Human Resources Division January 14, 2010. The St. Louis Plan is aligned to Standard #8 of the Districts Long Range Plan as well as the Districts Accountability.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
MISSION: POSSIBLE. Hello! Your mission, should you choose to accept it, is to implement the Tennessee standards. This new curriculum will go.
Improving Teacher Quality State Grants
Coherence Horizontal, Vertical, and Developmental (Herman, 2010) Vertical: Close alignment at various levels (student, school, district, state) Horizontal:
The Role of the Literacy Coach In a Primary School: A Collaborative Model International Reading Association Annual Conference Atlanta, 2008 Presenters.
St. Louis Public Schools Human Resources Support for District Improvement Initiatives (Note: The bullets beneath each initiative indicate actions taken.
Harrison County Schools Professional Learning Community (PLC) Implementation Plan.
1 OVERVIEW OF THE PGS MANUAL Professional Knowledge Instructional Planning Instructional Delivery Professionalism Learning Environment Assessment.
The SCPS Professional Growth System
Overview of the Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System KY Council of Administrators of Special Education Summer Conference July 9th, 2013.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
Santa Rosa County District Schools Evaluation Systems.
Research on Effective Professional Development Iris Weiss.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A new model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The correlation.
TEN TOP THINGS EVERY INSTRUCTIONAL LEADER SHOULD KNOW.
District Leadership Team Stakeholder Involvement in the District Strategic Plan! Session #4 April 12th, 2011.
By the end of this session we will have an understanding of the following:  A model for teacher evaluation based on current research  The FEAPs as a.
World’s Largest Educational Community
Sub-heading ADMINISTRATOR EVALUATION AND SUPPORT SYSTEM Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment Leader Proposed Adaptations.
The Principal and Assistant Principal Evaluation Process: Integrating the Teacher Working Conditions Survey.
1 Office of New Teacher Induction Introducing NTIMS New Teacher Induction Mentoring System A Tool for Documenting School Based Mentoring Mentors’ Guide.
Virginia Teacher Performance Evaluation System 0 August 2012.
Support Professionals Evaluation Model Webinar Spring 2013.
11 Securing the Future of Canada’s AHSCs… NATIONAL CONSULTATION FORUM Sheraton Hotel – Ottawa January 28 & 29, 2010 Dr. Nick Busing Co-chair, Steering.
Utah Effective Teaching Standards-based Jordan Performance Appraisal System Orientation (UETS-based JPAS)
C OLLABORATIVE A SSESSMENT S YSTEM FOR T EACHERS CAST
OCM BOCES APPR Regulations As of % Student Growth 20% Student Achievement 60% Multiple Measures APPR NOTE: All that is left for implementation.
Speech/Language Pathologist Evaluation System Orientation SY14-15 Evaluation Systems Office, HR John Adams, CHRO.
Title I Needs Assessment and Program Evaluation
Gifted Program Review Spring Process  In February 2013 a team of 41 individuals met to develop questions: parent, teachers, psychologists and administrators.
Local Mentor Plan South Brunswick Schools September 2005 South Brunswick Schools September 2005.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Teacher Development and Evaluation Model October 22, 2012.
Building Teacher Effectiveness A Lab School Protocol.
What does Educator Effectiveness (aka SB 191) mean for us?
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Field Test Overview.
Leveraging Educator Evaluation to Support Improvement Planning Reading Public Schools Craig Martin
Requirements are now 20 hours per year. July 1 – June 30 1.School calendar changes 2.Out of district opportunities 3.Online opportunities - Safe Schools.
Stronge Teacher Effectiveness Performance Evaluation System
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
NEW TEACHER INDUCTION By Amber Keller Dr. Massingill December 5, 2013.
The Professional Learning and Evaluation Model. Missouri Essential Principles of Effective Evaluation Measures educator performance against research-based,
TAP TAP Basics (Preparing for Success in a TAP School) [PSTS]
WW Why Evaluation?. Evaluation formalizes the shared responsibility of state and LEAs to improve student achievement and close the achievement gap in.
Educator Effectiveness Evaluation MERA Fall 2013 Conference November 25-26, 2013 Frankenmuth, Michigan.
The Why (Waiver & Strategic Plan) Aligned to research: MET Study Components: Framework/Multiple Measures Pilot Requirements Timeline.
Implementation Overview and Orientation. Goals for today Provide an overview of the plans and goals for your Odyssey implementation Provide necessary.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Project 3 Supporting Technology. Project Proposal.
Teacher Evaluation MEASURING EDUCATOR IMPACT / / / CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT.
Teacher Evaluation ___________________________ Modified ADEPT Model Assisting Developing Evaluating Professional Teaching
Turning Around Chronically Low- Performing Schools Nelson Colbert, Science Instructional Specialist Richmond Public Schools Richmond, VA.
Teaching and Learning Courageous Journey Presentation by: Glenn Maleyko, Ph.D December 9, 2013.
1 Monitoring and Revising the Title I, Part A, Schoolwide Plan Title I University March 11, 2015 Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration.
Presented by Mary Barton SATIF CFN 204 Principals’ Conference September 16, 2011.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
North Carolina Standard for School Executives Standard 1 By: Barbara Bumgardner Aleen Besmer James Westbrook Kristy Christenberry.
Office of School Improvement Contractor Update Division Leadership Support Team Meeting The College of William and Mary March 31, 2014.
School Improvement Jacqueline C. Chavis, Deputy Superintendent Douglas Dohey, Interim Chief of Operations Pam Connor, Director of Elementary Leadership.
Okeechobee County Instructional Evaluation
Writing Instruction System:
Russ Brock Coordinator of Programs
Transformational Literacy
The number of participants in professional development for multiple districts was about 10,000 in down from about 12,000 in Please note.
The number of participants in professional development for multiple districts was about 10,000 in down from about 12,000 in Please note.
CCSD Induction Program Overview and Evaluation January 19, 2015
To Improve Instruction
Student Centered Coaching Benchmark 2.1.E
Presentation transcript:

Human Resources Division January 14, 2010

The St. Louis Plan is aligned to Standard #8 of the Districts Long Range Plan as well as the Districts Accountability Plan-Highly Qualified The St. Louis Plan has already demonstrated Enhanced teacher quality that is directly impacting student achievement and time on task Feedback regarding the Districts existing new teacher induction model Consistent support and monitoring of instructional practices Increased new teacher confidence, knowledge, perseverance, and dedication to SLPS 2

93 candidates expressed an interest in the Districts new Consultant Teacher position 26 candidates were interviewed and 12 were selected as Consultant Teachers Currently, Consultant teachers have received or delivered 360 hours of Professional Development To date, Consultant Teachers have completed 184 formal observations and 300 informal observations and conferences 3

4 A core component of the St. Louis Plan includes constant, individual feedback for first year teachers; Consultant Teachers have logged over 700 contact hours with first year teachers The St. Louis Plan currently serves a total of 34 schools 10 high schools 1 alternative school 6 middle schools 17 elementary schools

72 probationary teachers and 1 tenured teacher are assigned a Consultant Teacher (53 1 st semester/ 18 1 st /2 nd year teachers added 2 nd semester) Feedback surveys of The St. Louis Plan distributed to hosting principals and new teachers - data will be used to drive next semesters efforts The Office of Accountability is developing program evaluation tools Retention/satisfaction Benchmark data EOC/MAP assessment Informal teacher assessments 5