Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Gamma-Ray Spectroscopy Dr.Ir. Peter Bode Associate Professor Nuclear Science & Engineering.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NUCP 2371 Radiation Measurements II
Advertisements

Detector Characterisation Group
Gamma-Ray Spectra _ + The photomultiplier records the (UV) light emitted during electronic recombination in the scintillator. Therefore, the spectrum collected.
Laser Testing of Silicon Detectors Rhorry Gauld University of Saint Andrews IPM program – PPD Mentor: Ronald Lipton 30/07/08 1.
Semiconductor Light Detectors ISAT 300 Foundations of Instrumentation and Measurement D. J. Lawrence Spring 1999.
XPS and SIMS MSN 506 Notes.
Experiments in X-Ray Physics Lulu Liu Partner: Pablo Solis Junior Lab 8.13 Lab 1 October 22nd, 2007.
Ionization. Measuring Ions A beam of charged particles will ionize gas. –Particle energy E –Chamber area A An applied field will cause ions and electrons.
Photomultiplier Tube m = k 8–19 dynodes (9-10 is most common).
GAMMA RAY SPECTROSCOPY
Simulations with MEGAlib Jau-Shian Liang Department of Physics, NTHU / SSL, UCB 2007/05/15.
Multichannel Analyzers A multichannel pulse-height analyzer (MCA) consists of an ADC, a histogramming memory, and a visual display of the histogram recorded.
Radiation Safety level 5 Frits Pleiter 02/07/2015radiation safety - level 51.
Anthony Sweeney Position Sensitive Detectors 9 Aberystwyth 2011.
Main detector types Scintillation Detector Spectrum.
Radiation Sensors Zachariadou K. | TEI of Piraeus.
Planar scintigraphy produces two-dimensional images of three dimensional objects. It is handicapped by the superposition of active and nonactive layers.
Gamma Spectroscopy HPT TVAN Technical Training
Radiation Detection and Measurement II IRAD 2731.
Detectors The energy loss of particles in matter can be used detect and identify those particles. There are different types of “detectors”: - Gas-filled.
Gamma ray spectrum, its acquiring and analysis
Characterization of Silicon Photomultipliers for beam loss monitors Lee Liverpool University weekly meeting.
References Hans Kuzmany : Solid State Spectroscopy (Springer) Chap 5 S.M. Sze: Physics of semiconductor devices (Wiley) Chap 13 PHOTODETECTORS Detection.
Why silicon detectors? Main characteristics of silicon detectors: Small band gap (E g = 1.12 V)  good resolution in the deposited energy  3.6 eV of deposited.
1 Semiconductor Detectors  It may be that when this class is taught 10 years on, we may only study semiconductor detectors  In general, silicon provides.
Performance test of STS demonstrators Anton Lymanets 15 th CBM collaboration meeting, April 12 th, 2010.
Chapter 12 Atomic X-Ray Spectroscopy
1 Lecture 5 Overview on the Analytical Procedures (  ) Lecture 5 Overview on the Analytical Procedures (  ) Moncef Benmansour Moncef Benmansour CNESTEN,
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم ” وقل رب زدنى علماً “ صدق الله العظيم.
Cube Measurements Tent Crew. Scintillation BNL 241 Am Semi- collimated  Spectralon Diffuse UV Reflector SBD  -Trigger Scint. Light Poisson.

1 Components of Optical Instruments Lecture Silicon Diode Transducers A semiconductor material like silicon can be doped by an element of group.
GERMANIUM GAMMA -RAY DETECTORS BY BAYAN YOUSEF JARADAT Phys.641 Nuclear Physics 1 First Semester 2010/2011 PROF. NIDAL ERSHAIDAT.
References Hans Kuzmany : Solid State Spectroscopy (Springer) Chap 5 S.M. Sze Physics of semiconductor devices (Wiley) Chap 13 PHOTODETECTORS.
Final Presentation By Matthew Lewis 17 th March 2006 “To Determine the Accuracy that GOES True Numbers can Reproduce the Full X-ray Spectrum of the Sun”
Accelerator Physics, JU, First Semester, (Saed Dababneh). 1 Principles of Spectrometry.
MEASUREMENT Of γ-RAY ENERGY SPECTRA BY A SCINTILLATION COUNTER
Development of X-ray Spectrometry for Nuclear Decay Data Applications at IFIN-HH Aurelian Luca Horia Hulubei National Institute of Physics and Nuclear.
Development of CCDs for the SXI We have developed 2 different types of CCDs for the SXI in parallel.. *Advantage =>They are successfully employed for current.
Medical Image Analysis Interaction of Electromagnetic Radiation with Matter in Medical Imaging Figures come from the textbook: Medical Image Analysis,
SEM- Schematic Overview. Electron Detection Tungsten Filament Electron Source.
Determination of activity of 51 Cr source on gamma radiation measurements V.V.Gorbachev, V.N.Gavrin, T.V.Ibragimova, A.V.Kalikhov, Yu.M.Malyshkin,A.A.Shikhin.
Session II.3.5 Part II Quantities and Measurements
Optical Receivers Theory and Operation
Medical applications of particle physics General characteristics of detectors (5 th Chapter) ASLI YILDIRIM.
Lecture 3-Building a Detector (cont’d) George K. Parks Space Sciences Laboratory UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA.
Tracking Background GRETINA Software Working Group Meeting September 21-22, 2012, NSCL MSU I-Yang Lee Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Electron tracking Compton camera NASA/WMAP Science Team  -PIC We report on an improvement on data acquisition for a Time Projection Chamber (TPC) based.
Photo-detection EDIT EDIT 2011Single photon counting measurements with an HPD – T. GysSlide 1 Single photon counting measurements with a hybrid photon.
1 Chapter No. 17 Radiation Detection and Measurements, Glenn T. Knoll, Third edition (2000), John Willey. Measurement of Timing Properties.
Testbeam analysis Lesya Shchutska. 2 beam telescope ECAL trigger  Prototype: short bars (3×7.35×114 mm 3 ), W absorber, 21 layer, 18 X 0  Readout: Signal.
Nuclear Medicine Instrumentation 242 NMT 1 Dr. Abdo Mansour Assistant Professor of radiology
Room-Temperature Semiconductors: From concepts to applications Zhong He Nuclear Engineering and Radiological Sciences Department The University of Michigan,
Institute of Basic Science Rare Isotope Science Project PANGEA P hoton detector system for A stro-science and N uclear physics with GE rmanium A rray 2015.
Semiconductor Detectors Nishina School Lecture (2009) Shunji Nishimura 西 村 俊 二 Silicon DetectorGermanium Detector.
Deep Level Transient Spectroscopy study of 3D silicon Mahfuza Ahmed.
NEM433 Radiation Detection and Measurement Laboratory Fall 2013 Osman Şahin ÇELİKTEN.
Hybrid Detector(s) for Complete Gamma Ray Spectroscopy S. S. Bhattacharjee, R Raut, S S Ghugre, A K Sinha UGC-DAE Consortium For Scientific Research, Kolkata.
3/2003 Rev 1 II.3.5 – slide 1 of 23 IAEA Post Graduate Educational Course Radiation Protection and Safe Use of Radiation Sources Session II.3.5 Part IIQuantities.
G. Prasanna, P. Manoj Kumar, K. Prabhakar, M. Raghuram, S
Elettra Sincrotrone Trieste
M.I. Abbas - Alexandria University - EGYPT.
Instrument Parameters in WDXRF
Lecture 2—Associated Electronics and Energy Spectrum
© 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. All rights reserved.
Gamma-Gamma Correlations in Na-22
HE instrument and in-orbit performance
Semiconductor Detectors
Why silicon detectors? Main characteristics of silicon detectors:
Gain measurements of Chromium GEM foils
Presentation transcript:

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Gamma-Ray Spectroscopy Dr.Ir. Peter Bode Associate Professor Nuclear Science & Engineering

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 INAA: Semiconductor detectors RNAA: Semiconductor detectors Scintillation detectors

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Principle of a semiconductor detector Solid-state ionisation detectors

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Principle of a semiconductor detector Solid-state ionisation detectors

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Solid-state ionisation detectors Energy band structure of extrinsic semiconductors Impurities: P, As B, Al, Ga

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Solid-state ionisation detectors N-type Ge: Impurities such as P and As as electron donors P-type Ge: Impurities as B, Al, Ga as positive charge donors

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Solid-state ionisation detectors Semiconductor detector: Junction diode with P and N type impurities on either side Applying a reverse bias: A P-I-N structure is formed

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 n-type silicon e h -V0 qeqe dV 1 qhqh dV 2 dq = ( q e dV 1 + q h dV 2 )/V i = dq/dt n + contact p + n junction reverse bias, fully depleted silicon diode germanium detector Solid-state ionisation detectors

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Some properties of semiconductor materials Solid-state ionisation detectors

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Schematic representation of a Ge-semiconductor detector, Solid-state ionisation detector

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Solid-state ionisation detector

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Solid-state ionisation detectors Contacts: n + : diffusion of Li-atoms 700 – 1000  m (dead layer) p + : implantation of B-atoms 0.3  m

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Different types of Ge semiconductor detectors Solid-state ionisation detector

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Solid-state ionisation detector Channel number  pulse height No.of pulses (* 1000)

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Solid-state ionisation detector

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Solid-state ionisation detector Pulse height spectra obtained with Si(Li) detectors. Left: X-ray spectrum of 241 Am Right:  - spectrum of 241 Am

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Different types of cryostats for use with Ge-semiconductor detectors Solid-state ionisation detector

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Energy resolution Usually: Full Width on Half 1332 keV of keV of 57 6 keV of 55 Fe

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Energy resolution State-of-the-art: 1332 keV: 1.58 – 2.0 keV, depending on crystal size 122 keV: 0.6 – 1 keV 5.9 keV: 0.2 – 0.5 keV

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Peak Shape Ratio of : FWHM/Full Width 0.1 M FWHM/Full Width (1/50) M

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Gamma-ray peak shape and tail parameters

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Peak Shape Ratio of : FWHM/Full Width 0.1 M theoretically: 1.83 FWHM/Full Width (1/50) M theoretically: 2.38 Importance: symmetry !!!

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 High energy (top) and low energy tail parameters

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 High energy tail of pulser peak

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 High energy tail of pulser peak

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Calibration source activity

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Peak-to-Compton ratio Defined as: Ratio of peak height at 1332 keV and average peak height in energy range between 1040 and 1096 keV

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Peak-to-Compton ratio State-of-the-art: p/C ~ , depending on size of crystal: pC = (ε Co-60 ) (ε Co-60 ) 2

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Efficiency Absolute efficiency defined as: Relative to the efficiency of a 3” x 3 ” NaI(Tl) detector, defined as counts/1332 keV photon, measured at a source-detector distance of 25 cm

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Determination of photopeak efficiency curve Absolute: Using calibrated sources with known gamma-ray emission rates and activity values, traceable to Bq Single gamma-ray emitting radionuclides Point sources Extended sources Problem: Many sources contain 60 Co and 88 Y; corrections for coincidence effects require also the p/T curve

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Determination of photopeak efficiency curve Relative: Using mix of sources with well-established gamma-ray intensity ratios 1 source for entire energy range, e.g. 152 Eu 2-5 sources, e.g. 182 Ta Ba + 75 Se + 24 Na + … Problem: Intensity ratios not always well established

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Determination of photopeak efficiency curve Relative: 1 source: advantage: simple disadvantage: do not always fully cover entire energy range; inter/extra-polation disputable in keV range 3-5 sources: advantage: better coverage all energy ranges disadvantage: more cumbersome, problems with non- matching parts

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Determination of efficiency curves Relative: Using mix of sources with well-established gamma-ray intensity ratios 1 source for entire energy range, e.g. 152 Eu 2-5 sources, e.g. 182 Ta Ba + 75 Se + 24 Na + …

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 New Tools for Nuclear Spectroscopy Better and bigger Ge detectors High count rate electronics High-resolution scintillation detectors (LaBr 3 (Ce)) Position-sensitive (strip) detectors Monte Carlo modeling Image processing

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Bigger Ge- Detectors Absolute photopeak efficiency 75 cm 3 (17 %) 4 cm 560 cm 3 well Photon energy, keV 0.3 %  20 % 3 %  90 %

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Typical improvement in detection limits 20 % 100 % well 125 cm 3 Arbitrary units 0,01 0,1 1 0,01 0,1 0,25-0,3 1 0,01 0,1 0,15-0,25 1 Bigger Ge-Detectors well 560 cm 3 0,01 0,1 1 0,07 - 0,1

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 New Tools for Nuclear Spectroscopy LaBr 3 (Ce) scintillation spectra P.Doorenbos et.al., IEEE Transactions 51 (2004) 1289 Developed and Patented by T.U.Delft: produced by Saint Gobain, France

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Preamplifiers - Resistor feedback - Pulse optical feedback high resolutions (planar detectors) - Transistor feedback high count rates

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 NIM bin and power supply - Adequate capacity - standard: +/- 24 V +/- 12 V +/- 6 V

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 High Voltage supply Typically (+/-) 3-5 kV Different power supplies for Ge and NaI(Tl) detectors dV/dt networks LN2 switchoff option

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Spectroscopy Amplifiers Analogue systems Digital systems - Gaussian shaping - Triangular shaping - Gated-integrated shaping

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Baseline retoration and Pole-zero setting

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Spectroscopy Amplifiers Essential: - Amplifier and HV at opposite outermost places in NIM-BIN - Match amplifier’s output DC level to ADC’s input DC level - High time (shaping) constant: better resolution, lower throughput Often typically set at 3  s for most (coaxial) detectors 6  s for planar detectors

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 ADC - Linear Approximation or Wilkinson ADC - Successive Approximation ADC Wilkinson ADC’s : best linearity Wilkinson ADC: dead time depends on channel no. Succ. Appr. ADC: fixed dead time per channel. Settings: zero level, lower level, upper level, conversion gain

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Pulse generators - Used for dead time/pile-up correction - Fed into the test input of the preamplifier - Essential: input peak shape must match detector signal (rise time and fall time (  s )

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Dead-time stabilizer Loss free counting Digital dead-time stabilizer

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Signals Use oscilloscope Track: - Output signal preamplifier - Output signal spectroscopy amplifier

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Bad signals

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Low energy tailing: - wrong baseline restoration - incomplete charge collection High energy tailing: - wrong baseline restoration Peak broadening: - increased noise - incomplete charge collection Shifts/instability: - proportional: gain - constant: DC problems

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Spectral shape

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Photoelectric effect (1) The photon energy is transferred to an atomic electron K L e-e- h Cross section Energy photo-electron: Photo-electron

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Compton effect (1) h h ’ E e-  Energy conservation: Energy Compton electron: Angular correlation: Partial energy transfer to a ‘free’ electron 

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 h h ’ E e-  Angular distribution of the scattered photons Compton effect (3)

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Only if E  > 1022 keV Mainly if high Z Pair production Annihilation

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Interactions of photons

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Photon interacts with crystal: Absorption of all energy by photoelectric effect Absorption of all energy by multiple scattering and subsequent absorption by photoelectric effect

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Photon interacts with crystal: 3. Absorption of part of the energy of the photon due to scattering effects and escape of scattered photon from the crystal

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Photon interacts with crystal: 3. If energy of photon > 1022 keV: pair production effects: -All energy absorbed - One of the electrons escapes from the crystal: only E- 511 keV deposited - both scattered electrons escape from the crystal: E-1022 keV deposited

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Photon interacts with crystal: 4. Al low energies: All energy transferred to Ge electrons, but scattered Ge electrons escape from crystal: E-(Ge-k  ) keV deposited in crystal

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Coincidence effects

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Coincidence effects Coincidence count rate: R c = D.  1.  2 Random coincidence count rate: R r = 2. .R 1.R 2 R r = 2. .D 2.  1.  2  1,  2 : total counting efficiency (= full energy photopeak efficiency x peak/Total ratio) Relevant: True coincidence effects: Absolute efficiencies Random coincidence effects: Count rate + absolute efficiencies In all cases needed: peak-to-Total ratio

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Measuring the p/T curve Simple: using e.g. 65 Zn or 137 Cs Complex: modeling using MCNP

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Coincidence effects

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Coincidence effects

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Coincidence effects

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Compton suppression systems

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Compton suppression spectometer Timing Electronics Anti- coincidence Spectroscopy electronics Analogue to Digital converter Multi-channel pulse-height analyzer Annular scintillation detector shield with plug detector Sample

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Gamma-ray spectrum of 137 Cs, recorded with and without Compton suppression. Compton suppression spectrometer

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Compton suppression spectrometer

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Compton suppression spectrometer

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Selecting a detector

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 P.Bode, J.Radioanal.Nucl.Chem. 222 (1997)

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 P.Bode, J.Radioanal.Nucl.Chem. 222 (1997)

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 P.Bode, J.Radioanal.Nucl.Chem. 222 (1997)

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 P.Bode, J.Radioanal.Nucl.Chem. 222 (1997)

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 P.Bode, J.Radioanal.Nucl.Chem. 222 (1997)

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 P.Bode, J.Radioanal.Nucl.Chem. 222 (1997)

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 P.Bode, J.Radioanal.Nucl.Chem. 222 (1997)

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 P.Bode, J.Radioanal.Nucl.Chem. 222 (1997)

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 P.Bode, J.Radioanal.Nucl.Chem. 222 (1997)

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 P.Bode, J.Radioanal.Nucl.Chem. 222 (1997)

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Errors in gamma-ray spectroscopy - Source-to-detector distance - Filling height and source-self attenuation effects - Coincidence summing effects

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Steps to be taken for an NAA laboratory Vial with comparator Vial with sample Neutron fluence rate Estimation neutron fluence rate at sample position Not necessarily the arithmetic mean of the comparator values !

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Source-detector distance Source-end-cap distance e.g. R cm End-cap thickness + end-cap-crystal distance e.g 0.6 cm Distance to average point of complete absorption of photon energy e.g. 2.5 cm

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Steps to be taken for an NAA laboratory Don’t correct just for difference in distance to end-cap! Include distance to average interaction point inside the Ge crystal (typically at ~ cm (depends on size of detector; add 0.5 cm crystal-end cap distance) sample standard 10 cm 0.5 cm 0.2 cm 0.5 cm 2.5 cm Correction for count rates: {10+ (0.5/2) } 2 /{10+(0.2/2) } 2 = Assuming uncertainty in interaction depth 1 cm: correction is then Uncertainty of correction is difference between these corrections, viz. 0.2 %

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 Source-detector distance

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008 The mot optimal choice

Summer Course Instrumental Neutron Activation Analysis July 7-18, 2008