Washington State Transportation Commission March 20, 2007 Jeff Monsen, PE Intergovernmental Policy Manager.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

County of Fairfax, Virginia Department of Transportation 1 Transportation Funding and Improving Roadway Services Delivery Transportation Advisory Commission.

Advertisements

County of Fairfax, Virginia Alternatives for Improving Roadway Services in Fairfax County Board Transportation Committee Meeting March 1, 2011 Department.

Tracy Lovell, PE A FOCUSED APPROACH TO SAFETY. Provide a Transportation System  Safe  Efficient  Environmentally Sound  Fiscally Responsible.

Statewide Traffic Engineers Meeting Rumble Strip(e) June 16, 2011 Simone Ardoin Assistant Road Design Engineer Administrator.

Life-Cycle Cost Analysis

Transportation System Needs House Transportation Committee Phil Williams, City of Bremerton Ashley Probart, AWC January 25, 2005.

Transportation Expenditures in Oregon January 14, 2015 Mike Marsh Willamette University.

Fuel Tax Revenue Revenue Drivers  Miles Driven (VMT)  Fuel Efficiency.

From KY 89 at the northern city limits of McKee to the recently improved section of US 421 just north of the Jackson-Rockcastle County line. Six-Year Highway.

Pavement Preservation in South Carolina J. C. “Clem” Watson, P.E. Chief Engineer for Operations South Carolina Department of Transportation.

Board of County Commissioners November 8, Recommendation Project Background and Location Traffic Analysis Comparison of Alternatives Public Meeting.

Complete Streets Policy and Implementation Jason Ridgway February 11, 2014.

Dennis Christiansen, Deputy Director April 20, 2005 Presented to TRB Committee AFK10 Meeting Texas Transportation Institute Overview Texas Transportation.

Federal Transit Administration New Starts Project Development Process

Multi-Modal Concurrency PSRC TRAC-UW Depart of Urban Design and Planning Evans School.

PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS OVERVIEW Lecture 2. n Provide a historical perspective of the evolution of PMS over the last 20 years n Describe the basic.

Workshop Presentation for Canyon County Jurisdictions for Canyon County Jurisdictions Corridor Management Plan.

Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users SAFETEA-LU Key Safety Provisions Federal Highway Administration.

COLORADO PERSPECTIVE Cathy Shull Board of Directors Ports-to-Plains Alliance.

SECTION 3. Centerline and Edge Line Final Rule DECEMBER 1999.

May 28, Vision Statement and Goals, Objectives and Performance Measures for the 2040 LRTP Status of these items: Draft Approved by LRTP Subcommittee.

Transport Investing in Regions SEATS Meeting 17 February 2012.

State and Federal Funding Programs for Local Agency Projects Alan Lively Local Government Section Project Delivery Specialist.

California’s Infrastructure Crisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.

Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21 st Century Act of 2011 Potential Freight Implications FHWA Talking Freight December 2011 Tony Furst, Director FHWA.

Freight Bottleneck Study Update to the Intermodal, Freight, and Safety Subcommittee of the Regional Transportation Council September 12, 2002 North Central.

2010 Minnesota Comprehensive Statewide Freight and Passenger Rail Plan AASHTO Standing Committee on Rail 2010 Washington Meeting Freight in State Rail.

Jeff Shelley, P.E. Project Delivery Team Leader FHWA, Alabama Division 9500 Wynlakes Place Montgomery, AL (334) Fax: (334) Mail.

Freight Issues and Policy Options Memphis Freight Planning Conference October 2, 2001 Gary Maring, FHWA.

California’sInfrastructureCrisis. Statewide Transportation System Needs Assessment 2011 “California’s transportation system is in jeopardy. Underfunding.

A Case Study of Promoting Metropolitan Freight Collaboration: The Twin Cities Experience Performance Management Framework Minnesota Department of Transportation.

Chapter 1: Highway Functions

KEY PROVISIONS OF THE DRIVE* ACT H.R. 22, as passed by the Senate on July 30, 2015 *Developing a Reliable and Innovative Vision for the Economy Thomas.

Missoula Long Range Transportation Plan 11 December 2008 Open House.

North Central Texas Council of Governments Transportation Department Summary Presentation January 2004 MOBILITY 2025: THE METROPOLITAN.

Timothy E. Barnett, P.E., PTOE State Safety Operations Engineer Alabama Department of Transportation.

Dane County Department of Public Works, Highway & Transportation Jerry Mandli, P.E. Commissioner/ Director.

DR O.S ABIOLA DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL ENGINEERING UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURE, ABEOKUTA. CVE 505 HIGHWAY & TRANSPORTATION ENGINEERING I.

HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT Tim G. Schulte, P.E. Richland County Engineer.

Creating the 2040 Regional Transportation Plan. Today’s Presentation Now Developing the Next RTP  Very Early Stages of Development  Website: 2040Plan.org.

Department of Transportation Report on Condition of County Maintained Road System Agenda Item 53 Board of Supervisor’s Meeting April 26, 2005.

Data Palooza Workshop May 9, 2013 Rabinder Bains, FHWA – Office of Policy and Government Affairs.

3000 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 208 Washington, DC

Caltrans Transportation Planning Grant Programs: Partnership Planning & 5304 Transit Planning Presented by Priscilla Martinez-Velez California Department.

Transportation Funding Workshop Nova Southeastern University December 10, 2012.

Regional Transportation Issues Infrastructure Maintenance New Facilities Air Quality Pollution Congestion Freeway System Surface Streets Income.

PRESENTED BY PRISCILLA MARTINEZ-VELEZ CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION DIVISION OF TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SACRAMENTO, CA (916)

System Management and Operations System Development and Design Growth and Development Plan Components E AST -W EST G ATEWAY.

Local Partnerships for Transportation October 14, 2013 Jennifer B. DeBruhl Director, Local Assistance Division.

Julie Skallman State Aid Division Director & State Aid Engineer.

Minneapolis Regional Chamber of Commerce, Critical Issues Forum Charlie Zelle, Commissioner Minnesota Department of Transportation.

Freight-21: A National Strategic Freight Mobility Program & Trust Fund Coalition for America’s Gateways and Trade Corridors.

Investing in Transportation Infrastructure Government Research Association Annual Policy Conference Janet Oakley, AASHTO July 28, 2009.

VBMP RCL Workshop: Using VDOT Data November 4, 2015.

Transportation Disadvantaged Local Coordinating Board (TDLCB)

1 Grant Anticipation Revenue Vehicles (GARVEE) Bond Presented to the California Transportation Commission July 25, 2007.

Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.

Caltrans Transportation Planning Grant Programs: Partnership Planning & 5304 (formerly 5305) Transit Planning Presented by Priscilla Martinez-Velez California.

Presentation to the Washington Transportation Commission March 16, 2010 Washington State Association of County Engineers.

U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Mary Peters Administrator Federal Highway Administration National Stone, Sand and Gravel.

Unit 2 DEVELOPMENT OF THE LONG RANGE TRANSPORTATION PLAN (LRTP) LCTCC Educational Program.

Federal Highway Administration University Course on Bicycle and Pedestrian Transportation Publication No. FHWA-HRT Bicycle and Pedestrian Planning.

FUNDING AVAILABILITY & SAFETY PROGRAMS 3//21/2013.

Next Steps.  To begin Planning Council discussion about the MPO’s Next Steps. Now that the 2035 Regional Transportation Plan has been updated and adopted,

DESTINATION 2030 Regional Local Personal Adopted May 24, 2001.

Design and Rehabilitation Strategies for Sustainable Concrete Pavements H. Thomas Yu Federal Highway Administration Office of Pavement Technology.

CITY OF BELLEVILLE ROAD IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM

Nevada Transportation Conference

Chelan County Transportation Element Update

Geometric Design: General Concept CE331 Transportation Engineering.

Presentation transcript:

Washington State Transportation Commission March 20, 2007 Jeff Monsen, PE Intergovernmental Policy Manager

 Discuss relationships between components of the transportation system  Discuss factors that lead to county roadway management decisions  Discuss transportation Cooperation / Coordination / Competition

RCW CRAB Mission: To preserve and enhance the transportation infrastructure of Washington State Counties by providing standards of good practice, fair administration of funding programs, leadership, and progressive and professional technical services.

 System element differences  Jurisdictions - Local / State / Port / Tribal / Federal / Private / etc  Magnitude of use  System element similarities  Users  Travel modes  Need for inter-connection

How people see the system

JurisdictionLane MilesDaily Vehicle Miles Traveled State 20,00386,222,000 County80,396 23,444,000 City 34,72840,972,000 Other 36,156 1,479,000 (Lane Miles by Jurisdiction WTP) How people use the system

 Surface / Structural / Functional conditions  Roadway capacity  Minimum tolerable condition  Pavement types (PCC/ACP/BST/GRV)  Routes / Routing / Corridors  Safety (engineering, education, enforcement)  “Level of Service”

 Jurisdictions with the largest component of statewide system  Significant amount of rural (low volume) roadways, critical to resource and agriculture industries  Provides significant ‘alternate’ routes for state highway system  Only travel option for many users

Urban Collector / Arterial1,917 Urban local access4,333 Rural Collector / Arterial12,587 Rural local access21,030 Total (centerline miles)39,867 (22% of system has travel lane widths of 9-ft or less) County Road System Centerline Miles (2005)

Portland Cement127 Asphalt8,455 BST17,215 Gravel11,845 Dirt2,225 Total (centerline miles)39,867 County Road System Pavement Type (2005)

 Roadway use and capacity  Pavement management decision-making  Safety issues  Multi-modal demands  Financial capacity (base funding and predicted grant revenues)  Local level of service decisions

Driving Surface Leveling Layer (s) Foundation – Imported Base Material Foundation – On-site Material (graded and compacted) Underlying Ground (undisturbed) Typical Roadway Structure (presence of layers and their thicknesses vary) When is a road all-weather?

Excellent (89-100) Good (68-88) Fair (49-67) Poor (21-48) Failed (0-20) Years Preventative Corrective Measures Reconstruction Measures Pavement Condition Rating Preventative vs. Rehab/Reconstruct (pavement structure life cycle)

Pavement Management Decision Tree

 Operational differences between jurisdictions (scale, scope, and sophistication)  Multi-model demands, services, and interconnection  Environmental mitigation and restoration  Transportation through: Coordination / Cooperation / Competition  Compromise required due to the increasing disparity between financial capacity and level of service preferences

Contact and information: Jeff Monsen, PE Intergovernmental Policy Manager County Road Administration Board (360)