Serbia Judicial Functional Review Multi Donor Trust Fund for Justice Sector Support in Serbia.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Delivering as One Viet Nam Country-led Evaluation Kigali, 20 October 2009.
Advertisements

Delivering as One UN Albania October 2009 – Kigali.
Sector Development, EU Accession and International Assistance: The case of Serbia Paul Wafer, Head of DFID Serbia October 2008.
Priority Environmental Investment Programme (PEIP) – CARDS Regional Regional Meeting for Senior Officials from SEE and Donors Community 28th November 2008.
THE STRATEGIC APPROACH IN MODERNIZING MUNICIPAL SERVICES Siegfried Brenke, Team Leader GTZ Project: Modernization of Municipal Services Takovska 9/14,
Performance Framework Part 2 – Performance and Resource Management Multi Donor Trust Fund for Justice Sector Support in Serbia.
Workshop on the Strengthened Approach to Supporting PFM Reform PFM Performance Measurement Framework And Procurement Pamela Bigart World Bank.
Analytical Evidence on Research & Innovation in the Danube Region Progress of WP4 Vienna, Béla Kardon, PhD; RCISD
SAI Performance Measurement Framework
Serbia Judicial Functional Review Multi-Donor Trust Fund for Justice Sector Support (MDTF-JSS) Klaus Decker, Task Team Leader Marina Matic, Consultant.
Admissions Process Review Dr Tammy Long Head of the Admissions Process Review (seconded) Stakeholder Reference Group.
Performance Framework Part 1 – System Performance Multi Donor Trust Fund for Justice Sector Support in Serbia.
Association of University Staff (AUS) Annual Conference 2003.
Introducing Regulatory Impact Analysis into the Turkish Legal Framework Prime Minister’s Office, Better Regulation Group The Project Implementation Team.
DISTILLATE An introduction Final workshop of the DISTILLATE programme Great Minster House, London Tuesday 22 nd January 2008 Professor Tony May ITS, University.
Cumulative Impact Assessment for the Wind Energy Sector
Quality evaluation and improvement for Internal Audit
ENERGY INNOVATION FINANCIAL NETWORK Dr HANNA BARTOSZEWICZ-BURCZY INSTITUTE OF POWER ENGINEERING WARSAW - POLAND 19 June 2007, WARSAW EIFN WORKSHOP.
Jointly for our common future SILVER CITY - SEE/D/0325/4.1/X Innovative urban strategies and action plans to increase the social and economic role of seniors.
The Process of Conducting a Post Disaster Needs Assessment (PDNA) United Nations Development Programme Bureau for Crisis Prevention and Recovery Bangkok,
Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA)on Food Security Ridzwan Abdul Rahman, PhD Study Team Leader, TWG (SEA) on Food Serurity in Sabah.
A Sourcebook for Monitoring and Evaluating Agricultural and Rural Development Measuring Results in less-than-ideal Conditions Global Donor Platform for.
OECD RECOMMENDATION ON DIGITAL GOVERNMENT STRATEGIES From citizen-centric to citizen-driven approaches Barbara Ubaldi Programme Manager– Reform of the.
State of Maine NASACT Presentation “Using the Business Case to Guide a Transformation Procurement” 1 Using the Business Case to Guide a Transformation.
Thriving Third Sector: Vision for Civil Society Les Hems GuideStar Data Services.
1 1 CURRENT ENERGY POLICY CHALLENGES. THE 2030 ENERGY AND CLIMATE FRAMEWORK DG Energy, European Commission.
Developing the New Zealand Energy Strategy IPS Roundtable Series on energy sustainability 4 August 2006 Stuart Calman.
1 Action Planning to Address Corruption in Water Supply and Sanitation (WSS) Dr. Donal O’Leary Senior Advisor, TI Secretariat.
Irene Khan – Secretary General Building effective and responsive INGOs, the strategic role of HR: The IS Job Value Review 8 February 2008.
…and how to give it to them What CEOs Want Patti Phillips, Ph.D.
SOUTH EAST PLAN South East Plan ESPACE - reminder Aim Incorporation of adaptation to climate change within spatial planning mechanisms at local, regional,
BPK Strategic Planning: Briefing for Denpasar Regional Office Leadership Team Craig Anderson Ahmed Fajarprana August 11-12, 2005.
Programme for Health Service Improvement Clinical Services Planning Group Moving forward CARDIFF AND VALE NHS TRUST YMDDIRIEDOLAETH GIG CAERDYDD A’R FRO.
Private & Confidential1 (SIA) 13 Enterprise Risk Management The Standard should be read in the conjunction with the "Preface to the Standards on Internal.
MAINSTREAMING MONITORING AND EVALUATION IN EDUCATION Can education be effectively managed without an M & E system in place?
Being The Best We Can Self-evaluation workshop Key results for Victoria’s public library services.
Division of Technology, Industry, and Economics Economics and Trade Branch SESSION 9 – Project Implementation and Organisational Aspects Capacity Building.
“Strategic technical assistance to improve the effectiveness of African EIA systems” Mark Stoughton, Ph.D. UNECA–CLEAA Experts’ Workshop 12 & 13 April.
Mozambique The United Nations At Work THE UN REFORM In Mozambique DaO Evaluability Study, Report and Recommendations May 2009.
THE STUDY: CAPACITY BUILDING OF THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA IN THE FIELD OF STRATEGIC PLANNING IN THE ENERGY SECTOR MINISTRY OF MINING AND ENERGY REPUBLIC OF.
Reallocation in the budget process Strategic Reviews around the world Cutting Tools: How to Cut Risks, consequences, sustainability Practical Considerations.
 Introduction  Local AIDS Governance Barometer (LAGB) Model  LAGB Purpose  LAGB Application – Kabwe district, Zambia  LAGB’s Contribution to the.
Setting the context: Full costing and the financial sustainability of universities Country Workshop: POLAND EUIMA – Full Costing Project University of.
The Strengthened Approach to Supporting PFM reforms Applying the PFM Performance Measurement Framework Washington, D.C., January 17-18, 2007 Bill Dorotinsky.
A short introduction to the Strengthened Approach to supporting PFM reforms.
PERSPECTIVES FROM THE OECD ROLF ALTER DIRECTOR FOR PUBLIC GOVERNANCE AND TERRITORIAL DEVELOPMENT OECD Key Challenges in Public Procurement 3 rd Annual.
Workforce Health and Wellbeing ARIOPS Conference John Abbott 18 th October 2013.
Public-Private-Partnership and Environmental Management in Liberia, Presented by: Washington Waka GEF National Dialogue Initiative & National Environmental.
EVALUATION OF THE SEE SARMa Project. Content Project management structure Internal evaluation External evaluation Evaluation report.
1 Performance Auditing ICAS & IRAS Officers NAAA 21 Jan 2016.
Developing a national governance framework for health promotion in Scottish hospitals Lorna Smith Senior Health Improvement Programme Officer NHS Health.
Area Reviews: The London Approach. CONTEXT Declining financial health of colleges since Challenges ahead including devolution and funding reforms.
AGRO PARKS “The Policy Cycle” Alex Page Baku November 2014.
Module 5.2: PFM diagnostic tools and the PEFA INTRODUCTION TO PUBLIC FINANCE MANAGEMENT.
The Global Partnership Monitoring Framework Purpose and Scope of Monitoring, Role of Participating Countries UNDP-OECD support team Copenhagen, 12 June,
Public Management Innovations and Administrative Capacity Tony Verheijen Senior Public Sector Management Specialist The World Bank.
Programme for Health Service Improvement Clinical Services Planning Group Moving forward CARDIFF AND VALE NHS TRUST YMDDIRIEDOLAETH GIG CAERDYDD A’R FRO.
Knowledge for Healthcare: Driver Diagrams October 2016
Country Level Programs
Pacific Region Infrastructure Facility
MDTF-JSS: Review of the Criminal Chain Process in Serbia
i2i turning development around
MDTF-JSS: Review of the Criminal Chain Process in Serbia
Open information day, DG Information Society
National SDG indicator frameworks in Georgia
WORKSHOP 17th Sept 2008 EUROPEAN COMMISSION
WHAT is evaluation and WHY is it important?
Workshop on Enhancing Policy Dialogue in the Sunflower Oil Sector
EVALUATIONS in the EU External Aid
Health and safety at work in the EU
Presentation transcript:

Serbia Judicial Functional Review Multi Donor Trust Fund for Justice Sector Support in Serbia

The Functional Review Core Team Mr. Klaus Decker, Senior Public Sector Specialist Ms. Georgia Harley, Public Sector Specialist Mr. Srdjan Svircev, Public Sector Specialist

What is a Functional Review? A Judicial Functional Review provides a baseline and analytical input for future reform by:  Assessing the current functioning and performance of institutions in a justice system;  Making recommendations to improve the performance of the justice system;  Providing a sound and solid empirical basis to assess the impact of future justice reform initiatives.

Why a Functional Review? A Judicial Functional Review presents a strategic opportunity to:  Identify an objective data-rich baseline for Serbia’s accession negotiations under Chapter 23;  Develop analytic input that can inform Serbia’s opening benchmarks under Chapter 23;  Enable the EU and Serbia to measure progress in reforms throughout the negotiations of Chapter 23.

What will the Functional Review cover? The Functional Review will focus on the courts as the main vehicle for justice service delivery and the primary institutions of justice in Serbia. The scope will also include those aspects of the functioning of other institutions to the extent to which they enable or impede service delivery by the courts. ‘whether and how the issue contributes, either directly or indirectly, to the delivery of justice services by the courts in Serbia’

How will system performance be analyzed? The Functional Review will establish a justice system performance framework and then generate baseline data. Performance Efficiency of service delivery Quality of services Access to services

What will be the process? Justice Performance Framework Data Collection & Data Generation Desk review Multi-stakeholder Perception survey (2010, 2014) Access to justice assessment Caseload and fiscal data Analysis & Assessment Performance assessment Resource assessments (HR, finance, IT, infrastructure etc) Comparative Assessments Hypothesis Testing Options & Recommendations Risks

Engagement with Institutional Stakeholders The Functional Review team will engage with each institution on equal footing. Our team will work in close cooperation with stakeholders to:  Collect and discuss data;  Receive your input and analysis;  Discuss hypotheses and possible options;  Make comments on drafts. A Stakeholder Consultation Group will comprise representatives and a contact point from each relevant institution.

What’s the timeframe?  Team is in place & data collection has commenced  First workshops taking place in late January 2014  Workshops & meetings throughout the Spring 2014  Analysis by mid-July 2014

Thank you for your attention! Contact: Mr. Srdjan Svirčev