PROGRAM REVIEW FOR ADMINISTRATIVE AND BUSINESS SERVICES WHY??

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
What is Assessment? The university, with the support and encouragement of President Hitt and the Vice President team, engages in the institutional effectiveness.
Advertisements

How to write an effective job description
Directions for this Template  Use the Slide Master to make universal changes to the presentation, including inserting your organization’s logo –“View”
Using the New CAS Standards to Assess Your Transfer Student Programs and Services Janet Marling, Executive Director National Institute for the Study of.
TJC, Institutional Effectiveness And You. Definition Institutional Effectiveness is an ongoing, comprehensive, and institutionally integrated system,
THIS WORKSHOP WILL ADDRESS WHY THE FOLLOWING ARE IMPORTANT: 1. A comprehensive rationale for funding; 2. Measurable objectives and performance indicators/performance.
Campus Improvement Plans
Basic Principles of Successful Grant Writing
- Overview- Program Review and SLOs Preparing to Write the Self-Study Why? What? How? For more SLO resources see:
1 GETTING STARTED WITH ASSESSMENT Barbara Pennipede Associate Director of Assessment Office of Planning, Assessment and Research Office of Planning, Assessment.
Developing Performance Goals That Work For You and ANR Performance Training and Workshop for County Directors November 1, 2013.
ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP: SESSION 1 ADMINISTRATIVE SUPPORT SERVICES ACADEMIC AND STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES PRESENTED BY THE DIVISION OF INSTITUTIONAL EFFECTIVENESS.
Pace University Assessment Plan. Outline I. What is assessment? II. How does it apply to Pace? III. Who’s involved? IV. How will assessment be implemented.
Application Streamlining Initiative Kickoff Meeting August 23, 2011.
Columbia-Greene Community College The following presentation is a chronology of the College strategic planning process, plan and committee progress The.
How to Develop a Project Evaluation Plan Pat Gonzalez Office of Special Education Programs
Concept Analysis Document Executive Summary Template, (To view template instructions – Save this template to project files, reopen and then select View,
Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice from Federal Compliance to Accreditation by the Southern Association of Colleges and Schools.
Emily Lynn Grant Administrator Office of Sponsored Projects and Research Administration.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
2009 NWCCU Annual Meeting Overview of the Revised Accreditation Standards and New Oversight Process Ronald L. Baker Executive Vice President and Director,
Learning Outcomes Assessment in WEAVEonline
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
Student Learning Objectives: Considerations for Teachers of Career and Technical Education Courses Name Title Date 1 Copyright © 2014 American Institutes.
Accreditation, SLOs and You – What are the patient outcomes? or Will the patient survive? Facilitators: Janet Fulks and Phillip Maynard.
ANDREW LAMANQUE, PHD SPRING 2014 Status Report: Foothill Reaffirmation of Accreditation.
Rethinking Homelessness Their Future Depends on it!
A Step-by-Step Process to Robust Planning Annual Program Review.
Successfully Aligning Resources With Planning League of Innovation Conference March 10, 2013 Greg Nelson Vice President of Administrative Services Tammeil.
Proposal Development Sample Proposal Format Mahmoud K. El -Jafari College of Business and Economics Al-Quds University – Jerusalem April 11,2007.
Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 National Training and Technical Assistance Cooperative Agreements (NCA) Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) HRSA Objective.
By Nanette Chapa.  To realize the benefits of technology, schools must develop a plan for integrating technology into the curriculum. An effective technology.
Program Review & Evaluation Processes CSUSB 508/09/10 Presented by Kit Alvarez.
University Planning: Strategic Communication in Times of Change Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Texas State University-San Marcos Presented at the July.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
University of Idaho Successful External Program Review Archie George, Director Institutional Research and Assessment Jane Baillargeon, Assistant Director.
Project Life Cycle – Project Initiation © Ed Green Penn State University All Rights Reserved.
A Multi-Campus Model for Program Review & Integrated Institutional Planning Raúl Rodriguez, Ph.D., Chancellor 1.
University of Central Florida Assessment Toolkit for Academic, Student and Enrollment Services Dr. Mark Allen Poisel Dr. Ron Atwell Dr. Paula Krist Dr.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Why Do State and Federal Programs Require a Needs Assessment?
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research Review Taking Stock Collect evidence Principal Practices & the Rubric End-of-the-Year Looking.
Meeting the ‘Great Divide’: Establishing a Unified Culture for Planning and Assessment Cathy A. Fleuriet Ana Lisa Garza Presented at the 2006 Conference.
PROGRAM REVIEW FOR ADMINISTRATIVE AND BUSINESS SERVICES WHY?? Yes! You too!!! Presentation for the ASCCC Accreditation Institute – March 19, 2011.
The University of Kentucky Program Review Process for Administrative Units April 18 & 20, 2006 JoLynn Noe, Assistant Director Office of Assessment
August Priority 7 Review Team 7: Planning Subcommittee R. Hall-Allen, M. DesVignes, J. Moore, R. Romali, R. Tillberg Increase the resources available.
Student Learning Objectives. Introductions Training Norms Be present Actively participate in activities Respect time boundaries Use electronics respectfully.
Copyright © 2009 Intel Corporation. All rights reserved. Intel, the Intel logo, Intel Education Initiative, and the Intel Teach Program are trademarks.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
Presented By WVDE Title I Staff June 10, Fiscal Issues Maintain an updated inventory list, including the following information: description of.
Response due: March 15,  Directions state that the report must “focus on the institution’s resolution of the recommendations and Commission concerns.”
External Review Team: Roles and Responsibilities A Very Brief Training! conducted by JoLynn Noe Office of Assessment.
The Periodic Review Report and Middle States Accreditation PRR Workshop April 9, 2008.
School Development Implementation and Monitoring “Building a Learning Community”
California Department of Public Health / 1 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH Standards and Guidelines for Healthcare Surge during Emergencies How.
4-1 Use of Feasibility Studies and Consultants National Food Service Management Institute The University of Mississippi.
Institutional Effectiveness: Administrative and Educational Support Assessment Units A Practical Handbook Incorporating TracDat Terminology.
Getting to the Root of the Problem Learn to Serve 501 Commons November 6, 2013 Bill Broesamle.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
JROTC Program of Accreditation. Why JPA? We are accredited as a Special Program by AdvancEd Four Standards for Accreditation Purpose and Direction Governance.
Focused Midterm Report
Assessment Cycle and Academic Effect
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Understanding Academic Staff Promotion and Title Change
Integrated Budget Process as Evidence of Institutional Effectiveness
Sam Houston State University
Supporting SEACs across the Province:
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Sam Houston State University
Instructional Personnel Performance Appraisal System
Presentation transcript:

PROGRAM REVIEW FOR ADMINISTRATIVE AND BUSINESS SERVICES WHY??

Program review is required for administrative and business services with the expectation that these reviews will: Assess and evaluate the program’s impact on student learning Inform long and short term planning Inform budget recommendations Collect and analyze information that will be useful in the accreditation process, academic program review deliberation, and college-wide assessment

It’s a lot of work… Therefore, Keep It Simple! Borrow from others Make it fit your school Share the pain – get many people involved in small parts

ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAM REVIEW CONTENT Introduction A brief description of the unit under review Relationship of the unit to the college mission and strategic plan

ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAM REVIEW CONTENT Description of the unit Programs, services, activities, special accomplishments Key constituents Dissemination activities Relationship to or support for other programs Including areas of cooperation & collaboration Personnel Resources Financial Resources Facilities/Equipment Influencing Factors (Categorical funding/legal mandates) (Use a good visual/organizational chart. Saves writing a lot of words.)

ADMINISTRATIVE PROGRAM REVIEW CONTENT Goals and Outcomes Identify goals of the unit Identify measurable objectives or outcomes for each goal (Remember – the more goals, the more outcomes, the more measuring, so stay broad.)

Administrative Unit Outcomes Template Anticipated Administrative Unit Outcomes (AUO): Assessment Methods: Timeframe:Targets/Bench marks: Use of Results: What are you trying to do, or what AUO are you planning to assess? NO MORE THAN 2 What assessment methods do you plan to use? When Will Assessment Be Conducted and Reviewed? What is the minimum result, target, or value that represents success at achieving this outcome? How do you anticipate using the results from the assessment?

Self-Study Assessment Assessing the quality of the unit Programs and services as reported in evaluations provided by clients/constituents (Tie this to the goals and outcomes you have identified for the unit.) Procedures and effectiveness as reported in evaluations provided by staff and managers (Tie this to the goals and outcomes you have identified for the unit.)

Assessment Continued… Assessing the demand for the unit Demand for programs and services from clients or constituents Demand for programs and services from other units Unmet needs

Which leads you conveniently to $$$$ Financial Resources Current use of financial resources Adequacy of financial resources Unmet needs Facilities Equipment/supplies/technology Personnel

Making a case for $$ Need/O bjective Link to Academic or Student Service Program Review Requests Office/Perso n Responsible for Completion New Budget Needed for Completion Anticipated Completion/ Measure of Success* Result /Date (Fill in when complete) NoYes/E st. $ Unit’s needs and objectives contained in the annual Instructional or Student Service Program Reviews that could potentially impact your unit:

Making a case for $$ ActivitiesLink to Mission, District or Campus Strategic Initiatives, or SLO/AUO Office/Person Responsible for Completion New Budget Needed for Completion Anticipated Completion/ Measure of Success* Result /Date (Fill in when complete) NoYes/E st. $ Unit’s other major activities for year exclusive of those linked to instructional Or student service program reviews:

Making a case for Staffing Staff Position TitleBrief RationaleAnnual TCP* for each Employee Staff Positions Needed for Academic Year by title in rank order: * TCP = “Total Cost of Position” for one year is the cost of an average salary plus benefits for an individual. New positions (not replacement positions) also require space and equipment.

Making a case for Facilities or Equipment Equipment or Equipment Repair Brief RationaleAnnual TCO* Cost per item Number Requested Total Cost of Request Equipment or Equipment Repair Needed for Academic Year for unit on its campus in rank order: * TCO = “Total Cost of Ownership” for one year is the average cost for one year. Facilities NeedsBrief RationaleAnnual TCO* Facilities Needs NOT covered by current building or remodeling Projects:

Making a case for Professional Development Professional Development Needs Brief Rationale (in response to AUO findings or needed to update skills) Annual TCO* Cost per item Number Requested Total Cost of Request Professional Development Needs not covered by current budget: Use data and findings from Administrative Unit Outcomes Research to justify Professional Development needs.

Rubric for Evaluating AUOs ItemCriteriaDoes not Meet Criteria Meets Criteria Mission and Goals  the objective is tied to the college mission and the unit goals Adapted from Mt Sac APPENDIX D: AUO CHECKLIST

Rubric for Evaluating AUOs ItemCriteriaDoes not Meet Criteria Meets Criteria Intended Objectives  is current  aligns with department goals  is reasonable given the scope of the experience  states that the unit will provide, improve, decrease or that the clients will understand, be satisfied with or receive specific service  is measurable (can be observed or tested)  is central to the unit Adapted from Mt Sac APPENDIX D: AUO CHECKLIST

Rubric for Evaluating AUOs ItemCriteriaDoes not Meet Criteria Meets Criteria Means of Assessment  identifies specific assessment method category (focus group, survey, etc.) for the objective  details the assessment method used to measure the objective Adapted from Mt Sac APPENDIX D: AUO CHECKLIST

Rubric for Evaluating AUOs Item Criteria Does not Meet Criteria Meets Criteria Targets and Benchmarks: Criteria for Success  establishes minimum expected score for success at achieving objective  quantifies (%, fraction or actual number) of clients who are expected to meet minimum score  indicates consideration of alternate data (previous AUO assessment effort(s), external reports), if available (optional) Adapted from Mt Sac APPENDIX D: AUO CHECKLIST

Rubric for Evaluating AUOs Item Criteria Does not Meet Criteria Meets Criteria Time Frame  specifies the time frame in which objective will be assessed  specifies who will administer the assessment Evaluation  identifies evaluator(s)  specifies evaluation process  attach relevant document(s), if applicable Adapted from Mt Sac APPENDIX D: AUO CHECKLIST

Rubric for Evaluating AUOs Item Criteria Does not Meet Criteria Meets Criteria Summary of Data  addresses the means of assessment and criteria for success  reports the actual results and compare with the number (%, fraction, actual number) originally expected to meet the minimum score  includes additional data for sub- category  highlights key findings from the data, if applicable Adapted from Mt Sac APPENDIX D: AUO CHECKLIST

Rubric for Evaluating AUOs Item Criteria Does not Meet Criteria Meets Criteria Use of Results  reports what the department/unit members have done or are doing as a result of the findings  identifies who has made or is making the changes  indicates the time frame for the changes Adapted from Mt Sac APPENDIX D: AUO CHECKLIST

Useful Resources Riverside Community College Foothill College Mt. San Jacinto Community College Saddleback Community College Western Nevada College Florida Keys Community College University of Central Florida

Presenters Yolanda Bellisimo – SLO Facilitator, College of Marin Sara McKinnon – Academic Senate President, College of Marin