Connect with CAEP Transformation Initiatives Respond to the Needs of the Profession James G. Cibulka, President,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
Advertisements

TWS Aid for Supervisors & Mentor Teachers Background on the TWS.
What is LEAP? Roundtable Discussions October 19 & 20.
Parents as Partners in Education
CAEP–State Partnerships: New Agreements, New Opportunities 2013 AACTE Annual Meeting Orlando, Florida Mark Lacelle-Peterson, CAEP Senior Vice President.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
Education Commission of the States Working Together to Address a Common Need: Partnerships for Teacher Quality Bruce Vandal Director, Postsecondary Education.
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
Center of Excellence in Mathematics and Science Education Cooperative Partners College of Arts and Sciences College of Education Dr. Jack Rhoton East Tennessee.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
How Institutions Can Leverage Change as an Opportunity for Educator Preparation The Missouri Association of Colleges for Teacher Education Fall 2009 Meeting.
Teacher Education Redesign Initiative (TERI). Executive Summary Core of Redesign  Partnerships  Adaptive Expertise  Performance driven curriculum 
Accreditation Engaging in Continuous Improvement.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Race to the Top Program Update January 30, State Funding 2.
BUILDING STRONG TEACHERS FOR TEXAS STUDENTS Welcome to TAP Connect.
Putting CAEP Standards 2 & 4 into Practice Kathryn Button TechTeach Professional Development Facilitator March 5, 2015.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
EVIDENCE THAT CONSTITUTE A “GOOD PRACTICE IN THE EVALUATION OF POLICIES Education Commission of the States National Center for Learning and Citizenship.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Transforming lives through learning Arts and culture education ‘Content and outcomes in Scotland‘ Education Scotland September 2013.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | Transitioning from NCATE and TEAC to CAEP: How? Patty Garvin, Senior Director,
The Scholarship of Civic Engagement Adapted from a presentation by Robert G. Bringle Director, Center for Service and Learning Indiana University-Purdue.
Summary of the U.S. Task Force on United Way’s Economic Model & Growth.
March 24, :00 pm to 3:00 pm Exhibition Lounge, Corey Union TEC Agenda and Notes.
REPORT ON THE OHIO CLINICAL ALLIANCE OCTEO CONFERENCE DUBLIN, OHIO MARCH 6, 2015.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice Summary Report Background: The Community College Survey.
Preparing and Evaluating 21 st Century Faculty Aligning Expectations, Competencies and Rewards The NACU Teagle Grant Nancy Hensel, NACU Rick Gillman, Valporaiso.
The New CAEP Standards: Implications for Teacher Education Programs Kathryn Chval.
School Effectiveness Framework Building effective learning communities together October 2009 Michelle Jones Professional Adviser WAG.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Murray County Schools February 26-29, 2012.
Paris, N.A. (2006) AACTE Session #334 V Conspicuous Excellence: Embracing Accountability, Documenting Impact & Building Trust Nita A. Paris, PhD, Associate.
Mentoring School Name Date Mentor’s Name. OVERVIEW What is Mentoring? The Mentoring Menu The Coaching Process.
Assessment System Overview Center for Education Overview for the NCATE BOE Team April 18-22, 2009.
STANDARD 4 & DIVERSITY in the NCATE Standards Boyce C. Williams, NCATE John M. Johnston, University of Memphis Institutional Orientation, Spring 2008.
Connect with CAEP The Common Core Standards: Transforming Teacher and Leader Preparation with Stronger Accreditation.
ESEA, TAP, and Charter handouts-- 3 per page with notes and cover of one page.
Louisiana Learning Standards WHAT DO YOU THINK? In the area of science, what should your students... know? be able to do? be like?
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | Standard 2: Partnership for Practice Stevie Chepko, Sr. VP for Accreditation.
Council for the Accreditationof EducatorPreparation Standard 5: Provider Quality Assurance and Continuous Improvement 2014 CAEP –Conference Nashville,
Supplemental Text Project Kenn Ward EDL 678 Dr. Pfennig June 2013.
Education 2018: Excellence for Every Student Presented to the Board of Education August 27,
SEA Strategies for Promoting Equity: SEA/IHE Collaboration on Teacher Preparation Lynn Holdheide, Center on Great Teachers and Leaders & Collaboration.
CONNECT WITH CAEP | | Measures of Teacher Impact on P-12 Students Stevie Chepko, Sr. VP for Accreditation.
School Improvement Needs Assessment – © Iowa Association of School Boards Assessment Conducted by the Iowa Association of School Boards.
Council for the Accreditationof EducatorPreparation Standard 1: CONTENT AND PEDAGOGICAL KNOWLEDGE 2014 CAEP –Conference Nashville, TN March 26-28, 2014.
1 Update on Teacher Effectiveness July 25, 2011 Dr. Rebecca Garland Chief Academic Officer.
CAEP STANDARD 1: TEACHERS KNOW THEIR CONTENT AND TEACH EFFECTIVELY STANDARD 1 COMMITTEE.
No Teacher Left Behind D. Gerald. How would you suggest we, as a nation, provide consistent learning opportunities for teachers and ensure that they are.
Cal Poly Pomona University Strategic Plan 2011 ‐ 2015 Partial Assessment of Progress Presented to the University Strategic Planning Committee (USPC) 12/4/2014.
Overview of CAEP Guidelines 2014 CAEP –Conference Nashville, TN March 26-28, 2014 Presenters: Mark LaCelle-Peterson, CAEP Hilda R. Tompkins, CAEP, Emerson.
Designing Quality Assessment and Rubrics
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
The Eugene T. Moore School of Education Working together to promote the growth, education, and social development of children and youth David E. Barrett.
“An Impact School Partnership”
Competency Based Learning and Project Based Learning
Phyllis Lynch, PhD Director, Instruction, Assessment and Curriculum
Field Experiences and Clinical Practice
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
PPMES-UPRM Methodology & Practice Working Retreat
The Need Why is the UW-Whitewater Teacher Residency Program needed?
SLE Information.
Minnesota State University, Mankato
Presentation transcript:

Connect with CAEP Transformation Initiatives Respond to the Needs of the Profession James G. Cibulka, President, CAEP/NCATE Deb Eldridge, Senior Vice President, CAEP/NCATE

Connect with CAEP Era of Big Data A lot more data, so how do we generate meaningful data and use data effectively?

Connect with CAEP GOAL 1: Transformation Provide way within accreditation to transform educator preparation FOCUS: Improving student achievement through the preparation of highly effective educators.

Connect with CAEP GOAL 2: Stronger Research Base Strengthen empirical knowledge base Contribute more broadly to the field Engage faculty in scholarly work related to their discipline

Connect with CAEP GOAL 3: Drive Innovation Through Research and Development Role of accreditation in transformative innovation at systemic level – move beyond compliance Creates system for rewarding institution for innovation and contributions to improving the empirical knowledge base within the field

Connect with CAEP GOAL 4: Culture of Continuous Improvement Transforming programs not going to happen without faculty engagement Research on high-performing organizations shows they draw on expertise of staff, working together in highly focused teams

Connect with CAEP GOAL 4: Culture of Continuous Improvement Opportunity to use data for program improvement Benchmarking – against peer institutions, as well as within own program – networking (e.g., networked learning communities)

Connect with CAEP GOAL 4: Culture of Continuous Improvement Creation within CAEP of the capacity to share information – Moving to system with more common measures, across states and institutions – Increasingly available longitudinal data – Ability to establish norms

Connect with CAEP Questions?

Connect with CAEP Where is TI now? Status update 23 institutions engaged in the process – 2 system-based collaborations Tennessee Board of Regents: includes 6 institutions Missouri Alliance: 3 institutions with a Public School System – 8 Independent TI projects – 3 in development – 3 inquiries in progress

Connect with CAEP Goal 1: Transformations Every licensed teacher (TN TBR) – should enter the classroom with at least entry-level knowledge, skills, and characteristics of quality teaching that lead to positive student outcomes. – should have access to avenues for competency-based recognition and advancement for teaching excellence. – should be exposed to research-based best- practice models of instruction in every facet of preparation.

Connect with CAEP Goal 2: Research Base What evidence is there that the design and workings of a specific teacher education program has contributed to a positive transformation of its teacher education program and one or more partner schools? (MO) What is the effect of year-long student teaching placements in selected partnership schools…on the performance of the teacher candidate…? (CSUMB)

Connect with CAEP Goal 3: Innovation Instruments (TTU) Teaching competency: Teacher candidates’ (TC’s) scores on the Teacher Advancement Program (TAP) rubric, with six administrations Readiness to teach: Readiness to Teach Questionnaire Classroom Climate: Tripod assessment instrument (Cambridge Evaluation survey focused on improving student performance by strengthening content, pedagogy, and relationships) Student-learning gains: District assessments (DAs) or other benchmarking assessment; value-added score of mentor teachers; comparison of changes over time

Connect with CAEP Goal 4: Continuous Improvement We propose to build an outcomes-based system based on five essential outcomes … (CO): – impact on P-12 student learning, – knowledge of content and content pedagogy, – evidence-based performance/practice, – dispositions, and – persistence in the education profession. In our schools, we will implement the outcomes framework in all our programs that prepare educators at the initial and advanced levels. In so doing, we intend to further deepen faculty commitment to the process of continuous improvement.

Connect with CAEP Questions?