Establishing Resiliency in the Water Sector The WARN Initiative Kevin M. Morley July 13, 2008 Southern Legislative Conference Oklahoma City, OK.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Metropolitan Medical Response System Program Overview.
Advertisements

Disability Inclusive Disaster Risk Reduction Recommendations for Integrating the Preparedness, Response, Recovery and Mitigation Needs of the Whole Community.
Utilities Helping Utilities: An Action Plan for Mutual Aid and Assistance Networks for Water and Wastewater Utilities.
A Brief Overview of Emergency Management Office of Emergency Management April 2006 Prepared By: The Spartanburg County Office of Emergency Management.
Unit 1: Introductions and Course Overview Administrative Information  Daily schedule  Restroom locations  Breaks and lunch  Emergency exit routes 
“Utilities Helping Utilities”. What is SoonerWARN?
National Incident Management System Overview. Homeland Security Presidential Directive 5 Directed Secretary, DHS to develop and administer: 1.National.
FEMA’s mission is to support our citizens and first responders to ensure that as a nation we work together to build, sustain, and improve our capability.
National Incident Management System Overview Briefing Fiscal Year (FY) 2006 Implementation.
Role of Government in Sustainable Disaster Recovery Matt Campbell, National Coordinator Community Planning and Capacity Building Federal Emergency Management.
Utilities Helping Utilities: A Mutual Aid and Assistance Network for Water and Wastewater Utilities in Maryland Stephen C. Gerwin, PE Howard County DPW.
“Measuring Water Security Progress” 2008 Water Policy Conference AMWA Security Committee March 3, 2008 By Billy Turner, President, Columbus Water Works.
National Infrastructure Protection Plan
Emergency Management in Washington State: Our Capabilities, Our Challenges.
1 Executive Office of Public Safety. 2 National Incident Management System.
DHS, National Cyber Security Division Overview
Session 6 Integrated Emergency Management. Objectives of the Session Students will be able to 6.1 Define the principle of integration. 6.2Discuss the.
US Army Corps of Engineers BUILDING STRONG ® Ty Brumfield (LNO to FEMA –RSF-IS National Coordinator Office of Homeland Security Directorate of Contingency.
Alachua County Post-Disaster Redevelopment Plan Alachua County Board of County Commissioners Meeting April 27, 2010.
Community Planning & Capacity Building Recovery Support Function Presented By: Michelle Diamond Community Planning & Capacity Building Coordinator FEMA.
IS-0700.A: National Incident Management System, An Introduction
Alabama GIS Executive Council November 17, Alabama GIS Executive Council Governor Bob Riley signs Executive Order No. 38 on November 27 th, 2007.
Session 121 National Incident Management Systems Session 12 Slide Deck.
1 Webinar on: Establishing a Fully Integrated National Food Safety System with Strengthened Inspection, Laboratory and Response Capacity Sponsored by Partnership.
Homeland Security and Emergency Management in Iowa: An Overview Bob Seivert, Coordinator Shelby County.
Session 8 Coordination. Session Objectives Define the Principle of Coordination Define the Principle of Coordination Identify characteristics of successful.
National Incident Management System. Homeland Security Presidential Directive – 5 Directed the development of the National Incident Management System.
National Disaster Recovery Framework. National Disaster Recovery Framework Reasons for establishing the Framework Past large-scale recovery efforts revealed.
Food and Agriculture Sector Coordinating Councils John L. Williams, DVM U.S. Department of Agriculture AFDO Annual Conference Kansas City, MO June 7, 2005.
Part of a Broader Strategy
National Incident Management System Overview Briefing Fiscal Year (FY) 2006 Implementation NIMS Requirements for States and Local Jurisdictions Carole.
National Response Plan Overview [date] [location] [presenter]
1 Preparing Texas Today... Texas Preparedness Workshop November 16-17, 2005 Austin, Texas A Texas Community Partnership...for Tomorrow’s Challenges Governor’s.
Emergency Response: The Katrina Factor ACWI – January 19, 2006 Kevin M. Morley Regulatory Analyst AWWA--Washington, DC.
Jeffery Graviet Emergency Services Coordinator, Salt Lake County Chairperson, Salt Lake Urban Area Working Group.
1 “EPA’s Water Security initiative : Integrating the Water Sector and Public Health” Wednesday June 20, 2012 Healthy and Safe Community Environments (Track.
Module 3 Develop the Plan Planning for Emergencies – For Small Business –
Overview of NIPP 2013: Partnering for Critical Infrastructure Security and Resilience October 2013 DRAFT.
October 27, 2005 Contra Costa Operational Area Homeland Security Strategic and Tactical Planning and Hazardous Materials Response Assessment Project Overview.
Dam Hazard Consequences Assessment
Disasters and Emergencies The Role of The Chaplain in the world of Emergency Management.
Food and Agriculture Sector Update NASDA Food & Agriculture Security Task Force February 19, 2009.
1 Recent Accomplishments and Opportunities for 2007 ~WEROC~ Kelly Hubbard WEROC Emergency Manager Municipal Water District of Orange County WACO, January.
Fostering a ‘Whole Community’ Approach to Emergency Management David J. Kaufman Director, Office of Policy and Program Analysis 8 June 2011.
Critical Infrastructure Protection Overview Building a safer, more secure, more resilient America The National Infrastructure Protection Plan, released.
Critical Infrastructure Protection: Program Overview
5/30/2008 Water/Wastewater Agency Response Network (WARN) Atlantic States Rural Water Works Association Rhode Island WARN May 30, 2008.
United We Ride: Where are we Going? December 11, 2013 Rik Opstelten United We Ride Program Analyst.
Texas Emergency Management Conference San Antonio April 3, 2012.
Homeland Security Grant Program 2015 Process Michelle Hanneken Illinois Emergency Management Agency.
Water Security Updates & Initiatives Asset Management Workshop May 5, 2005 Presented by: Jim Wheeler Office of Wastewater Management U.S. Environmental.
Survivor Centric Emergency Management Integrating the Access and Functional Needs of the Whole Community Before, During and After Disasters August 2015.
Food and Agriculture Sector A Collaborative Path to Agriculture Security and Food Defense LeeAnne Jackson, HHS/FDA Multistate Partnership Meeting Madison,
An Operational System Description for Health Care Systems.
BIOTERRORISM AND LEGAL ISSUES: THE TEXAS EXPERIENCE NGA REGIONAL BIOTERRORISM WORKSHOP March 15, 2004 Susan K. Steeg General Counsel Texas Department of.
NCR-Homeland Security Strategic Plan November 2005 Draft Initiatives Included.
APRIL 12, 2011 Sponsored by: Kentucky Department for Environmental Protection (DEP) Kentucky Division of Emergency Management (KYEM) U.S. Environmental.
© 2010 AT&T Intellectual Property. All rights reserved. AT&T, AT&T logo and all other marks contained herein are trademarks of AT&T Intellectual Property.
Business Crisis and Continuity Management (BCCM) Class Session
Implementing an Interstate Mutual Aid/Assistance Program for Water and Wastewater Utilities.
Homeland Security and Emergency Management Discussion U.S. Department of Homeland Security  National Preparedness Directorate, FEMA Higher Education Conference.
NATIONAL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM Department of Homeland Security Executive Office of Public Safety.
1 Roles and Responsibilities During a Water Sector Incident: USEPA and USACE Dawn Ison, EPA Region 6 Arkansas Exercise for the Water Sector 2010 November.
Harris County Case Study.  Aligning plans with emergency support functions (ESFs) can facilitate an efficient and effective response to emergencies.
National Emergency Communications Plan Update National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners Winter Committee Meeting February 16, 2015 Ron Hewitt.
DHS/ODP OVERVIEW The Department of Homeland Security (DHS), Office for Domestic Preparedness (ODP) implements programs designed to enhance the preparedness.
REGIONAL RESPONSE TEAM NOVEMBER 5, Executive Order: Improving Chemical Facility Safety & Security.
The Metropolitan Medical Response System Olan Johnston Christine Tolis The New England Center for Emergency Preparedness The Northern New England MMRS.
Continuity Guidance Circular Webinar
Introduction to: National Response Plan (NRP)
Presentation transcript:

Establishing Resiliency in the Water Sector The WARN Initiative Kevin M. Morley July 13, 2008 Southern Legislative Conference Oklahoma City, OK

Objectives —What is Resiliency —National Homeland Security Strategy —A Little Alphabet Soup —What is and Why consider WARN —Supporting Actions

What is Resiliency ? Resilience -- the ability to accommodate change gracefully and without catastrophic failure, is critical in times of disaster. (Foster 1997) Local resiliency with regard to disasters means that a locale is able to withstand an extreme natural event without suffering devastating losses, damage, diminished productivity, or quality of life and without a large amount of assistance from outside the community. (Mileti 1999) Resiliency is the capability of an asset, system, or network to maintain its function during or recover from a terrorist attack or other incident (NIPP 2006).

Linkage to the Federal Strategy

Why do we need WARN?

Because “stuff” happens Utilities will need HELP!

Preparing for

Responding to

and Recovering from

All-Hazards

The Water Sector Vision —A secure and resilient drinking water and wastewater infrastructure that provides clean and safe water as an integral part of daily life. This Vision assures the economic vitality of and public confidence in the nation's drinking water and wastewater through a layered defense of effective preparedness and security practices in the sector.

SSP Goals 1.Sustain protection of public health and the environment. 2.Recognize and reduce risks in the water sector. 3.Maintain a resilient infrastructure. 4.Increase communication, outreach, and public confidence.

Linkage to HSPD-5 & 8 Goal 3: Maintain a resilient infrastructure. Objective 1: Emphasize continuity of drinking water and wastewater services as it pertains to water sector utility emergency preparedness, response, and recovery planning. Objective 2: Explore and expand the implementation of mutual aid agreements/compacts in the water sector. The water sector has significantly enhanced its resilience through mutual aid agreements among utilities and states; increasing the number and scope of these agreements will further enhance resiliency in the sector. Objective 3: Identify and implement key response and recovery strategies. Response and recovery from an incident in the sector will be crucial to maintaining public health and public confidence. Objective 4: Increase the understanding of how the water sector is interdependent with other critical infrastructure sectors. Sectors such as public health and emergency services are largely dependent on the water sector for their continuity of operations, while the water sector is dependent upon sectors such as chemical and electricity for the continuity of its operations.

Supporting Goal 3: Objective 2 —The water sector is actively seeking to leverage the success and lessons learned from existing intrastate mutual aid & assistance networks to support the formation of state-level Water/Wastewater Agency Response Networks (WARNs) —AWWA, with the support of an existing USEPA grant, has been facilitating the establishment of WARNs nationally via regional workshops

Utilities Helping Utilities (Feb 2006) —Joint Policy Statement –8 major water organizations –Encourages the creation of intrastate mutual aid & assistance networks –Provides for greater water sector resiliency against natural or manmade incident

The WARN Action Plan —Utilities Helping Utilities –Outlines 10 key steps in the formation of a WARN –Includes sample agreement that satisfies NIMS and comparative assessment of existing WARN programs –Recognized by DHS as model for the water sector

What’s Involved - 10 Steps to Success 1.Identify interest in starting a program 2.Form an initial leadership team 3.Prepare a kick-off session 4.Establish a steering committee 5.Identify a mission for the program and steering committee goals 6.Review use of state regions 7.Identify mutual aid and assistance activation criteria 8.Draft an agreement 9.Create facilitation tools 10.Maintain the program

Who’s Involved? —Utility owner/operators —Professional association representation –(AWWA, NRWA, WEF, sanitation association, etc.) —State water and wastewater primacy agency –(State health, environmental protection, etc.) —State emergency management and/or homeland security agency –(State EMAC coordinator) —US EPA region representation

Benefits of Having an Agreement —Increases planning & coordination —Enhances access to specialized resources —Expedites arrival of aid –FEMA is muscular and provides support, but is not agile —Reduces administrative conflict –Signed agreement in place, workman’s comp, indemnification, etc. —Increase community and customer hope –The right resources with the right skills are available

Is It Working?

WARN – The Beginning (April 2006)

WARN – 30 & Counting (June 2008)

“The WARN Ultimatum”

Resource Typing Manual —Purpose is to provide common set of terms for requesting and providing certain resources that only water sector utilities are likely capable of providing —Follows FEMA guidance for typing resources which is focused on teams that could be deployed in response to an incident

Active Projects to Support WARN —Sample Mutual Aid/Assistance Operational Plan: EPA developed to help each WARN create its procedures on how to activate and implement the signed agreement or test a draft agreement. —WARN TableTop Exercise: EPA developed TTX to help each WARN exercise communications during activation. Recently piloted in Jacksonville and currently under revision to address gaps.

Bottom Line – Establishing Resiliency —All emergencies are local and require a local response capability. —Participation in a WARN agreement will enhances a utility’s preparedness and overall resiliency against any disaster. —In its most basic form, WARN is a low or no-cost action that helps ensure the continuity of operations of the water infrastructure vital to the well being of every community.

Items for Consideration by SLC —Is your State Emergency Management Agency actively engaged and supporting the WARN initiative? —While WARN is a low cost initiative, some maintenance is required for outreach, website, training and education…can the State provide any assistance? —Work with WARN programs to address legislative barriers related to inclusion of private utilities and providing interstate assistance (ex. FlaWARN helping Alabama/Mississippi after Katrina).

References —Utilities Helping Utilities: An Action Plan for Mutual Aid and Assistance for Water and Wastewater Utilities —Morley, K.M., A Vision and Direction for Water Sector Security and Preparedness Initiatives. Jour. AWWA, 99:2:38. —Roberson J. A. & Morley, K.M., Water Security: Shifting to an All-Hazards Resiliency Approach. Jour. AWWA, 98:5:46. —Roberson J. A. & Morley, K.M., We Need to Get Strategic on Water Security. Jour. AWWA, 97:10:42.

?? Questions ?? Kevin M. Morley Regulatory & Security Analyst AWWA – Government Affairs 1300 Eye Street, NW Suite 701W Washington, DC or