STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES (SLOs) “Reviewing” © Pennsylvania Department of Education.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

SLG Goals, Summative Evaluations, and Assessment Guidance Training LCSD#7 10/10/14.

Advertisements

Student Learning Objectives (SLO)

STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES (SLOs) “Designing” © Pennsylvania Department of Education.

Assessment Literacy Series

(B) FOR PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYES AND TEMPORARY PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYES WHO SERVE AS CLASSROOM TEACHERS, THE FOLLOWING SHALL APPLY: (1) BEGINNING IN THE

SLO Review Principal Meeting CLIU October Student Learning Objective REVIEW -Quality Assurance-

STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES (SLOs) 1 Orientation Module.

Student Learning Objectives Session 3 Denver Public Schools Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 2014.

May 14, May 14, 2015May 14, 2015May 14, 2015 Azusa, CA Sheldon X. Liang Ph. D. Software Engineering in CS at APU Azusa Pacific University, Azusa,

Applying Assessment to Learning

SLO Process A process to document a measure of educator effectiveness based on student achievement of content standards.

EPSS Part 2.  Learn the process for uploading artifacts to EPSS  Learn the process of aligning artifacts to components  Learn the process of editing.

These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by.

These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by.

IS&T Project Management: Project Management 101 June, 2006.

STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES (SLOs) 1 Heather Brown Denise Kaminski.

Title I Needs Assessment/ Program Evaluation Title I Technical Assistance & Networking Session October 5, 2010.

Assessment Literacy Series

Presented by Joanne Roberts, PHN, PSC Los Angeles County November 2, 2011 Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) and Quality Assurance (QA)

Process: A Generic View

STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES (SLOs) 1 Heather Brown Denise Kaminski.

“… Nothing anyone says will do any more than inspire you. You must internalize procedures to do a better job. To do this, you must try them out and receive.

Student Learning Objectives 1 Phase 3 Regional Training April 2013.

STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES (SLOs) Orientation Module © Pennsylvania Department of Education.

Student Learning Objectives (SLOs) 1 Michele Westphal.

1 Our Expertise and Commitment – Driving your Success An Introduction to Transformation Offering November 18, 2013 Offices in Boston, New York and Northern.

PENNSYLVANIA'S STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES (SLO) PROCESS School Leaders © Pennsylvania Department of Education.

1 Michigan Department of Education Office of School Improvement One Common Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)

Chapter 2 Process: A Generic View

Assessment Literacy Series 1 -Module 6- Quality Assurance & Form Reviews.

(B) FOR PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYES AND TEMPORARY PROFESSIONAL EMPLOYES WHO SERVE AS CLASSROOM TEACHERS, THE FOLLOWING SHALL APPLY: (1) BEGINNING IN THE

These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by.

1 ND Topical Call Series: NDTAC Resources to Meet Technical Assistance Needs (Call 3) 22 September 2015 – Katie Deal.

Student Learning Objectives (SLO)

ASDN/EED Educator Effectiveness Post-Conference Webinar 1 Wednesday, May 7, 2014.

Winter  Provide information and examples of the SLO process to help faculty use assessment to improve teaching and learning  Provide tools and.

Developing Structured Activity Tools. Aligning assessment methods and tools Often used where real work evidence not available / observable Method: Structured.

Effective Project Management: Traditional, Agile, Extreme Presented by (facilitator name) Managing Complexity in the Face of Uncertainty Ch08: How to Close.

Current and Future Applications of the Generic Statistical Business Process Model at Statistics Canada Laurie Reedman and Claude Julien May 5, 2010.

Evidence-Based Observations Training for Observers of Teachers Module 5 Dr. Marijo Pearson Dr. Mike Doughty Mr. John Schiess Spring 2012.

10/20/ The ISMS Compliance in 2009 GRC-ISMS Module for ISO Certification.

QUALITY ASSURANCE A process to ensure quality patient care.

Monitoring and Evaluation Management of a Training Program.

普华永道 Phase 1: Project Preparation Phase 1: Project Preparation Phase Overview Phase Overview.

EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS: 1 An Orientation for Teachers.

Montgomery County ESC Phase II: SLO Training.  In order to show growth you need to have a consistent framework between the pre- and post-assessments.

One Common Voice One Plan February 11, 2010 Office of Educational Improvement and Innovation and Office of Field Services.

SLG Goals: Reflecting on the First Attempt Oregon Collaboration Grant Statewide Grantee Meeting November 21, 2013.

March 23, NYSCSS Annual Conference Crossroads of Change: The Common Core in Social Studies.

Subgrant Goals and Activities Frostburg State University.

OHT 12.1 Galin, SQA from theory to implementation © Pearson Education Limited 2004 Introduction Types of external participants Risks and benefits of introducing.

These courseware materials are to be used in conjunction with Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e and are provided with permission by.

Student Learning Objectives 1 SCEE Summit Student Learning Objectives District Professional Development is the Key 2.

1 Chapter 2 A Generic View of Process Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6th edition by Roger S. Pressman.

Brian Parr- The University of Georgia. Lesson Planning Efficient use of time Curriculum alignment Document systematic approach to instruction.

Evaluate Phase Pertemuan Matakuliah: A0774/Information Technology Capital Budgeting Tahun: 2009.

CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS MANUAL

Software Engineering CE 501 Prepared by : Ashwin Raiyani.

 Rubrics for Literacy Learning.  What is your current view of rubrics? What do you know about them and what experiences have you had using them ? Self.

1 Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e Chapter 2 Process: A Generic View Software Engineering: A Practitioner’s Approach, 6/e Chapter 2.

January, 2010 Betsy Ott, Charlotte Creason Co-Chairs, Assessment Committee Molly McCoy Assistant Director, Institutional Effectiveness 1.

SLO P ROCESSES G UIDE This guide is a compilation of a series of SLO presentations over the last several years. This guide will serve as a review or for.

Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)

Software Verification and Validation

SLO Design, Build, Review: Using PDE’s Online Tools to Implement the SLO Process SAS Portal:

Program Quality Assurance Process Validation

Project Management Lifecycle Phases

Safe Work Method Statements

Educator Effectiveness Regional Workshop: Round 2

Effective Project Management: Traditional, Agile, Extreme

Presentation transcript:

STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVES (SLOs) “Reviewing” © Pennsylvania Department of Education

STUDENT LEARNING OBJECTIVE REVIEW -Quality Assurance-

3 Process Components Designing A.Goal Statement B.Targeted Standards C.Blueprints Building A.SLO Process Template B.Performance Measures Reviewing A.Quality Assurance

4 Session Objectives Educator Groups will: Conduct a multi-faceted, three-level quality assurance review of their SLO for: A.Completeness B.Comprehensiveness C.Coherency Note: All performance measures must be evaluated in terms of high quality and rigor.

5 Task Structure SLO Review 1. Completeness -SLO Process Template 2. Comprehensiveness -Performance Measures 3. Coherency -SLO Alignment

6 Design Coherency GOAL STATEMENT RATING PERFORMANCE MEASURE PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ALL STUDENTSFOCUSED STUDENTS

7 Helpful Tools Review FocusTool Completion of SLO Process Template Handout #4 – SLO Procedural “Cheat Sheet” Handout #5 – QA Checklist-SLO Comprehensiveness of the Performance Measures Template #6 – Performance Measure Rubric Refinement Control Checklist Coherency of SLO Template #7 – SLO Coherency Rubric *Note: Additional information regarding assessment quality can be found within the Quick Start Training

8 Final Deliverables Refined SLO Process Template with… A.Rigorous, high-quality performance measures; and, B.Identified areas needing further improvement (as documented within the SLO rubric).

Create the SLO Review for Completeness Evaluate SLO for Comprehensiveness Determine SLO Coherency Identify and Apply Corrective Actions 9 Generic Review Workflow

10 Summary The SLO Review phase was focused on: Applying a set of quality assurance criteria to ensure the SLO, along with its applicable performance measures were comprehensive, and coherent. Identifying areas of improvement in future SLO and/or performance measure development.