US Regulatory Process FCC Equipment Authorization Program

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NERC Policies Introduction
Advertisements

JCAHO –A HIPAA Business Associate National HIPAA Summit
FHWA Qualification Requirements for Laboratories NACLA Forum February 11, 2009 Mike Rafalowski Materials Engineer Office of Pavement Technology Federal.
1. Regulatory Requirements 2. Written Policies & Procedures 3. Documentation of Expenses 4. Managing Cash 5. Efficient Accounting System 6. Budget Controls.
OMB Regulatory Requirements Regulatory Requirements 2. Written Policies & Procedures 3. Documen- tation of Expenses 4. Managing Cash 5. Efficient.
OECD International Futures Programme 1 OECD Futures Project The Commercialisation of Space and the Development of Space Infrastructure: The Role of Public.
International Organization International Organization
1 Introduction to Safety Management April Objective The objective of this presentation is to highlight some of the basic elements of Safety Management.
24 May 2004Michael Sharpe, ETSI Secretariat Radio Competence Centre 1 How can ETSI help? The regulatory environment for RFID Michael Sharpe.
The National Standards and Quality System Jean-Louis Racine The World Bank Cambridge, England April 19, 2007 Knowledge Economy Forum VI Technology Acquisition.
Industry Canada /strategis.ic.gc.ca Industrie Canada /strategis.ic.gc.ca March Canadian Experience with Suppliers Declaration of Conformity.
1 Mr. Bing Yuan Liou, Senior Specialist, Bureau of Standards, Metrology and Inspection, Ministry of Economic Affairs BSMI web site:
WTO, Trade and Environment Division
Trends in the Mechanisms to Facilitate the Acceptance of Conformity Assessment Results Barbara Fliess Trade Directorate, OECD Committee on TBT Workshop.
Reliability Provisions of EPAct of 2005 & FERC’s Final Rule
The Managing Authority –Keystone of the Control System
Harmonized implementation of CDM Accreditation CDM-Accreditation Panel.
International Telecommunication Union Geneva, July THE CERTIFICATION AND APPROVAL REGULATION FROM ANATEL - BRAZIL Julio Cesar Fonseca Technical.
International Telecommunication Union Accra, Ghana, June 2009 Conformance and Interoperability Testing: (WTSA-08) Resolution 76 Joshua Peprah Director,
International Telecommunication Union Quito, 6 July REGULATORY ASPECTS ON CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT AND HOMOLOGATION FOR TELECOMMUNICATION PRODUCTS.
Interoperability, why it is important Dr. Ghassem Koleyni FORUM ON NEXT GENERATION STANDARDIZATION (Colombo, Sri Lanka, 7-10 April 2009) Colombo, Sri Lanka,
Nairobi, Kenya, 26 – 27July 2010 Maintaining Equipment Standards to ensure good QoS Mwende Njiraini Engineer I/NT/LCS Communications Commission of Kenya.
1 ITU Interconnection Workshop 17 August 2001 Role of the Regulator K S Wong Office of the Telecommunications Authority Hong Kong, China.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Determine Eligibility Chapter 4. Determine Eligibility 4-2 Objectives Search for Customer on database Enter application signed date and eligibility determination.
Privacy Impact Assessment Future Directions TRICARE Management Activity HEALTH AFFAIRS 2009 Data Protection Seminar TMA Privacy Office.
EMS Checklist (ISO model)
NIH RESEARCH CONTRACTS
TRAINING FOR THE WEIGHTS AND MEASURES OFFICIAL COURSE CURRICULUM MODULE 1Introduction MODULE 2Laws & Regulations MODULE 3Enforcement Procedures MODULE.
Checking & Corrective Action
25 seconds left…...
Visual 3.1 Delegation of Authority & Management by Objectives Unit 3: Delegation of Authority & Management by Objectives.
FCC Actions To Support Development of WISPS Julius P. Knapp Deputy Chief Office of Engineering and Technology Federal Communications Commission.
ACTA and Part 68 Review and Update Responsible Party Code (RPC) Data Validation Program April 7, 2011 Jim Haynes, ACTA Chair.
An Overview of the Responsible Party’s Responsibility Following Part 68 Privatization.
The Old Rules Just Don’t Fit Anymore: A Panel Discussion on the Proposed Revision of the Telecommunications Act of 1996 John Windhausen, Jr., Past President,
American Certification Body - Your Online Resource for Regulatory Training 1588 ENERGYSTAR®
August 8, 2005USCEL - August FCC Update William Hurst Chief, Technical Research Branch Federal Communications Commission Office of Engineering and.
October 3, 2006TCBC Meeting October, 2006Slide 1 TCB Code of Practice Art Wall
1 Presented by Melinda Tan, International 11/05/05 SCHEME FOR RECOGNIZING FOREIGN CERTIFICATION BODIES FOR CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT OF TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT.
Industry Canada /strategis.ic.gc.ca Industrie Canada /strategis.ic.gc.ca 1 September 26, 2003, PCC.1 MRA Workshop Inter-American Mutual Recognition.
1 Regulatory Framework for C&I Regimes Presented by Andrew Kwan ITU Consultant Conformity and Interoperability Training for ARB Region on Type Approval.
Dennis Ward ATCB FCC Overview. CFR 47 FCC Regulation Part 2 General Requirements Part 5 Experimental Radio Service Part 15 Subpart C, D, and E Unlicensed.
Technical Regulations – U.S. Procedures and Practices U.S.-Brazil Commercial Dialogue Digital Video Conference Series August 22, 2006 Mary Saunders Chief,
Conformity Assessment Activities in Korea Conformity Assessment Activities in Korea CHOI, Woo Huk.
February 19-21, 2008 Hazim Dawood Telecommunications Engineering and Certification Canadian Update on MRA Implementation.
Certification Scheme for Information and Communications Equipment May 2005 Radio Research Laboratory Radio Research Laboratory Ministry of Information.
Doc.: IEEE /1119r0 Submission November 2005 Alistair Buttar, MotorolaSlide 1 Support for Emergency Calls Notice: This document has been prepared.
STANDARDS OVERVIEW Wednesday, April 30, 2015 KAREN RECZEK, STANDARDS COORDINATION OFFICE, NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY
The Value of Joining and Participating in Mutual Recognition Arrangements (MRA) Mick Owens International Standardisation Section International Training.
An Overview of the Administrative Council for Terminal Attachments (ACTA) The Federal Communications Commission’s Privatization of Certain 47 CFR Part.
An Overview of the Administrative Council for Terminal Attachments (ACTA) The Federal Communications Commission’s Privatization of 47 CFR Part 68 Presented.
March 14, 2002 (revised 2/13/2002) 1 Version of CISPR 22 used in the United States by the FCC William S. Hurst Office of Engineering and Technology Federal.
Office of Engineering and Technology 2006 ANNUAL REPORT January 17, 2007.
14 March 2002Update on SDoC - USA1 Update on Supplier’s Declaration of Conformity – USA William Hurst Federal Communications Commission Office of Engineering.
May 13, 2005TCB Workshop May TCB Accreditation Review William Hurst Chief, Technical Research Branch Federal Communications Commission Office of.
Deputy Head of Federal Accreditation Service Sergey V. Migin Approximation of accreditation systems of European Union and Russia.
14 March 2002Overview of TCB ProgramSlide 1 Overview of FCC Telecommunication Certification Body Program.
Conformity Assessment Requirements to Access the U.S. Market - An Overview - Steven Bipes Program Manager – Regional & Bilateral Policy.
Telecommunications Industry Association (TIA) ADVANCING GLOBAL COMMUNICATIONS.
High Level Symposium to Enhance Regulator Expertise on Good Regulatory Practices and the WTO Agreement on Technical Barriers to Trade.
Basics of the U.S. Table of Frequency Allocations
Equipment Authorization Update
FCC Regulations for Spread Spectrum Devices
Basics of the U.S. Table of Frequency Allocations
Test Requirements and Procedures
Premised on a comprise, Part 68 rules mandated that:
Stephen R Whitesell TR-41 Chair VTech Communications
Lecture 10: FCC Organization, Power and Structure
Presentation transcript:

US Regulatory Process FCC Equipment Authorization Program Karen Rackley Chief, Technical Rules Branch Federal Communications Commission Office of Engineering and Technology Policy and Rules Division

About the FCC The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is an independent United States government agency, directly responsible to Congress. The FCC was established by the Communications Act of 1934 and is charged with regulating interstate and international communications by radio, television, wire, satellite and cable. The FCC's jurisdiction covers the 50 states, the District of Columbia, and U.S. possessions. April 23, 2003 US Regulatory Process

Organization The FCC is directed by five Commissioners appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate for 5-year terms, except when filling an unexpired term. The President designates one of the Commissioners to serve as Chairperson. None of the Commissioners can have a financial interest in any Commission-related business. April 23, 2003 US Regulatory Process

Office of Engineering and Technology OET’s Mission Manage the spectrum and provide technical leadership to create new opportunities for innovative, competitive technologies and services for the American public FCC Laboratory Columbia, MD (40 km NE of DC) April 23, 2003 US Regulatory Process

OET’s Principal Functions Spectrum Management Technical Research and Analysis Network Reliability and Technology Authorization of Service Equipment Authorization Experimental Licensing Technical Education April 23, 2003 US Regulatory Process

Federal Communications Commission Federal Communications Commission (FCC) regulates the private sector telecommunications industry, in the public interest Establishes technical regulations for transmitters and other equipment to minimize their potential for causing interference to radio services. Administers an authorization program to ensure that equipment reaching the market complies with the technical requirements. Section 302 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, authorizes the Commission to make reasonable regulations, consistent with the public interest, governing the interference potential of equipment that emits radio frequency energy. The purpose of this provision is to ensure that radio transmitters and other electronic devices meet certain standards before they reach the market to control interference to radio services. The Commission carries out its responsibilities under Section 302 in two ways. First, the Commission establishes technical regulations for transmitters and other equipment to minimize their potential for causing interference to radio services. Second, the Commission administers and authorization program to ensure that equipment reaching the market complies with the technical requirements. April 23, 2003 US Regulatory Process

FCC Regulations Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations Transmitter specifications Radio Services EMC specifications Telephone Terminal Equipment Test Methods Equipment Authorization Requirement Marketing and Importation Rules April 23, 2003 US Regulatory Process

How are regulations made? Administrative Procedures Act (APA- 5 USC 553) Requires all US government agencies to give the public the opportunity to comment on any regulations that will affect them. FCC Rule Making Process Proposal Comments and Reply Final Rule (Report & Order) April 23, 2003 US Regulatory Process

Standards for RF Equipment Incidental Radiator Unintentional Radiator Intentional Radiator Licensed Transmitters April 23, 2003 US Regulatory Process

Incidental Radiators Generate radio frequency energy during the course of its operation although the device is not intentionally designed to generate or emit radio frequency energy. (§15.13) Manufacturers of these devices must employ good engineering practices to minimize the risk of harmful interference. Examples: DC motors mechanical light switches April 23, 2003 US Regulatory Process

Unintentional Radiators Part 15, Subpart B – Any device that intentionally generates RF energy, but does not intentionally radiate that energy Examples: Digital devices (computers, data processing equipment, etc.), Radio receivers that tune between 30-890 MHz, TV interface devices (VCRs, cable terminal devices, etc.) April 23, 2003 US Regulatory Process

Intentional Radiators Part 15, Subpart C – Lists frequency bands and types of operation permitted. Examples: Cordless Telephones Remote Switches, door controls, alarms Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) April 23, 2003 US Regulatory Process

Licensed Radio Services Transmitters that require either an individual license or a blanket authorization are subject to requirements of a specific radio service. General Mobile Radio Services (non-cellular) Personal Mobile Services Broadcast Radio Services Microwave Radio Services Maritime and Aviation Radio Services April 23, 2003 US Regulatory Process

Telephone Terminal Regulations 47 CFR Part 68 – Telephone Terminal Equipment (TTE) Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) Private Line Interfaces Analog Interfaces Digital Interfaces April 23, 2003 US Regulatory Process

Example – Spread Spectrum A number of telecom products, such as cordless telephones, have taken advantage of Spread Spectrum Spread spectrum technology was originally developed for military applications FCC first established provisions for Part 15 unlicensed spread spectrum devices in 1985 Little activity in first few years Then it started to grow! Spread spectrum technology was originally developed for military applications because it resists jamming and is difficult to detect. We first established provisions for unlicensed spread spectrum devices in 1985. There was little activity for the first few years, but then it started to grow! April 23, 2003 US Regulatory Process

Equipment Authorization Program The FCC currently has four equipment approval programs Verification Supplier Declaration of Conformity (SDoC) (Part 68) Declaration of Conformity (DoC) Certification The product approval requirement is specified in the rule part under which equipment operates All four programs involve the use of the private sector to varying degrees April 23, 2003 US Regulatory Process

Equipment Authorization Program Maximum Certification (Approved by FCC or TCB) The type of approval is specified in the rules for the particular type of device DoC (Self-approval using an accredited lab) SDoC (Part 68) (Self-approval Database by ACTA) Verification (Self-approval) Minimum April 23, 2003 US Regulatory Process

Why Use the Private Sector? Speed at which technology is changing and shorter product life cycles require faster product approvals The private sector has the technical expertise and ability to certify equipment. Increase the resources performing conformity assessment Efficiencies in designing and approving product in the same geographic location Reduce uncertainty and delay in obtaining certification April 23, 2003 US Regulatory Process

What is a TCB? A Telecommunication Certification Body is a Certification Body that has been accredited to ISO/IEC Guide 65 by a recognized Accrediting Organization and designated by the FCC to approve equipment subject to certification. A TCB has certain rights and responsibilities (equitable treatment of applicants, audit through sampling of equipment on market) Foreign entities may become a TCB in accordance with the terms of a government-to-government Mutual Recognition Agreement/Arrangement. April 23, 2003 US Regulatory Process

Certification Options Test and Evaluate Product to Determine Compliance F C G R A N T Submit Application to TCB Label Product and Instructions in User Manual Prepare Test Report and Application Submit Application to FCC Market Product April 23, 2003 US Regulatory Process

Equipment Authorization Application Trend Private Certification Bodies FCC April 23, 2003 US Regulatory Process

What is an MRA? Mutual Recognition Agreement/Arrangement (MRA) Mutually agree to accept test results and product approvals Use of harmonized technical standards is not part of an MRA April 23, 2003 US Regulatory Process

United States and MRAs The US Government has agreed to participate in three separate MRAs: European Union MRA Asian Pacific Economic Co-operation Tel MRA (APEC) Inter-American Commission for Telecommunications (CITEL MRA) April 23, 2003 US Regulatory Process

Identification of Players Regulatory Authority (RA) Federal Communications Commission (FCC) www.fcc.gov Designating Authority (DA) National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) www.nist.gov Accreditation Body (Phase 1) National Voluntary Lab Accreditation Program (NVLAP) & American Association of Lab Accreditation (A2LA) www.a2la.org AB (Phase 2) American National Standards Institute (ANSI) www.ansi.org April 23, 2003 US Regulatory Process

Summary Rulemaking process is open to all interested parties Opportunity to appeal decisions made by the regulatory authority Decisions are made by a five member independent Commission Rules provide for flexibility and innovation Use of the private sector: Development of technical standards Development of measurement procedures Conformity Assessment April 23, 2003 US Regulatory Process

Information On Line OET Info on line (Orders, Public Notices, etc.) http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/ http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/documents/ FCC Rules and Regulations http://www.fcc.gov/oet/info/rules/ General FCC Information http://www.fcc.gov April 23, 2003 US Regulatory Process

Questions and Answers Thanks! April 23, 2003 US Regulatory Process