The Regulatory Impact Analysis Statement (RIAS) in Canada

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Evaluation at NRCan: Information for Program Managers Strategic Evaluation Division Science & Policy Integration July 2012.
Advertisements

THE ROLE OF UNESCO NATCOMS Dr. Yvonne Donders Faculty of Law.
Publication of Proposed Regulations and the Consultation of Citizens The experience of the Government of Canadas official newspaper Rémi Massé Director,
1 Environmental Assessment of Trade Negotiations Government of Canada Approach WTO Public Forum September 25, 2006.
Matching the supply of technical assistance with recipient needs and ensuring best practices – a donor's experience Agust Jonsson, consultant
Office of Best Practice Regulation Best Practice Regulation Regulatory Impact Analysis Darrell Porter Office of Best Practice Regulation.
Transparency mechanisms in domestic regulation WTO Working Party on Domestic Regulation Workshop on Regulatory Practices Geneva, 11 April 2011.
Scottish Learning and Teaching Strategies Support Group Academy Scotland - Enhancement and Engagement 24 May 2007.
Draft Change Management Strategy Framework and Toolkit An Overview TAU Workshop: Vulindlela Academy (DBSA) 12 April 2012 Presenter: Dr Patrick Sokhela.
1 Looking at the TPBs Draft Participation Plan Presentation to the Transportation Planning Board July 18, 2007 Sarah Crawford Transportation Planner Department.
Singapore February 2001 Promoting Fair and Transparent Regulation in Securities Markets A Presentation to the APEC-OECD Co-operative Initiative on Regulatory.
SAI Performance Measurement Framework
OECD’s Engagement in Promoting Good Governance Plenary meeting of the Annual Conference “Development of Public Governance in Russia. The Present and the.
ISO
C.H. Montin, Manama 11 Manama, 20 January 2014 Regulatory Impact Assessment for Better Standards International Best Practices from OECD Charles-Henri Montin,
Standards experts. Accreditation solutions. Andrea Spencer Coordinator, WTO/NAFTA Enquiry Point (Canada) SPS Workshop on Transparency, Geneva October 18,
29e CONFÉRENCE INTERNATIONALE DES COMMISSAIRES À LA PROTECTION DES DONNÉES ET DE LA VIE PRIVÉE 29 th INTERNATIONAL DATA PROTECTION AND PRIVACY COMMISSIONERS.
C.H. Montin, Ankara 12 May Ankara, 12 May 2014 Further techniques to improve the design of legislation Charles-Henri Montin, Smart Regulation Consultant.
Brazil, EU and India Nairobi, 12. April Create horizontal disciplines across all NAMA sectors on NTBs Reduction and where appropriate elimination.
Introducing Regulatory Impact Analysis into the Turkish Legal Framework Prime Minister’s Office, Better Regulation Group The Project Implementation Team.
1 Regulatory Impact Assessment: Methodology and Best Practices David Shortall INMETRO International Workshop on Conformity Assessment Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
February 2007Federal Regulatory Improvement Commission.
Session 3 - Plenary on implementing Principle 1 on an Explicit Policy on Regulatory Quality, Principle 3 on Regulatory Oversight, and Principle 6 on Reviewing.
Applying the Federal Cabinet Directive on Streamlining Regulation Regulatory Craft in Nova Scotia Conference 2007 Halifax, Nova Scotia November 20, 2007.
Introduction to RIA and the Regulatory Governance Cycle. Improving the Design and Evaluation of Regulation and the Use of Regulatory Impact Analysis Israel.
1.  The views expressed are those of the speaker and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors, or the Federal Reserve.
Presentation by: Judith St-George - Director General
Standards experts. Accreditation solutions. Andrea Spencer Coordinator, WTO/NAFTA Enquiry Point (Canada) TBT Special Meeting on Procedures for Information.
Adviser, Ministry for State Reform, Lebanon
Culture Programme - Selection procedure Katharina Riediger Infoday Praha 10/06/2010.
Compliance with the WTO Technical Barriers to Trade Agreement and Steps Toward Developing Good Regulatory Practices Bryan O’Byrne Trade Compliance Center.
U.S Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration Federal Transit Administration Regional Workshop on Performance Management and Performance-Based.
Better Regulation Executive Making regulation work for everyone Introduction to Regulatory Impact Assessment Claire Chaubert February 2007.
1 Hsin Chu, August 2012 Regulatory Impact Assessment Charles-Henri Montin, Senior Regulatory Expert, Ministry of economy and finance, Paris
RIA and the case of Mexico Dr. Manuel Gerardo Flores Senior Economist Regulatory Policy Division OECD OECD-Israel Workshop on Improving the Design and.
Regulatory Impact Analysis – Lebanon Working Group IV: Focus Group on Public Service Delivery, Public-Private Partnership and Regulatory Reform Amman,
“Analytical Tools and Data Collection” Workshop April 2009 EuropeAid/125317/D/SER/TR Introduction: Course Objectives and RIA Context in Turkey.
Introducing Regulatory Impact Analysis into the Turkish Legal Framework “Training the Trainers” November 2008 RIA in the EU by Lydia Jørgensen, Senior.
RIA: Communication – building credibility Aleš Pecka Department of Regulatory Reform and Public Administration Quality Ministry of Interior, Czech Republic.
The Role of Peer Review in a Multilateral Framework on Competition Policy Andrea Bruce Investment Trade Policy UNCTAD Regional Seminar for Latin America.
Regulatory Impact Analysis (RIA) in OECD countries: a policy tool to manage the flow of regulation Regional Capacity-Building Seminar on “Drafting Legislation.
Compliance Promotion Formalizing an Approach to Support Stakeholder Compliance.
Faisal Naru Head of Better Regulation DAI Europe Ltd November 2007 Washington London Johannesburg Ramallah RIA – An Art and not a Science.
Regulatory Policy The Potential for Common Federal- Provincial-Territorial Policies on Regulation Robert Johnson Presentation for “Rules, Rules, Rules,
PUBLIC–PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP (PPP) FRAMEWORK AND GUIDELINES Syed M. Ali Zaidi, P.Eng. PM(Stanford), Ph.D. Director, Strategic Partnerships Alberta Infrastructure.
Introducing Regulatory Impact Analysis into the Turkish Legal Framework Improving Transparency, Consultation and Communication of RIAs March 2009.
Developing a Framework In Support of a Community of Practice in ABI Jason Newberry, Research Director Tanya Darisi, Senior Researcher
1 Seminar of Government Experts: Presentation by Canada Bonn Germany, May 16, 2005 Norine Smith Assistant deputy Minister Global Climate Affairs Environment.
The Committee on Technical Barriers to Trade Good Regulatory Practice Presentation by Mr. Margers Krams Chairman of the TBT Committee.
An overview of OECD Strategies for Improving Regulatory Performance Regulatory Reform and Building Governance Capacities – New Delhi 3 December 2009 Mr.
The United States Trade Representative  Is an agency within the Executive Office of the President  Approximately 200 people work at USTR  Negotiate.
Special Meeting on Procedures for Information Exchange November 7, 2007 Geneva Session 1 Anne Meininger United States USA WTO TBT Enquiry Point.
UK approach to independent scrutiny to achieve better regulation 30/05/16.
C.H. Montin, Tbilisi 11 Tbilisi, 12 November 2014 Developing Regulatory Impact Assessment In Georgia Overview of the RIA process & methodology Charles-Henri.
Civil Society Participation and Contribution to the UNCAC Review Process Towards Transparency – TI National Contact Vietnam UNCAC Self Assessment Process:
JSGS Professional Workshop Series Copyright ©Heather McWhinney, 2016 WRITING A CABINET DECISION ITEM.
Regulatory Impact Assessment in Poland
Session 3 General RIA Training 6–8 July 2009 EuropeAid/125317/D/SER/TR
Transparency and Coordination in Rulemaking
Regulatory Strategies and Solutions Group, LLC
Regulatory Strategies and Solutions Group, LLC
RIA: Communication – building credibility
Jennifer Stradtman, Director, Technical Barriers to Trade
OECD good practices for setting up an RIA system Regional Capacity-Building Seminar on Regulatory Impact Assessment Istanbul, Turkey 20 November 2007.
Stakeholder Engagement: Webinar Part I: The Regulatory Development Process for the Government of Canada Part II: Making Technical Regulations Under.
Overview of Good Regulatory Practice
Transparency and Coordination in Rulemaking
Workshop on GRP, Quito, Ecuador, 7-9 Nov. 2018
Presentation transcript:

The Regulatory Impact Analysis Statement (RIAS) in Canada Workshop on Good Regulatory Practice WTO TBT Committee March 18-19, 2008 Contact: Karen M. Zarrouki Regulatory Affairs Sector Treasury Board of Canada Secretariat, Ottawa, Canada

RIAS is the public face of regulation… Introduced in 1986 by the GC, RIAS describes the regulations and its impacts Identification of reason for regulating How Canadians have been consulted Impacts of the regulations Implementation, compliance and enforcement Performance measurement and evaluation Draft regulations are published, with the RIAS, in the Canada Gazette to give Canadians and other interested parties (e.g., international companies and governments) a chance to have input Within government, the RIAS is intended to provide better information for decision-makers 2

… and the new Canadian policy (CDSR) creates expectations for change. RIAS plays a fundamental role in the implementation of the Cabinet Directive on Streamlining Regulation (CDSR), the new Canadian regulatory policy Current RIAS is based on the 1999 Regulatory Policy and does not reflect the new the CDSR which came into force on April 1st, 2007 Canadians and business expressed a strong interest in seeing clearer, more transparent RIAS and more and better analysis As of April 1, 2008, the new RIAS format will be implemented to reflect the enhanced CDSR requirements 3

RIA assists in decision-making. Regulatory impact analysis: Enhances understanding of the reason for regulating Expresses the issue or problem, the objective of the regulation Demonstrates analysis of costs, benefits, risks, impacts on regulators and regulated parties, and how regulation provides a good solution Provides ministerial accountability The sponsoring minister is responsible to defend the regulatory proposal Public RIA provides opportunities for shared solutions Increases understanding of issue/problem Increases responsiveness of regulator Increases compliance by regulated parties 4

The decision-makers and the public will see: New and enhanced regulatory system Performance measurement, service standards, international regulatory cooperation, enhanced risk assessment and quantitative cost-benefit analysis Increased transparency and accountability Web links to analysis Summary “Cost-Benefit Statement” Performance measurement & evaluation Consistent information with a risk-based approach More effort on “high” impact regulations, less on “low” impact regulations 5

Canada’s new RIAS New RIAS intends to demonstrate and explain: Increased analysis and accountability (e.g., for costs and benefits, service standards, performance measurement) Choice of instrument (e.g., regulation, voluntary practice) Potential impacts on business, trade Life-cycle approach to regulating Links of proposed regulation to broad, government policy objectives 6

Benefits of RIA Consistency in approach for all federal regulators Accountability, transparency in decision-making by government officials and ministers Communication Tool Invites comments through consultation (e.g. Canada Gazette) Analysis of impact allows identification of potential areas for shared solutions allows for alternative approaches to be developed and considered 7

Challenges New CDSR enhances analysis included in RIAS, leading to an increased need for robust data and analytical requirements (mitigated by triage) Regulators must increased their effort to include new elements in RIAS and regulators must acquire new skills (mitigated by Centre of Regulatory Expertise, training, guides) Achieving common understanding of new requirements and consistent application across Government (mitigated by access to expertise and consistent advice from Centre) Culture change 8

Best Practices and Final Comments Developing improvements to the RIAS using a consultative approach Extensive consultation in Canada (EACSR) Working Groups in Government Comparing with international practices through OECD, WTO, SPP Consensus-building at many levels; Senior Executive (ADM) committee, officials for developing and implementation of tools and products Review the new RIAS before July 2008 to make any final adjustments Developing and increasing capacity and skills to use the new RIAS Guides developed (4 to date) accessible online Courses at the Canada School of Public Service Training seminars (Risk, Evidence-based Regulation) Tailoring analysis to fit different regulatory proposals Low versus Medium-High RIAS Using a consistent approach to determine impact level (Triage) 9

Old RIAS compared to new RIAS Annex A RIAS SECTIONS OLD RIAS LOW MEDIUM/HIGH NEW RIAS Executive summary √ Issue Objectives Description Regulatory & non-regulatory options Benefits & costs Rationale Consultation Implementation, enforcement & service standards √ (when required) Performance measurement & evaluation Contact 10

Key elements of the new Directive Annex B Necessary to regulate? Cost/benefit analysis Consultations Respect international obligations Identify rationale for approach International standards, guides and recommendations Performance based Cooperation (bilateral or multilateral) Life-cycle approach (continually meets initial policy objectives) 11

The Cabinet Directive on Streamlining Regulation is available at : Annex C The Cabinet Directive on Streamlining Regulation is available at : www.regulation.gc.ca 12