Noel Cole, Coordinator Michigan Department of Education, Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Preschool Special Education A Review of State Performance Indicators and The Child Outreach Network.
Advertisements

Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619* Part C to B Transition by Three Jessica Brady, Noel Cole Michigan Department of Education Office.
From Here to Here Transition from Infant and Toddler Connection Programs to ECSE School Division Programs.
Building a national system to measure child and family outcomes from early intervention Early Childhood Outcomes Center International Society on Early.
Transition from Part C to Part B in Louisiana (Session # S & 115)
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements.
Presented at: Annual Conference of the American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA - November 3, 2011 Performance Management in Action: A National System.
Michigan Part C and Part B Collaboration Noel Cole and Lisa Wasacz, Consultants Michigan Department of Education Office of Early Childhood Education and.
Update on Child Outcomes for Early Childhood Special Education Lynne Kahn ECO at UNC The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center The National Association.
2011 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career 2.0 The Results are In: Using Early Childhood Outcome Data.
Early Childhood Outcomes ECO Institute Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Robin Rooney ECO at FPG Prepared for the Office of Early Learning and School Readiness.
1 Measuring Child Outcomes: State of the Nation. 2 Learning objective: To gain new information about the national picture regarding measuring child outcomes.
Highs and Lows on the Road to High Quality Data American Evaluation Association Anaheim, CA November, 2011 Kathy Hebbeler and Lynne Kahn ECO at SRI International.
CHILD OUTCOMES BASELINE AND TARGETS FOR INDICATOR 7 ON THE STATE PERFORMANCE PLAN State Advisory Panel for Exceptional Children November 12, 2009 January.
The Results are In! Child Outcomes for OSEP EI and ECSE Programs Donna Spiker Early Childhood Outcomes Center at SRI International October 13, 2011 (CCSSO-SCASS.
Update on Part C Child Outcomes Lynne Kahn ECO at UNC The Early Childhood Outcomes (ECO) Center June 2011 Kathy Hebbeler ECO at SRI International.
The Results are In: Using Early Childhood Outcome Data Kathy Hebbeler Early Childhood Outcomes Center at SRI International August, 2011.
Presented at Division for Early Childhood National Harbor, Maryland November, Child Outcomes: What We Are Learning from National, State, and Local.
Updates on APR Reporting for Early Childhood Outcomes (Indicators C-3 and B-7) Western Regional Resource Center APR Clinic 2010 November 1-3, 2010 San.
Child Outcomes Data July 1, 2008 – June 30, 2009.
Early Childhood Outcomes Center Using the Child Outcomes Summary Form February 2007.
The Current Status of States' Early Childhood Outcome Measurement Systems Kathy Hebbeler, SRI International Lynne Kahn, FPG Child Dev Inst October 17,
Partnering with Local Programs to Interpret and Use Outcomes Data Delaware’s Part B 619 Program September 20, 2011 Verna Thompson & Tony Ruggiero Delaware.
1 Early Childhood Special Education Connecticut State Department of Education Early Childhood Special Education Maria Synodi.
2013 Office of Special Education (OSE) Fall Forum Tuesday, November 4, 2013  10:15 am – 11:45 am  Ballroom E Jayme Kraus Data Analyst, Performance Reporting.
Target Setting For Indicator #7 Child Outcomes WDPI Stakeholder Group December 16, 2009 Ruth Chvojicek Statewide Child Outcomes Coordinator 1 OSEP Child.
Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Lynne Kahn, ECO at FPG Christina Kasprzak, ECO at FPG Cornelia Taylor, ECO at SRI Lauren Barton, ECO at SRI National Picture.
Erin Arango-Escalante & Sandra Parker. EC Indicators At-a-Glance.
MSDS Report: Student Count by Primary Ed Setting Sample Report Center for Educational Performance and Information - Michigan Student Data System Student.
ND Early Childhood Outcomes Process Nancy Skorheim – ND Department of Public Instruction, Office of Special Education.
OSEP National Early Childhood Conference December 2007.
Preparing the Next Generation of Professionals to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Early Intervention and Preschool Special Education Lynne Kahn Kathy.
Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Results of FFY 2007 Monitoring Indicators For The Annual Performance Report & State Performance Plan.
UNDERSTANDING THE THREE CHILD OUTCOMES 1 Maryland State Department of Education - Division of Special Education/Early Intervention Services.
Early Childhood Education for ALL Young Children: A Look at the IDEA Six-Year State Performance Plan Susan Crowther IDEA, Part B, Section 619 Coordinator.
Overview to Measuring Early Childhood Outcomes Ruth Littlefield, NH Department of Education Lynne Kahn, FPG Child Dev Inst November 16,
1 Measuring Child Outcomes: State of the Nation. 2 Learning objective: To gain new information about the national picture regarding measuring child outcomes.
1 Charting the Course: Smoother Data Sharing for Effective Early Childhood Transition Wisconsin’s Journey Lori Wittemann, Wisconsin Department of Health.
2012 OSEP Leadership Conference Leading Together to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career Child Outcomes for Early Intervention and Preschool Special Education:
JANUARY 6, 2014 VERNA THOMPSON Delaware 619 Meeting.
Delaware Child Outcomes Part C and 619 Collaboration Measuring Child and Family Outcomes July 30, 2010 Arlington, Virginia.
Understanding and Using Early Childhood Outcome (ECO) Data for Program Improvement Kansas Division for Early Childhood Annual Conference Feb. 23rd 2012.
Aren’t they all the same? Differences Between Part B, Part C, and Michigan Mandatory Special Education (MMSE) Teri Johnson Assistant Director of Special.
Early Childhood Special Education Part B, Section 619 Measurement of Preschool Outcomes-SPP Indicator #7 Training Sessions-2010.
Understanding and Using Early Childhood Outcome (ECO) Data for Program Improvement TASN – KITS Fall 2012 Webinar August 31 st, 2012 Tiffany Smith Phoebe.
1 Indicator 7 Child Outcomes: Changes & Updates June 2011 Indicator 7 Child Outcomes: Changes & Updates June 2011.
Presented at ECEA-SCASS Meeting Savannah, Georgia October, 2010 OSEP Initiatives on Early Childhood Outcomes Kathy Hebbeler Early Childhood Outcomes Center.
1 Indicator 6: Preschool in the LRE Massachusetts Patricia Cameron, 619 Coordinator, Department of Early Education and Care Donna Traynham, Elementary.
Early Childhood Transition Part C Indicator C-8 & Part B Indicator B-12 Analysis and Summary Report of All States’ Annual Performance Reports.
Indicator 7: Measuring Preschool Outcomes Sarah Geldart – MA ESE – Additional Contact:
Why Collect Outcome Data? Early Childhood Outcomes Center.
Office of Special Education and Early Intervention Services UPDATES October 2010.
Parent and National TA Perspectives on EC Outcomes Connie Hawkins, Region 2 PTAC Kathy Hebbeler, ECO at SRI Lynne Kahn ECO at FPG and NECTAC.
Vanessa Winborne Kelly Hurshe Colleen O’Connor EARLY ON ® UPDATES.
Early Intervention Colorado TA Call December 5, 2013 Annual Performance Report.
Measuring EC Outcomes DEC Conference Presentation 2010 Cornelia Taylor, ECO Christina Kasprzak, ECO/NECTAC Lisa Backer, MN DOE 1.
Early Childhood Outcomes Trying to Get The Word Out Maria Synodi, 619 Coordinator Connecticut State Department of Education NECTAC National TA Meeting.
Child Outcomes Summary Process April 26, 2017
Child Outcomes Data: A Critical Lever for Systems Change
Early Childhood Outcomes Data (Indicator C3 and B7)
IDEA Part C and Part B Section 619 National Child Outcomes Results for
Webinar for the Massachusetts ICC Retreat October 3, 2012
Building Capacity to Use Child Outcomes Data to Improve Systems and Practices 2018 DEC Conference.
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Understanding Indicator 6: Early Childhood Special Education Settings for Children Ages Birth-Five Hello and welcome to Understanding Indicator 6: Early.
Measuring Part C and Early Childhood Special Education Child Outcomes
Refresher: Background on Federal and State Requirements
Christina Kasprzak Frank Porter Graham Child Development Institute
Early Childhood Outcomes Data (Indicator C3 and B7)
Presentation transcript:

Noel Cole, Coordinator Michigan Department of Education, Office of Early Childhood Education and Family Services Kelli Jolly, Trainer and TA Clinton County RESA, Office of Innovative Projects Early Childhood Special Education (ECSE) Updates

Agenda 1. Welcome 2. Preschool Outcomes (Indicator B-7) a. Trends in performance data b. Understanding the decrease in performance c. Strategies for improving data collection and reporting d. Regional training 3. Child Outcomes Manual Update Preschool Education Environments (Indicator B-6) a. New codes in the MSDS b. Improving Quality Inclusion Programs Training 4. Transition (Indicator B-12) a. B-12 verification b. Updated Transition Guide 5. ARRA Funds

Early Childhood Special Education Federal Indicators Preschool Special Education Environments Preschool Outcomes Early Childhood Transition

Preschool Outcomes Percent of preschool children with improved : Positive social-emotional skills Acquisition and use of knowledge and skills Use of appropriate behaviors

Trends in performance data Positive Social-Emotional Skills Summary Statement 1: Of those children who entered the program below expectation in Outcome A, the percent who substantially increased their rate of growth by the time they turned six years of age or exited the program. FFYBaselineTargetActual % % 85.5% % 81.1% Summary Statement 2: The percent of children who were functioning within age expectations in Outcome A by the time they turned six years of age or exited the program. FFYBaselineTargetActual % % 59.8% % 56.5%

Trends in performance data Acquiring and Using Knowledge and Skills Summary Statement 1: Of those children who entered the program below expectation in Outcome B, the percent who substantially increased their rate of growth by the time they turned six years of age or exited the program. FFYBaselineTargetActual % % 86.8% % 82.1% Summary Statement 2: The percent of children who were functioning within age expectations in Outcome B by the time they turned six years of age or exited the program. FFYBaselineTargetActual % % 58.2% % 56.6%

Trends in performance data Use of Appropriate Behaviors to Meet Needs Summary Statement 1: Of those children who entered the program below expectation in Outcome C, the percent who substantially increased their rate of growth by the time they turned six years of age or exited the program. FFYBaselineTargetActual % % 87.7% % 80.6% Summary Statement 2: The percent of children who were functioning within age expectations in Outcome C by the time they turned six years of age or exited the program. FFYBaselineTargetActual % % 71.6% % 62.5%

Understanding the decrease in performance ECSE Population Change in data systems Missing data issues

Strategies for improving data collection and reporting Frequent data checks Increased TA Development of online TA materials

Regional Training through EOT&TA Child Outcomes Training, January 25 Regional Training, Spring 2012 Online Training Registration will be available at eotta.ccresa.org

Child Outcomes Manual Updated version of Outcomes Manual Online version

Preschool Educational Environments Percent of preschool children with IEPs who receive special education and related services in setting with typically developing peers (e.g., early childhood settings, home, and part-time early childhood/part-time early childhood special education setting). (20 U.S.C. 1416(a) (3) (A))

New codes in the MSDS Available on CEPI website at 986_50502_ ,00.html 986_50502_ ,00.html Preschool Educational Environments Decision Tree and Worksheet that have been used in hard copy have crosswalks to MSDS codes on ECSE website (see resources) Preschool Educational Environments Data is due in MSDS with the Special Education Child Count on October 5 Data for the is NOT going to be reported in the APR or to districts. Expected to be reported to OSEP for school year.

Improving Quality Inclusion Programs Training Quality Inclusion Strategies Individual Child Focused Strategies Collaborative Inclusion Strategies for Early Childhood Special Education and Regular Education Teachers

Early Childhood Transition Percent of children referred by Part C Prior to age 3, found eligible for Part B and had an IEP developed and implemented by the third birthday.

B-12 Verification Updates B-12 Data Verification Activity is in the CIMS system B-12 Data Verification Activity is to be done by ISD CIMS Coordinators Collaboration is necessary between Early On and LEAs to complete this activity Verified spreadsheets are due into the CIMS system by October 4

Transition Guide Has been updated since the school year to reflect: Changes in compliance definitions from OSEP Description of compliance and improvement activities

ARRA Funds MUST be allocated by September 30 AND spent by November 29 Implications for not spending funds Communication from MDE

Questions?

Resources ECSE Webpage EOT&TA Webpage National Early Childhood Technical Assistance Center (NECTAC) Early Childhood Outcomes Center Continuous Improvement and Monitoring System (CIMS) National Transition Center