David Hotz and Anthony Cavallucci National Weather Service, Knoxville/Tri-Cities, Tennessee Geoffrey Stano ENSCO/SPoRT, Huntsville, Alabama Tony Reavley.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mission: Apply NASA measurement systems and unique Earth science research to improve the accuracy of short-term (0-24 hr) weather prediction at the regional.
Advertisements

Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to operations SPoRT Update GOES-R Proving Ground November 23, 2010.
SPoRT Products in Support of the GOES-R Proving Ground and NWS Forecast Operations Andrew Molthan NASA Short-term Prediction Research and Transition (SPoRT)
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to operations SPoRT Total Lightning Activities and Updates Geoffrey Stano NASA SPoRT / ENSCO,
SPoRT Activities in Support of the GOES-R and JPSS Proving Grounds Andrew L. Molthan, Kevin K. Fuell, and Geoffrey T. Stano NASA Short-term Prediction.
Total Lightning Collaborations with NASA SPoRT and the National Weather Service Southern Thunder Workshop July, 2011 Norman, OK Christopher Darden,
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to operations GOES-R Proving Ground Activities at the NASA Short-term Prediction Research and.
Lightning Climatology Oklahoma Lightning Mapping Array May - September, Paul Krehbiel New Mexico Tech September 28, 2005.
The Areal Mean Basin Estimated Rainfall (AMBER) Program A Tool to Assist in Flash Flood Forecasting Ami Arthur Cooperative Institute for Mesoscale Meteorological.
Correlation Between Lightning and the Joplin Missouri Tornado Ariel Powers 1, Brian West 1, Humberto Barbosa 2, Ivon Wilson 2 1 1Department of Earth Sciences,
NASA/SPoRT GOES-R PG update 1.Transition and Use of RGB Imagery 2.UAH CI Evaluation at WFOs 3.PG Related Presentations at NWA/GUC 4.QPE 5.Pseudo-GLM /
Geostationary Lightning Mapper (GLM) 1 Near uniform spatial resolution of approximately 10 km. Coverage up to 52 deg latitude % flash detection day.
Inter-comparison of Lightning Trends from Ground-based Networks during Severe Weather: Applications toward GLM Lawrence D. Carey 1*, Chris J. Schultz 1,
Predicting lightning density in Mediterranean storms based on the WRF model dynamic and microphysical fields Yoav Yair 1, Barry Lynn 1, Colin Price 2,
GOES-R Proving Ground NOAA’s Hazardous Weather Testbed Chris Siewert GOES-R Proving Ground Liaison OU-CIMMS / Storm Prediction Center.
1 Comparative Lightning Characteristics of a Tornadic and Non-Tornadic Oklahoma Thunderstorm on April , 2006 Amanda Sheffield Purdue University.
Science Mission Directorate National Aeronautics and Space Administration transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies The SPoRT Center – Infusing.
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to operations GOES-R Proving Grounds Fifth Meeting of the Science Advisory Committee November,
Proxy Data and VHF/Optical Comparisons Monte Bateman GLM Proxy Data Designer.
Kristopher White & Brian Guyer The GOES-R Convective Initiation Product... Operational Examples and Thoughts on Proper Viewing Strategies.
Oklahoma Department of Environmental Quality Land Protection Division, Radiation Management Section Michael Reid.
Phillip Bothwell Senior Development Meteorologist-Storm Prediction Center 3 rd Annual GOES-R GLM Science Meeting Dec. 1, 2010 Applying the Perfect Prog.
SCAN SCAN System for Convection Analysis and Nowcasting Operational Use Refresher Tom Filiaggi & Lingyan Xin
Product Training Fifth Meeting of the Science Advisory Committee November, 2009 Kevin Fuell, Geoffrey Stano transitioning unique NASA data and research.
The Lightning Warning Product Fifth Meeting of the Science Advisory Committee November, 2009 Dennis Buechler Geoffrey Stano Richard Blakeslee transitioning.
Geoffrey Stano– NASA / SPoRT – ENSCO, Inc. Brian Carcione– NWS Huntsville Jason Burks– NWS Huntsville Southern Thunder Workshop, Norman, OK July.
GOES-R Proving Ground Annual Meeting, May 2011, Boulder Colorado SPoRT GOES-R Proving Ground Activities GOES-R Proving Ground Annual Meeting
THE GOES-R GLM LIGHTNING JUMP ALGORITHM (LJA): RESEARCH TO OPERATIONAL ALGORITHM Elise V. Schultz 1, C. J. Schultz 1,2, L. D. Carey 1, D. J. Cecil 2, G.
GOES-R Proving Ground Storm Prediction Center and Hazardous Weather Testbed Chris Siewert 1,2, Kristin Calhoun 1,3 and Geoffrey Stano OU-CIMMS, 2.
H U N T S V I L L E, A L A B A M A Utility of the GLM in an Evolving Decision Support Environment Brian C. Carcione National Weather Service, Huntsville,
NASA SPoRT’s Pseudo Geostationary Lightning Mapper (PGLM) GOES-R Science Week Meeting September, 2011 Huntsville, Alabama Geoffrey Stano ENSCO, Inc./NASA.
GOES-R Risk Reduction Annual Meeting, September 2011, Huntsville SPoRT GOES-R Proving Ground Activities GOES-R Risk Reduction Annual Meeting 22 September.
USE AND EVALUATION OF TOTAL LIGHTNING DATA IN THE GOES-R PROVING GROUND AND EXPERIMENTAL WARNING PROGRAM Kristin Kuhlman (CIMMS/NSSL) Geoffrey Stano (NASA/SPORT)
The NASA Short-term Prediction Research and Transition (SPoRT) Center GOES-R Proving Ground Update 9 September 2013 Contributions from: Kevin Fuell, Geoffrey.
Christopher J. Schultz 1, Walter A. Petersen 2, Lawrence D. Carey 3* 1 - Department of Atmospheric Science, UAHuntsville, Huntsville, AL 2 – NASA Marshall.
Enhanced Lightning Products and Services for Incident Support Operations through Improved Short Term Forecast Techniques Ben Herzog 1, Matthew Volkmer.
Deirdre Kann Brian Guyer National Weather Service Albuquerque Deirdre Kann Brian Guyer National Weather Service Albuquerque GOES R Satellite Proving Ground.
Mission: Transition unique NASA and NOAA observations and research capabilities to the operational weather community to improve short-term weather forecasts.
The NASA Short-term Prediction Research and Transition (SPoRT) Center GOES-R Proving Ground Update 9 July, 2012 Contributions from: Gary Jedlovec, Kevin.
Proving Ground Activities with Aviation Weather Center, Storm Prediction Center and NASA SPoRT GLM Science Meeting Huntsville, Alabama 20 September 2012.
Bryan Jackson General Forecaster WFO LWX. Introduction Utilizing Total Lightning data from the DC- Lightning Mapping Array (DC-LMA) to create a preview.
Evaluation of the Pseudo-GLM GLM Science Meeting Huntsville, Alabama September 2013 Geoffrey Stano – NASA SPoRT / ENSCO Inc. Kristin Calhoun – NOAA.
H U N T S V I L L E, A L A B A M A Leveraging Total Lightning and Convective Initiation Data for Impact-Based Decision Support Services Brian Carcione.
GOES-R Recommendations from past GOES Users’ Conference: Jim Gurka Tim Schmit Tom Renkevens NOAA/ NESDIS Tony Mostek NOAA/ NWS Dick Reynolds Short and.
Geoffrey Stano – ENSCO / SPoRT David Hotz and Anthony Cavalluci– WFO Morristown, TN Tony Reavley – Director of Emergency Services & Homeland Security of.
GLM Lightning Val Plans Monte Bateman, Doug Mach, Rich Blakeslee, Bill Koshak & Steve Goodman.
Transitioning research data to the operational weather community Overview of GOES-R Proving Ground Activities at the Short-term Prediction Research and.
H U N T S V I L L E, A L A B A M A Severe Weather/Lightning: Operational Perspective Brian Carcione WFO Huntsville, Alabama.
Lightning Jump Evaluation RITT Presentation Tom Filiaggi (NWS – MDL) 11/28/12 Evaluation of “2σ” as Predictor for Severe Weather.
Forecaster Training for HWT Current: Articulate (via NASA SPoRT) – Previous: intro ppt on arrival Monday Two events in Warning Event Simulator (WES) –
Travis Smith Hazardous Weather Forecasts & Warnings Nowcasting Applications.
User Readiness Issues for GOES-R Jim Gurka Tim Schmit (NOAA/ NESDIS) Tony Mostek (NOAA/NWS) Dick Reynolds (Short and Associates) 4 th GOES Users’ Conference.
Early Evaluation and Operational Applications of Total Lightning in AWIPS-2 Al Cope NOAA/National Weather Service Forecast Office Mount Holly, NJ
1 86 th Annual American Meteorological Society Meeting Atlanta, Georgia January 29 – February 2, 2006 The Severe Weather Data Inventory (SWDI): A Geospatial.
Decision Support Services Dan Byrd WFO Jackson MS.
GOES-R GLM Lightning-Aviation Applications GOES-R GLM instrument will provide unique total lightning data products on the location and intensity of thunderstorms.
Lightning Mapping Technology & NWS Warning Decision Making Don MacGorman, NOAA/NSSL.
Transitioning unique NASA data and research technologies to operations Short-term Prediction Research and Transition (SPoRT) Project Future Directions.
Total Lightning AWIPS II Operational Demonstration Fifth Meeting of the Science Advisory Committee November, 2009 Geoffrey Stano, Matt Smith, and.
SPoRT Product Assessments Fifth Meeting of the Science Advisory Committee November, 2009 Geoffrey Stano, Kevin Fuell transitioning unique NASA data.
Total Lightning Characteristics in Mesoscale Convective Systems Don MacGorman NOAA/NSSL & Jeff Makowski OU School of Meteorology.
NWS / SPoRT Coordination Call 24 March, 2011 March 2011, Coordination Call.
Rusty Billingsly and Brian Motta National Weather Service NOAA Satellite Science Week May 2012 Rusty Billingsly and Brian Motta National Weather Service.
Lightning Updates Several tasks underway o Continue to develop training o Coordinate data transition to 2010 Spring Program o Transition data to newest.
Total Lightning Applications Sixth Meeting of the Science Advisory Committee 28 February – 1 March 2012 National Space Science and Technology Center, Huntsville,
Operational Use of Lightning Mapping Array Data Fifth Meeting of the Science Advisory Committee November, 2009 Geoffrey Stano, Dennis Buechler, and.
Kristin M. Kuhlman (CIMMS/NSSL) Christopher Siewert (CIMMS/SPC) Geoffrey Stano (NASA/SPORT) Eric Bruning (TTU) GLM in the GOES-R Proving Ground and HWT.
User Preparation for new Satellite generations
Essential Questions Why is accurate weather data important?
Current progress in aviation nowcasting at SAWS: A Demo Project
Presentation transcript:

David Hotz and Anthony Cavallucci National Weather Service, Knoxville/Tri-Cities, Tennessee Geoffrey Stano ENSCO/SPoRT, Huntsville, Alabama Tony Reavley Director of Emergency Services & Homeland Security Hamilton County, Tennessee March 2014

Cloud-to-ground strike locations from the United States Precision Lightning Network (USPLN) Common Depictions of Lightning

The Lightning Mapping Array (LMA) observes the individual stepped leaders of the entire flash, also called sources Observes flashes not detected by the National Lightning Detection Network (NLDN) Observes intra-cloud and cloud-to- ground lightning Related to the strength of storm

Advantages of Total Lightning Total Lightning Activity 31 Individual Storms Cloud-to-Ground Strikes Inter-Cloud Flashes

NALMA DomainNo CoveragePartial CoverageMRX Full Coverage

What is this? Based off the local North Alabama Lightning Mapping Array (NALMA) Demonstrates a future weather instrument – The Geostationary Lightning Mapper (~2016) Displays the number of flashes in 8-km grid boxes Available every 2 minutes Opportunity for EMA to learn of a new capability and shape its use The Pseudo-Geostationary Lightning Mapper (GLM) Product Pseudo-GLM centered on Chattanooga

This is a collaboration project between ENSCO/SPoRT, NWS Morristown, Tennessee and Hamilton County, Tennessee EMA to evaluate the usefulness of using LMA data at the local Emergency Management (EM) level for public safety. The local EM will have access to the latest LMA output to aid in public safety decisions. We will stress to the EM that the total lightning data is experimental and should be used in conjunction with other preparedness tools, such as the doppler radar. Before and during the project, ENSCO/SPoRT and NWS will provide training to the local EM on the best ways to evaluate the total lightning data.

NASA SPoRT has developed on-line access to the total lightning data. The link is the following: FED_CHACentered.html The internet access is a Google Earth page. The page will overlay the data over Google Earth allowing you to zoom in and out of the area of interest.

Example Output of Total Lightning Data How to Read the Data Data is updated every 2 minutes. Flash Density Scale: Measures the number of cloud to ground and cloud to cloud lightning strikes during the last 2 minutes. Resolution 8 km Flash Density Data on July 11 th, 2013 between 0209 UTC

Outside Sport Activities Decision Support Services Outside Summer Events

Question 1: Have you found the Total Lightning data to be useful for operations? I have used the lightning data numerous times and have found it to provide some very valuable information.

Question 2: If so, what ways have you utilized the Total Lightning data. Please give specific case examples (such as during a baseball game or outside venue) I have used the data from the lightning information at an outdoor venue locally. This one lasts 9 days and data were used to compare with what local weather forecasters were predicting. This event has an attendance of 75,000 to 90,000 nightly depending upon the entertainer(s). I have also used it at a recent football practice to assist the coaches in determining whether to cancel practice or not. The data were used to determine if the storm cell was weakening or strengthening. The data were accurate as I interpreted it. It was also used on a recent fuel spill involving diesel to alert responders of safety concerns associated with the storm.

Question 3: What ways can the Total Lightning display on the computer be improved? Have it loop so that possible tracks of the storm can be planned.

Question 4: How can we improve the training on the Total Lightning data, and how to best utilize the computer display? Training can be improved to the end user such as myself by making it easier accessible by utilizing one or two computer clicks to get to the information.

Question 5: Do you have any other comments about Total Lightning information? I appreciate the opportunity to have experienced the test version and to be able to provide input from the responder view. This is another tool that is in my toolbox, I just need to get more comfortable with its capabilities, so that I can better use it.

The evaluation of the total lightning data at the Emergency Management (EM) level will continue into We will be seeking ways to improve the display of the pseudo GLM lightning data. Additional refresher training on the best ways to utilize the data will continue as well. We plan on utilizing previous events as a tool to improve usage of the lightning data. EM, the NWS and SPoRT will work together to determine the most effective ways to integrate these future observations to improve lightning safety.