Segmentation Duke BIRN-MIRIAD Item (semi-automated)(fully-automated) # of tissue classes3 (Fig1)23 (Fig2) Time for 200 brains400 hours1 hour Time for 200 lobe &250 hours all lobes (Fig3) and 27 regional analysis regions included above Improved computational capabilities 1 2 3

Integration and Application of Processing Tools Projects driving developments: Multi-site Imaging Research in Analysis of Depression*† Data from one site processed with tools of multiple sites Multi-site Morphometry in Analysis of Alzheimer’s Disease *† Data from multiple sites processed with tools of one site Semi-Automated Shape Analysis Project † Data from BIRN sites processed with tools of various sites * Demo at BIRN Toolbox’s session (12:00-3:00pm) † Poster available with more details Morphometry BIRN: Reality

AD Project: Overview MGH Segmentation Multi-Site Data Acquisition De-identification and upload SRB UCSD BWH/MGH Multi-site Data Queries and Statistics HID Visualization and Scientific Search with 3DSlicer & Query Atlas

AD Project: Accomplishments Data sharing: Successfully tested Deidentification and Upload Pipeline (DUP) Integration of data Common database schemas for clinical and derived morphometry data at different sites Human Imaging Database (HID) Mediated queries that interrogate databases at two sites Integration of processing tools MGH subcortical segmentation completed on UCSD data Statistical tools through the BIRN Portal and HID Query Interface Data visualization and interpretation using 3DSlicer and Query Atlas

Integration and Application of Processing Tools Projects driving developments: Multi-site Imaging Research in Analysis of Depression*† Data from one site processed with tools of multiple sites Multi-site Morphometry in Analysis of Alzheimer’s Disease *† Data from multiple sites processed with tools of one site Semi-Automated Shape Analysis Project † Data from BIRN sites processed with tools of various sites * Demo at BIRN Toolbox’s session (12:00-3:00pm) † Poster available with more details Morphometry BIRN: Reality

SASHA Project: Overview MGH Segmentation Data Donor Sites De-identification And upload JHU Shape Analysis of Segmented Structures SRB BWH Visualization Goal: comparison and quantification of structures’ shape and volumetric differences across patient populations UCSD Supercomputing

SASHA Project: Accomplishments  Data: 46 hippocampus data sets (2070 comparisons)  Each LDDMM comparison takes about 3 to 8 hours Large Deformation Diffeomorphic Metric Mapping (LDDMM) using the TeraGrid Improved computational capabilities Single PCTeraGrid  1 comparison  ~431 days  60 comparisons simultaneously  ~7 days

Morphometry BIRN: Future  Calibration: Expand imaging modalities,correction methods, refine protocols  Analysis & Visualization: continue integration development, improve automaticity, support new imaging modalities  Computational Informatics: database interoperability, support genomics, support new image data, grid enable  Utilization: propagate widespread utilization of infrastructure, add new sites to testbed

Why are we here today? WE NEED FEEDBACK FROM YOU:  Which developments are useful for your projects?  Which developments are we missing?  How can we build better bridges to your projects?

Challenges  Technical Integration of disparate sources (data and software) Processing and handling of large datasets Federation of databases in compliance with HIPAA Quality control Audit and versioning requirements Accessing legacy data Project coordination and knowledge distillation  Sociological Encouraging collaboration Intellectual Property issues (data & software sharing) Authorship

Metrics for Success  Adopted for use by increasing numbers of experts  Sharing of tools and infrastructure with scientific community  Creation and maintenance of a valuable image archive that supports on-going research  Peer reviewed publications in scientific and technical journals  Presentations at national and international scientific meetings  Professional advancement of key personnel linked to success of project

AD Project: Accomplishments Successfully tested DUP to share data across sites following federal HIPAA guidelines Established common database schemas for clinical and derived morphometry data at different sites (HID) Enabled mediated queries that interrogate databases at two sites Successfully tested integration of tools for common analysis and data mining MGH Subcortical segmentation completed on UCSD data Univariate and bivariate statistical tools through the BIRN Portal and HID Query Interface Data visualization and intelligent scientific search based on anatomical labels using 3DSlicer and Query Atlas

MIRIAD Project: Accomplishments 50 depressed, 50 controls, imaged at baseline and 2 years Parietal lobe smaller in depressed (p < 0.02) In subjects responding to therapy: Temporal lobe smaller (p < 0.08) Frontal lobe was not smaller (p < 0.6)