April 15, 2010. Through the SIG program, the United States Education Department (USED) requires state educational agencies (SEAs) to use three tiers to.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School Improvement Grants Webinar – Tier I and II Schools April 21, 2010.
Advertisements

School Improvement Grants Tier I and Tier II Schools March, 2010.
Restructuring Plans Glenbrook Middle School Bel Air Elementary School Rio Vista Elementary School Shore Acres Elementary School Mt. Diablo Unified School.
Presented by : Delaware Department of Education March 15, 2011.
Elementary and secondary education in Tennessee is governed by Federal law, Tennessee statutes, State Board of Education Rules and policies of local.
TENNESSEE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION APRIL 27, 2010 VANDERBILT MARRIOTT NASHVILLE, TENNESSEE SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT APPLICATION ROLLOUT 1.
Minnesotas Plan for Monitoring School Improvement Grant Implementation April 21, 2010 Patricia King Jonathan Luknic 1.
Title I, Part A Targeted Assistance 101 Field Services Unit Office of School Improvement.
Race to the Top Discussion Points to determine LUSD’s interest in participating in the State program January 7, 2010.
Highlights from the Survey on the Use of Funds Under Title II, Part A State Activities Funds August 2014.
MARYLAND’S REFORM PLAN RACE TO THE TOP. This presentation is a product of the Maryland State Department of Education 03/03/10 American Recovery and Reinvestment.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Dr. Kathleen M. Smith Director, Office of School Improvement (804) (804) (Cell) Dr. Dorothea Shannon.
FY 2012 SIG 1003G LEAD PARTNER REQUEST FOR SEALED PROPOSAL (RFSP) BIDDERS’ CONFERENCE February 7, 2011.
Teacher: Decide what to teach Decide what to assign Decide how to assess Decide how to grade In the end, convey how the kids did compared.
1 SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT COHORT 2 LODI UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION APRIL 5, 2011.
Nebraska Department of Education Focus on Effective Instruction and Student Learning Revised Standards and NeSA Nebraska’s P-16 Effort Federal Agenda Fiscal.
Support for the Change, Challenge, and Commitment All Maryland Students College and Career Ready.
School Improvement Grants. Over 13,000 schools are currently under some form of improvement status schools = 5% of schools in some form of restructuring.
Debbie C. Hester Austin ISD July 9 & 11, 2012 Texas Turnaround Center.
1. KCS Strategic Goals: Focus on the student to ensure they excel academically and are prepared for life beyond the classroom. Recruit, select, induct,
1 Tier 1 Education: Review Participant Training January AmeriCorps External Reviewer Training.
Understanding Stimulus Funding and Leveraging Philanthropy to Support Long-Term Education Goals A Webinar for the Foundation Community February 16, 2010.
Subtitle 1003(g) School Improvement Grants April 2, 2012.
Iowa’s Teacher Quality Program. Intent of the General Assembly To create a student achievement and teacher quality program that acknowledges that outstanding.
Federal Program Monitoring and Support Division Charlotte Hughes, Director Donna Brown, Section Chief.
School Improvement Grants (SIG) Overview Adapted from LACOE Intervention for for Persistently Lowest- Achieving Schools 1.
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANTS (SIG): A New Opportunity for Turning Around Low-Performing High Schools January 29, 2010.
School Improvement Grants March, Overview American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Goals and purpose of SIG grants Definition of “persistently lowest-
“An Act Relative to the Achievement Gap” Report of the Superintendent Melinda J. Boone, Ed.D. March 4, 2010.
Mississippi Department of Education Office of School Recovery November 18, :30-4:30 Committee of Practitioners Meeting School Improvement Grant 1003(g)
FLDOE Title I Update FASFEPA Technical Assistance Forum September 16, 2009.
Race to the Top (RTTT) Overview of Grant Competition Goals and Requirements 1.
School Improvement Grant Update Fall Grant Purpose School Improvement Grants (SIG), authorized under section 1003(g) of Title I of the Elementary.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction March 17, 2011 Presented by: California Department of Education.
HEE Hui For Excellence in Education June 6, 2012
Mississippi Department of Education Office of Innovative Support February 17, 2010 Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting.
QUESTIONS MAY BE ED DURING THIS SESSION, OR AFTERWARD TO: Welcome to the SIG Cohort III Webinar Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
U.S. Department of Education Reform Agenda Overview April 2010.
Alabama State Department of Education Federal Programs FY 2011 SIG Technical Assistance Mini-Webinar: March 18, 2011.
Slide 1 Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Office of Superintendent of.
Considerations for Technical Assistance School Improvement Grant 1.
REVIEW PROCESS District Capacity Determination:. Review Team Selection Teams will contain geographically balanced representation. Each review team will.
Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement Office of Program Administration and Accountability April 19, 2011.
Title I 2010 Spring Admin. Meeting Spring Title I Administrative Meeting Maryland State Department of Education April 13-14, 2010 Presented by: Maria E.
AYP Changes for Percent Meeting Standard Elementary uniform bar (3-5)
School Improvement Grant (SIG) Cohort 3 Competition April 26, 2012 Gina Scroggins Director, School Turnaround.
SAM REDDING ACADEMIC DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE CENTER ON INNOVATIONS IN LEARNING CENTER ON SCHOOL TURNAROUND BUILDING STATE CAPACITY AND PRODUCTIVITY CENTER.
Choosing a Reform Model District Wide Stakeholder Meeting 1.
School Improvement Overview September 17-18, 2015 Tyson Carter School Improvement Coordinator Idaho State Department of Education
Title I, IDEA Part B and IDEA Part C September 2, 2009 American Recovery and Reinvestment Act Use of Funds Guidance 1.
AB Miller High School Community Meeting April 13, 2010.
APRIL 2, 2012 EDUCATOR PREPARATION POLICY & PRACTICE UPDATE.
Title I 1003(g) School Improvement Grants Presented by: WVDE Title I Staff March 9, 2010.
Center on School Turnaround at WestEd. 2 3 Race to the Top School Improvement Grants Alignment of Existing Federal Resources ESEA Flexibility Lowest-
Office of School Turnaround Center for Accountability and Improvement, Ohio Department of Education 25 South Front Street, Columbus, Ohio
Texas Transformation Project Sam Houston High Fox Tech High Board Presentation September 20, 2010.
Virginia Department of Education March 5,  The Virginia Department of Education (VDOE) was informed that on March 3, 2010, USED posted the states’
Texas Title I Priority Schools (TTIPS) Grant Cycle 3 Grant Overview & Applicant Conference 1© Texas Education Agency, 2014.
February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.
Federal Programs Committee of Practitioners Meeting
West Virginia Department of Education
January 2010 Marilyn Peterson Data and Federal Programs
Monitoring LEA Implementation of SIG Interventions:
The Role a Charter School Plays in its Charter Authorizer’s Submission of the Consolidated Federal Programs Application Joey Willett, Unit of Federal Programs.
SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT GRANT
Filling Your Buckets: Aligning it ALL!
RACE TO THE TOP: An Overview
School Improvement Grants
Presentation transcript:

April 15, 2010

Through the SIG program, the United States Education Department (USED) requires state educational agencies (SEAs) to use three tiers to prioritize funding to local educational agencies (LEAs) with the lowest-achieving schools that have the greatest need and demonstrate the strongest commitment to use the funds to significantly raise the achievement of their students. It is USEDs expectation that SIG funds are used for the implementation of one of four rigorous school intervention models: 1. Turnaround Model 2. Restart School Model 3. Closure Model 4. Transformation Model DESE will provide LEAs with SIG grants to facilitate implementation of one of the four school intervention models. LEAs will be able to receive from $50,000 up to $2 million per school to implement a model selected by the LEA and approved by the SEA. This funding is contingent on the LEAs demonstrated capacity to implement the selected models and an approved application and budget that includes sufficient funds to implement the selected intervention model fully and effectively in each school. 2

3 March 1-May 7, 2010 Release the projected list of Tier I, II, and III schools to the LEAs/districts. April 5, 2010 – Projected date The final application will be distributed to the LEAs/districts within one week April 20, 2010 – Projected date The LEAs/districts will: declare their commitment to serve schools, submit a projected list of schools it may commit to serve, and the intervention model or improvement activities June 22, 2010 – Projected date Preliminary application submitted July 21, 2010 – Projected date Final application submitted August 12, 2010 The Department will make final determinations and approvals August 15, 2010 Funds will be available to approved LEAs/districts

Model One – Turnaround Required Activities Replace the principal and grant the new principal operational flexibility Calendars and time Budgeting All staff reapply and rehire no more than 50% Implement staff incentives Provide on-going, high-quality, ….professional development Use data to identify and implement instructional programs Continuous use of student data (formative, interim, and summative assessments) Establish schedules for increased learning time Provide appropriate social-emotional and community-oriented services and supports for students. The schools are: 1.Vashon4. Mann 2.Hamilton5. Columbia 3.Sigel 4

Model Two – Restart Model Convert or close and reopen a school under a Education Management Organization (EMO) or Charter Management Office (CMO) Use a rigorous selection process for the CMO or EMO Serve the children who attended before the restart within the grades the school serves May implement any of the required and permissible activities under the transformational model The schools are: 1.Central VPA 2.Sumner 3.Walbridge 4.Ashland 5

MODEL THREE - Closure Close school Enroll students in other schools in the LEA that are higher achieving In reasonable proximity May be charter or new school(s) for which achievement data are not yet available SIG funds may NOT follow students to their new school The schools are 1. Bunche - (Consolidate with Soldan) 6

MODEL FOUR – Transformational Model Teacher and school leader effectiveness required activities Replace the principal who led the school prior to the commencement of the transformation model (There is some flexibility IF the principal has been in the school for two years or less and some turnaround activities have been started.) Rigorous, transparent, equitable evaluation systems for teachers and principals Take into account students growth Multiple observation-based assessments of performance Ongoing collection of professional practice reflective of student achievement and increased graduation rates Designed and developed with teacher and principal involvement (does not have to be the teachers and principals in the building where the intervention is being implemented); 7

MODEL FOUR – Transformational Model Identify and reward school leaders, teachers, and other staff who, in implementing this model, have increased student achievement and high school graduation rates and identify and remove those who, after ample opportunities have been provided for them to improve their professional practice, have not done so; Provide ongoing, high-quality, job-embedded professional development; Implement such strategies as financial incentives, increased opportunities for promotion and career growth, and more flexible work conditions that are designed to recruit, place, and retain staff with the skills necessary to meet the needs of the students in a transformation school. 8

MODEL FOUR – Transformational Model The Schools are : 1. Carr Lane 2. Gateway Middle 3. Fanning 4. Jefferson 5. LOuverture 6. Long 7. Langston 8. Stevens 9. Yeatman 10. Dunbar 11. Roosevelt 9