Pressure sensor 2.008-spring-2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
MICROELECTROMECHANICAL SYSTEMS ( MEMS )
Advertisements

Nanoscience, Nanotechnology and Nanomanufacturing Exciting new science and technology for the 21st century.
6.1 Transistor Operation 6.2 The Junction FET
Computer Graphics HARDWARE. LCD Displays Thinner and lighter. No tube or electron beams. Blocking/unblocking light through polarized crystals. Crystals.
Xiaogan Liang, Keith J. Morton, Robert H. Austin, and Stephen Y. Chou Nano Lett., 2007, 7 (12),
MetalMUMPs Process Flow
MICROFLEX S Beeby, J Tudor, University of Southampton Introduction to MEMS What is MEMS? What do MEMS devices look like? What can they do? How do we make.
Photolithography Photolithography is the transfer of patterns, circuits, device structures, etc. to a substrate or wafer using light and a mask.
Overview of Nanofabrication Techniques Experimental Methods Club Monday, July 7, 2014 Evan Miyazono.
Hello from Mike Deal at Stanford University - Senior Research Scientist at the Stanford Nanofabrication Facility V5.15.
Bulk Micromachining of Silicon for MEMS Mustafa G. Guvench, Ph.D. University of Southern Maine.
MEMS Cell Adhesion Device Andrea Ho Mark Locascio Owen Loh Lapo Mori December 1, 2006.
Bulk MEMS 2014, Part 1 Types of MEMS Bulk MEMS: anisotropic wet or DRIE of bulk silicon SOI MEMS: DRIE or wet etching of SOI.
EE42/100, Spring 2006Week 15, R. White1 Micro- and Nanotechnology.
SOIMUMPs Process Flow Keith Miller Foundry Process Engineer.
MEMs Fabrication Alek Mintz 22 April 2015 Abstract
Case Studies in MEMS Case study Technology Transduction Packaging
Surface micromachining
Generated by IntelliSuite CleanRoom Electrothermal Actuator
Introduction to microfabrication, chapter 1
1 ME 381R Fall 2003 Micro-Nano Scale Thermal-Fluid Science and Technology Lecture 18: Introduction to MEMS Dr. Li Shi Department of Mechanical Engineering.
Bulk Micromachining of Silicon for MEMS
ES 176/276 – Section # 2 – 09/19/2011 Brief Overview from Section #1 MEMS = MicroElectroMechanical Systems Micron-scale devices which transduce an environmental.
Surface MEMS 2014 Part 1
Overview of course Capabilities of photonic crystals Applications MW 3:10 - 4:25 PMFeatheringill 300 Professor Sharon Weiss.
Os, 9/16/99 MICROMACHINING AND MICROFABRICATION TECHNOLOGY FOR ADAPTIVE OPTICS Olav Solgaard Acknowledgements: P.M. Hagelin, K. Cornett, K. Li, U. Krishnamoorthy,
Electron Microscopy 1 Electron Microscopy (EM) Applying Atomic Structure Knowledge to Chemical Analysis.
Why do we put the micro in microelectronics?. Why Micro? 1.Lower Energy and Resources for Fabrication 2.Large Arrays 3.Minimally Invasive 4.Disposable.
Why do we put the micro in microelectronics?. Why Micro? 1.Lower Energy and Resources for Fabrication 2.Large Arrays 3.Minimally Invasive 4.Disposable.
1 Absolute Pressure Sensors Z. Celik-Butler, D. Butler and M. Chitteboyina Nanotechnology Research and Teaching Facility University of Texas at Arlington.
Copyright Prentice-Hall Chapter 29 Fabrication of Microelectromechanical Devices and Systems (MEMS)
© Pearson & GNU Su-Jin Kim MEMS Manufacturing Processes MEMS Devices The MEMS(Microelectromechanical systems) devices can be made through the IC Process:
Introduction to CMOS VLSI Design CMOS Fabrication and Layout Harris, 2004 Updated by Li Chen, 2010.
Introduction to Prototyping Using PolyMUMPs
ISAT 436 Micro-/Nanofabrication and Applications
Top Down Manufacturing
MIT Lincoln Laboratory NU Status-1 JAB 11/20/2015 Advanced Photodiode Development 7 April, 2000 James A. Burns ll.mit.edu.
Top Down Method Etch Processes
1 M. Chitteboyina, D. Butler and Z. Celik-Butler, Nanotechnology Research and Teaching Facility University of Texas at Arlington
Surface Micromachining Dr. Marc Madou, Fall 2012, UCI Class 10.
JY/11/15/99 MTC Optically flat arrays of micromirrors June Yu James A. Folta William Cowan (AFRL) to improve the mirror surface quality and optical fill-factor.
Spencer/Ghausi, Introduction to Electronic Circuit Design, 1e, ©2003, Pearson Education, Inc. Chapter 3, slide 1 Introduction to Electronic Circuit Design.
©2008 R. Gupta, UCSD COSMOS Summer 2008 Chips and Chip Making Rajesh K. Gupta Computer Science and Engineering University of California, San Diego.
Display Technology INFO410 & INFO350 S Jack Pinches INFORMATION
2. Design Determine grating coupler period from theory: Determine grating coupler period from theory: Determine photonic crystal lattice type and dimensions.
 Refers to techniques for fabrication of 3D structures on the micrometer scale  Most methods use silicon as substrate material  Some of process involved.
CMOS VLSI Fabrication.
Optimization of T-Cell Trapping in a Microfluidic Device Group #19
Thin Oxides The new frontier. Volume 43, No Special Issue on Ultrathin Oxides.
Chieh Chang EE 235 – Presentation IMarch 20, 2007 Nanoimprint Lithography for Hybrid Plastic Electronics Michael C. McAlpine, Robin S. Friedman, and Charles.
MEMS 2016 Part 2 (Chapters 29 & 30)
(Chapters 29 & 30; good to refresh 20 & 21, too)
Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS) Device Fabrication
Antenna Project in Cameron clean room Wafer preparation, conductor deposition, photolithography.
Introduction to microfabrication, chapter 1 Figures from: Franssila: Introduction to Microfabrication unless indicated otherwise.
7. Surface Micromachining Fall 2013 Prof. Marc Madou MSTB 120
FRONT END PROCESSES - CLEANING, LITHOGRAPHY, OXIDATION
Lecture 7 Fundamentals of Multiscale Fabrication
UV-Curved Nano Imprint Lithography
Temperature Sensors on Flexible Substrates
MEMS, Fabrication Cody Laudenbach.
How a CCD Works (Charge-Coupled Device)
Add nitride Silicon Substrate.
MICROMACHINING AND MICROFABRICATION TECHNOLOGY FOR ADAPTIVE OPTICS
Process flow part 2 Develop a basic-level process flow for creating a simple MEMS device State and explain the principles involved in attaining good mask.
Memscap - A publicly traded MEMS company
MEMS: Basic structures & Current Applications
(2) Incorporation of IC Technology Example 18: Integration of Air-Gap-Capacitor Pressure Sensor and Digital readout (I) Structure It consists of a top.
SILICON MICROMACHINING
BONDING The construction of any complicated mechanical device requires not only the machining of individual components but also the assembly of components.
Presentation transcript:

Pressure sensor 2.008-spring-2003

Surface Micromachining Deposit sacrificial layer Pattern anchors Deposit/pattern structural layer Etch sacrificial layer 2.008-spring-2003

Surface micromachining Structure sacrificial etchant 􀂄  Polysilicon Silicon dioxide HF 􀂄  SiNx PSG HF 􀂄  Silicon dioxide polysilicon XeF2 􀂄  SiNx polysilicon XeF2 􀂄  Aluminum photoresist oxygen plasma 2.008-spring-2003

Residual stress gradients More tensile on top More compressive on top Just right! 2.008-spring-2003

Clean Room 􀂄  Gowning with bunny suit 􀂄  Class 1, 10, 100 A salt grain on a chip 2.008-spring-2003

Class of clean rooms 􀂄  Class 1 means one speckle of 0.5 μ partical in one ft3. 􀂄  Class 10, 100, 1000 􀂄  HEPA filter, AHU 2.008-spring-2003

Air Filters 􀂄  HEPA (High Efficiency Particulate Air) filters 􀂄  High efficiency, low Δp, good loading characteristics 􀂄  Glass fibers in a paper like medium 􀂄  97% retainment of incident particles of 0.3 μm or larger 2.008-spring-2003

Class of clean rooms Class Temp tolerance tolerance 2.008-spring-2003

Particles Class Federal Standard 209; Number of particles per cubic foot 2.008-spring-2003

Toxicity 􀂄  TLV (Threshold Limit Value) 􀂄  Upper limit material concentration that an average healthy person can be exposed without adverse effects, ppm or mg/m3 􀂄  Notorious Poisons 􀂄  CO (100 ppm), CO2 (5000 ppm), HCN (110 ppm), H2S (10 ppm) 􀂄  SO2 (5 ppm), NH3 (50 ppm) 􀂄  Arsenic trioxide AS2O3 (0.1g fatal) 􀂄  Hg (0.1 ppm via skin contact) 􀂄  All material are toxic in sufficient quantity, 5g caffein is fatal. 2.008-spring-2003

MEMS Applications 2.008-spring-2003

Display Technologies Market Screen Leader Size R.& D. Issues 􀁺 ● HDTV for 60” ~ 80” Home Theater 􀁺 ● Digital Presentation for 100 ” ~ 300” Projector 􀁺 ● Key Factor : Brightness 2.008-spring-2003

Brightness of Projection Displays lux = lumen / m2

DIGITAL MICROMIRROR DEVICE & DLP TM PROJECTOR PHOTONICS AND MICROMACHINING 1st Optical MEMS device DIGITAL MICROMIRROR DEVICE & DLP TM PROJECTOR 96365-39 CORPORATE RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT

DMD Optical Switching Principle DMD Mirror on/off ± 10o Texas Instruments’s Technical Journal: Vol. 15, No. 3, July-Sept. 1998. 2.008-spring-2003

DMD Cell Structure 2.008-spring-2003 Texas Instruments’s Technical Journal: Vol. 15, No. 3, July-Sept. 1998. 2.008-spring-2003

TMA 2.008-spring-2003

Light Modulation of TMA Thinfilm Micromirror Array 2.008-spring-2003

Pixel Architecture Post contact to actuator Mirror Via contact to MOS Top Electrode PZT Bottom Electrode Supporting Layer Common Electrode Anchor Drain Pad Gate Line Source Line 2.008-spring-2003

Electronics) Piezoelectric TMA vs DMD DMDTM (Texas Instrument) Electrostatic TMATM (Daewoo Electronics) Piezoelectric Actuation 0o ~ 3o (continuous) Tilting Angle -10o, 0o, +10o Linear Simple On/Off Complex Gray Scale Control • Fatigue • Sticking • High Cost • Uniformity Drawbacks 2.008-spring-2003

Micromirror Arrays XGA 1024 X 768 786,432 pixels VGA 640 X 480 2.008-spring-2003

Mirror Flatness (VGA) 2.008-spring-2003

Coupled Natures of Thin Film Processes 􀂄  Forward coupling 􀂄  Step coverage, confromality 􀂄  Backward coupling 􀂄  Temperature dependent microstructural degradation 􀂄  Over/under etch, etch stop control 􀂄  Side attack, Passivation breakage 2.008-spring-2003

Evolution of TMA Pixels 2.008-spring-2003

MIT Bow-actuator Nick Conway, MS 2003 End effector Piezoelectric Amplifiers Released 4-bar linkage design Fixed substrate 2.008-spring-2003

Design of nanopipette (2): In-line array of nanopipettes 􀂄  Massive Parallel Nanopipette Array by In- plane Scanning Probe Systems 􀂄  Integration with Microfluidic channels 􀂄  Integration of nanopipettes in AFM in an 100 x 100 array Single nanopipette 2.008-spring-2003

Photonic crystal modeling Microcavity waveguide finite-difference time-domain 1 mesh 2.008-spring-2003

Photonic band gap microcavity waveguide processing 􀂃  design matrix of various geometries: defect lengths, waveguide width, d/a, number of holes 􀂃  Nanofabrication: 􀂃  SiNx mask1 /w electron-beam 􀂃  Proximity pattern transfer to resist 􀂃  130 nm minimum features 􀂃  Hard mask from Cr lift-off 2 􀂃  Optimized Si RIE 1 J. Ferrera, NanoStructures Laboratory, MIT. 2 J. Foresi, Kimerling group, MIT. 2.008-spring-2003

Design Domains What How 􀂄  Design is a mapping process 􀂄  From “What” to “How” 􀂄  Small scale systems design What How 2.008-spring-2003 N. P. Suh, Axiomatic Design, Oxford