ACHIEVING A FAIR RETURN TO RACING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS 1.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Looking Good: Appeal of Designs in Getting Noticed by the Customer Dr. Kristina Janušauskaitė Advocate (Lithuania) WIPO TOT Program for SMEs Damascus,
Advertisements

What’s Yours In Mine: Intellectual Property and Copyright For the Magazine Media Publisher Jim Sawtelle Partner and Co-leader, Media, Publishing and Marketing.
MULTI-STAKEHOLDER WORKSHOP ON THE USE OF IP FOR TECHNOLOGICAL CAPACITYBUILDING & THE ESTABLISHMENT OF TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION SUPPORT CENTERS IN THE.
Rethinking Copyright in the Name of
The fundamentals of EC competition law
Control procedures in polish public procurement law Public Procurement Office 2007.
Eneken Tikk // EST. Importance of Legal Framework  Law takes the principle of territoriality as point of departure;  Cyber security tools and targets.
Copyright Defined Copyright is a legal term describing rights given to creators for their literary and artistic works. Kinds of works covered by copyright.
UPDATE ON INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS ISSUE OPEN FORUM ANDREW HARDING, DIRECTOR OF RACING DEVELOPMENT, HKJC, SECRETARY GENERAL OF ARF.
Intellectual Property Boston College Law School April 19, 2007 State Law – Misappropriation.
IPR-INSIGHTS CONSULTING AND RESEARCH 1116 BUDAPEST, KONDORFA U. 10. TEL.: (+36-1) FAX: (+36-1)
Legality of Online Recruitment Online Recruitment Conference 20 th June 2006, Westminster London Paul Van den Bulck Lecturer, University Paris XII Lecturer,
COPYRIGHT CANADIAN LAW.. According to Canadian Law these terms mean: ....
SPORTS BETTING IN FRANCE Thibault Verbiest Partner, Ulys 3rd Legal Gaming Summit 26 January 2009 London.
B. Warusfel, nd EPIP Conference - Maastricht1 Legal protection of databases in Europe and public scientific research Pr. Bertrand WARUSFEL, University.
Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights in the Republic of Macedonia State Office of Industrial Property of the Republic of Macedonia ______________________________.
A centre of expertise in data curation and preservation Digital Curation Centre/ Edinburgh eScience Collaborative Workshop – 12th June 2008 Funded by:
Copyright / Legal liability Paul Van den Bulck Brussels 28 November 2002 Law of : New Technologies Intellectual.
Regulation of Personal Information Daniel Pettitt, Leon Sewell and Matthew Pallot.
Intellectual Property Rights Adam and Stephen. What are Intellectual Property Rights? Protect ideas, inventions, designs, names & images. Grants ownership.
LEGAL ASPECTS OF CONTENT MINING copyright publisher licences country-specific legislation.
Copyright dilemma: Access right over databases of raw information? Gemma Minero, Lecturer in Law, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
Copyright Reform for Text and Data Mining Advocacy Workshop Jonas Holm, Stockholm university LIBER 2015 London, 24 th June 2015.
Migration Law Schengen Information System by Konrad Wilk.
"Open Europe: Open Data for Open Society" Selected legal barriers for Open data results from Lapsi 2.0 best practices in IP.
Re – use of PSI in Slovenia Kristina Kotnik Šumah Deputy of the Information Commisoner.
Emergency Briefing Remote Gambling - European Update THIBAULT VERBIEST Attorney-at-law at the Brussels and Paris Bars Founding Partner of ULYS LawFirm.
IP LAW AND ADMINISTRATION IN TANZANIA Presented by: Leonila Kishebuka Deputy Registrar, Business Registrations and Licensing Agency [BRELA],
An Introduction to regulation, it ’ s significance and rationale Kevin Hinde.
Page 1 IOP Genomics Workshop Patents and Patenting Biotech Inventions Annemieke Breukink, Ph.D. September 8th, 2009.
Copyright / Legal liability Paul Van den Bulck Brussels 6 th of february 2004 Law of : New Technologies Intellectual.
US contrasted to EU in re Copyright on Databases David S. Wise Indiana University.
Announcements -Final Study Guide will be posted the beginning of next week. -Thursday, May 31 class will be a review session.
Personal data protection in criminal procedure International collaboration and principle of proportionality LEFIS ROVANIEMI MEETING 19TH 20TH JANUARY 2007.
Copyright / Legal liability Paul Van den Bulck Brussels 6 th of june 2003 Law of : New Technologies Intellectual.
Rise of European Supranationalism Matej Accetto ECL, 27 October 2010.
SUNITA K SREEDHARAN SKS LAW ASSOCIATES, NEW DELHI 23 July 2014, Delhi.
What is Copyright? Copyright is a form of intellectual property protection granted under Indian law to the creators of original works of authorship such.
Copyright laws. Framework for educators COPYRIGHT ACT 98 OF TRIPSTRIPS (World Trade Organisation.
France: Controlled opening and recent case-law regarding remote gaming operators EIG, 24th September 2008 Thibault Verbiest, Partner, Ulys
Intellectual Property Alignment of Current Policies Tana Pistorius UNISA Government CIO Summit Towards reducing costs of doing business in government and.
F.3 E.P.A Government’s role in the economy -Stable and fair legal systems (uphold rule of law)
WARSAW May 2006 Seminar on Enforcement of Property Variety Rights.
Trends in alcohol marketing New products Digital marketing Alcohol as a health food Stakeholder marketing.
© Haihong Liu, SISU Law School Nov Shan Zhai.
Court Systems and Practices. Copyright © Texas Education Agency All rights reserved. Images and other multimedia content used with permission. 2.
Data protection and compliance in context 19 November 2007 Stewart Room Partner.
Copyright Law A Guide for Educators. Jolene Hartnett, RDH, BS Seattle Central College © 2015 Certain materials in this program are included under the.
Intellectual Property Right Bernard Denis, DG-KTT.
Intellectual Property Law Introduction Victor H. Bouganim WCL, American University.
Copyright and Fair Use What Teachers Should Know April Shinpaugh By PresenterMedia.comPresenterMedia.com.
DATA BASE 1 A new property right * Before a protection by unfair competition, or concept of misappropriation * A will of uniformisation * Datas are a valuable.
Copyright for teaching. 2 katelyncollins/category/week-5 CC BY.
The Directive on Enforcement and The Customs Regulation Warsaw May 2006 Martin Ekvad Community Plant Variety Office Head of Legal Affairs.
Copyright issues in Text and Data Mining OAI9 Jonas Holm Legal counsel, Stockholm University
Praque, April 21, 2016 Intellectual Property Policies in Universities and Research Institutions Metropolitan University Prague  Industrial Property Studies.
Copyright Protection in Indonesia: General Information on the Implementation of Copyright Law in Indonesia; policies and planning Seoul, November 2007.
TAIEX INTERNAL MARKET WEEK IN BUDAPEST November 2004 Co-operation of Customs Administrations Presentation by: Sandro Le Noci – Italian Customs.
Copyright Protection Copyright Protection aims at: Providing incentives for creativity by granting authors a number of exclusive rights Providing incentives.
Recruitment and Selection
Intro to Intellectual Property 3.0
MGT601 SME MANAGEMENT.
The OHIM Sabina Rusconi, institutional affairs and external relations department, OHIM Roving Seminar on the Conmunity Trade Mark System in China,
International Law.
Interactive Gaming Council Board Meeting I-Gaming Legal status
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS
A2: The Judicial Branch Basics Notes
External Trade and Development Policy
A2: The Judicial Branch Basics Notes
Copyright laws.
Presentation transcript:

ACHIEVING A FAIR RETURN TO RACING INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS 1

Exclusive rights framework Creator of intellectual property can reap fruits of investment Investment is made in intellectual property creation Public benefit PART 1 – Economic theory and intellectual property law Intellectual Property Rights Rationale Paris 2012 IPR & A FAIR SHARE 2

ExcludableNon-excludable RivalrousPrivate GoodCommon Pool Good Non-rivalrousClub Good Toll Good Public Good Paris 2012 IPR & A FAIR SHARE PART 1 – Economic theory and intellectual property law 3

PART II – Existing Intellectual Property Law Q1 – Does the existing IP regime adequately protect racing against free riding? Q2 – Are there other options for achieving an exclusive rights framework? Paris 2012 IPR & A FAIR SHARE 4

PART IIA -- Copyright 5 Paris 2012 IPR & A FAIR SHARE Copyright protection YES NO Expression of facts or information Facts or information

6 Paris 2012 IPR & A FAIR SHARE PART IIA -- Copyright

Copyright – Preparatory Steps 1.Catalogue process 2.Written assignment 3.Written acknowledgement 4.Copyright notices Calendar and Race Program Nominations Lists Weights Lists Progressive Acceptance Lists Acceptance Lists Final Fields Race books Form guides published in newspaper and elsewhere Race results 7 Paris 2012 IPR & A FAIR SHARE PART IIA -- Copyright

8 Paris 2012 IPR & A FAIR SHARE PART IIA -- Copyright

Copyright – Infringement A.Use ≠ Reproduction B.Reproduction of a “substantial part” 9 Paris 2012 IPR & A FAIR SHARE PART IIA -- Copyright

10 Paris 2012 IPR & A FAIR SHARE PART IIA -- Copyright

PART IIB – Sui generis database right 11 Paris 2012 IPR & A FAIR SHARE

PART IIB – Sui generis database right 12 Paris 2012 IPR & A FAIR SHARE

13 PART IIB – Sui generis database right Paris 2012 IPR & A FAIR SHARE Substantial investment in the obtaining, verification or presentation of database contents Sui generis database right

BHB v William Hill Fixtures Marketing 14 PART IIB – Sui generis database right Paris 2012 IPR & A FAIR SHARE Sui generis database right Content created “in-house”

PART IIC – Harmonized copyright database Harmonized copyright protection to original database – can it protect sporting fixture lists? 15 Paris 2012 IPR & A FAIR SHARE Football DataCo v. Yahoo European Court of Justice High Court Court of Appeal

PART III – Race fields legislation as an alternative 16 Paris 2012 IPR & A FAIR SHARE Evolution Stage IARBAustralian Racing Ministers Stage IIARBAustralian Racing Ministers Product fee principle Race fields legislation mechanism

17 PART III – Race fields legislation as an alternative Paris 2012 IPR & A FAIR SHARE Evolution Stage IIIFulcrum of legislation changed from “publish to “use" Stage IVHigh Court upholds constitutional validity

Offence to use in Australia “or elsewhere” Crimes Act Extradition -Decision to request extradition – Minister for Justice & Customs -Maximum penalty of ≥12 months -Dual criminality 18 PART III – Race fields legislation as an alternative Paris 2012 IPR & A FAIR SHARE The long arm of the law?

19 PART III – Race fields legislation as an alternative Paris 2012 The long arm of the law? Paris 2012 IPR & A FAIR SHARE

1.Free trade & open competition 2.Is race fields legislation possible in Europe? 3.Ripple effects 20 PART III – Race fields legislation as an alternative Other considerations Paris 2012 IPR & A FAIR SHARE

PART IV – Conclusions 1.Sui generis database right is a dead letter for racing. 2.Scope for Europe to use database copyright will be made clearer by English Court of Appeal decision in Football Dataco. 3.Outside Europe scope for copyright to be used against free riding wagering operators potentially exists, but the tests applied vary around the world. 21 Paris 2012 IPR & A FAIR SHARE

StrengthsWeaknesses Copyright Legal framework already exists Whether copyright subsists in race fields is unclear – test cases needed Racing organiser can initiate enforcement – not reliant on government regulator that may be unwilling to expend resources on a prosecution Infringement depends on reproducing: - Bookmaker taking bets over telephone without publishing race field does not infringe - Bookmaker that reproduces only slivers of the race field may not infringe Marginal utility where wagering operator is external Race fields “use” is sufficientRequires new law to be enacted Deterrent effect of criminal offence Race organizer cannot initiate enforcement – is reliant on government regulator that may be unwilling to expend resources on presentation Effectiveness is reduced where wagering operator is external 22 PART IV – Conclusions Paris 2012 IPR & A FAIR SHARE

PART V – Developing a strategy 1.Identify interested IFHA members. 2.Scope the issues in each country. 3.Develop template(s). 4.IFHA advocacy. 23