Ted S. Hasselbring Margaret E. Bausch National Assistive Technology Research Institute University of Kentucky Teacher Education Division Conference Albuquerque,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Guidelines for IDEA Implementation Developed and Presented through Collaborative Efforts RIDE – Office of Special Populations Rhode Island Technical.
Advertisements

IEP Training for Kansas Schools 2013 – 2014 Kansas State Department of Education Technical Assistance System Network Services Special Factors/Considerations.
Working with Parents of a Child with Disabilities Perry C. Hanavan, Au.D.
Section 504 and ADAAA Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973
The IEP Individualized Educational Program. The IEP is the process and document that outlines what a free appropriate public education (FAPE) is for an.
1 ADVOCACYDENVER Special Education 101 Pamela Bisceglia Advocate for Children and Inclusive Policy Implementation August 31, 2011.
1 Massachusetts DOE IEP Transition Process FUTURE.
The Role of the Educator in the IEP Process. A Little History… The 70’s 1. Public Law : Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
Entitlement vs. Eligibility The Differences Between Public and Postsecondary Education for Individuals With Disabilities March 30, 2011 Gus Ekhardt, M.Ed.
Surrogate Parent Training
Early Childhood Transition Forums Sponsored by the Massachusetts Department of Early Education and Care, Department of Elementary and Secondary Education,
Student 504 Uintah High School Training March 6, 2014.
1 Students with Disabilities: High School to College U.S. Department of Education Office for Civil Rights.
1 Academic Adjustments & Auxiliary Aids & Documentation Office for Civil Rights US Department of Education This presentation is not to be reproduced in.
Assistive Technology Works: Legislation, Definitions and Benefits
Laws and Family Rights. Why are federal laws important?  Empowers families to advocate for their children  Aids individuals with disabilities in decision.
An Overview of the Law 1 Free Appropriate Public Education (FAPE)
No One Can Stop Me Now Educational Rights of Children With Disabilities Bonnie B. Roswig Senior Staff Attorney Medical-Legal Partnership Project Center.
A Model for Developing AT Competencies for Education Professionals Brian W. Wojcik George R. Peterson-Karlan H Phillips Parette SEAT Center, Illinois State.
ELIGIBILITY PROCEDURES FOR SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES Chapter Seventeen.
Special Education Adrienne Lacey-Bushell, Ed.D. Director Special Education.
Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 Las Cruces Public Schools Technical Assistance Training Department of Learning, Teaching and Research.
Margaret Rose McDonnell Kathleen A. Rinehart.  The IDEA – ◦ Applies from birth to age 21, or until the student receives the regular education diploma.
Shelley Ardis Florida School for the Deaf and the Blind Outreach Services: 30 Years of Successful Services.
Overview of Section 504. What is Section 504? ● Section 504 is a part of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 that prohibits discrimination based upon disability.
Rising to the Challenge of Transitioning from High School to Higher Education November 21, 2008 Debra Spotts Merchant, JD University of Cincinnati.
Special Education Policies, Practices, and Programs
Preparing for Success: The Individualized Education Program August 2015 New Teacher Institute 1.
Skills and Achievement Commencement Credential
ACCOMMODATIONS. Step 1 Expect students with disabilities to achieve grade level academic content standards.
The 411 on IEPs and Section 504s Claudia Otto, Ph.D. Oklahoma Department of Career & Technology Education March 10, 2015.
Margaret E. Bausch National Assistive Technology Research Institute University of Kentucky TED/TAM Conference San Diego, CA November 10, 2006 AT Training.
Getting Oriented to Exceptionality and Special Education There is no single accepted theory of normal development, so relatively few definite statements.
Section 504 / ADA. Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA) A civil rights law enacted in 1990; A civil rights law enacted in 1990; Prohibits discrimination.
Targeted Assistance Programs: Requirements and Implementation Spring Title I Statewide Conference May 15, 2014.
Rebecca C. Cory, PhD. Manager, Disability Services North Seattle Community College.
Bilingual Students and the Law n Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 n Title VII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act - The Bilingual Education.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
2010 OSEP Leadership Mega Conference Collaboration to Achieve Success from Cradle to Career Students with Disabilities: High School to College U.S. Department.
YOUTH TRANSITION PROGRAM (YTP) PUT INTO PRACTICE Reynolds School District.
1 Charting the Course: Smoother Data Sharing for Effective Early Childhood Transition Wisconsin’s Journey Lori Wittemann, Wisconsin Department of Health.
Overview of Title I Part A Prepared by: Title I Staff - Office of Superintendent of Instruction OSPI Dr. Bill Wadlington, Superintendent/Principal and.
Melinda Jones Ault University of Kentucky Technology Innovators’ Conference Washington D.C. November 16, 2004 Working with Schools: Innovative Research.
Children With Disabilities Enrolled by Their Parents in Private Schools 34 CFR §§ Equitable Participation (EP) Child Find Free and Appropriate.
SPED 473 Emotional/Behavioral Disorders Assistive Technology.
Chapter Two Policies, Practices, and Programs. Key Special Education Court Cases  Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, Kansas (1954)  PARC v. Commonwealth.
Legislation for Children with Disabilities Ms. Boldt.
Ted S. Hasselbring Margaret E. Bausch Melinda Jones Ault National Assistive Technology Research Institute University of Kentucky First Annual TED/TAM Conference.
Historical and Legal Perspectives of Assistive Technology BJ Gallagher, Ph.D., CCC-SLP.
Special Education: Our Future Role and Needed Policy Supports.
Climbing the Ladder Special Education OVERVIEW Niles North High School, District 219.
The IEP Process MAASE New Administrators Workshop October 2010.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
AN MCTC COMMUNITY APPROACH ACCOMMODATING STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES.
M a r g a r e t E. B a u s c h M e l i n d a J o n e s A u l t Minneapolis, MN October 21, 2005 Nationwide Use of Assistive Technology Implementation Plans.
 ask in writing for evaluation; keep a copy of the request  explain child’s problems and why evaluation is needed  share important information with.
Assistive Technology Laws by: Family Center on Technology and Disability.
Ted S. Hasselbring Margaret E. Bausch Melinda Jones Ault Orlando, FL January 19, 2006 Using Assistive Technology Implementation Plans Unversty of Kentucky.
C HAPTER 5 Individuals With Disabilities EDAD 859 By: Group 2.
SPED 494/594 Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act.
Chapter 1 Introduction to Adapted Physical Education and Sport 1 Introduction to Adapted Physical Education and Sport Joseph P. Winnick C H A P T E R.
Student with Disabilities and transitioning HIGHER ED AND THE WORKFORCE.
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) 1990 What Teachers Should know about Title II – Public Educational Institutions. Presented by Janie Beverley.
The PDA Center is funded by the US Department of Education Office of Special Education Programs Stories from the Field and from our Consumers Building.
OSEP-Funded TA and Data Centers David Guardino, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education.
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
Section 504 training.
Assistive Technology Laws
Developing and Revising Schoolwide Plans
Assistive Technology Laws
Presentation transcript:

Ted S. Hasselbring Margaret E. Bausch National Assistive Technology Research Institute University of Kentucky Teacher Education Division Conference Albuquerque, NM November 11, 2004 Are Assistive Technology Knowledge Skills Being Developed at the Preservice Level?

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky NATRI Overview of NATRI Need for AT Personnel Federal Legislation State AT Policies Status of AT Users Family Teacher and Student Perspectives of AT Skills Required by AT Service Providers Current Status of AT Personnel Summary

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky What is NATRI? National Assistive Technology Research Institute Overview of NATRI

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky NATRI Funded by the U.S. Department of Education, Office of Special Education Programs Cooperative Agreement Funded October 1, year project - extended for 18 months $2.8 million award Jane Hauser - Project Officer B ackground

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky NATRI To examine factors related to the planning, development, implementation, and evaluation of AT services in schools To disseminate the findings of the research in ways that will assist school personnel to develop or improve AT policies and practices for students with disabilities P roject G oals

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky NATRI 1- Status of AT use in schools and the role it provides in education 2- Policies & procedures in the development and delivery of AT services 3- AT decision-making by IEP teams 4- Integration of AT use in learning environments (facilitate instruction, access to curriculum) 5- Effects of AT use on academic, social, functional performance of students 6- Training and technical support needed by persons implementing AT 7- Extent to which IHEs are developing AT knowledge and skills 7 P roposed R esearch A reas

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky NATRI - State Case Study

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky NATRI - State Case Study States: CA, FL, KY, OR, TX, VA, WI, KS, MA, MT Subjects: State Department of Education Personnel, Local Education Agency Personnel, School Personnel, Classroom Teachers, Parents, and Students P articipants

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky Study of 10 states Six districts in each state Ten students in each district 10 X 6 X 10 = 600 students Currently > 200 AT data collectors P articipants NATRI - State Case Study

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky NATRI - State Case Study On-Site Data Collection Train team of local AT data collectors Select target students using AT Distribute and gather permission letters and consent forms Obtain demographic data on students, AT data collectors, and teachers Conduct classroom observations Attend IEP meetings Interview teachers, parents, and students Conduct follow-up interviews P rocedures

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky Need for AT Personnel Federal Legislation State AT Policies Status of AT Users Family Teacher & Students Perspectives of AT

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky Act to Promote the Education of the Blind (1879) Enacted a system to provide free school books and tangible apparatus for students who were blind Named the American Printing House for the Blind in Louisville, KY as the national central source of the educational materials. Federal Legislation

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky In the mid-1930’s, the federal government supported the development of “Talking Books for the Blind.” Federal Legislation

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky Federal Legislation - 60’s & 70’s Captioned Films Act Aided in the development of captioning on feature films. Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) Funded materials and equipment for schools to aid economically disadvantaged and children with special needs. Section 504 of the Vocational Rehabilitation Act Amendments of 1973 “No otherwise qualified individual with a disability...shall, solely by reason of his or her disability, be excluded from the participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving federal financial assistance…” 29 U.S.C. 794.

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky Education for All Handicapped Children Act (P.L ) FAPE which emphasized special education and related services designed to meet unique needs. P.L Amendments Included younger children and their families. Technology-Related Assistance for Individuals with Disabilities Act of 1988 (P.L )Tech Act Defined assistive technology and addressed access, trained personnel, and financing. It provided funds for states that wished to implement assistive technology services. Federal Legislation - 70’s & 80’s

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky Included assistive technology as an integral part of the legislation. “Supplementary Aids and Services” for the first time included assistive technology devices and services. History of AT Legislation - 90’s Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990 (IDEA) (P.L ) Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Civil rights law for people with disabilities of all ages. “No qualified individual with a disability shall, by reason of such disability, be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits or the services, programs or activities of a public entity….” 42 U.S.C

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky Includes a statement that ALL students with an IEP must be considered for Assistive Technology. Federal Legislation - 90’s & beyond Supports programs of grants to States to address the AT needs of individuals with disabilities Assistive Technology Act of 1998 & 2004 Individuals with Disabilities Education Act Amendments of 1997 (P.L )

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky Need for AT Personnel Federal Legislation State AT Policies Status of AT Users Family Teacher & Students Perspectives of AT

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky State Policy Survey 92% of states and 40% circulate AT policies, guidelines or technical assistance documents 50 states, DC, & 7 territories circulate some AT documents Documentation of AT consideration in the IEP was required by 90% of states and 70% of the territories Special Education Directors in 50 states, DC & 10 U.S. territories

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky Need for AT Personnel Federal Legislation State AT Policies Status of AT Users Family Teacher & Students Perspectives of AT

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky S tatus of AT U sers AT is being used in schools - extent is unknown AT is reported to be used more often by students with low incidence disabilities AT is being used across all grade levels preschool – 12 grade and through the transition process AT is use to aid all areas of human function, but mostly communication High tech devices are more often reported than low tech although both are used

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky Need for AT Personnel Federal Legislation State AT Policies Status of AT Users Family Teacher & Students Perspectives of AT

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky W hat W e A re H earing from T eachers A lack of knowledge about state AT policies and products Desire for AT training/certification Depend on personnel with AT expertise Receive some 1:1 training - vendors, service providers Request help with individual students

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky W hat W e A re H earing from T eachers Seek assistance They do reach out to apply knowledge to students - they do know who to contact Lack of adequate time Keep abreast of new technology In-class assistance AT has positive impact on student’s lives

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky W hat W e A re H earing from F amilies Lack of knowledge about AT funding Involvement in decision-making varies Desire for more training AT has a positive impact on their children’s lives

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky W hat W e A re H earing from S tudents AT has positive impact on their lives Most are very positive about their AT - some complaints about malfunctions AT service delivery could be better Satisfaction with specific devices Involvement in decision-making and evaluation

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky Skills Required by AT Service Providers

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky Skills Required by AT providers Assess/evaluate students Match students need to devices Consult with faculty and/or individual teachers Train students, teachers, families on using a specific device Collaborate with IEP team members

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky Provide professional development trainings to school staff Purchase equipment Collaborate with other staff to include students into the general education classroom Adapt and modify the curriculum Follow-up and evaluate AT implementation Skills Required by AT providers

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky Current Status of AT Service Providers

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky 173 AT Service Providers Served as NATRI data collectors Representing 8 states 32 school districts S ubjects Current Status of AT Personnel

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky 24% Speech/Language/Communication 20% Special Education 20% General Education 8% Psychology 7% Occupational Therapy 10 % Unrelated field Bachelor’s Degree Current Status of AT Personnel

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky 35% Speech/Language/Communication 33% Special Education 9% AT or IT 5% General Education 5% Occupational Therapy 3 % PT or Adapted PE 2% Early Childhood 2% Unrelated Master’s Degree - 68% Current Status of AT Personnel

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky CSUN RESNA RIATT UW - Madison Certification - 17% Current Status of AT Personnel

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky Conferences (CSUN, CTG) Local/state workshops University courses Vendor training Professional Development Activities Current Status of AT Personnel

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky Summary & Implications

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky Summary & Implications By law, schools are required to provide AT services, and they do, but data suggest that students are underserved because of a lack of training in AT.

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky Summary & Implications More AT services are being provided by non special educators than by special educators. Focus is device specific rather than on the education programs.

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky Summary & Implications AT skills are being developed outside of higher education, often device and vendor driven.

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky Summary & Implications Opportunity for higher education programs to offer courses and certification programs at both the preservice and inservice training level.

The National Assistive Technology Research Institute at the University of Kentucky Website