Questions for multifunctionality symposium: 1. Where is the space for synergy in integrated multifunctionality? 2. Where are ‘hard tradeoffs’ unavoidable.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
OPERATING SUSTAINABILITY IN FOOD AND AGRICULTURE 4 th MULTI-STAKEHOLDER PLATFORM MEETING OF THE GLOBAL AGENDA FOR SUSTAINABLE LIVESTOCK Ottawa, 15 th.
Advertisements

CAP and so-called public goods Gilles Allaire Inra, France.
Biodiversity Land Degradation Climate Change Chemicals International Waters Sustainable Forest Management Sustainable Cities Food Security Fisheries Forests.
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Land Degradation GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop March 22 – 24, 2011 Kyiv, Ukraine.
“Sustainable agriculture”: what is it? Tim Benton UK Champion for Global Food Security & Professor of Ecology, University of Leeds
Commonwealth Government links to the National Biodiversity Strategy Overview of: the Commonwealth Government's constitutional responsibility for the environment.
Towards More Sustainable and Market-based Payment for Ecosystem Services A Pilot Project in Lijiang, China Lu Zhi.
Reward to the Upland Poor for Environmental Service, Food Security and/or Environmental Sustainability? Case of Sloped Upland Conversion Program (SLCP)
2. Fisheries management and the Ecosystem approach
Uma Tenure and Regulatory Reforms: Lessons and Future Steps in Asia September
Integrated Management of Agricultural Landscapes Foday Bojang, Senior Forestry Officer FAO/RAF, Accra.
Climate-smart Agriculture Peter Holmgren FAO. Peter Holmgren, FAO 3 November 2009.
Conditional Land Tenure in Watershed Protection Forest Suyanto The Land Tenure Center’s forum “Designing Pro-Poor Rewards for Ecosystem Services,” April.
ROLE OF YOUTH IN THE EMERGING GREEN ECONOMY OF UTTRAKHAND Presented by Group 3 Gaurav, Pradeep, Richa.
GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop Windhoek, Namibia February 17-18, 2015 GEF 6 Programming Strategic Plan for Biodiversity,
WLE and the INTEGRATING ECOSYSTEM SOLUTIONS INTO POLICY and INVESTMENTS (IES) FLAGSHIP Nathanial Matthews Global Research Coordinator IES Flagship Leader.
9/10/2015A GLOBALLY COMPETITIVE AND PROSPEROUS KENYA Challenges on Climate Change Adaptation in Kenya.
Copyright 2010, The World Bank Group. All Rights Reserved. Importance and Uses of Agricultural Statistics Section A 1.
Defining the HNV farming concept at EU and local levels Guy Beaufoy EFNCP Spain.
Session 3: Ensuring REDD+ Complements Restoration, Poverty Alleviation and Adaptation Jeffrey Hatcher RRI Dialogue on Forests, Governance and Climate Change.
1 Future Forests Why it is so important to address the productivity and sustainability of our forests Hal Salwasser College of Forestry Oregon State University.
REDD+ & AGRICULTURAL DRIVERS OF DEFORESTATION Peter A Minang ASB Partnership at ICRAF World Agroforestry Centre (ICRAF) R EDD After Cancun: From Negotiation.
Soil carbon in dynamic land use optimization models Uwe A. Schneider Research Unit Sustainability and Global Change Hamburg University.
ICRAF Joseph Tanui CHALLENGE Enabling landscape level ecosystem integrity for improved productivity, livelihoods and conservation.
Investment in Sustainable Natural Resource Management (focus: Agriculture) increases in agricultural productivity have come in part at the expense of deterioration.
Conservation in Human Modified Landscapes- CH and ●Ecological changes are negative, anthropogenic, large, and accelerating (feedback.
Actions needed to halt deforestation and promote climate-smart agriculture.
GEF-6 Programming Directions in Natural Resources Management
Enhancing Integrated Approaches in Agricultural Learning Systems using experiences from agroforestry August Temu, World Agroforestry Centre Per Rudebjer,
Conservation Agriculture as a Potential Pathway to Better Resource Management, Higher Productivity, and Improved Socio-Economic Conditions in the Andean.
Conservation Growth Poles A landscape level development pathway.
Forestry Research For Sustainable Forest Management PP Bhojvaid, Director FRI.
The Economics of Climate Change Adaptation UNDP Accra 2012 Robert Mendelsohn Yale University.
Promoting sustainable upland farming: what does economics tell us?
Principal Investigator: Dr. Amir Muhammed, Director Asianics Agro. Dev. International, Islamabad, Pakistan Countries Involved: Pakistan, India, Nepal,
WLE: Science Focal Point Meeting 2014 Uniting Agriculture and Nature for Poverty Reduction.
Agroforestry The Future of Global Land Use Introducing the Congress Theme 2 nd World Congress of Agroforestry Nairobi, August 2009.
Climate Smart Agriculture : way forward for Food Security in a changing climate Alberto Sandoval FAO.
Sub-global Assessments: Synthesis and Case Studies (Portugal) June 2004 Tiago Domingos.
Ministry of the Environment and Conservation, Agriculture and Consumer Protection of the State of North Rhine-Westphalia Integrating Adaptation into Policy.
Segregate or integrate for multifunctionality and sustainagility Symposium at 2 nd World Congress of Agroforestry 26 August 2009, Nairobi.
Presented at UNCCD COP12, Ankara, Turkey by the Land Degradation Focal Area Team Global Environment Facility GEF-6 Programming Update & UNCCD Enabling.
Presented at UNCCD COP12, Ankara, Turkey by the Land Degradation Focal Area Team Global Environment Facility Land Degradation Focal Area & SDGs.
Importance of local communities empowerment Lucia Madrid Ramirez
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Land Degradation GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop April 5 – 7, 2011 Da Lat, Vietnam.
Photo :Nico Sepe / IWMI Sustainable Intensification of Agriculture with Sustainable Irrigated Agroecosystem Services Ian W. Makin* and Herath Manthrithilake**
Rainfed Strategic Research Portfolio of CGIAR Research Program Water, Land and Ecosystems Our vision: farmers and pastoralists thrive in highly productive.
Defining the HNV farming concept at EU and local levels Guy Beaufoy & Gwyn Jones EFNCP.
Focal Area and Cross Cutting Strategies – Land Degradation GEF Expanded Constituency Workshop July 6 – 9, 2011 Dakar, Senegal.
The CGIAR Research Program on Integrated Systems for the Humid Tropics Teklu Erkossa (PhD) Researcher, Land and Water Resources International Water Management.
Transforming rural livelihoods and landscapes: sustainable improvements to incomes, food security and the environment Trevor Nicholls, CEO CABI Global.
The People Dimension of Forest-Based Climate Change Mitigation and REDD Olivier Dubois Environment, Climate Change and Bioenergy.
A POLICYMAKER’S GUIDE TO THE SUSTAINABLE INTENSIFICATION OF SMALLHOLDER CROP PRODUCTION.
Social Safeguards: Protecting the Rights and Interests of Indigenous Peoples and Forest-Dependent Communities in REDD+ Introductory remarks Dr. John Parrotta.
Agroforestry Science: Tackling Key Global Development Challenges Presentation at Virginia Tech 16 July 2008 Dennis Garrity Director General.
Biodiversity, Access & Benefit-sharing and the Sustainable Development Goals Tomme R. Young IRIS (International Research Institute for Sustainability)
1 REDD+, biodiversity and people: Opportunities and risks John A. Parrotta, Chair, Global Forest Expert Panel (GFEP) on Biodiversity, Forest Management.
Improving livestock water productivity under changing climate Theib Oweis, ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria & Don Peden, ILRI, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia Presentation.
Climate Smart Agriculture to Foster Food Production by Dyborn Chibonga, NASFAM CEO Prepared for WFO Annual General Assembly in Livingstone, Zambia -
International Union for Conservation of Nature Conserving biodiversity Pioneering nature’s solutions to global challenges.
Honduras’ experience on NAP
GEF-6 Programming Directions in Natural Resources Management
Smallholder Farmers Perspective on Agriculture Insurance in Malawi by Dyborn Chibonga, NASFAM CEO Presentation at Africa-Asia Conclave on Loss and Damage.
Ecosystem Health & Sustainable Agriculture Project Definitions of Sustainability – sustainable rural development and sustainable agriculture Christine.
NAGARKOT… Reward for the early birds.
Carly Cipolla ATOC 4800 Final Project
QUO VADIS PRECISION FARMING
Robin Chazdon University of Connecticut
RESULTS FROM THE INNOVATION LAB FOR SMALL SCALE IRRIGATION
Green Infrastructure and Natura 2000
Presentation transcript:

Questions for multifunctionality symposium: 1. Where is the space for synergy in integrated multifunctionality? 2. Where are ‘hard tradeoffs’ unavoidable and is segregated multifunctionality more efficient? 3. How can sustainagility of people, flora and fauna be secured?

 Goods and tradables  Ecological services

Segregate or integrate for multifunctionality and sustainagility: concepts Meine van Noordwijk Symposium at 2 nd World Congress of Agroforestry, 26 August 2009, Nairobi

Properties of a system that sup- port actors to cope with change, to be adaptive and resilient.

Sustainable livelihoods somewhere on the globe Sustainable livelihoods at current location Sustainable farms at current location Sustainability of current farming system Sustainability of current trees/crops/animals Sustainability of current cropping system Sustainagility E: human migration Sustainagility D: shift to non-ag sectors Sustainagility C: other farming system Sustainagility B: other cropping system Sustainagility A: other trees/crops/ animals

Supporting the ability of farmers to remain agile in responding to new challenges, by adapting their production system Resilience or adaptive capacity are proper- ties of the actors, sustainagility that of the system in which they function Resilience may indicate return to status quo, agility refers to continuously moving targets Sustainagility + Sustainability => Probability of meeting future needs Sustainagility

segregate integrate Minimize length of sharply defi- ned boundaries Gradients, maxi- mize interactions Two basic ways to achieve ‘multifunctionality’ Zones – land use plans: rules & rewards Local Livelihoods & Local& Global Biodiversity

intensive agriculture natural forest integrated, multifunctional landscape: crops, trees, meadows and forest patches Tree plan- tations intensive extensive conservation protection production Agroforestry Agriculture Forestry Segregate Integrate functions Current legal, institutional & educational paradigm Current reality ‘deforestation’ ‘loss of forest functions’

Integrate Segregate Tree cover: Deforestation, Reforestation Less patchy: Inte- grate More patchy: Segre- gate More trees  agroforestation re- and afforestation  Less trees deforestation   forest modification Fields,fallow, forest mosaic Farm fo- restry, agrofo- rests 100% forest Fields, Forests & Parks Open field agriculture

Less patchy: Integrate More patchy: segregate Fewer trees More trees Food bowlFields and fallow Protected forests, parks, cities and fields Agroforests, Farm forestry

Landscape beauty C stocks Watershed services  Goods and tradables  Ecological services  Goods and tradables  Ecological services  Goods and tradables  Ecological services  Goods and tradables  Ecological services Biodiversity ?

The biodiversity deficit increases with intensification in case of rubber agroforestry The biodiversity deficit decreases with intensification in case of food crops…

The appreciation by local and ex- ternal stakeholders of the envi- ronmental services that remain- ing forest + agroforest patches provide tends to depend on how much forest is left, as well as the spatial pattern. Hypothesis on landscape patterns

ES Forest, External ES Agro-forest, External ES Agro-forest, Local ES Forest, Local 100 Forest cover 0

In forest-rich landscapes, forest functions are taken for granted at the local scale, even if they represent considerable value from a global perspective; in landscapes with little forest left, the environmental services of the remaining forest may be highly valued locally, but probably represent little of interest to global stakeholders (as sensitive species will most likely have disappeared).

Following this logic, it is in interme- diate landscape mosaics that forms of ‘environmental service rewards’ will be needed, as external value exceeds local appreciation, while (supposing that loss of forest cover continues) conservation may in fact match future local appreciation.

Real-world land use systems Unknown territory Net present value based on product flows, $/ha Plot-level Carbon stock, Mg/ha Total economic value, k$ Landscape-level Carbon stock, Tg 1A 1B 2A2B Open-field agriculture Agroforests Intensive tree crops

Relationship between land use intensity, agronomic functionality (linked to yield), costs and net benefits, for three scenarios that reflect increasing relative ‘weight’ of the environmental services in the net benefit function: 0,02, 0,1 and 0,2 for scenarios A, B and C, respectively

Lateral ‘climate shift’ flora & fauna Climate change relative to past local variability people

Biodiversity  Livelihood deficits deficits 1)Loss of habitat 2)Change in water flows 3)Overharvesting 4)Lack and loss of knowledge 5)Lack of representation in maps and policies 6)Lack of voice for local diversity proponents 7)Lack of effective incentives from those who care 1)Lack of land for ag 2)Lack of clean water 3)Lack of collective action 4)Underuse of resources for local domestication 5) Rigid land use classifi- cations, lack of access 6) Favouratism for external interests 7) Market volatility and risk..8),9) Lack of education, gender equity

Questions for this symposium: 1. Where is the space for synergy in integrated multifunctionality? 2. Where are ‘hard tradeoffs’ unavoidable and is segregated multifunctionality more efficient? 3. How can sustainagility of people, flora and fauna be secured?