November 7, 2011 1. Report on the community feedback Inform the Board on our progress on the recommendations from Dr. Orfield’s report Review the timeline.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Audience: Local school/PTA leaders (PTA president, school principal, school board members, PTA board) Presenter: State/district PTA leader.
Advertisements

Bridging Race, Income and Cultural Differences to Support Student Success.
Report to the KSD Board June 9, Provide Kent School District the necessary guidance and assistance to create an equitable, academically enriching,
Stepping Out! Create a parking lot for questions or have information booths to answer families’ questions. Make sure to remind families that they will.
1 Gifted and Talented Task Force Presentation to the Howell Township Board of Education March 29, 2006.
Alamance-Burlington Schools
Performance Based Teacher Evaluation March 10, 2006.
1 PROPOSED ATTENDANCE BOUNDARIES FOR HERITAGE AND NEEDHAM ELEMENTARY SCHOOLS LODI UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION MEETING APRIL 6, 2010.
Margaretville Central Superintendent’s Goals.
Karen L. Mapp, Ed.D. Deputy Superintendent, Boston Public Schools
WALLED LAKE CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT Redistricting Plan for the school year.
UNIT 5 REDISTRICTING COMMUNITY FORUM mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.
School Development Planning Initiative
IDENTIFICATION 1 PROPOSED REGULATORY CHANGECOMMENTS Implement a four step ELL identification process to ensure holistic and individualized decisions can.
Stepping Up with PARCC ● Create a parking lot for questions or have information booths to answer families’ questions. Make sure to remind families that.
Bill Buchanan Ready Kids Conference Louisville June 2014 Count Down to New Eligibility Requirement for Kindergarten.
Part II: Strategic Planning for a Successful 1:1 Program
1. KCS Strategic Goals: Focus on the student to ensure they excel academically and are prepared for life beyond the classroom. Recruit, select, induct,
What is the Parent Involvement Plan (PIP)? Why do we have a Parent Involvement Plan (PIP)? (PIP) PARENT INVOLVEMENT PLAN 1.
Elementary Crowding and Capacity Committee (ECCC) Meeting #8 November 19, 2007.
English as a Second Language Parent Orientation Lackawanna City School District Martin Road Elementary School.
School Uniforms: An Investigation Status Report Harford County Public Schools December 17, 2007.
Implementation of the North Carolina Read to Achieve Program Montgomery County Schools August 5, 2013.
Bluebonnet Elementary School Celebrations and Recommendations for Continuous School Improvement Round Rock Independent School District Module 7 Assignment.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
John Muir Middle School SSC Meeting SPSA DEVELOPMENT TIMELINE April 20th SSC meeting - Parent Survey Major Findings, John Muir Data, SLUSD Survey.
Student Assessment Inventory for School Districts Context setting, assessment scenarios, and communications.
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
Introduction to Home/School Compacts
© 2013 K12 Insight Central Office Climate Survey Results Las Cruces Public Schools March , 2013.
WASC Visiting Committee Final Presentation for Overseas Schools International School Eastern Seaboard March , 2011.
State Laws, Recommendations, & NCLB How research becomes policies Janice Kroeger, Ph.D. Associate Professor, TLC, ECED.
IB Learner Profile. St. Anthony Academy An IB Candidate School November 18, 2010.
- 0 - Community Forums OUSD School Admissions and Attendance Boundary Policies Spring 2008.
Strong Schools, Strong Communities Strategic Plan Implementation Process and Roles Saint Paul Public Schools has designed the following process and roles.
Welcome back to CASA Volunteer Training
PAULDING COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT AdvancED EXTERNAL REVIEW REPORT.
ACADEMIC SERVICES DIVISION. ACADEMIC SERVICES In other words, Chapters 4, 5, and 6 of your charter.
C.O.R.E Creating Opportunities that Result in Excellence.
URBAN SCHOOL LEADERSHIP AND GOVERNANCE PARTNERSHIPS, PARENTS AND PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT October 27, 2011 Presented By Ramona Reyes, Vice President, Columbus.
O As professionals within the teaching profession, we recognize our responsibilities to continually analyze our practices in the pursuit of excellence.
May 29,  In September 2011, Dr. Orfield offered recommendations regarding student assignment  In January 2012, the Board adopted changes to.
Title I Parent Meeting at Back-to-School Night Tri-Community Elementary School September 2, 2015.
1 Created by Angela Ward Intro. to Culturally Responsive Pedagogy Student –Focused Dialogue.
1 Presentation to the ACI on the FY 2013 Budget December 14, 2011.
Staying on Message in Changing Times Oklahoma Statewide System of Support (SSOS) January 7, 2011 Dr. Cindy Koss, Assistant State Superintendent Oklahoma.
Excellence for All Children Elementary Rezoning Follow-up parent/community input meetings.
West Sylvan Enrollment and Capacity
Connecticut PEAC meeting Today’s meeting Discussion of draft principal evaluation guidelines (1 hour) Evaluation and support system document.
1 Plainville Coalition for Positive Youth Development: Keeping Kids Safe By Exploring the Dress Code A Community Conversation September 28, 2006 Report.
Professional Learning Communities Board Update February 2012.
Alton Village School Boundary Review April 17, 2012 FINAL REPORT 1.
DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION ONLY Student Reassignment Survey Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools October 1 – November 1, 2012.
Shelton School District Hi Cap Program Review Results and Recommendations for April 29, 2014.
D90 Administrative Recommendation: Full-Day Kindergarten Board of Education Meeting 1/23/12.
Taft Elementary Title Meeting. AGENDA What is Title 1? Action Plan: What does it look like at Taft Elementary? Assessment Title Policy Parent Conferences:
Parent Satisfaction Surveys November What is the Parent Satisfaction Survey?  The survey consists of 18 questions that examine schools’ efforts.
A System of Instructional Effectiveness: Connecting the Dots The District Accountability Plan (DAP) Bloomfield Public Schools Every Student,
PERRIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT Superintendent’s Advisory Attendance Area Advisory Committee Report December 10, 2015.
A SPECIAL THANK YOU TO ALL WHO PARTICIPATED IN THE STUDY AND THE SURVEYS IN ORDER TO BUILD A PROPOSAL THAT BENEFITS THE STUDENTS AND COMMUNITIES OF DIGHTON-REHOBOTH.
OVERVIEW of the ISTE NETS for Administrators Presented by Kevin Brady and Alison Fricke.
The Big Interview Sonya Edwards Ashford University Teaching, Learning and Leading in the 21 st Century Dale Kimball.
A lens to ensure each student successfully completes their educational program in Prince Rupert with a sense of hope, purpose, and control.
The Read to Achieve program is part of The Excellent
The Read to Achieve program is part of The Excellent
Parent-Teacher Partnerships for Student Success
Improve IEP Project IEP Form Improvement Project
Parent-Teacher Partnerships for Student Success
Presentation transcript:

November 7,

Report on the community feedback Inform the Board on our progress on the recommendations from Dr. Orfield’s report Review the timeline for elementary applications and assignments Determine the next steps 2

I. Introductions – Jack Jacobs II. Community Feedback—Dena Dossett III. Progress Report—Barbara Dempsey, Rick Caple, Brent West, Rick Mosley IV. Timeline—Kathy McGinnis V. Next steps—Jack Jacobs 3

4

 Locations ◦ Gheens, Central, Doss, Ballard, Southern ◦ JCPS staff ◦ Elementary principals ◦ Superintendent’s Summit ◦ On-line responses  Format ◦ Video of Dr. Orfield’s recommendations ◦ Followed by a PRESS activity and the opportunity to “turn and talk” after the questions  Over 900 people responded to a survey regarding Dr. Orfield’s recommendations 5

AgreeDisagree  Improves ride times  Promotes parent involvement by being closer to home  Want neighborhood plan  Long bus rides still exist  Promoting diversity isn’t the most important factor  Limits choices  Unclear how it would improve achievement 9

AgreeDisagree  Provides educational continuity  Reduces transitions  Simplifies process for parents  Reduces administrative time/costs  Allows opportunity to change school if desired  Kindergartners may have long ride times 11

AgreeDisagree  Would agree if the assigned school was closer to home and older child could be placed closer to home  Like option to stay at current school  Parents want all siblings at the same school to promote parent involvement, simplify childcare issues, and allow older sibling to help with younger child 13

The third option “I don’t know” was only available for community forums

Current School Shorter Bus Ride  My child’s school works for us, and we want him/her to remain  Would want continuity for my child  Closer school would be beneficial for after school opportunities 15

AgreeDisagree  If safety (example: a busy road) is taken in to consideration, would be OK with longer distance to bus stop  Close bus stops are very convenient for parents  Younger children may need bus stops closer to home  Likes the location of current bus stop 17

AgreeDisagree  Younger students may not know their interests  Would require teachers to have high expectations of all students  Gifted students need opportunity to excel  Ensures that all students are interested in the magnet 19

AgreeDisagree  Online will enhance the application process  That is OK as long as there is way for parents to do paper applications as well  All parents don’t have computer access  Some parents might need additional guidance 21

Web survey not included in these results.

AgreeDisagree  Support integration without exclusion  Some classrooms (for example, AP) appear segregated  Don’t agree with board’s diversity goals  How would this be implemented 25

Web survey not included in these results.

AgreeDisagree  This is already the policy in some communities  The more diversity in neighborhoods the better  Concern that mixed- income housing would impact property values  This recommendation may exceed the school board’s authority 27

 Would like specific information about how this would affect my family  What would be the impact of the case before the Kentucky Supreme Court 29

 Most families want to know how it would affect their families  Most in favor of applying for kindergarten and not reapplying for 1 st grade  Most indicated they wanted siblings to remain together  Support for advanced technology 30

31

Work session on 10/24/11 Adjusting cluster arrangement Defining Diversity Delayed implementation of high school boundary changes Focus on elementary Positive result from public survey and elementary principals Include kindergarten 32

Surveyed public and elementary principals Existing practice Grandfathering existing students Minority students included in plan Future recommendation about inclusion of ESL students in diversity guideline Minority students and ESL Identified vendor for GPS and AVL State contract pending for vendor Demonstration for district staff Transportation 33

Will be studied after adoption of plan Rewarding stable neighborhood Cultural competence PD Will explore additional PD models Strengthening academic benefits Recruitment programs in place Will explore additional recruitment options Diverse faculty 34

Enhanced school finder On-line application Reviewing automated assignment Upgrading technology Will review existing programs to ensure equitable access to programs for all students Monitoring equity Will develop format for reporting progress on diversity Improving evaluation 35

Develop communication plan to reach parents in all communities Equalizing information in application & placements 36

37

Complete In process Not started Decision Point Need decision 38

39

40

41

42

43

 In order to implement a different elementary student assignment plan for the school year: ◦ It is necessary to present a plan for discussion on November 21, This plan would be based on the recommendations from Dr. Orfield. Staff is continuing to study and make adjustments to the original proposal from Dr. Orfield. ◦ The plan would be presented to the Board for approval on December 12, 2011 ◦ We have been asked to consider other scenarios; this will require additional time to research and investigate each scenario thoroughly. 44