4/16/07 Assessment of the Core – Science Charlyne L. Walker Director of Educational Research and Evaluation, Arts and Sciences.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Assessment
Advertisements

Embedding Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes in Regularly Scheduled Assignments Dr. Larry H. Kelley Auburn, Alabama
General Education Assessment 2013: Introduction
Why are we spending time writing assessment reports? 1.Because documenting your process can potentially lead to more trustworthy results and meaningful.
What Behaviors Indicate a Student is Meeting Course Goals and Objectives? “Indicators”
Course Design: The Basics Monica A. Devanas, Ph.D. Director, Faculty Development and Assessment Programs Center for Teaching Advancement and Assessment.
Del Mar College Planning and Assessment Process Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness January 10, 2005.
STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT. Cycle of Assessment Course Goals/ Intended Outcomes Means Of Assessment And Criteria For Success Summary of Data.
Part II of our Presentation… is based on projects in the Center for Teaching Excellence and The Office of Undergraduate Studies.
4/16/07 Assessment of the Core – Social Inquiry Charlyne L. Walker Director of Educational Research and Evaluation, Arts and Sciences.
Graduate Program Assessment Report. University of Central Florida Mission Communication M.A. Program is dedicated to serving its students, faculty, the.
Introduction to Student Learning Outcomes in the Major
Math 105: Problem Solving in Mathematics. Course Description This course introduces students to the true nature mathematics, what mathematicians really.
FLCC knows a lot about assessment – J will send examples
Assessment Assessment Planning Assessment Improvements Assessment Data Dialogue & Reflection.
Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Institutional Effectiveness Southern Association of Colleges and Schools February 2008 Stephen F. Austin State University.
Purpose Program The purpose of this presentation is to clarify the process for conducting Student Learning Outcomes Assessment at the Program Level. At.
Learning Outcomes at the University of North Alabama Dr. Andrew L. Luna Institutional Research, Planning, and Assessment.
Timothy S. Brophy, Ph.D., Director of Institutional Assessment University of Florida Office of the Provost.
Principles of Assessment
LEARNING PROFILE Title of Degree Program PROGRAM CHARACTERISTICS (Description, Unique Experiences, Inputs, Outcomes) (EXAMPLES) Year Established. Accreditation.
Spring 2012 Pilot Project Module Nine A New Texas Core Curriculum 1.
Science & Technology Grades Spring 2007
Draft Kin Program Learning Objectives (Key principles: critical understanding and application of research and scholarship in the field of kinesiology;
Sheila Roberts Department of Geology Bowling Green State University.
BY Karen Liu, Ph. D. Indiana State University August 18,
University Assessment Committee Comprehensive Standard (CS) The institution identifies expected outcomes, assesses the extent to which it achieves.
Overview of the Department’s ABET Criterion 3 Assessment Process.
Poetry Assessment Analysis & Critique Krissa Loretto EDUC 340 Spring 2014.
Northcentral University The Graduate School February 2014
Elizabeth Godfrey 1.  Periodic assessment of results Appropriateness, effectiveness, efficiency, impact, sustainability  Identifies intended and unintended.
TMCC Faculty Senate Curriculum, Assessment & Programs Committee Master Course Outline Guide March 2012.
Validity & Practicality
ASSESSMENT OF CORE SKILLS/ GENERAL EDUCATION OUTCOMES Angelina Hill, PhD Associate Director, Office of Academic Assessment.
Full-Time Faculty In-Service: Program and Student Learning Outcomes Fall 2005.
Math 105: Problem Solving in Mathematics
USING SCIENCE JOURNALS TO GUIDE STUDENT LEARNING Part 1: How to create a student science journal Part 2: How to assess student journals for learning.
“Outcomification”: Development and Use of Student Learning Outcomes Noelle C. Griffin, PhD Director, Assessment and Data Analysis Loyola Marymount University.
Guide to Test Interpretation Using DC CAS Score Reports to Guide Decisions and Planning District of Columbia Office of the State Superintendent of Education.
NCATE for Dummies AKA: Everything You Wanted to Know About NCATE, But Didn’t Want to Ask.
CSE 1105 Week 1 CSE 1105 Course Title: Introduction to Computer Science & Engineering Classroom Lecture Times: Section 001 W 4:00 – 4:50, 202 NH Section.
Summary of Assessments By the Big Island Team: (Sherry, Alan, John, Bess) CCSS SBAC PARCC AP CCSSO.
Designing Your Selected Response Assessment. Create a Cover Page Include: 1.A statement of purpose Is this an assessment FOR or OF learning (formative.
Assessing Student Learning Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors Workshop for Department Chairs & Program Directors January 9, 2007.
The Gold Standard… Faculty are Key.  Annual Assessment based on  Address each SLO  Be specific, measurable, student- focused  Align the new.
Fidelity of Implementation A tool designed to provide descriptions of facets of a coherent whole school literacy initiative. A tool designed to provide.
Student Growth Goals for Coaching Conversations. Requirements for Student Growth Goals Time line Reference to an Enduring Skill Proficiency and Growth.
What is Research?. Intro.  Research- “Any honest attempt to study a problem systematically or to add to man’s knowledge of a problem may be regarded.
QCC General Education Assessment Task Force March 21 and 22, 2016 Faculty Forum on General Education Outcomes.
A Tutorial Institutional Research and Effectiveness.
Learning Goals Development & Assessment The Basics of Goals-Based Course Design.
4/16/07 Assessment of the Core – Humanities with Writing Charlyne L. Walker Director of Educational Research and Evaluation, Arts and Sciences.
Module Example: Influence of Race and Gender on Income 1 Used in Social Problems class, 100-level course 20 students in class (all have laptops) Takes.
4/16/07 Assessment of the Core – Quantitative Reasoning Charlyne L. Walker Director of Educational Research and Evaluation, Arts and Sciences.
Department of Physics and Goal 2 Committee Chair
Criteria Rollout Meeting October 30, 2016
How can understanding the Civics EOC Item Specification Document impact teaching and increase student achievement? The Item Specifications is a resource.
GENERAL EDUCATION COURSE-BASED ASSESSMENT – IT’S EASIER THAN YOU THINK! C. Griffin.
Study of Religion.
General Education Assessment
General Education Assessment Subcommittee Report
General Education Assessment
Writing to Learn vs. Writing in the Disciplines
Using Action Research to Guide Student Learning Experiences & Assessments Exploring the synergistic activities of curriculum design/delivery and assessment.
Assessment Information
How can understanding the Civics EOC Item Specification Document impact teaching and increase student achievement? The Item Specifications is a resource.
Assessment Literacy: Test Purpose and Use
Business Administration Programs School of Business and Liberal Arts Fall 2016 Assessment Report
How can understanding the Civics EOC Item Specification Document impact teaching and increase student achievement? The Item Specifications is a resource.
How can understanding the Civics EOC Item Specification Document impact teaching and increase student achievement? The Item Specifications is a resource.
Presentation transcript:

4/16/07 Assessment of the Core – Science Charlyne L. Walker Director of Educational Research and Evaluation, Arts and Sciences

4/16/07 Assessing the Major SACS requires us to assess all degree programs bachelors through doctorate as part of Institutional Effectiveness FIU has been assessing our degree programs since Recent changes in SACS has moved us toward more direct measures Departments assess programs in a variety of ways Sample IE document

4/16/07 Science Core Category Description Our technologically dependent world requires an understanding of the processes that led us here. Learning the basic concepts and ideas of scientific fields provides contact with not just those fields but with how science is done.

4/16/07 Science Core Category Description In these courses students study the scientific method through examination of the foundational theories of modern scientific thought. Students apply scientific principles and theories to problem solving, evaluate scientific statements, and incorporate new information within the context of what is already known. Emphasizing the essential connection between theory and experiment, the hands-on laboratory experience provides the context for testing scientific theories. Students will be able to describe the scientific method through examination of the foundational theories of modern scientific thought.

4/16/07 Foundations of Science Students will be able to  Apply scientific principles and theories to problem solving,  Evaluate scientific statements,  Interpret new information (e.g. scientific data, journal articles, media reports of scientific findings, etc.) within the context of what is already known, and  Apply the scientific method by conducting experiments to test scientific hypotheses.

4/16/07 Objectives and Measures There should be objectives for the courses in course syllabi As objectives are developed, we may be asking for you to include them into course syllabi As measures are developed, you might be asked to include them into course syllabi to let students know what measures are being used This is not a “short term” solution for the 2010 SACS visit The measures must be on going as part of SACS requirements beyond 2010

4/16/07 Types of Direct Measures Embedded questions  Set of locally developed questions intended to measure specific student learning outcomes  Placed within tests of all sections of the same course  Used to track cognitive or skill development through a program, sets of embedded questions, with each expecting a higher level of proficiency than the previous, may be used across sequential courses Papers or short answer questions using rubrics – a rubric is used to standardize the grading of work

4/16/07 Types of Direct Measures Locally developed exams - exams produced by faculty within a discipline Pre/Post Test - a locally developed test that measure students’ incoming and post program levels of knowledge, skills, behaviors and attitudes to measure students’ gains You can find more types of measures at

4/16/07 Examples of Objectives and Measures from UCF PSC 1121 Physical Science - Demonstrate an understanding of the scientific method. In particular, to demonstrate an ability to assess which claims presented as "scientific" are indeed scientific and not pseudoscientific. Measures:  7.1 PSC 1121 Physical Science - A pre-test and a post-test will be given. A gain of 30 % will be considered satisfactory, a gain of 50 % will be considered well above satisfactory, and a gain of 65 % or more will be considered outstanding. The gain is defined as the net change in the average score divided by the average of the pre-test. If full tests cannot be given, few questions will be sufficient.  7.2 PSC 1121 Physical Science - In each exam, questions will be embedded to enable an assessment of the extent to which this objective is met. The questions may be multiple choice, long answer, or quantitative problems. An overall score of 70% on these questions will be considered acceptable.

4/16/07 Examples of Objectives and Measures from UCF GLY 1030 Geology and its Applications - To demonstrate an understanding of multifaceted scientific terminology and an ability to apply the definitions involved. Measures:  19.1 GLY 1030 Geology and its Applications - A set of 8 tightly-written definitions, several involving at least 3 characteristics, will be presented and illustrated in class, in conjunction with graded homework assignments. A 7-question quiz (or quiz section) will follow, testing knowledge of precisely what is included in each definition. Each quiz question will require more than one answer; and no partial credit will be given, in order to stress the importance of learning the entire definition for application later in the course. Because any error or omission can render an answer incorrect, a score of at least 4 out of 7 on these questions by 100% of students who earn a "C" or higher in the course will be considered acceptable. A similar, but smaller, set of questions will be included on a pretest in Spring 2007 to establish a baseline for use in subsequent years.

4/16/07 Examples of Objectives and Measures from UCF GLY 1030 Geology and its Applications - To demonstrate an understanding of multifaceted scientific terminology and an ability to apply the definitions involved. Measures:  19.2 GLY 1030 Geology and its Applications - A subsequent test will include an embedded set of 7 questions that require simultaneous application of all the characteristics of each definition from measure 19a that is tested. For example, determining the number of minerals in a collection described in the question-set requires consideration of whether to count: types or pieces, natural and/or synthetic materials, and crystalline and/or noncrystalline materials. In addition, knowledge of the basic mineral compositions of the igneous rocks is needed. Again, no partial credit will be given, in order to promote the learning of knowledge as a cohesive whole, rather than as a set of disconnected fragments. Because any error or omission can render an answer incorrect, a score of at least 4 out of 7 on these questions by 100% of students who earn a "C" or higher in the course will be considered acceptable. A similar, but smaller, set of questions will be included on a pretest in Spring 2007 to establish a baseline for use in subsequent years.

4/16/07 Examples UCF General Education Science Foundation ew_2006_07.asp?program_ID=1240 UCF Assessment Plans for asp?group=visitor